A randomized phase III post-operative trial of platinum-based chemotherapy (P) versus capecitabine (C) in patients (pts) with residual triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC): ECOG-ACRIN EA1131

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 605-605
Author(s):  
Ingrid A. Mayer ◽  
Fengmin Zhao ◽  
Carlos L. Arteaga ◽  
William Fraser Symmans ◽  
Ben Ho Park ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Clinical Stage ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Invasive Disease ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Primary Analysis ◽  
Surgical Specimen ◽  
Basal Subtype ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Patient Reported

605 Background: Pts with TNBC who have residual invasive disease (RD) after completion of NAC have a very high risk for recurrence, which is reduced by adjuvant capecitabine (C). Pre-clinical models support the use of platinum agents (P) in the TNBC basal subtype. EA1131 tested the hypothesis that invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) would not be inferior but improved in pts with basal subtype TNBC after NAC with the adjuvant use of a P instead of C (primary objective). Methods: Pts with clinical stage II/III TNBC post neoadjuvant taxane +/- anthracycline-based chemotherapy with at least 1 cm RD in the surgical specimen were randomized (1:1) to receive P (carboplatin or cisplatin once every 3 weeks for 4 cycles) or C (14/7d every 3 weeks for 6 cycles). TNBC subtype (basal vs. non-basal) was analyzed in the surgical specimen by PAM50. A non-inferiority design (non-inferiority margin of hazard ratio [HR] of 1.154) with superiority alternative (alternative HR of 0.754) was chosen, assuming a 4-year iDFS of 67% for the C arm. Non-inferiority was tested first. If non-inferiority was shown, a formal test for superiority of P compared to C would be conducted. Results: 401 participants were randomized to P or C between 2015 and 2020 (recruitment goal, 775), 310 (77%) had TNBC basal subtype disease (primary analysis population). Pts’ median age was 52 years, 71% were White and 19% Black. At diagnosis, most tumors were high grade (78%), T2 (59%), 47% N0, and 40% N1. Residual tumors were 37% ypT1, 44% ypT2, and 47% ypN0. Overall incidence of any toxicity was similar (83% with P, 80% with C), but grade 3 and 4 toxicities (no grade 5) were more common with P (25% vs 15%). After median follow-up of 18 months, 113 iDFS events (58% of full information) had occurred. 3-year iDFS for P arm was 40% (95%CI, 29%-51%) and 44% (95%CI, 32%-55%) for C arm. The HR for arms P/C was 1.09 (95% Repeated Confidence Interval, 0.62-1.90) and the probability of eventually rejecting the null of inferiority (i.e., conditional power) was 6%. The Data Safety and Monitoring Committee recommended stopping the trial at the 5th interim analysis in March 2021 since it was unlikely that the trial would be able to show non-inferiority or superiority of the P arm. Conclusions: Participants with TNBC with RD after NAC had a lower than expected 3-year iDFS regardless of study treatment. Available data show that it is very unlikely that the study would be able to establish non-inferiority of P to C. In addition, severe toxicities were more common with P. In pts with TNBC, particularly basal subtype, with at least 1 cm RD after NAC and high-risk of recurrence, adjuvant P use does not improve outcomes. Correlative analyses of RD tissue (NGS), circulating markers (ctDNA and CTC pre/post treatment), and patient-reported outcomes (PRO) questionnaires will now occur. Clinical trial information: NCT02445391.

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) from KATHERINE: A phase III study of adjuvant trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) versus trastuzumab (H) in patients (pts) with residual invasive disease after neoadjuvant therapy for HER2-positive breast cancer.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 513-513 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Schneeweiss ◽  
Sibylle Loibl ◽  
Eleftherios P. Mamounas ◽  
Gunter von Minckwitz ◽  
Max S. Mano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Therapy ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Invasive Disease ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Life Questionnaire ◽  
Meaningful Change ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Adjuvant Trastuzumab ◽  
Patient Reported

