A phase II study of durvalumab (MEDI4736) (anti-PD-L1) and trametinib (MEKi) in microsatellite stable (MSS) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 152-152
Author(s):  
Benny Johnson ◽  
Jane V Thomas ◽  
Arvind Dasari ◽  
Kanwal Pratap Singh Raghav ◽  
Eduardo Vilar Sanchez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Blockade ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Stage Design ◽  
Entire Cohort ◽  
Second Stage ◽  
Acneiform Rash ◽  
Efficacy Criteria ◽  
Clinical Trial Information

152 Background: Monotherapy with immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) is ineffective for patients (pts) with MSS mCRC. Novel approaches to modulate the tumor microenvironment (TME) are needed. Here, we investigate whether the combination of trametinib (T) with durvalumab (D) can alter the immune TME by successfully priming and activating T-cells. Methods: An open-label, single center phase II trial with primary endpoint of immune-related response rate for T+D in refractory MSS mCRC pts (NCT03428126). T is 2mg/day orally starting 1 week prior to D, which is given 1500mg intravenously every 4 weeks. Dose de-escalation strategy performed to identify maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Simon 2-stage design utilized with plans to enroll 29 pts into the first stage, requiring response in 2 or more pts to proceed to stage 2 (n = 15). Results: Demographics for 29 treated pts: 48% female, median age 48 years (range 28-75), and median prior therapies was 2 (range 1-5). No grade (G) 4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAE). The most common G3 TRAE included autoimmune hepatitis (14%) and acneiform rash (10%). G1/2 TRAE included acneiform rash (69%), fatigue (24%) and anemia (21%). No fatal TRAE and 4 pts discontinued treatment due to TRAE. 1 of 29 pts had confirmed partial response (PR) lasting 9.3 months (mo) for an ORR of 3.4%. This pt had an ATM E221fs*14 mutation. 7 pts had stable disease (SD) with median time to progression (TTP) of 5.4 mo (range 3.9-9.3 mo). 1 pt remains on active therapy with SD ( > 10 mo). 5 pts (1 PR, 4 SD) demonstrated decrease in total CEA ng/mL (best percentage reduction: 94%, 95%, 42%, 34% and 21.6% respectively). Median TTP for the entire cohort was 3.2 mo (range 1.1-9.3 mo). Consensus molecular subtypes (CMS) were performed on the primary CRC in 23 pts: 12 CMS2, 2 CMS3, and 9 CMS4. 4 SD pts were CMS2, 1 SD pt was CMS4 and the CMS status of the pt with a PR was unknown. Conclusions: The combination of T+D did not meet efficacy criteria to proceed to the second stage of the study. Analysis of 15 paired on-treatment biopsies is ongoing and will be presented. Utilization of CMS characterization in mCRC clinical trials is feasible and may provide an improved biological understanding of treatment activity. Clinical trial information: NCT03428126.

A multi-center phase II study of nivolumab +/- ipilimumab for patients with metastatic sarcoma (Alliance A091401).

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 11007-11007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandra P. D'Angelo ◽  
Michelle R. Mahoney ◽  
Brian Andrew Van Tine ◽  
James N Atkins ◽  
Mohammed M. Milhem ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Progressive Disease ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Efficacy Criteria ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Favorable Safety ◽  
Metastatic Sarcoma ◽  
Clinical Trial Information

