Cemiplimab as first intervention for patients with locally advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10065-10065
Author(s):  
Jennifer Lynn Atlas ◽  
Marina Kanos ◽  
James Thomas Symanowski ◽  
Daniel Brickman ◽  
Meghan Forster ◽  
...  

10065 Cemiplimab as First Intervention for Patients with Locally Advanced Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma (cSCC) Background: Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma is the second most common non-melanoma skin cancer. Early stage disease is managed with local intervention in the form of surgery or radiation and translates into cure for greater than 95% of the patients. Patients with high risk disease who have large primary lesions, neural, or nodal involvement are usually not amenable to cure with local intervention and may experience significant morbidity, disfigurement, or functional deficits. These patients had no effective systemic treatment options until recent approval of cemiplimab. We report the outcomes for upfront treatment with cemiplimab in locally advanced cSCC. Methods: This is a single institution retrospective study of patients with locally advanced cSCC defined as those requiring more than simple excision and/or complex repair or regional disease with nodal involvement who received at least two doses of cemiplimab between January 1, 2018 through January 17, 2020. Patients with radiologically measurable disease had response evaluated per RECIST criteria. Patients who had no measurable disease had their clinical response (complete resolution or healing of primary lesion) assessed per treating physician and need or lack of local intervention documented. Adverse events were assessed and graded per CTCAE criteria. The primary end point was to ascertain the need for local intervention. Results: Thirty six patients were eligible. Twenty-two (61%) patients treated with upfront cemiplimab were able to avoid local intervention with surgery and/or radiation; four patients progressed or died on treatment. Three (8%) patients received local intervention. Eleven (31%) patients are still receiving cemiplimab and local intervention decision is pending. The overall response rate was 69% and the clinical benefit rate was 92%. The median treatment duration was six months and the median number of doses received was six. Adverse events occurred in 31% of patients; the most common adverse event was dermatitis. Conclusions: Upfront treatment with cemiplimab in patients with locally advanced cSCC obviated need for disfiguring/complex surgery or radiation in majority of patients. Cemiplimab was tolerated well; no new safety signals were observed. Neo-adjuvant phase II study is in development.

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert M. Samstein ◽  
Alan L. Ho ◽  
Nancy Y. Lee ◽  
Christopher A. Barker

Background.Advanced age and immune dysfunction are risk factors for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) and often render patients with locally-advanced disease medically inoperable or surgically unresectable, but potentially curable with radiotherapy. Concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy may not be well tolerated in this population, but another systemic therapy may improve disease control.Objective.Determine the tolerance and efficacy of concurrent cetuximab and radiotherapy (CRT) for patients with locally advanced and unresectable cSCC.Methods.Retrospective analysis of 12 patients treated with CRT for locally advanced and unresectable cSCC.Results.Patients were elderly and 75% had moderate-to-severe comorbidities, while 42% had immune dysfunction. Grades 3-4 adverse events were noted in 83% of patients; 67% required hospital admission for adverse events. Complete and partial response was noted in 36% and 27% (response rate, 64%). Stable and progressive disease was noted in 3 and 1 patients, respectively (disease control rate, 91%). Median progression-free and overall survival were 6.4 and 8.0 months, respectively.Limitations.Retrospective small-cohort, single-institution analysis.Conclusion.Patients selected for CRT were elderly, with comorbidities and immune dysfunction, but treatment responses were observed. Patients selected for this treatment approach have a poor prognosis with limited capacity for therapy; more effective treatment is needed.


Medicina ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 57 (12) ◽  
pp. 1342
Author(s):  
Pierfrancesco Franco ◽  
Giuditta Chiloiro ◽  
Giampaolo Montesi ◽  
Sabrina Montrone ◽  
Alessandra Arcelli ◽  
...  

