Evaluation of scheduled video visits for cancer care at the Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (27_suppl) ◽  
pp. 277-277
Author(s):  
Nathan Handley ◽  
Adam Binder ◽  
Megan Sabonjian ◽  
Ana Maria Lopez
Keyword(s):  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Cancer Care ◽  
Average Distance ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Similar Response ◽  
Broadband Internet ◽  
Detailed Survey ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Quality Technology

277 Background: Telehealth is currently undergoing exponential growth as a result of improved access through less costly, more portable, and better quality technology and through increased broadband internet proliferation. Telehealth has been shown to improve access and decrease costs while maintaining quality of care and high levels of patient satisfaction. One approach to telehealth is the video visit, in which audiovisual technology is used to connect patients and providers virtually. We implemented a pilot scheduled video visit program in a large academic cancer center (SKCC). Methods: Oncology clinical teams were trained in the use of JeffConnect, the video visit platform developed at our institution. Clinical teams were encouraged to utilize video visits in instances they deemed appropriate (i.e. post hospital follow-up, post-chemotherapy evaluations). All participating patients received a link to an evaluation following completion of the video visit. A subset of patients receiving more detailed survey questions. We reviewed evaluations occurring between 9/1/2016 and 3/31/2019. Results: Sixty-nine unique clinicians and 759 unique patients engaged in 865 completed telemedicine visits. For these, 118 surveys were completed and returned (14.03% of total visits), a similar response rate for other services. Average likelihood to recommend JeffConnect to a friend or colleague was 9.1 (scale 0-10). The majority of patients reported video visits saved them time (Figure 1) and money. For the subset of patients receiving the more detailed survey (n=30), average distance from SKCC at the time of the visit was 125 miles (range 10-963 miles, median 50) and average financial savings were $61.15 (range $8-$300, median $45). Conclusions: Scheduled cancer care video visits were feasible, resulted in high patient satisfaction, and saved patients time and money. Evaluating patient and clinician perceptions of the benefits of and barriers to telemedicine in greater detail is necessary for broader implementation. Patient-reported time saved by telemedicine. [Table: see text]

Assessing the impact of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting on patients’ quality of life: An Arabic version of the Functional Living Index-Emesis

2021 ◽  
pp. 107815522199844
Author(s):  
Abdullah M Alhammad ◽  
Nora Alkhudair ◽  
Rawan Alzaidi ◽  
Latifa S Almosabhi ◽  
Mohammad H Aljawadi
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Arabic Language ◽  
Nausea And Vomiting ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Arabic Version ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Arabic Speaking ◽  
The Impact

Introduction Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting is a serious complication of cancer treatment that compromises patients’ quality of life and treatment adherence, which necessitates regular assessment. Therefore, there is a need to assess patient-reported nausea and vomiting using a validated scale among Arabic speaking cancer patient population. The objective of this study was to translate and validate the Functional Living Index-Emesis (FLIE) instrument in Arabic, a patient-reported outcome measure designed to assess the influence of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting on patients’ quality of life. Methods Linguistic validation of an Arabic-language version was performed. The instrument was administered to cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy in a tertiary hospital's cancer center in Saudi Arabia. Results One-hundred cancer patients who received chemotherapy were enrolled. The participants’ mean age was 53.3 ± 14.9 years, and 50% were female. Half of the participants had a history of nausea and vomiting with previous chemotherapy. The Cronbach coefficient alpha for the FLIE was 0.9606 and 0.9736 for nausea and vomiting domains, respectively, which indicated an excellent reliability for the Arabic FLIE. The mean FLIE score was 110.9 ± 23.5, indicating no or minimal impact on daily life (NIDL). Conclusions The Arabic FLIE is a valid and reliable tool among the Arabic-speaking cancer population. Thus, the Arabic version of the FLIE will be a useful tool to assess the quality of life among Arabic speaking patients receiving chemotherapy. Additionally, the translated instrument will be a useful tool for future research studies to explore new antiemetic treatments among cancer patients.