11007 Background: Patients (pts) with metastatic sarcoma (SAR) have limited options. Nivolumab(N), a fully human anti-PD-1 mAb and ipilimumab (I), a humanized anti-CTLA-4 mAb, have favorable safety & efficacy in other tumors. Pembrolizumab demonstrated a response rate (RR) of 12% in SAR pts. We evaluated N, independently from N+I, in SAR pts. Methods: This open-label multi-center phase II study enrolled pts failing prior regimens. Randomized (non-comparative) pts received either N3 [N (3 mg/kg q2W)] or N3+I1 [N(3 mg/kg Q3W x4, then Q2W) & [I(1 mg/kg q3W x4)]. Treatment continued beyond progressive disease (PD) in 1st12 weeks. 5 confirmed responses in 38 evaluable pts yielded 90% power (0.05 1-sided alpha) to detect a 20% (vs 5%) confirmed RR. Other endpoints: adverse events (AEs), progression-free, overall survival (PFS, OS), and correlative studies including PD-L1 expression by IHC, mutational burden/neoantigen analysis, TCR clonality and TIL characterization. Results: 85 pts (43 - N3; 42 - N3+I1) were enrolled [mean age 54 yrs (21–81), 52% female). No significant differences in histological subtypes across cohorts: 36% LMS, 4% LPS, 10% UPS/MFH, 6% synovial, 5% bone, 5% Ewing’s, and 34% other. Pts were refractory to 1(20%), 2(22%), and ≥3 (58%) regimens. Grade 3-4 treatment related adverse events (TRAE) occurred in 7% (N3) and 14% (N3+I1) and 0 Gr 5 TRAEs. 8% of pts stopped due to AEs (2% N3, 14% N3+I1). 2/3 confirmed responses on N3, with 2 ongoing (range 1.1-3.2 months). 6/7 confirmed responses (2 complete) on N3+N1, with 5 ongoing (range 6-13 months). Responses occurred in 7 histologies. See Table for pt outcomes. Conclusions: N + I showed acceptable safety and encouraging antitumor activity with most responses ongoing across multiple SAR histologies, passing efficacy criteria. There was minimal activity observed with N alone. Increased TRAEs were observed in N3+I1. Correlative analyses ongoing. NCT02500797. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882, Conquer Cancer Foundation, BMS. Clinical trial information: NCT02500797. [Table: see text]

A phase II study of sunitinib in recurrent or metastatic endometrial carcinoma: A trial of the PMH Phase II Consortium

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5576-5576
Author(s):  
S. Welch ◽  
H. J. Mackay ◽  
H. Hirte ◽  
G. F. Fleming ◽  
R. Morgan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Second Stage ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Ecog Ps

5576 Background: Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynecologic malignancy. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) overexpression in EC correlates with poor outcome, thus targeting VEGF is a rational therapeutic approach. We have conducted a two-stage open-label phase II study in advanced EC with sunitinib, an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor of multiple VEGF receptors. Methods: Eligible pts have recurrent or metastatic EC and have received up to 1 prior chemotherapy (CT) regimen for metastatic disease. Sunitinib is given at 50 mg daily (OD) for 4 consecutive weeks (wks) followed by 2 wks off. Dose could be reduced to 37.5 mg OD and then 25 mg OD in the setting of toxicity. Imaging is repeated every 12 wks. Primary objectives are objective response rate (ORR by RECIST) and rate of 6-month progression-free survival (PFS). If 1 or more responses occur in the first 15 evaluable pts, the study would continue to a second stage (total = 30 pts). Secondary objectives are time to progression (TTP), overall survival (OS), and safety. Results: We report the results of the first stage of this study. Sixteen pts have been treated (median age: 63; range 41–74) with 37 cycles of sunitinib (median 2; range: 1–7). Baseline ECOG PS was 0 (7 pts), 1 (8 pts), or 2 (1 pt). Histology was endometrioid (7 pts), serous (5 pts), clear cell (1 pt), or mixed/other (3 pts). Most pts had high-grade histology (G3: 8; G2: 4; G1: 2; GX: 2). Nine pts had prior adjuvant CT, 8 pts had 1 prior CT for advanced EC, 4 pts had prior hormones and 7 pts had prior radiotherapy. Partial response was achieved by 2 pts (ORR = 12.5%), and 2 other pts had a best response of stable disease; 3 of these pts remained progression-free > 6 months. Median TTP = 2.5 months (95% CI: 2.47-NR), and median OS = 6.2 months (95% CI: 5.1-NR). Grade 3/4 adverse events (AE) in >10% of pts were fatigue (7 pts, 44%) and hypertension (5 pts, 31%). Dose reduction was required for 11 of 16 pts (69%). Two pts were inevaluable after receiving <2 cycles due to AE (grade 4 hyponatremia; grade 3 fatigue) and 1 other pt has yet to complete 2 cycles. Conclusions: Sunitinib shows preliminary activity in EC. This trial will proceed to a second stage of accrual to further explore the efficacy and safety of sunitinib in advanced EC. [Table: see text]