Background and objectives: The diagnosis and therapy of squamous cell carcinoma of the anus may vary significantly in daily clinical practice, even if international guidelines are available. Materials and Methods: We conducted a pattern of care survey to assess the management of patients with anal cancer in Italy (38 questions). We analyzed 58 questionnaires. Results: Most of the respondents work in public and/or university hospitals (75.8%) in northern Italy (65.5%). The majority (88.0%) treat less than 20 patients/year. Common examinations for diagnosis and staging are anorectal endoscopy (84.5%), computed tomography scan (86.2%) and pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (96.5%). The most frequently prescribed dose to primary tumor is 50–54 Gy (46.5–58.6%) for early stage disease and 54–59.4 Gy (62.1–32.8%) for locally advanced cases. Elective volumes are prescribed around 45 Gy (94.8%). Most participants use volumetric intensity modulated radiotherapy (89.7%) and a simultaneous integrated boost (84.5%). Concurrent radiotherapy, 5-fluorouracil and mitomycin is considered the standard of care (70.6%). Capecitabine is less frequently used (34.4%). Induction chemotherapy is an option for extensive localized disease (65.5%). Consolidation chemotherapy is rarely used (18.9%). A response evaluation is conducted at 26–30 weeks (63.9%) with a pelvic MRI (91.4%). Follow-up is generally run by the multidisciplinary tumor board (62.1%). Conclusions: Differences were observed for radiotherapy dose prescription, calling for a consensus to harmonize treatment strategies.


2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xi-Lei Zhou ◽  
Chang-Hua Yu ◽  
Wan-Wei Wang ◽  
Fu-Zhi Ji ◽  
Yao-Zu Xiong ◽  
...  

Abstract Background This retrospective study was to assess and compare the toxicity and efficacy of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with S-1 or docetaxel and cisplatin in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Methods Patients with locally advanced ESCC who received CCRT with S-1 (70 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1–14, every 3 weeks for 2 cycles, S-1 group) or docetaxel (25 mg/m2) and cisplatin (25 mg/m2) on day 1 weekly (DP group) between 2014 and 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. Radiotherapy was delivered in 1.8–2.0 Gy per fraction to a total dose of 50–60 Gy. Treatment-related toxicities (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0), response rate, and survival outcomes were compared between groups. Results A total of 175 patients were included in this study (72 in the S-1 group and 103 in the DP group). Baseline characteristics were well balanced between the two groups. The incidence of grade 3–4 adverse events were significantly lower in the S-1 group than that of the DP group (22.2% vs. 45.6%, p = 0.002). In the DP group, elderly patients (> 60 years) had a significantly higher rate of grade 3–4 adverse events than younger patients (58.1% vs. 31.3%, p = 0.01). The objective overall response rate (complete response + partial response) was 68.1% in the S-1 group, and 73.8% the DP group (p = 0.497). The 3-year overall survival was 34.7% in the S-1 group, and 38.8% in the DP group (p = 0.422). The 3-year progression free survival in the DP group was higher than that in the S-1 group but without significant difference (33.0% vs. 25.0%, p = 0.275). Conclusion CCRT with S-1 is not inferior to CCRT with docetaxel and cisplatin and is better tolerated in in elderly patients with locally advanced ESCC.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e21524-e21524
Author(s):  
Michele Guida ◽  
Annarita Fanizzi ◽  
Davide Quaresmini ◽  
Annalisa Nardone ◽  
Andrea Armenio ◽  
...  

