FGFR expression, fusion and mutation as detected by NGS sequencing of DNA and RNA.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16061-e16061
Author(s):  
Ivan De Dios ◽  
Wanlong Ma ◽  
Spiraggelos Antzoulatos ◽  
Jeffrey Estella ◽  
Maher Albitar
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Next Generation Sequencing ◽  
Next Generation ◽  
Lung Cancers ◽  
Expression Levels ◽  
Dna And Rna ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
High Incidence ◽  
Next Generation Sequencing Ngs ◽  
Generation Sequencing

e16061 Background: Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptors (FGFR1-4) abnormalities (fusion, amplification and mutations) are common in urothelial, breast and endometrial cancers. However, FGFR1-4 have been shown to play a major role in cell proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis in other types of cancers including colorectal (CRC) and lung cancers. We explored the value of using DNA and RNA next generation sequencing (NGS) in determining the presence of abnormalities in FGFR1-4 in various types of cancer. Methods: Using targeted panel and next generation sequencing (NGS), we analyzed DNA sequencing data (434 genes) in 438 Solid tumors and RNA data (1408 genes) in 160 lung cancers and 53 colorectal cancers (CRC). The expression levels of the CRC and lung cancer were also compared with expression levels of 32 cases of endometrial, urothelial and breast cancers as a group of cancers known to have high incidence. Results: The DNA data showed mutations in 85 samples and CNV in 12 samples. The detected mutations were 18% in FGFR1, 25% in FGFR2, 45% in FGFR3, and 12% in FGFR4. Only 20% of the detected mutations by NGS testing can be detected if the PCR-based FDA-approved kit was used. Analysis of the expression levels of FGFR1-4 mRNA in CRC and lung cancer showed highest expression in FGFR2, followed by FGFR1 then FGFR3. Expression of FGFR4 was the lowest (P < 0.0001). There was no difference between CRC and lung cancer in FGFR1 and FGFR2 mRNA, but FGFR3 was slightly higher in lung cancer as compared with CRC (P = 0.01). FGFR4 was significantly higher in CRC as compared with lung cancer (P < 0.0001). No fusion involving FGFR1-4 was detected in any of the tested CRC or lung cancers. Upon comparing overall expression between CRC/lung cancer with the group of cancers that are known to have high incidence of FGFR1-4 abnormalities (urothelial, breast, and endometrial), FGFR1 and FGFR2 mRNA were significantly lower in CRC/lung cancers (P < 0.0001 and P = 0.0002, respectively), but there was no significant difference in FGFR3. However, significant overlap is noted. In contrast, FGFR4 was significantly higher in CRC (P < 0.0001). Conclusions: This data suggests that while FGFR1-3 genes are overall expressed in CRC and lung, some cases may have significantly high expression of FGFR1-3 and perhaps these cases should be singled out for treatment with FGFR inhibitors. Furthermore, NGS testing for mutations significantly more efficient and can detect significant number of mutations that can be missed if PCR-based testing is used. NGS testing of DNA and RNA is the most appropriate testing for abnormalities in FGFR1-4.

The applications of next-generation sequencing (NGS) in drug development for cancer therapy

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pelin Telkoparan-Akillilar ◽  
Dilek Cevik
Keyword(s):  
Next Generation Sequencing ◽  
Drug Discovery ◽  
Cancer Therapy ◽  
Target Identification ◽  
Rapid Development ◽  
Next Generation ◽  
Biomedical Sciences ◽  
Dna And Rna ◽  
Next Generation Sequencing Ngs ◽  
Generation Sequencing

Background: Numerous sequencing techniques have been progressed since the 1960s with the rapid development of molecular biology studies focusing on DNA and RNA. Methods: a great number of articles, book chapters, websites are reviewed, and the studies covering NGS history, technology and applications to cancer therapy are included in the present article. Results: High throughput next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies offer many advantages over classical Sanger sequencing with decreasing cost per base and increasing sequencing efficiency. NGS technologies are combined with bioinformatics software to sequence genomes to be used in diagnostics, transcriptomics, epidemiologic and clinical trials in biomedical sciences. The NGS technology has also been successfully used in drug discovery for the treatment of different cancer types. Conclusion: This review focuses on current and potential applications of NGS in various stages of drug discovery process, from target identification through to personalized medicine.

scholarly journals Clinical results and importance of next-generation sequencing (NGS) in detecting targeted mutations in the treatment of metastatic Lung Cancer: Single center initial results

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (12) ◽  
pp. 327-332
Author(s):  
Cem Mirili ◽  
Çiğdem Kahraman ◽  
Ali Yılmaz ◽  
Mehmet Bilici ◽  
Salim Başol Tekin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Next Generation Sequencing ◽  
Genetic Variants ◽  
Genetic Variant ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Clinical Effects ◽  
Next Generation ◽  
Variant Analysis ◽  
Next Generation Sequencing Ngs ◽  
Generation Sequencing

