ARAMIS: Efficacy and safety of darolutamide in nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 140-140 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karim Fizazi ◽  
Neal D. Shore ◽  
Teuvo Tammela ◽  
Albertas Ulys ◽  
Egils Vjaters ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Brief Pain Inventory ◽  
Cognitive Disorder ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Weight Decrease

140 Background: Delaying metastases for nmCRPC patients, while minimizing the risk of adverse events, is an important treatment goal. Darolutamide, a structurally unique androgen receptor (AR) antagonist, is being evaluated for the treatment of advanced prostate cancer. The ARAMIS trial studied the efficacy and safety of darolutamide in nmCRPC patients. Methods: This double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trial randomized nmCRPC patients in a 2:1 ratio to receive darolutamide 600 mg (two 300 mg tablets) twice-daily or placebo, while continuing androgen deprivation therapy. Patients were stratified by prostate-specific antigen doubling time (≤6 months or >6 months) and use of osteoclast-targeted therapy. The primary endpoint was metastasis-free survival (MFS), with independent central review of radiographic imaging every 16 weeks. Secondary endpoints include overall survival (OS), times to pain progression (assessed by Brief Pain Inventory), first cytotoxic chemotherapy and first symptomatic skeletal event, as well as safety profile. Results: In total, 1,509 patients were randomized (955 to darolutamide, 554 to placebo). Median MFS was 40.4 months with darolutamide vs 18.4 months with placebo (hazard ratio [HR] 0.41; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.34–0.50; 2-sided p<0.0001). OS showed a trend in favor of darolutamide (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.50–0.99, 2-sided p=0.045), as did time to pain progression (HR 0.65; 95% CI 0.53–0.79; 2-sided p<0.0001). Other secondary and exploratory efficacy endpoints also favored darolutamide. Incidences of treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) with ≥5% frequency or grade 3–5 were comparable between darolutamide and placebo arms; none except fatigue occurred in >10%. Discontinuation rates due to AEs were 8.9% with darolutamide and 8.7% with placebo. Grouped terms for AEs noted with other AR inhibitors (including fracture, falls, seizures, weight decrease, hypertension, and cognitive disorder) showed minimal or no difference in incidence between study arms. Conclusion: Among men with nmCRPC, MFS was significantly longer with darolutamide than with placebo with a low incidence of treatment-related AEs in this asymptomatic patient population. Clinical trial information: NCT02200614.

scholarly journals Efficacy and safety of darolutamide in Japanese patients with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a sub-group analysis of the phase III ARAMIS trial

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroji Uemura ◽  
Hisashi Matsushima ◽  
Kazuki Kobayashi ◽  
Hiroya Mizusawa ◽  
Hiroaki Nishimatsu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Small Sample Size ◽  
Group Analysis ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Japanese Patients ◽  
Small Sample ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Castration Resistant

Abstract Background Darolutamide, an oral androgen receptor inhibitor, has been approved for treating nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC), based on significant improvements in metastasis-free survival (MFS) in the ARAMIS clinical trial. Efficacy and safety of darolutamide in Japanese patients are reported here. Methods In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trial, 1509 patients with nmCRPC and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) doubling time ≤ 10 months were randomized 2:1 to darolutamide 600 mg twice daily or matched placebo while continuing androgen deprivation therapy. The primary endpoint was MFS. Results In Japan, 95 patients were enrolled and randomized to darolutamide (n = 62) or placebo (n = 33). At the primary analysis (cut-off date: September 3, 2018), after 20 primary end-point events had occurred, median MFS was not reached with darolutamide vs. 18.2 months with placebo (HR 0.28, 95% CI 0.11–0.70). Median OS was not reached due to limited numbers of events in both groups but favored darolutamide in the Japanese subgroup. Time to pain progression, time to PSA progression, and PSA response also favored darolutamide. Among Japanese patients randomized to darolutamide vs. placebo, incidences of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were 85.5 vs. 63.6%, and incidences of treatment discontinuation due to TEAEs were 8.1 vs. 6.1%. Conclusions Efficacy outcomes favored darolutamide in Japanese patients with nmCRPC, supporting the clinical benefit of darolutamide in this patient population. Darolutamide was well tolerated; however, due to the small sample size, it is impossible to conclude with certainty whether differences in the safety profile exist between Japanese and overall ARAMIS populations.

