Breast cancer patients’ quality of life: Real-world data.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e23115-e23115
Author(s):  
Paris A. Kosmidis ◽  
Barbara Athanasakou ◽  
Thanos Kosmidis

e23115 Background: CareAcross is a digital platform dedicated to support, inform and engage with cancer patients. It also collects medical and other data, and generates real world evidence. Methods: In an effort to collect and analyze information from breast cancer patients regarding side effects in relation to their treatments and supplements intake, we contacted 4837 patients in the UK, Germany, France, Spain and Italy. 474 had triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) and the remaining 4363 other breast cancer subtypes (non-TNBC). All data was collected anonymously, with strong privacy and security controls. Results: Different regimens were given either as adjuvant or as systemic treatments. AC treatment was given to 9% of TNBC vs 4% of non-TNBC patients; FEC-T to 20% vs 13%, FEC to 10% vs 8%, taxanes to 37% vs 20% and platinum-based chemotherapy to 12% vs 2%, respectively. Among non-TNBC patients, 12% received Trastuzumab and 53% received hormonal treatment. Eighty four TNBC and 696 non-TNBC patients were asked regarding side effects as well as vitamins and supplements intake. Among them, 76 TNBC patients reported an average of 2.8 side effects (95% CI 1.0-8.0) vs 577 non-TNBC patients reporting an average of 2.8 side effects (95% CI 1.0-13.0); p < 0.92. Similarly, an average of 5.0 vitamins and supplements was reported by 64 TNBC patients (95% CI 10.0-17.0) and an average of 3.8 was reported by 555 non-TNBC patients (95% CI 1.0-29.0); p < 0.023. Toxicity and supplements are tabulated below. Conclusions: The real world evidence obtained through an international analysis shows that TNBC patients receive more toxic treatments due to the aggressive disease, as expected. However, TNBC patients experience similar toxicities with non-TNBC patients, but their consumption of vitamins and supplements is much higher. [Table: see text]

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 ◽  
pp. v744-v745
Author(s):  
T. Kosmidis ◽  
B. Athanasakou ◽  
P.A. Kosmidis

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhaoyun Liu ◽  
Jing Shan ◽  
Qian Yu ◽  
Xinzhao Wang ◽  
Xiang Song ◽  
...  

ObjectivesThe NCCN guidelines recommend that the addition of bevacizumab should be considered in metastatic breast cancers in some circumstances, but there are no recommendations for the similar antiangiogenic drug apatinib. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of apatinib in metastatic breast cancer patients pretreated with multiline treatment in a real-world setting.Materials and MethodsMetastatic breast cancer patients pretreated with multiline treatment who had apatinib treatment initiated from September 2015 to August 2019 at Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute were included. The primary endpoints included PFS and OS, and the secondary endpoint was treatment-related toxicity.ResultsA total of 66 patients with metastatic breast cancer received apatinib treatment after failure of multiline chemotherapy in this study. The median PFS and OS of all 66 patients were 6.0 months and 10.0 months, respectively. The clinical beneficial rate was 40.9%. All patients tolerated treatment well, and no patients died of toxicity. The common toxicities of apatinib were hand and foot syndrome, secondary hypertension and fatigue events. The number of prior chemotherapy regimens was significantly associated with DFS and OS. Capecitabine may be a better choice for combination with a longer median OS of 19 months, while apatinib combined with other drugs was 9 months, and the apatinib monotherapy was 10 months.ConclusionApatinib produced moderate efficacy in metastatic breast cancer patients pretreated with multiline treatment with no significant treatment-related adverse events. Apatinib might be a choice for women as a maintenance salvage therapy following multiline chemotherapy failure.


Author(s):  
Maria Purificacion Martínez del Prado ◽  
Borja López de San Vicente ◽  
Juan Fernando Arango Arteaga ◽  
Jairo Legaspi Folgueira ◽  
Ane Zumárraga Cuesta ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louis E. Fernandes ◽  
Caroline G. Epstein ◽  
Alexandria M. Bobe ◽  
Joshua S.K. Bell ◽  
Martin C. Stumpe ◽  
...  

INTRODUCTION We performed a retrospective analysis of longitudinal real-world data (RWD) from breast cancer patients to replicate results from clinical studies and demonstrate the feasibility of generating real-world evidence. We also assessed the value of transcriptome profiling as a complementary tool for determining molecular subtypes. PATIENTS AND METHODS De-identified, longitudinal data were analyzed after abstraction from U.S. breast cancer patient records structured and stored in the Tempus database. Demographics, clinical characteristics, molecular subtype, treatment history, and survival outcomes were assessed according to strict qualitative criteria. RNA sequencing and clinical data were used to predict molecular subtypes and signaling pathway enrichment. RESULTS The clinical abstraction cohort (n=4,000) mirrored U.S. breast cancer demographics and clinical characteristics indicating feasibility for RWE generation. Among HER2+ patients, 74.2% received anti-HER2 therapy, with ˜70% starting within 3 months of a positive test result. Most non-treated patients were early stage. In this RWD set, 31.7% of patients with HER2+ IHC had discordant FISH results recorded. Among patients with multiple HER2 IHC results at diagnosis, 18.6% exhibited intra-test discordance. Through development of a whole-transcriptome model to predict IHC receptor status in the molecular sequenced cohort (n=400), molecular subtypes were resolved for all patients (n=36) with equivocal HER2 statuses from abstracted test results. Receptor-related signaling pathways were differentially enriched between clinical molecular subtypes. CONCLUSION RWD in the Tempus database mirrors the overall U.S. breast cancer population. These results suggest real-time, RWD analyses are feasible in a large, highly heterogeneous database. Furthermore, molecular data may aid deficiencies and discrepancies observed from breast cancer RWD.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document