Objective:  In Lung cancer (LC), which is one of the most deadly cancers, longer survival has been achieved with targeted agents. For this reason, it is important to find the patients who are suitable for targeted therapies. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is a method that allows multiple genetic variants to be detected simultaneously by performing massive parallel DNA sequencing at the same time. We wanted to reveal the clinical effects and benefits of genetic variant analysis with NGS for our patients. Material and Methods: Patients with stage 4 non-squamous and not otherwise specified (NOS) Non-small cell LC who underwent genetic variant analysis with NGS were included in the study, retrospectively. Results: Total of the 51 patients, 41 (80.4%) were male and the median age was 64 (35-85) years. According to TNM, 21 (41.2%) patients were stage 4A, 30 (58.8%) patients were stage 4B and 39 (76.5%) patients had adenocarcinoma and 12 (23.5%) had NOS histology. NGS analyzes were performed in median 14 days (8-43) and determined 24 pathogenic variants in 17 (%25) patients: 9EGFR (%17,6), 6PIKC3A (%11,7), 5KRAS (%9,8), 2PTEN (%3,9), 1BRAF (%1,9), 1MET (%1,6) (7 of them concomitantly). Cytotoxic chemotherapy was recommended in 41, anti-EGFR agents in 8 (afatinib in 4, erlotinib in 4 patients) patients and anti-BRAF+MEK inhibitor agent (dabrafenib+trametinib) in 1 patient. Conclusion: With the NGS, in just two weeks, both target and resistance genetic variants of our patients were detected at the same time and individualized treatments were applied. In this way, both time and cost were saved.

scholarly journals Demystification of RNAseq Quality Control

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dragana Dudić ◽  
Bojana Banović Đeri ◽  
Vesna Pajić ◽  
Gordana Pavlović-Lažetić
Keyword(s):  
Quality Control ◽  
Next Generation Sequencing ◽  
Rna Sequencing ◽  
Next Generation ◽  
Comprehensive Guidance ◽  
Dna And Rna ◽  
Control Evaluation ◽  
Downstream Analysis ◽  
Next Generation Sequencing Ngs ◽  
Generation Sequencing

Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) analysis has become a widely used method for studying the structure of DNA and RNA, but complexity of the procedure leads to obtaining error-prone datasets which need to be cleansed in order to avoid misinterpretation of data. We address the usage and proper interpretations of characteristic metrics for RNA sequencing (RNAseq) quality control, implemented in and reported by FastQC, and provide a comprehensive guidance for their assessment in the context of total RNAseq quality control of Illumina raw reads. Additionally, we give recommendations how to adequately perform the quality control preprocessing step of raw total RNAseq Illumina reads according to the obtained results of the quality control evaluation step; the aim is to provide the best dataset to downstream analysis, rather than to get better FastQC results. We also tested effects of different preprocessing approaches to the downstream analysis and recommended the most suitable approach.

scholarly journals Next-generation sequencing in neuropathological diagnosis of infections of the nervous system

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven L. Salzberg ◽  
Florian Breitwieser ◽  
Anupama Kumar ◽  
Haiping Hao ◽  
Peter Burger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Nervous System ◽  
Next Generation Sequencing ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Infectious Agent ◽  
Next Generation ◽  
Dna And Rna ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Next Generation Sequencing Ngs ◽  
Generation Sequencing

Objective: To determine the feasibility of next-generation sequencing (NGS) microbiome approaches in the diagnosis of infectious disorders in brain or spinal cord biopsies in patients with suspected central nervous system (CNS) infections. Methods: In a prospective-pilot study, we applied NGS in combination with a new computational analysis pipeline to detect the presence of pathogenic microbes in brain or spinal cord biopsies from ten patients with neurological problems indicating possible infection but for whom conventional clinical and microbiology studies yielded negative or inconclusive results. Results: Direct DNA and RNA sequencing of brain tissue biopsies generated 8.3 million to 29.1 million sequence reads per sample, which successfully identified with high confidence the infectious agent in three patients, identified possible pathogens in two more, and helped to understand neuropathological processes in three others, demonstrating the power of large-scale unbiased sequencing as a novel diagnostic tool. Validation techniques confirmed the pathogens identified by NGS in each of the three positive cases. Clinical outcomes were consistent with the findings yielded by NGS on the presence or absence of an infectious pathogenic process in eight of ten cases, and were non-contributory in the remaining two. Conclusions: NGS-guided metagenomic studies of brain, spinal cord or meningeal biopsies offer the possibility for dramatic improvements in our ability to detect (or rule out) a wide range of CNS pathogens, with potential benefits in speed, sensitivity, and cost. NGS-based microbiome approaches present a major new opportunity to investigate the potential role of infectious pathogens in the pathogenesis of neuroinflammatory disorders.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document