Phase III study of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with enzalutamide (ENZA) or placebo (PBO) in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC): The ARCHES trial.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 687-687 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew J. Armstrong ◽  
Russell Zelig Szmulewitz ◽  
Daniel Peter Petrylak ◽  
Arnauld Villers ◽  
Arun Azad ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
High Volume ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Secondary Endpoints ◽  
Phase Iii Study ◽  
Grade 3

687 Background: ENZA, a potent androgen receptor inhibitor, has demonstrated benefit in men with metastatic and nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Efficacy of ENZA with ADT in men with mHSPC is unknown. Methods: ARCHES is a multinational, double-blind, phase 3 study (NCT02677896). Patients (pts) with mHSPC were randomized 1:1 to ENZA (160 mg/day) + ADT or PBO + ADT, stratified by disease volume (CHAARTED criteria) and prior docetaxel therapy. Primary endpoint was radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) assessed centrally or death within 24 weeks of treatment discontinuation. Secondary endpoints included time to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression, PSA and radiographic responses and overall survival (OS). Treatment continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Results: 1150 men were randomized to ENZA (n=574) or PBO (n=576); baseline characteristics were balanced between groups. Overall, 67% had distant metastasis at initial diagnosis; 63% had high volume disease, 18% had prior docetaxel. Median follow-up was 14.4 mo. ENZA + ADT significantly improved rPFS (Table); similar significant improvements in rPFS were reported in prespecified subgroups of disease volume, pattern of spread, region and prior docetaxel (HRs 0.24–0.53). Secondary endpoints improved with ENZA + ADT (Table); OS data are immature. Grade 3–4 adverse events (AEs) were reported in 23.6% of ENZA pts vs 24.7% of PBO pts with no unexpected AEs. Conclusions: ENZA + ADT significantly improved rPFS and other efficacy endpoints vs PBO + ADT in men with mHSPC, with a preliminary safety analysis that appears consistent with the safety profile of ENZA in previous CRPC clinical trials. Acknowledgements: Medical writing and editing assistance was provided by Stephanie Rippon, MBio, and Lauren Smith from Complete HealthVizion, funded by the study sponsors. This study was funded by Astellas Pharma Inc. and Medivation LLC, a Pfizer Company, the co-developers of enzalutamide. Clinical trial information: NCT02677896. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Phase III Study of Cabozantinib in Previously Treated Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: COMET-1

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (25) ◽  
pp. 3005-3013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Smith ◽  
Johann De Bono ◽  
Cora Sternberg ◽  
Sylvestre Le Moulec ◽  
Stéphane Oudard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Bone Biomarkers ◽  
End Point ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Previously Treated

Purpose Cabozantinib is an inhibitor of kinases, including MET and vascular endothelial growth factor receptors, and has shown activity in men with previously treated metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). This blinded phase III trial compared cabozantinib with prednisone in patients with mCRPC. Patients and Methods Men with progressive mCRPC after docetaxel and abiraterone and/or enzalutamide were randomly assigned at a two-to-one ratio to cabozantinib 60 mg once per day or prednisone 5 mg twice per day. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Bone scan response (BSR) at week 12 as assessed by independent review committee was the secondary end point; radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) and effects on circulating tumor cells (CTCs), bone biomarkers, serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA), and symptomatic skeletal events (SSEs) were exploratory assessments. Results A total of 1,028 patients were randomly assigned to cabozantinib (n = 682) or prednisone (n = 346). Median OS was 11.0 months with cabozantinib and 9.8 months with prednisone (hazard ratio, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.76 to 1.06; stratified log-rank P = .213). BSR at week 12 favored cabozantinib (42% v 3%; stratified Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel P < .001). rPFS was improved in the cabozantinib group (median, 5.6 v 2.8 months; hazard ratio, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.40 to 0.57; stratified log-rank P < .001). Cabozantinib was associated with improvements in CTC conversion, bone biomarkers, and post–random assignment incidence of SSEs but not PSA outcomes. Grade 3 to 4 adverse events and discontinuations because of adverse events were higher with cabozantinib than with prednisone (71% v 56% and 33% v 12%, respectively). Conclusion Cabozantinib did not significantly improve OS compared with prednisone in heavily treated patients with mCRPC and progressive disease after docetaxel and abiraterone and/or enzalutamide. Cabozantinib had some activity in improving BSR, rPFS, SSEs, CTC conversions, and bone biomarkers but not PSA outcomes.