An open-label multicenter phase II study of bevacizumab for the treatment of angiosarcoma

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10522-10522 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Agulnik ◽  
S. H. Okuno ◽  
M. Von Mehren ◽  
B. Jovanovic ◽  
B. Brockstein ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Event ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Antiangiogenic Agents ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Antitumor Effects ◽  
Stage Design ◽  
Dismal Prognosis ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Unacceptable Toxicity

10522 Background: The limited therapeutic options and dismal prognosis for patients (pts) with angiosarcomas (AS) provide a strong rationale for the evaluation of new therapies. Preclinical studies in AS tumor models have shown antitumor effects of antiangiogenic agents. We conducted a phase II study to determine the antitumor effect of bevacizumab in AS. Methods: The study was a two-stage design in which patients with newly diagnosed or relapsed/refractory AS and epithelioid hemangioendotheliomas were treated with bevacizumab 15 mg/kg IV every 3 weeks. Treatment was continued until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Response was assessed by RECIST criteria. Results: To date, of 29 pts enrolled, 28 received treatment. Baseline data on 29 pts are: M:F= 12:17 and median age 62 (range 18–94). Three pts are not evaluable (1 too early, 2 full treatment not given). Among 26 pts evaluable for response so far: 3 have PR (range 3–16 cycles), 13 have SD (3–32 cycles) and 10 have PD. ORR 3/26 (12%). After 141 cycles of therapy, only 1 grade 4 adverse event occurred (thrombocytopenia) and 5 patients experienced a grade 3 adverse event (anemia, pleural effusion, congestive heart failure, pain, headache, and nausea). Conclusions: Bevacizumab monotherapy for AS resulted in a response rate of 12% and tumor stabilization achieved by 62% of pts. Further studies with bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy should be explored in this disease. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

A phase II therapeutic, open label, multi-center clinical trial of NPC-1C, a chimeric monoclonal antibody(mAb), in adults with chemotherapy refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), initial results.

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 500-500
Author(s):  
Richard D. Kim ◽  
Nilofer Saba Azad ◽  
Michael Morse ◽  
Benjamin R. Tan ◽  
Elizabeth Poplin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Survival Data ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Significance Level ◽  
Initial Results

500 Background: NEO-102 is a novel chimeric mAb targeting a variant of MUC5AC with specificity to colorectal cancer. Its mechanism of action is through antibody dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC). An earlier, phase I study, established the maximum tolerated dose at 3.0 mg/kg IV every 2 weeks with encouraging early signs of clinical activity. We report initial results of the subsequent phase II study. Methods: This is a single arm, open label multi-center clinical trial of NEO-102 in adults with mCRC pts who failed at least two lines of standard chemotherapy (C). An immunohistochemistry (IHC) based companion diagnostic assay was used to select eligible pts whose tumors express the target in > 20% of tumor cells. NEO-102 at 3.0 mg/kg IV was administered q 2 weeks until disease progression. The primary endpoint was OS. A minimum of 43 pts were needed assuming that treatment with NEO-102 will improve OS by 40% (7.0 months) using a one-sided significance level of 10% and 80% power for this study compared to historical control of 5 months. Additional objectives were to evaluate response rate as measured by RECIST criteria and analyze patient PBMCs for ADCC and immune cytokine profiling. Results: A total of 47 pts enrolled were evaluable. 26 pts were male and 35 pts were white. Twenty-four out of 47 pts (51%) remain alive as of September 2015 with an ongoing median OS of 7.0 months (Range 2-22 months). Of these heavily pre-treated pts, 42 were evaluable for response, 13 (31%) demonstrated stable disease by RECIST. Seven pts had more than 4 doses of treatment, maximum 13 doses. Grade 3 adverse events were anemia 1/47 (2%), hyperbilirubinemia 1/47 (2%), diarrhea 1/47 (2%), fatigue 1/47 (2%), headache 1/47 (2%), nausea 1/47 (2%) and vomiting 1/47 (2%). No grade 4 toxicities were reported. Conclusions: In the monotherapy phase 2 study of NEO 102 in patients with refractory mCRC preliminary results demonstrate excellent tolerability and encouraging OS. Updated OS and Progression Free Survival data will be presented at the ASCO 2016 GI Cancers symposium. Additional combination trials with NEO-102 and C are underway. Clinical trial information: NCT01040000.

