Tumor response score with neoadjuvant FLOT versus FOLFOX in gastric cancer patients: Results from a United States-based cohort.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16573-e16573
Author(s):  
James Pereira De Andrade ◽  
Hye Seong Ahn ◽  
Joseph Chao ◽  
Laleh Golkar Melstrom ◽  
Isaac Benjamin Paz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Tumor Response ◽  
Tumor Regression ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Pathologic Complete Response ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Poorly Differentiated ◽  
Gastric Cancer Patients

e16573 Background: A recent RCT comparing FLOT and ECF regimens for locally advanced gastric cancer found FLOT to be superior in pathologic complete response (PCR) rates: 16% versus 6%. We evaluated patients who underwent resection after FLOT and FOLFOX in a diverse US population. Methods: Patients diagnosed with gastric adenocarcinoma at a single institution who underwent preoperative chemotherapy either with FLOT or FOLFOX between 2017 and 2019 were evaluated for pathologic response. Results: Fifty-nine patients underwent gastrectomy for adenocarcinoma. Of these, 59% underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy: FLOT 20 patients, FOLFOX 12 patients, ECF 1 patient, other regimen 2 patients. Racial/ethnic background of patients were 20% non-Hispanic white, 23% Hispanic/Latino, 40% Asian, 6% black, and 6% other. Three patients (8.6%) had PCR, two received FLOT and one FOLFOX. Four patients had a near complete response (tumor regression score 1), all of whom received FLOT. In total, 16 of 20 patients who received FLOT had at least a partial response whereas only 5 of 12 patients who received FOLFOX had any tumor response (p = 0.027). Among all patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 66% had poorly differentiated tumors. Only 1 of these patients experiencing a complete or near complete response compared to 50% of patients with non-poorly differentiated tumors (p = 0.001). Conclusions: In an ethnically diverse US population, tumor regression rates were improved with FLOT when compared to FOLFOX. For medically appropriate patients, strong consideration should be given for FLOT in the neoadjuvant setting.

scholarly journals Case Report: Neoadjuvant PD-1 Blockade Plus Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in Unresectable Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer Patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jia Wei ◽  
Xiaofeng Lu ◽  
Qin Liu ◽  
Lin Li ◽  
Song Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Pathologic Complete Response ◽  
Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Programmed Death 1 ◽  
Gastric Cancer Patients

Programmed death 1(PD-1) blockade has shown promising efficacy in advanced gastric cancer. Here, we performed a retrospective analysis of three patients with locally advanced gastric cancer who received adjuvant PD-1 plus chemoradiotherapy as neoadjuvant treatment. Neoadjuvant sintilimab plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy had an acceptable side-effect profile. All three patients underwent surgical gastrectomy after a median of 3.9 months. A major pathological response occurred in two resected tumors and a pathologic complete response was observed in one patient. Our results suggest that PD-1 blockade combined with chemoradiotherapy is a promising strategy as a neoadjuvant therapy in patients with unresectable locally advanced gastric cancer.

Long-term follow-up of advanced gastric cancer patients who achieved a pathologic complete response with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 133-133
Author(s):  
Haruhiko Cho ◽  
Takaki Yoshikawa
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Pathologic Complete Response ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Pathological Response ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Gastric Cancer Patients ◽  
The Impact

133 Background: Adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) after D2 gastrectomy has become a standard treatment for stage 2/3 gastric cancer in Japan and Korea; however, the results remain unsatisfactory due to insufficient risk reduction in patients with stage 3 disease and low compliance. Although the administration of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is a promising approach associated with a high rate of compliance and a downstage effect, the long-term survival benefits of this modality are unclear. Moreover, the impact of the pathological response on survival has not been evaluated. Based on the hypothesis that the pathological response grade is associated with survival, we conducted a search for reports of a pathological complete response (pCR) obtained with NAC. Methods: A total of 27 gastric cancer patients who achieved a pCR following NAC therapy were identified using PubMed and the Japanese medical search engine “Ichu-shi,” with the search words “gastric cancer,” “NAC,” and “pCR.” A questionnaire regarding the patients’ prognoses was posted in 23 institutions in Japan in July 2013. Results: Answers regarding 22 patients were obtained from 20 institutions. The subjects included 13 males and nine females. The mean age was 67.5 years. Tumors with stage 3/4 (95.4%: 21/22) and a diffuse-type histology (61.9%: 13/21) were dominant. S1/CDDP was the most frequently selected NAC regimen. A total of 77.2% (17/22) of the patients required combined resection of adjacent organs, and all patients underwent R0 resection and D2 lymphadenectomy. At present, 86.3% (19/22) of the patients are alive without recurrence; none of the ten patients who received postoperative AC demonstrated any recurrence, while three of twelve patients who did not receive postoperative AC developed recurrence, and two patients died of the disease after surgery (at 71 months and nine months, respectively). The overall and recurrence-free survival rates at three/five years were 95.5%/85.1% and 90.9%/75.1%, respectively. Conclusions: Patients with gastric cancer who achieve a pCR with NAC are rare; however, their prognoses are excellent. It is therefore important to develop a NAC regimen focusing on a high pCR rate.

scholarly journals High expressions of CD10, FAP and GPR77 in CAFs are associated with chemoresistance and worse prognosis in gastric cancer

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yilin Tong ◽  
Zehua Zhao ◽  
Jianjun Zhang ◽  
Wentao Wang ◽  
Yanmei Zhu
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Regression Model ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Tumor Regression ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Predictive Values ◽  
Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Gastric Cancer Patients