Patient Satisfaction and Short-Term Outcome in Elective Cranial Neurosurgery

Neurosurgery ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 77 (5) ◽  
pp. 769-776 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elina Reponen ◽  
Hanna Tuominen ◽  
Juha Hernesniemi ◽  
Miikka Korja
Keyword(s):  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Quality Of Care ◽  
Health Status ◽  
Patient Experience ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Term Outcome ◽  
Major Morbidity ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Relationship Of

Abstract BACKGROUND: Patient-reported experience is often used as a measure for quality of care, but no reports on patient satisfaction after cranial neurosurgery exist. OBJECTIVE: To study the association of overall patient satisfaction and surgical outcome and to evaluate the applicability of overall patient satisfaction as a proxy for quality of care in elective cranial neurosurgery. METHODS: We conducted an observational study on the relationship of overall patient satisfaction at 30 postoperative days with surgical and functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score) in a prospective, consecutive, and unselected cohort of 418 adult elective craniotomy patients enrolled between December 2011 and December 2012 at Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland. RESULTS: Postoperative overall (subjective and objective) morbidity was present in 194 (46.4%) patients; yet almost 94% of all study patients reported high overall satisfaction. Low overall patient satisfaction at 30 days was not associated with postoperative major morbidity in elective cranial neurosurgery. Dependent functional status (mRS score ≥3) at 30 days, minor infections, poor postoperative subjective overall health status, and patient-reported severe symptoms (double vision, poor balance) may contribute to unsatisfactory patient experience. CONCLUSION: Overall patient satisfaction with elective cranial neurosurgery is high. Even 9 of 10 patients with postoperative major morbidity rated high overall patient satisfaction at 30 days. Overall patient satisfaction may merely reflect patient experience and subjective postoperative health status, and therefore it is a poor proxy for quality of care in elective cranial neurosurgery.

Leveraging the electronic medical record (EMR) to predict patient reported financial hardship in cancer patients.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6594-6594
Author(s):  
Sandeep Sai Voleti ◽  
Sikander Ailawadhi ◽  
Carolyn Mead-Harvey ◽  
Rahma M. Warsame ◽  
Rafael Fonseca ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Mayo Clinic ◽  
Cancer Care ◽  
Disease State ◽  
Financial Hardship ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Median Income ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Race Ethnicity ◽  
Zip Code

6594 Background: Patient reported financial hardship (FH) in cancer care is a growing challenge for patients, their caregivers and healthcare providers. As treatment costs escalate, it is imperative to develop effective strategies to proactively recognize and mitigate FH within oncology practice. Using automated processes to screen and refer patients to appropriate resources is a potential option. At Mayo Clinic, screening for FH involves using a single financial strain question ‘ How hard is it for you to pay for the very basics like food, housing, medical care, and heating?’ completed by all cancer patients annually as part of the Social Determinants of Health (SDOH) assessment. In this study, we describe the prevalence and predictors for FH (denoted by the answer ‘hard and very hard’) in our patient population. Methods: Patients receiving cancer care at the three Mayo Clinic sites (Minnesota, Arizona, and Florida) who completed the FH screen at least once were included in this study. Demographics (age, gender, race/ ethnicity, insurance, employment status, marital status, and zip code) and disease state data for included patients was extracted from the EMR and Mayo Clinic Cancer Registry. Disease state was categorized by type of cancer (hematological or solid malignancy) and cancer stage. Zip code was used to derive median income, rural/urban residence and distance from the cancer center. Multivariable logistic regression models were utilized to examine factors associated with FH. Results: The final study cohort included 31,969 patients with median age 66 years (IQR 57,73), 51% females, and 76% married. Race/ethnicity composition was 93% White, 3% Black, and 4% Hispanic. 52% of patients had Medicare and 43% had commercial insurance. Other notable factors included 48% retired, 41% working/ students, 76% married, and 72% urban residents. Median time from cancer diagnosis was 1.1 year (IQR 0.1, 3.8) and median income was $64,406 (IQR 53,067, 82,038). 31% of patients had hematological malignancies, 20% of the cancers for which staging information was available were metastatic. FH was reported by 4% (n = 1194) of the patients. A significantly higher likelihood of endorsing FH (p < 0.001 for all) was noted in Hispanic (OR 1.64), Black (OR 1.84), American Indian/Alaskan native (OR 2.02), below median income (OR 1.48), rural (OR 1.17), self-pay (OR 2.77), Medicaid (OR 2.29), Medicare (OR 1.43), unemployed/disabled (OR 2.39), single (OR 2.07), or divorced (OR 2.43) patients. Older age, being retired, and living farther from the cancer center were associated with significantly less likelihood of endorsing FH. Conclusions: Our study successfully leveraged the EMR to identify key sociodemographic groups more likely to report FH. An electronic trigger to flag such patients at high-risk of FH and proactively address FH is currently being developed.

scholarly journals Long-Term Patient Satisfaction and Quality of Life After Breast-Conserving Therapy: A Prospective Study Using the BREAST-Q

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ilona Stolpner ◽  
Jörg Heil ◽  
Fabian Riedel ◽  
Markus Wallwiener ◽  
Benedikt Schäfgen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Risk Factors ◽  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Repeated Measures ◽  
Aesthetic Surgery ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Breast Conserving Therapy ◽  
Patient Reported