Activity and safety of Nab-FOLFIRI and Nab-FOLFOX as first-line treatment for metastatic pancreatic cancer (phase II NabucCO study).

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 351-351 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elisa Giommoni ◽  
Evaristo Maiello ◽  
Vanja Vaccaro ◽  
Ermanno Rondini ◽  
Caterina Vivaldi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Dose Finding ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
First Line ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Grade 3

351 Background: FOLFIRINOX is an approved regimen for metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC). We performed a modification in FOLFIRINOX schedule, using nab-paclitaxel (nab-p) to obtain two regimens that could be as effective and less toxic than the original triplet. NabucCO study was a randomized phase II trial to assess activity and toxicity of nab-p instead of either oxaliplatin (Nab-FOLFIRI) or irinotecan (Nab-FOLFOX) in first line setting. Previous dose–finding NabucCO study defined that maximum tolerated dose of nab-p with FOLFIRI is 120 mg/m2, and with FOLFOX is 160 mg/m2. Methods: The study was a 1:1 parallel arm, open label, not comparative one to assess overall response rate (ORR) of Nab-FOLFIRI and Nab-FOLFOX as primary end-point. Patients (pts) with PS 0-1, untreated for mPC were randomized to receive leucovorin 400 mg/m2, 5FU bolus 400 mg/m2, 5FU 48h ci 2400 mg/m2, irinotecan 180 mg/m2 plus nab-p 120 mg/m2 (arm A) or leucovorin 400 mg/m2, 5FU bolus 400 mg/m2, 5FU 48h ci 2400 mg/m2 and oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 iv plus nab-p 160 mg/m2 (arm B) every 2 weeks for up to 12 cycles. Secondary end points were clinical benefit rate (CBR), progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Results: From November 2015 to January 2017, 84 pts were treated (42 for each arm). Median age was 60 years (29-65) in arm A and 64 years (47-64) in arm B. The ORR was 31 % for both schedules, with a CBR of 69% and 71%, respectively. At a median follow-up of 11.4 months for arm A and 14.5 months for arm B (censored on august, 31th 2017), 1-year survival is 41% and 50%, respectively. For Nab-FOLFIRI PFS and mOS were 6 months (90% CI: 4.9-8.0) and 13.2 months (90% CI: 8.3-14.8), while in Nab-FOLFOX were 5.6 months (90% CI:4.9-7.2) and 10.8 months (90% CI: 8.4-12.8). Grade ≥3 toxicities in arm A were neutropenia (19%) and febrile neutropenia (12%). In arm B, main grade ≥3 toxicities were neutropenia (29%), fatigue (14%), peripheral neuropathy (7%). No toxic death were registered. Conclusions: Nab-FOLFIRI and Nab–FOLFOX demonstrated a similar activity to FOLFIRINOX, with better safety profile in terms of neutropenia, fatigue and neuropathy. These results could justify a future phase III evaluation. Clinical trial information: NCT02109341.

