Evolving patterns of metastatic renal cell carcinoma: A meta-analysis.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 563-563
Author(s):  
Justin Lin ◽  
William K. Oh ◽  
Bobby Chi-Hung Liaw ◽  
Matt D. Galsky ◽  
Che-Kai Tsao
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Bone Metastasis ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Temporal Trends ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Linear Regression Models ◽  
First Line

563 Background: Advances in diagnostic and treatment modalities have resulted in better outcomes in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients. With new therapies extending survival, we hypothesize that pattern of metastatic disease has evolved over time. We assessed the pattern of metastases as reported in baseline characteristics of prospective clinical trial patients between 1990 and 2018. Methods: This study identified all phase I-III mRCC therapeutic clinical trials published between January 1990 and July 2018 in PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov. Studies that included patients with other cancers or did not report metastases were excluded. Data was stratified to examine differences in three listed treatment eras for first-line therapy. Linear regression models were used to evaluate temporal trends and subcategorized as either First Line Only treatments (FLO) or Second-Line and Beyond (SLB). Results: 127 clinical trials encompassing 16534 subjects were identified. Between 1990 and 2018, rates of lymph node metastases in the FLO population increased significantly at 1.03% per year ( P < 0.05). The rate of lung and liver metastases in FLO showed a trend of increase at 0.48% and 0.04% per year, respectively, but decreased -0.73% and -0.15% per year in the SLB population. Moreover, rate of bone metastasis showed a trend of increase in both populations, particularly between the VEGF/TKI and Immunotherapy/TKI eras in the SLB population (18.89% to 29.19%). Conclusions: Notable changes were found in the pattern of metastasis in patients with mRCC. Increasing rate of bone metastasis may warrant dedicated bone imaging for routine staging in patients with mRCC. These evolving patterns may have important implications in treatment selection and prognosis in this patient population. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Evolving Patterns of Metastasis in Renal Cell Carcinoma

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 13-19
Author(s):  
Justin Lin ◽  
Yue Zhang ◽  
Wei Hou ◽  
Qian Qin ◽  
Matthew Galsky ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Bone Metastasis ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Lung Metastases ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Metastatic Patterns

Advance diagnostic and treatment modalities have improved outcomes for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients, but the prognosis for those with metastatic disease (mRCC) remains poor. As given metastatic distribution is critical in guiding treatment decisions for mRCC patients, we evaluated evolving metastatic patterns to assess if our current practice standards effectively address patient needs. A systematic literature review was performed to identify all publicly available prospective clinical trials in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) from 1990 to 2018. A total of 16,899 mRCC patients from 127 qualified phase I–III clinical trials with metastatic site documentations were included for analysis for incidence of metastases to lung, liver, bone, and lymph nodes (LNs) over time. Studies were categorized into three treatment eras based on the timing of regulatory approval: Cytokine Era (1990-2004), vascular endothelial growth factor/tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) Era (2005-2016), and immune checkpoint inhibitor/TKI Era (ICI-TKI, 2017-2018) and also classified as first-line only (FLO) or second-line and beyond (SLB). Overall, an increase in the incidence of bone and LNs metastases in FLO and SLB, and lung metastases in FLO, was seen over the three treatment eras. Generally, the burden of disease is higher in SLB when compared with FLO. Importantly, in the ICI-TKI era, the incidences of bone metastasis are 28% in FLO and 29% in SLB settings. The disease burden in patients with mRCC has increased steadily over the past three decades. Given the unexpectedly high rate of bone metastasis, routine dedicated bone imaging should be considered in all patients with mRCC.

Pazopanib for the First-Line Treatment of Patients with Advanced and/or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

2012 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary Kilonzo ◽  
Jenni Hislop ◽  
Andrew Elders ◽  
Cynthia Fraser ◽  
Donald Bissett ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
First Line Treatment

Immune-based combinations for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials

2021 ◽  
Vol 154 ◽  
pp. 120-127
Author(s):  
Francesco Massari ◽  
Alessandro Rizzo ◽  
Veronica Mollica ◽  
Matteo Rosellini ◽  
Andrea Marchetti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Randomised Clinical Trials

191 Association of immune related adverse events with the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in metastatic renal cell carcinoma

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A205-A206
Author(s):  
Vasilii Bushunow ◽  
Leonard Appleman ◽  
Roby Thomas
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
First Line ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Kaplan Meier

BackgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are first-line therapy for tumors including metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Use of ICI is complicated by diverse immune-related adverse events (irAEs), which can add significant morbidity but are also associated with improved efficacy of therapy.1 2 Risk factors for development of irAE are still poorly understood. We hypothesized that patients with mRCC treated with ICI as first-line therapy have higher rates of developing irAE’s than patients previously treated with other therapies.MethodsWe conducted a single-institution, retrospective medical record review of patients with mRCC treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitors from March 2011 through April 15, 2020. We identified therapy duration, and presence, severity, and treatment of adverse events. We defined overall survival as time elapsed from date of diagnosis until death or until completion of study. We classified severity of adverse events according to CTCAE guidelines. Statistical methods included univariate Cox proportional hazards and logistic regression models, and Kaplan-Meier curves were plotted for subgroups.ResultsA total of 64 unique charts were reviewed. 18 patients (28%) of patients were treated with ICI as first-line therapy. 28 patients (44%) experienced immune-related adverse events with a total of 40 irAE’s identified. Most irAE were grade I-II (78%), with 7 (17%) grade III and 1 (2.4%) grade IV irAE’s. Most common sites were skin (29%), thyroid (20%) and gastrointestinal (15%). Patients with irAE had increased survival compared to those who did not have irAE (median survival not reached, vs 139 weeks, p=0.0004) (figure 1). This finding remained after excluding patients who had only experienced dermatologic irAE (median survival not reached in non-derm irAE subgroup, vs 144 weeks for dermatologic or no irAE, p=0.01) (figure 2). Patients treated with ICI as first line therapy had greater rates of developing irAE (72%) than those who had prior therapies (32%) (OR 5.4; p = 0.006). There was no association between histology type and rate of irAE.Abstract 191 Figure 1Kaplan-Meier survival plot of OS between patients with any irAE and those without any irAEAbstract 191 Figure 2Kaplan-Meier survival plot of OS between patients with non-dermatologic irAE and those without any irAE or only dermatologic irAEConclusionsThe development of irAE’s in patients with mRCC treated with ICI is associated with longer survival. This study joins the growing body of evidence showing that presence of irAE’s is associated with increased treatment efficacy. Use of ICI as first-line therapy is associated with higher risk of irAE. Given growing use of ICI as first-line therapy, further study to predict onset and severity of irAE’s is required.AcknowledgementsHong Wang, PhD, for statistical support.Ethics ApprovalThis study was approved by the University of Pittsburgh Institutional Review Board. Approval number STUDY19100386.ReferencesElias R, Yan N, Singla N, Levonyack N, Formella J, Christie A, et al. Immune-related adverse events are associated with improved outcomes in ICI-treated renal cell carcinoma patients. J Clin Oncol 2019;37(7):S645.Verzoni E, Cartenì G, Cortesi E, et al. Real-world efficacy and safety of nivolumab in previously-treated metastatic renal cell carcinoma, and association between immune-related adverse events and survival: the Italian expanded access program. J Immunother Cancer 2019;7(1):99.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document