Abstract Background Poor patient-reported satisfaction after breast-conserving therapy (BCT) has been associated with impaired health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and subsequent depression in retrospective analysis. This prospective cohort study aimed to assess the HRQOL of patients who have undergone BCT using the BREAST-Q, and to identify clinical risk factors for lower patient satisfaction. Methods Patients with primary breast cancer undergoing BCT were asked to complete the BREAST-Q preoperatively (T1) for baseline evaluation, then 3 to 4 weeks postoperatively (T2), and finally 1 year after surgery (T3). Clinicopathologic data were extracted from the patients’ charts. Repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to determine significant differences in mean satisfaction and well-being levels among the test intervals. Multiple linear regression was used to evaluate risk factors for lower satisfaction. Results The study enrolled 250 patients. The lowest baseline BREAST-Q score was reported for “satisfaction with breast” (mean, 61 ± 19), but this increased postoperatively (mean, 66 ± 18) and was maintained at the 1 year follow-up evaluation (mean, 67 ± 21). “Physical well-being” decreased from T1 (mean, 82 ± 17) to T2 (mean, 28 ± 13) and did not recover much by T3 (mean, 33 ± 13), being the lowest BREAST-Q score postoperatively and in the 1-year follow-up evaluation. In multiple regression, baseline psychosocial well-being, body mass index (BMI), and type of incision were risk factors for lower “satisfaction with breasts.” Conclusion Both the aesthetic/surgery-related and psychological aspects are equally important with regard to “satisfaction with breasts” after BCT. The data could serve as the benchmark for future studies.

Patient reported sexual concerns in routine cancer care.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 12128-12128
Author(s):  
Brittany Lees ◽  
Smitha Vilasagar ◽  
Jubilee Brown ◽  
Peter E Clark ◽  
Maxim McKibben ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sexual Health ◽  
Cancer Care ◽  
Unmet Need ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Cancer Site ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Cancer Symptoms ◽  
Health Concerns ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Sexual Concerns

12128 Background: Sexual health is an important component of overall well-being and can be adversely impacted by chemotherapy, surgery, radiation, in addition to the psychological effects of cancer treatments. Sexual health is challenging to discuss and may be overlooked or avoided during cancer care. Methods: Patients presenting for consultation in an outpatient multisite cancer center completed electronic distress screening (EDS) between January 2017 and December 2020. The EDS contains 42 questions; demographic information, cancer symptoms and side effects, and psychosocial factors. The EDS is completed by patients before a clinical encounter for early symptom identification and intervention. We conducted a retrospective data analysis of sexual health concerns (>5; scale 0-10) and evaluated patient characteristics and clinically relevant distress (>4; NCCN Distress Tool), depression risk (>3; PhQ2), and anxiety risk (>3; GAD2). Our primary aim was to identify the prevalence of sexual health concerns. The secondary aim was to examine the relationship between sexual health and emotional well-being. Results: 57,375 EDS screens were completed. 13,950 patients (24%) reported sexual concerns or lack of interest in sex (>5) within the last 2 weeks. The frequency of these concerns at specific clinics ranged from 12% to 48%, with the highest rates at Palliative care (39%) and Psycho-Oncology (48%) clinics. Genitourinary (30%), Gynecologic (27%) and Gastroenterology (26%) reported the highest frequency of sexual concerns from cancer site specific clinics. Males reported a higher rate of sexual problems compared to females (30% vs 21%, p < 0.001), but a lower rate of relationship concern distress (12% vs 13%, p < 0.05). Patients with a risk for depression (n = 9,126) or anxiety (n = 10,809) had higher rates of self-reported sexual concerns than those with a negative screen (44% vs 21% depression, p < 0.001; 40% vs 21% anxiety, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Sexual health is a concern for approximately one-quarter of patients presenting for cancer care. Sexual health concerns were prevalent across cancer sites. Patients with positive screens for anxiety and/or depression have nearly double the rates of reported sexual health concerns. Sexual health is a current unmet need that impacts cancer patients and warrants attention.