TPExtreme randomized trial: TPEx versus Extreme regimen in 1st line recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6002-6002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joel Guigay ◽  
Jerome Fayette ◽  
Ricard Mesia ◽  
Cedrik Lafond ◽  
Esma Saada-Bouzid ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Trial ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Locoregional Treatment ◽  
Significance Level ◽  
Hpv Dna ◽  
Open Label Trial ◽  
Clinical Trial Information

6002 Background: After promising results from the GORTEC TPEx phase II trial, the role of taxane instead of 5FU in 1st-line R/M HNSCC chemotherapy (CT) remained to be confirmed by comparing TPEx to the reference EXTREME regimen. Methods: Randomized (1:1), open-label trial. Main inclusion criteria were R/M HNSCC not suitable for locoregional treatment, age 18-70 years, PS <2, creatinine clearance >60ml/min, prior cisplatin <300 mg/m². Reference EXTREME regimen (arm A: 6 cycles every 3 weeks (Q3W) of 5FU–cisplatin-cetuximab (cetux) followed by weekly cetux maintenance) was compared to TPEx regimen (arm B: 4 cycles Q3W of docetaxel 75mg/m²–cisplatin 75mg/m²- cetux 250mg/m² with mandatory G-CSF support followed by every 2W cetux 500mg/m² maintenance). The primary endpoint was Overall Survival (OS). To detect a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.72 (median OS increase from 10.1 to 14.0 months (mo) with 88% power, 2-sided significance level of 0.05, 374 deaths were required. 540 patients (pts) were planned to enroll. Results: 539 pts were enrolled in 37 mo. Median age was 60 years, 93% were smokers, 40% had oropharyngeal tumor (p16 or HPV DNA was done in 85%, positive in 28%). In arm A, 44% of pts received all CT cycles vs 72% in arm B. Delays in administration were more frequent in arm A (27% vs 10%). Cisplatin was more frequently switched to carboplatin in arm A (34% vs 9%). Toxicity was lower in arm B: 34% pts had grade ≥4 adverse events during CT in arm B vs 50% in arm A (p<0.001). Less pts in arm A started maintenance than in arm B (53% vs 73%). At time of analysis, the median follow-up duration was 30 mo and 406 pts had died. OS was not significantly different between arms: HR=0.87 (95%CI: 0.71-1.05), p=0.15. Median OS was 13.4 mo in arm A vs 14.5 in arm B. 2-year OS rate was 21.0% in arm A vs 28.6% in arm B. Conclusions: This large randomized trial confirmed the encouraging survival results of the TPEx regimen observed in the first phase II. OS in both arms was higher than observed in previous randomized CT or immunotherapy combination trials. Despite lack of significant OS increase, taxane based TPEx regimen appears to be a new option in 1st line R/M HNSCC, with a shorter time on CT and significantly lower toxicity than the EXTREME regimen. Clinical trial information: NCT02268695.

Combination of bemcentinib (BGB324): A first-in-class selective oral AXL inhibitor, with pembrolizumab in patients with triple negative breast cancer and adenocarcinoma of the lung.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (5_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS43-TPS43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Murray Yule ◽  
Kjersti Davidsen ◽  
Magnus Bloe ◽  
Linn Hodneland ◽  
Agnete Engelsen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Immune Escape ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Cell Activity ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Blockade ◽  
Mammary Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Tumour Immunity ◽  
Adenocarcinoma Of The Lung ◽  
Phase Ii Studies