Enzalutamide Versus Bicalutamide in Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: The STRIVE Trial

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (18) ◽  
pp. 2098-2106 ◽  
Author(s):  
David F. Penson ◽  
Andrew J. Armstrong ◽  
Raoul Concepcion ◽  
Neeraj Agarwal ◽  
Carl Olsson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Prostate Specific Antigen ◽  
Cancer Progression ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Beneficial Effects ◽  
Castration Resistant

Purpose Enzalutamide, a potent oral androgen receptor inhibitor, improves survival in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) before and after chemotherapy. Bicalutamide, a nonsteroidal antiandrogen, is widely used to treat men with nonmetastatic or metastatic CRPC. The efficacy and safety of these drugs were compared in this randomized, double-blind, phase II study of men with CRPC. Patients and Methods A total of 396 men with nonmetastatic (n = 139) or metastatic (n = 257) CRPC were randomly assigned to enzalutamide 160 mg per day (n = 198) or bicalutamide 50 mg per day (n = 198). Androgen deprivation therapy was continued in both arms. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Results Enzalutamide reduced the risk of progression or death by 76% compared with bicalutamide (hazard ratio [HR], 0.24; 95% CI, 0.18 to 0.32; P < .001). Median PFS was 19.4 months with enzalutamide versus 5.7 months with bicalutamide. Enzalutamide resulted in significant improvements in all key secondary end points: time to prostate-specific antigen progression (HR, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.14 to 0.26; P < .001); proportion of patients with a ≥ 50% prostate-specific antigen response (81% v 31%; P < .001); and radiographic PFS in metastatic patients (HR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.21 to 0.50; P < .001). Beneficial effects with enzalutamide were observed in both nonmetastatic and metastatic subgroups. The observed adverse event profile was consistent with that from phase III enzalutamide trials. Conclusion Enzalutamide significantly reduced risk of prostate cancer progression or death compared with bicalutamide in patients with nonmetastatic or metastatic CRPC.

scholarly journals NEW TREATMENT STANDARD FOR PATIENTS WITH NON-METASTATIC CASTRATION-RESISTANT PROSTATE CANCER

2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 68-77
Author(s):  
B. Ya. Alekseev
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Prostate Specific Antigen ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Group Versus ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Treatment Standard ◽  
New Treatment

Men with nonmetastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer and a rapidly rising prostate-specific antigen level are at high risk for metastasis. Until recently there was no standard of treatment for this category of patients. A total of 1401 patients with nonmetastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer and a prostate-specific antigen doubling time of 10 months or less underwent randomization to double-blind, phase III PROSPER trial. Patients were continuing androgen-deprivation therapy in combination with enzalutamide (at a dose of 160 mg) or placebo once daily. The median metastasis-free survival was 36.6 months in the enzalutamide group versus 14.7 months in the placebo group. Enzalutamide treatment resulted in a 71 % lower risk of radiographic progression or death than did placebo (hazard ratio 0.29; 95 % confidence interval 0.24 to 0.35; p <0.001). Adverse events were consistent with the established safety profile of enzalutamide.

Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III Trial of Ipilimumab Versus Placebo in Asymptomatic or Minimally Symptomatic Patients With Metastatic Chemotherapy-Naive Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 40-47 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomasz M. Beer ◽  
Eugene D. Kwon ◽  
Charles G. Drake ◽  
Karim Fizazi ◽  
Christopher Logothetis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Phase Iii Trial ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Grade 3

Purpose Ipilimumab increases antitumor T-cell responses by binding to cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4. We evaluated treatment with ipilimumab in asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic patients with chemotherapy-naive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer without visceral metastases. Patients and Methods In this multicenter, double-blind, phase III trial, patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to ipilimumab 10 mg/kg or placebo every 3 weeks for up to four doses. Ipilimumab 10 mg/kg or placebo maintenance therapy was administered to nonprogressing patients every 3 months. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Results Four hundred patients were randomly assigned to ipilimumab and 202 to placebo; 399 were treated with ipilimumab and 199 with placebo. Median OS was 28.7 months (95% CI, 24.5 to 32.5 months) in the ipilimumab arm versus 29.7 months (95% CI, 26.1 to 34.2 months) in the placebo arm (hazard ratio, 1.11; 95.87% CI, 0.88 to 1.39; P = .3667). Median progression-free survival was 5.6 months in the ipilimumab arm versus 3.8 with placebo arm (hazard ratio, 0.67; 95.87% CI, 0.55 to 0.81). Exploratory analyses showed a higher prostate-specific antigen response rate with ipilimumab (23%) than with placebo (8%). Diarrhea (15%) was the only grade 3 to 4 treatment-related adverse event (AE) reported in ≥ 10% of ipilimumab-treated patients. Nine (2%) deaths occurred in the ipilimumab arm due to treatment-related AEs; no deaths occurred in the placebo arm. Immune-related grade 3 to 4 AEs occurred in 31% and 2% of patients, respectively. Conclusion Ipilimumab did not improve OS in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. The observed increases in progression-free survival and prostate-specific antigen response rates suggest antitumor activity in a patient subset.

Phase III, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study of Docetaxel in Combination With Zibotentan in Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (14) ◽  
pp. 1740-1747 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karim Fizazi ◽  
Celestia S. Higano ◽  
Joel B. Nelson ◽  
Martin Gleave ◽  
Kurt Miller ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
End Points ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Endothelin A

PurposeAs part of the ENTHUSE (Endothelin A Use) program, the efficacy and safety of zibotentan (ZD4054), an oral specific endothelin A receptor antagonist, has been investigated in combination with docetaxel in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC).Patients and MethodsIn this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III study, patients received intravenous docetaxel 75 mg/m2on day 1 of 21-day cycles plus oral zibotentan 10 mg or placebo once daily. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Secondary end points included time to pain and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression, pain and PSA response, progression-free survival, health-related quality of life, and safety.ResultsA total of 1,052 patients received study treatment (docetaxel-zibotentan, n = 524; docetaxel-placebo, n = 528). At the time of data cutoff, there had been 277 and 280 deaths, respectively. There was no difference in OS for patients receiving docetaxel-zibotentan compared with those receiving docetaxel-placebo (hazard ratio, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.84 to 1.18; P = .963). No significant differences were observed on secondary end points, including time to pain progression (median 9.3 v 10.0 months, respectively) or pain response (odds ratio, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.61 to 1.16; P = .283). The median time to death was 20.0 and 19.2 months for the zibotentan and placebo groups, respectively. The most commonly reported adverse events in zibotentan-treated patients were peripheral edema (52.7%), diarrhea (35.4%), alopecia (33.9%), and nausea (33.3%).ConclusionDocetaxel plus zibotentan 10 mg/d did not result in a significant improvement in OS compared with docetaxel plus placebo in patients with metastatic CRPC.

scholarly journals Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter Trial Comparing Orteronel (TAK-700) Plus Prednisone With Placebo Plus Prednisone in Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer That Has Progressed During or After Docetaxel-Based Therapy: ELM-PC 5

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (7) ◽  
pp. 723-731 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karim Fizazi ◽  
Robert Jones ◽  
Stephane Oudard ◽  
Eleni Efstathiou ◽  
Fred Saad ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Statistical Testing ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Pain Response ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
End Point ◽  
Castration Resistant