Abstract Background As neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) has been successfully introduced in gastric cancer (GC), more biomarkers are needed to evaluate the efficacy. Cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) is associated with chemoresistance and prognosis. Three biomarkers, CD10, fibroblast activation protein-α (FAP) and G-protein-coupled receptor 77 (GPR77), have been proved to express in CAFs. However, their predictive values for efficacy of NCT and prognosis in gastric cancer is unknown. Methods Totally, specimens of 171 locally advanced gastric cancer patients who underwent NCT and D2 radical gastrectomy and matched preoperative biopsy specimens were retrospectively analyzed. Tumor regression grade (TRG) is reevaluated according to Mandard TRG. Expressions of CD10, FAP and GPR77 in CAFs before NCT (pre-) and after NCT (post-) were evaluated by immunohistochemistry. Survival curves on overall survival (OS) were obtained by Kaplan-Meier method, and differences were analyzed by log-rank test. Associations between categorical variables were explored by chi-square test or Fisher's exact method. Univariable and multivariate analyses were performed by logistic regression model and Cox proportional hazard regression model. Results High expressions of post-CD10, post-FAP, post-GPR77 and pre-CD10 were related to worse TRG (all p<0.05). In multivariable analysis, post- and pre-FAP were independent predictive factors to TRG (p<0.010). Post-CD10 (p=0.032) and post-FAP (p=0.013) were related to OS in univariable analysis, but none of biomarkers were independent prognostic factors in multivariable analysis. Conclusions Expressions of CD10, FAP and GPR77 in CAFs were related to chemoresistance and overall survival, and these biomarkers have predictive values for tumor regression and prognosis in locally advanced gastric cancer patients.

scholarly journals Neoadjuvant Docetaxel, Oxaliplatin, Leucovorin, and 5-Fluorouracil (FLOT) Versus S-1 plus Oxaliplatin (SOX) for Patients with Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Birendra Kumar Sah ◽  
Benyan Zhang ◽  
Huan Zhang ◽  
Jian Li ◽  
Fei Yuan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Tumor Regression ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Pathological Response ◽  
Clinicopathological Parameters ◽  
Regression Grading ◽  
Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Significant Difference

AbstractBackgroundDespite growing trends of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer, there is still no consensus of optimal regimens between East and West countries. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel, oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and Leucovorin (FLOT) regimen has shown promising results in terms of pathological response and survival rate. However, S-1 plus oxaliplatin (SOX) is a more favorable chemotherapy regimen in Eastern countries. We conducted this study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of both regimens, and to explore a suitable regimen for Chinese patients.MethodsPatients with locally advanced gastric cancer(LAGC) were 1:1 randomly assigned to receive either 4 cycles of FLOT or 3 cycles of SOX regimen before curative gastrectomy. The primary endpoint was the comparison of complete or sub-total tumor regression grading (TRG1a+ TRG1b) in the primary tumor.ResultsAltogether 74 cases enrolled between August 2018 and March 2020. All 74 randomly assigned cases were considered as intention-to-treat (ITT) population, and the 55 patients who completed the planned chemotherapy plus surgery were considered as per protocol (PP) population. There was no significant difference in pre-treatment clinicopathological parameters between the FLOT and SOX group(p>0.05). There was no significant difference in adverse effects or postoperative morbidity and mortality between two groups (p>0.05). Similarly, there was no significant difference in the proportion of tumor regression grading between the FLOT and SOX group(p>0.05). In the ITT population, complete or sub-total TRG was 20.0 % in FLOT versus 32.4 % in the SOX group (p>0.05).ConclusionsOur study demonstrates that FLOT and SOX regimens are similarly effective for locally advanced gastric cancer patients in terms of clinical downstaging and pathological response. Both regimens were well-tolerated in this study. A large scale phase 3 randomized controlled trial is necessary to validate this result.

Prognostic value of response assessed by RECIST and WHO criteria to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced gastric cancer patients

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15647-e15647
Author(s):  
S. R. Park ◽  
J. S. Lee ◽  
Y. W. Kim ◽  
I. J. Choi ◽  
K. W. Ryu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Tumor Size ◽  
Tumor Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Who Criteria ◽  
Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Response To Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

e15647 Background: In metastatic gastric cancer, the response to chemotherapy is assessed by RECIST or WHO criteria according to the change of tumor size. There are no data, however, on the usefulness of those criteria in evaluating tumor response in the setting of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy-as assessed by RECIST and WHO criteria-and clinical outcome in locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) patients. Methods: This study recruited LAGC patients who, from January 2003 through November 2005, entered the neoadjuvant arm of prospective randomized phase II trials comparing neoadjuvant chemotherapy to adjuvant chemotherapy. LAGC was defined as stage III or IV (M0) disease based on computed tomography (CT) according to the Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma. Patients with measurable lesions received 3 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy consisting of docetaxel (36 mg/m2) and cisplatin (40 mg/m2) on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks, followed by surgery. Results: After chemotherapy, 40 (95%) patients underwent surgery and the remaining 2 patients showed new distant metastasis on CT scan. Thirty-five (83%) patients had curative R0 resection. Twenty-eight (67%) patients had a clinical response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy according to RECIST/WHO criteria. Although R0 resection rate (93% vs 64%, P = 0.03), median relapse-free survival (RFS) (43.2 vs 7.5 months, P = 0.14), and overall survival (OS) (not reached vs 27.0 months, P = 0.10) were better in responders than non-responders, they did not differ significantly in the subgroup that subsequently underwent surgery. When we redefined the decrease in tumor size judged as a response by RECIST (≥60% rather than ≥30%) and WHO (≥75% rather than ≥50%) criteria, response correlated significantly with both RFS (P = 0.03) and OS (P = 0.02). Conclusions: In the neoadjuvant setting, which frequently involves smaller measurable lesions than the metastatic setting, larger changes in tumor size than those specified by RECIST and WHO criteria are needed to predict postoperative outcome. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document