TPS43 Background: Activation of the receptor tyrosine kinase AXL has a profound suppressive effect on the innate immune system. AXL is overexpressed on multiple cell types in the tumour immune microenvironment including dendritic cells, NK cells and tumour-associated macrophages. AXL signalling in immune cells supports tumour immune escape by downregulating dendritic cell activity, modulating efferocytosis as well as favouring an immunosuppressive chemokine profile and M-MDSC expansion. AXL is prevalent in tumours resistant to anti-PD-1 therapy (Hugo, 2016). Axl expression in tumour cells confers resistance to effector T cell cytotoxicity. Bemcentinib (BGB324) is a first-in-class, highly selective and orally bioavailable small molecule AXL inhibitor in phase II clinical development. In pre-clinical models of pancreas, breast and lung cancer, inhibition of AXL signalling with bemcentinib reversed multiple tumour immune suppressive mechanisms as evidenced by increased infiltration of cytotoxic T lymphocytes, NK and NKT cells and decreased infiltration of M-MDSCs (Wnuk-Lipinska, 2017). Bemcentinib enhanced the effect of immune checkpoint blockade via PD-1 or CTLA-4 in lung and mammary adenocarcinoma mouse models and achieved sustained tumour immunity. Methods: BGBC007 (NCT03184558) and BGBC008 (NCT03184571) are open-label, phase II studies designed to assess the anti-tumour activity of bemcentinib in combination with pembrolizumab in patients with previously treated TNBC and adenocarcinoma of the lung respectively. All patients will be treated with bemcentinib in combination with pembrolizumab continuously for up to two years. The primary endpoint is objective response rate, secondary endpoints include duration of response, progression free survival according to RECIST 1.1, pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerability. Pretreatment tumour specimens are scheduled to assess AXL expression/signalling and PD-L1 expression; the levels of circulating immune-related cytokines and soluble AXL receptor will also be measured in longitudinal patient plasma samples. Both studies are open to recruitment. Clinical trial information: NCT03184558.

scholarly journals Phase I and Pharmacokinetic Study of Cetuximab and Irinotecan in Children With Refractory Solid Tumors: A Study of the Pediatric Oncology Experimental Therapeutic Investigators' Consortium

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (30) ◽  
pp. 5102-5108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tanya M. Trippett ◽  
Cynthia Herzog ◽  
James A. Whitlock ◽  
Johannes Wolff ◽  
John Kuttesch ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Children And Adolescents ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Cns Tumors ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Patients Âgés ◽  
Open Label Phase ◽  
Recommended Phase Ii Dose

Purpose To determine the dose of cetuximab that can be safely combined with irinotecan for treatment of pediatric and adolescent patients with refractory solid tumors. Patients and Methods This open-label, phase I study enrolled patients ages 1 to 18 years with advanced refractory solid tumors, including tumors of the CNS. Patient cohorts by age group (children, ages 1 to 12 years; adolescents, ages 13 to 18 years) received escalating weekly doses of cetuximab (75, 150, 250 mg/m2) in a 3 + 3 design, plus irinotecan (16 or 20 mg/m2/d) for 5 days for 2 consecutive weeks every 21 days. The primary end points were establishing the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), recommended phase II dose (RPIID), and pharmacokinetics of the combination. Preliminary safety and efficacy data were also collected. Results Twenty-seven children and 19 adolescents received a median of 7.1 and 6.0 weeks of cetuximab therapy, respectively. Cetuximab 250 mg/m2 weekly plus irinotecan 16 mg/m2/d (pediatric) or 20 mg/m2/d (adolescent) have been established as the MTD/RPIID. Dose-limiting toxicities included diarrhea and neutropenia. Mild to moderate (grade 1 to 2) acneiform rash occurred in a majority of patients; no grade 3 to 4 rashes were observed. Cetuximab demonstrated dose-dependent clearance in both children and adolescents, similar to that in adults. There were two confirmed partial responses, both in patients with CNS tumors. Stable disease was achieved in 18 patients overall, including 10 patients with CNS tumors (38.5%). Conclusion The cetuximab/irinotecan combination can be given safely to children and adolescents with cancer. Promising activity, particularly in CNS tumors, warrants phase II evaluation of this regimen.

Phase I evaluation of tipifarnib in combination with low-dose Ara-C (LDAC) in high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) or acute myeloid leukemia (AML): Interim results

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 14014-14014
Author(s):  
J. E. Cortes ◽  
E. J. Feldman ◽  
D. Douer ◽  
A. Raza ◽  
S. Fruchtman
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Dose Finding ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Entire Cohort ◽  
Investigational Agent