Purpose Orteronel (TAK-700) is an investigational, nonsteroidal, reversible, selective 17,20-lyase inhibitor. This study examined orteronel in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer that progressed after docetaxel therapy. Patients and Methods In our study, 1,099 men were randomly assigned in a 2:1 schedule to receive orteronel 400 mg plus prednisone 5 mg twice daily or placebo plus prednisone 5 mg twice daily, stratified by region (Europe, North America [NA], and non-Europe/NA) and Brief Pain Inventory–Short Form worst pain score. Primary end point was overall survival (OS). Key secondary end points (radiographic progression-free survival [rPFS], ≥ 50% decrease of prostate-specific antigen [PSA50], and pain response at 12 weeks) were to undergo statistical testing only if the primary end point analysis was significant. Results The study was unblinded after crossing a prespecified OS futility boundary. The median OS was 17.0 months versus 15.2 months with orteronel-prednisone versus placebo-prednisone (hazard ratio [HR], 0.886; 95% CI, 0.739 to 1.062; P = .190). Improved rPFS was observed with orteronel-prednisone (median, 8.3 v 5.7 months; HR, 0.760; 95% CI, 0.653 to 0.885; P < .001). Orteronel-prednisone showed advantages over placebo-prednisone in PSA50 rate (25% v 10%, P < .001) and time to PSA progression (median, 5.5 v 2.9 months, P < .001) but not pain response rate (12% v 9%; P = .128). Adverse events (all grades) were generally more frequent with orteronel-prednisone, including nausea (42% v 26%), vomiting (36% v 17%), fatigue (29% v 23%), and increased amylase (14% v 2%). Conclusion Our study did not meet the primary end point of OS. Longer rPFS and a higher PSA50 rate with orteronel-prednisone indicate antitumor activity.

Overall survival (OS) analysis of a phase II randomized controlled trial (RCT) of a poxviral-based PSA targeted immunotherapy in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5013-5013
Author(s):  
P. W. Kantoff ◽  
T. Schuetz ◽  
B. A. Blumenstein ◽  
M. M. Glode ◽  
D. Bilhartz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Viral Vectors ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Gm Csf

5013 Background: Therapeutic poxviral vaccines for prostate cancer are safe with preliminary evidence of clinical benefit in phase I/II studies. PROSTVAC-VF (PV) comprises 2 recombinant viral vectors (Vaccinia and Fowlpox), each encoding transgenes for prostate specific antigen (PSA) and 3 immune costimulatory molecules (B7.1, ICAM-1, and LFA3: TRICOM). PV is administered subcutaneously in a heterologous prime-boost regimen with concurrent low-dose GM-CSF. Methods: 122 patients (pts) were treated in a multi-center, double-blind, RCT of a vaccination series. Pts were randomized 2:1 to PV + GM-CSF vs. placebo empty vector + control saline injections (C). Vaccinia-based vector was used for priming followed by 6 planned Fowlpox-based vector boosts. The trial completed enrollment in July 2005. Eligible pts had metastatic disease, a rising PSA despite castrate testosterone levels, and a Gleason score of ≤7. Pts with a history of prior chemotherapy use, visceral metastasis, or narcotic use were excluded. The 1º endpoint was progression free survival (PFS), with progression defined as 2 new lesions on bone scan or RECIST-defined progression. Vaccination was discontinued after progression. Results: 82 pts received PV and 40 received C. Pt characteristics were similar (means): age (72PV/76C), PSA (134PV/188C), Alk-Phos (142PV/159C), LDH (207PV/218C), Hgb (13PV/13C), and number bone metastatic sites (5.3PV/6.5C). Mean number of vaccinations was 5.4 PV and 5.3 C. PFS was similar in the 2 groups (p = 0.56). However, at 3 years post study, PV patients had a better overall survival than C patients (25 alive, 30%, PV, versus 7 alive, 17%, C) and a longer median survival (24.5 months PV, versus 16 months C); estimated hazard ratio 0.6 (95% CI 0.4–0.9); stratified log rank p = 0.016. Conclusions: In a RCT, PV immunotherapy was associated with an 8.5 month improvement in median OS in men with mCRPC. These data provide evidence of prolonged anti-tumor activity, but need to be confirmed in a larger phase III study. [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document