Assessing the quality of breast cancer care in cancer center hospitals in Japan.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16566-e16566 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Higashi ◽  
F. Nakamura ◽  
H. Mukai ◽  
T. Sobue ◽  
E. Mekata ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Care ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Breast Cancer Care

Advanced cancer patients' (CP) attitudes and perceptions regarding reasons for outpatient supportive care (SC) referral at a comprehensive cancer center: A randomized controlled study.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e24135-e24135
Author(s):  
Angelique Wong ◽  
Frank V. Fossella ◽  
George R. Simon ◽  
Rama Maddi ◽  
Zhanni Lu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Supportive Care ◽  
Cancer Care ◽  
Comprehensive Cancer Center ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Cancer Type ◽  
Attitudes And Perceptions ◽  
Outpatient Supportive Care

e24135 Background: Current ASCO guidelines propose early access to SC in all CP to improve quality of care, quality of life, and symptoms. Very few studies have evaluated patients’ perceived criteria for referral to outpatient SC and perceptions of patients who are referred early in their disease trajectory. Methods: In this study we evaluated CP attitudes and perceptions regarding the role of and access to outpatient Supportive Care clinic (SCC) at a comprehensive cancer center. CP with life expectancy of greater than 6 months (as determined by the oncologist) and who are newly registered at MD Anderson Cancer Center were randomized to either obtain an educational brochure that explained the role of the SCC or no brochure. Both groups then completed a survey regarding the role and access to of outpatient SCC. After completion of the survey, patients were asked if they would like to be seen by the SC team. If so, they were scheduled by their oncologist for a SC consult. Results: 288 patients were evaluable: median age was 63, 43% were female, 84% were Caucasian, and the most common cancer type was lung cancer (39%). Median survival was 15 months. Patients who received a brochure reported more understanding of the role of SC vs those who did not receive a brochure (63% vs 37%, p = 0.04). Both groups felt that SC could help to address physical (47% vs 54%) and psychosocial (50% vs 50%) symptoms. Both groups felt SC could help to address questions regarding prognosis (50% vs 50%) and future care (53% vs 47%). Both groups did not feel that time (50% vs 50%) nor financial concerns (49% vs 51%) would be barriers to access SC. Both groups did not feel that receiving SC would impede their cancer care (60% vs 40%) nor change their oncologists’ perspective of them (25% vs 75%). Both groups felt they could receive SC and cancer care simultaneously (50% vs 50%). Approximately half of the patients in both groups perceived it was not too early for a referral to SC. There were no statistical differences in these groups for these findings. Conclusions: Patients who received a brochure had a better understanding of the role of SC. A very significant proportion in both groups had limited awareness of the value of SC. Oncologist driven referral and education of SC may facilitate better understanding of the value of SC. Further studies are needed.

Self-reported patient experience and quality of care among elderly patients with colon cancer.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 33-33 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca A Snyder ◽  
Rebecca Wardrop ◽  
Alexander Mclain ◽  
Alexander A. Parikh ◽  
Anna Cass
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Patient Experience ◽  
Cancer Care ◽  
Health Care Quality ◽  
Care Quality ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Experience Of Care ◽  
Patient Reported

33 Background: Although studies have identified demographic and clinical factors associated with quality colorectal cancer care, the association between patient-reported experience of care and quality of care is unknown. Our primary aim was to assess the relationship between patient-reported experience of care and receipt of guideline-concordant colon cancer (CC) treatment. Methods: Fee-For-Service Medicare beneficiaries with resected stage I-III CC (2003-2013) were identified in the linked SEER registry and Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems patient experience survey (SEER-CAHPS) dataset. Patient-reported ratings were compared based on receipt of care consistent with recommended treatment guidelines [resection of ≥ 12 lymph nodes (LN) (stage I-III) and receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy (stage III)]. Linear regression was performed to compare mean patient experience scores by receipt of guideline concordant care, adjusting for patient and hospital factors. Results: 1010 patients with stage I-III CC were identified (mean age 76.7, SE 6.9). Of these, 58.4% of stage I (n = 192/329) and 73.4% of stage II (n = 298/406) patients underwent resection of ≥ 12 LN. Among stage III patients, 76.0% (n = 209/275) underwent resection of ≥ 12 LN and 52.4% (n = 144/275) received adjuvant chemotherapy. By multivariable analysis, patient-reported ratings of health care quality, personal and specialty physicians, customer service, physician communication, getting needed care, and getting care quickly were similar among patients who received guideline-concordant treatment compared to those who did not. However, mean ratings of overall health care quality [91.3 (SE 2.0) vs. 82.4 (SE 1.7), p = 0.0004] and getting needed care [92.8 (SE 2.4) vs. 86.8 (SE 2.0), p = 0.047] were higher among stage III patients who received guideline concordant care compared to those who did not. Conclusions: Patient-reported ratings of health care quality and ability to get needed care are associated with guideline concordant cancer care among elderly patients with stage III CC. Further investigation is needed to determine if patient-reported experience correlates with other clinical measures of quality of colorectal cancer care.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document