14014 Background: Tipifarnib (T) is a farnesyltransferase inhibitor with clinical activity in MDS and AML. LDAC has utility in the elderly with MDS/AML; hence its use in combination with the investigational agent T to improve outcomes is warranted. Methods: The primary objective of this ongoing phase I, dose finding, multicenter, open-label study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) based on dose limiting toxicities (DLT) of T+LDAC observed during the first 28 day cycle. MDS (IPSS Int 1, 2 or High) and untreated AML pts (age =75y or =65y with preceding MDS) or relapsed/refractory AML (age >18y) were included. Planned sample size was up to 57 pts with a traditional 3+3 dose escalation and a minimum of 3 pts enrolled per cohort. T (Dose Level 0) was administered initially at 200mg PO BID x 21 days in combination with LDAC 10mg SC BID x 10 days; both repeated every 28 days. Efficacy will be assessed by bone marrow and peripheral blood count studies. Results: 15 pts have been enrolled to date: 2 MDS (Int 1 n=1, High n=1) and 13 AML (7/13 pts with no previous therapy); all 15 pts were evaluable. Mean baseline characteristics for the entire cohort were: age 76.2y, 67% men, Hb 9.4 ± 0.9 g/dL, WBC 8.7 ± 11.3 x 103/μL, platelets 96.8 ± 96.6 x 103/μL. The observed DLT for T+LDAC was generalized rash seen at Dose Level 3. The MTD was therefore determined to be T 300mg and LDAC 15mg. The most common grade 3/4 adverse events were neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, and rash. Conclusions: These interim findings show the combination of T at 300mg PO BID x 21 days and LDAC at 15mg SC BID x 10 days to be the MTD in this study. Assessment for efficacy is ongoing. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.

A phase Ib study of the MEK inhibitor GSK1120212 combined with gemcitabine in patients with solid tumors: Interim results.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 278-278 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. W. Tolcher ◽  
J. C. Bendell ◽  
A. Patnaik ◽  
K. Papadopoulos ◽  
K. M. Bellew ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Febrile Neutropenia ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Mek Inhibitor ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Serious Adverse Events

278 Background: GSK1120212 (212) is a reversible, allosteric inhibitor of MEK1/MEK2. The objectives of this open-label, single-arm study are to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and anti-tumor activity of 212 + gemcitabine (gem), and to determine the recommended phase II regimen (RP2R) in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors. Methods: 212 (1-2.5mg) is given continuously, orally, once daily. Gem (1,000mg/m2) is infused on days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days. Doses are escalated to the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and followed by an expansion cohort to confirm the RP2R tolerability. Results: 28 pts received ≥ 1 dose of 212 + gem, including 8 pancreatic, 6 breast, and 4 non-small cell lung (NSCLC) cancer pts. The MTD and RP2R is 2mg 212 + 1,000mg/m2 gem. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) are G3/G4 febrile neutropenia (n=2), G3 AST elevation (n=2), and G2 uveitis (n=1). 16 serious adverse events (SAEs) were reported; 5 were considered to be related to study drugs (1 pneumonitis, 3 febrile neutropenia, 1 dyspnea). All DLTs and SAEs have resolved. The most common AEs at the RP2R (n=18) were rash (78%), fatigue (67%), thrombocytopenia (61%), neutropenia (50%), decreased appetite (50%), nausea (44%), diarrhea and constipation (39%); all ≤ G2 except thrombocytopenia (17% ≥ G3) and neutropenia (33% ≥ G3). Co-administration did not affect the PK profiles of 212 or gem. 25 pts had measurable disease at baseline. 1 pancreatic cancer pt with previous radiotherapy and 2 cycles of gem achieved a partial response and stayed on study for 6 months. 3 additional pancreatic cancer pts reported stable disease; 2 of which were on the study for 3.5-5 months and the third pt continues in the study. 1 triple-negative breast cancer pt, refractory to chemotherapy, and 1 parotid cancer pt experienced a complete response of their target lesions. Conclusions: 212 + gem is tolerable with an acceptable safety profile in this pt population, with evidence of clinical activity in pancreatic cancer. A randomized phase II study in previously untreated patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer is underway to investigate the clinical activity of this combination. [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document