e21524 Background: Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) is the second most common skin cancer. Although representing less than 5% of all CSCCs, advanced stages are difficult to treat. Cemiplimab, an antiPD-1 monoclonal antibody, is the first approved immunotherapy in the US and EU for patients with locally advanced (laCSCC) or metastatic (mCSCC) CSCC. Phase I-II studies showed high antitumor activity and good tolerability, but few data are still available regarding cemiplimab in real life experience in non-selected patients. Methods: We recruited 30 consecutive patients with laCSCC (25 pts) and mCSCC (5 pts) treated with cemiplimab from August 2019 to November 2020 at our Institution. Median age was 81 years (range 36-95); 24 males; median ECOG PS 1 (range 0-2). Five patients had an immunosuppressive condition including 3 patients with stable hematologic malignancies and two patients on immunosuppressive therapy for kidney transplantation and Crohn’s disease, respectively. The majority of patients had comorbidities (median 3). Cemiplimab was administered at the flat dose of 350 mg i.v. every 21 days until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. In all patients we evaluated clinical outcomes, toxicity, and associations between clinical outcomes and peripheral blood parameters. Results: We reported 23 responses (ORR 76.7%) with CR in 5 patients (16.7%). One patient had SD for 5 months. The global DCR was 80%. The median duration of response and PFS was not reached at a median follow-up of 6 months. We observed a higher ORR in head and neck primary tumours (87% vs. 42.9% of others, p = 0.016) and in patients with haemoglobin level > 12 g/dL (87.5% vs. 64.3%). No significative difference in ORR was observed with respect to the median age (81.3% in >81 years vs. 71.4% in < 81 years). Among the 5 patients with immunosuppressive status, a response was obtained in 4 patients (80%), including 1 CR. Nine patients died, 7 for PD and 2 for causes unrelated to the disease. Twenty patients (67.7%) still have an ongoing response. The treatment was well tolerated by the majority of patients. The most common adverse events were fatigue in 7 patients (23.3%) and skin toxicity in 10 patients (33.3%) including pruritus in 6 patients, rash in 3 patients, bullous erythema in 1 patient. Only 3 (10%) patients experienced severe (grade 3/4) toxicity. Three responder patients interrupted treatment (2 for toxicity after 7 and 9 cycles, and one for pre-existing dementia) but maintaining their response. Conclusions: In our real-life experience cemiplimab showed high antitumor activity with acceptable safety profile similar to those in selected patients of trials. Moreover, its antitumor activity resulted not impaired in very elderly patients or in those with immunocompromized status.


2018 ◽  
Vol 63 (2) ◽  
pp. 257-263 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kurian Joseph ◽  
Khalifa Alkaabi ◽  
Heather Warkentin ◽  
Sunita Ghosh ◽  
Naresh Jha ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (7) ◽  
pp. 969-974
Author(s):  
Liming Zhang ◽  
Hui Zhang ◽  
Yuheng Huang ◽  
Xiaowei Xi ◽  
Yunyan Sun

ObjectiveCervical cancer is one of the most common cancers worldwide, and immune function may impact disease progression. Serum markers may also be associated with diagnosis and progression. The aim of this study was to explore the clinical usefulness of determining the levels of peripheral blood immune cells and serum tumor markers in predicting diagnosis and prognosis of patients with cervical cancer.Methods82 patients with cervical cancer (early stage group: IA–IB1 and IIA1; locally advanced group: IB2 and IIA2), 54 patients with cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia (CIN), and 54 healthy women (control group) were recruited. Inclusion criteria were: (1) patients whose cervical lesions were determined based on biopsy; and (2) patients who had not undergone immunotherapy, chemotherapy, or radiotherapy. The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) patients with a history of other malignant tumors; (2) patients with heart, kidney, and other organ failure; (3) patients with immune diseases; and (4) pregnant or lactating women. The levels of immunocytes and tumor markers were assayed. The relationships among histopathologic factors were analyzed. The correlation between the levels of immunocytes and tumor markers in patients with different degrees of cervical lesions (pre-invasive or cancer) and healthy women was evaluated.ResultsThe squamous cell carcinoma antigen and carcinoembryonic antigen levels in the control group and the CIN group were significantly lower than those in the cervical cancer groups (p<0.01). The incidence of lymph node metastasis in the early stage and locally advanced groups were 22.9% (11/48) and 46.2% (12/26), respectively, and 58.8% (20/34) and 7.5% (3/37) in the positive and negative lymphovascular invasion groups, respectively (p<0.05). The levels of CD8+ and CD8+ CD28+ T cells in the early stage group were markedly lower than those in the CIN group and the control group (p=0.014, p=0.008, respectively). The ratio of CD4+CD25+/CD4+ in the cervical cancer groups was significantly higher than in the control group (p<0.01). The increased serum squamous cell carcinoma and carcinoembryonic antigen levels and CD4+CD25+/CD4+ ratio were risk factors for cervical cancer by logistic regression analysis (p<0.05).ConclusionsIn patients with cervical cancer, immune function was impaired compared with that in healthy women and patients with CIN, while squamous cell carcinoma and carcinoembryonic antigen levels were increased. Combined detection of the levels of peripheral blood immune cells and serum tumor markers may be helpful for early detection, diagnosis, and prognosis evaluation of patients with cervical cancer.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document