513 Background: The phase 3 KATHERINE (NCT01772472) study, met its primary endpoint by demonstrating significantly improved invasive disease-free survival with adjuvant T-DM1 compared to H in pts with residual invasive disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus HER2-targeted therapy. PROs are reported here. Methods: Eligible pts had HER2-positive early breast cancer, received taxane- and H-containing neoadjuvant therapy (with/without anthracyclines) followed by surgery, and had residual invasive disease in the breast and/or axillary nodes. Pts were randomized to 14 cycles of adjuvant T-DM1 (3.6 mg/kg IV q3w) or H (6 mg/kg IV q3w) and adjuvant endocrine and radiation therapy per standard of care. The EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire–Core 30 (QLQ-C30) and QLQ–Breast Cancer (QLQ-BR23) were completed at screening, at day 1 of cycles 5 and 11, within 30 days after study drug completion, and at 6 and 12 months’ follow-up. Results: Of 1,486 pts randomized (T-DM1, n = 743; H, n = 743), 612 (82%) and 640 (86%), respectively, had valid baseline and ≥1 post-baseline PRO assessments. During the study, pts in both arms had similar mean scores on the QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BR23 function and symptom scales. There was no clinically meaningful change (≥10 points) from baseline in the mean scores in either arm, including on symptoms similar to AEs seen with T-DM1 (eg, fatigue). While more pts in the T-DM1 arm reported clinically meaningful deterioration in role functioning (49% vs 41%), appetite loss (38% vs 28%), constipation (47% vs 38%), fatigue (66% vs 61%), nausea/vomiting (39% vs. 30%), and systemic therapy side effects (49% vs 36%) at ≥1 assessment, the proportion reporting clinically meaningful change in functioning was similar between arms at any given assessment. Conclusions: Mean scores showed only small deterioration from baseline in patient-reported treatment-related symptoms in both study arms. While more pts in the T-DM1 arm reported deterioration at some point in several symptoms, baseline global health status and functioning were generally maintained in both arms over the treatment course. Clinical trial information: NCT01772472.

Primary analysis of KAITLIN: A phase III study of trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) + pertuzumab versus trastuzumab + pertuzumab + taxane, after anthracyclines as adjuvant therapy for high-risk HER2-positive early breast cancer (EBC).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 500-500 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nadia Harbeck ◽  
Seock-Ah Im ◽  
Carlos H. Barrios ◽  
Herve R. Bonnefoi ◽  
Julie Gralow ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
High Risk Population ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Primary Endpoints ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Patient Reported

500 Background: The standard of care for HER2-positive EBC is chemotherapy plus one year of HER2-directed therapy. However, recurrence—particularly in high-risk populations—remains a problem, as does systemic chemotherapy-associated toxicity. In KAITLIN, we aimed to improve efficacy and reduce toxicity by replacing taxanes and trastuzumab with T-DM1. Methods: KAITLIN (NCT01966471) is a phase 3, randomized, open-label study that enrolled 1846 patients with adequately excised, centrally confirmed HER2-positive EBC either node-positive (LN+); or node-negative, HR-negative, and tumor size > 2.0 cm. Within 9 weeks of surgery, patients were randomized 1:1 to 3-4 cycles of anthracycline-based chemotherapy followed by 18 cycles of T-DM1 3.6 mg/kg + pertuzumab 420 mg q3w (loading dose [LD] 840 mg) (AC-KP) or taxane (3-4 cycles) + concurrent trastuzumab 6 mg/kg (LD 8 mg/kg) + pertuzumab 420 mg q3w (LD 840 mg) (AC-THP). Patients were stratified by world region, nodal status, HR status, and anthracycline type. Adjuvant radiotherapy and/or endocrine therapy was administered after 4 cycles of HER2-targeted therapy when indicated. The co-primary endpoints were invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) in the LN+ and in the ITT populations applying a hierarchical testing procedure. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and safety. Results: KAITLIN did not meet its co-primary endpoints. In LN+ patients (n = 1658), there was no significant difference between arms in IDFS event risk (stratified hazard ratio = 0.97; 95%CI 0.71–1.32). Three-year IDFS was 94.1% with AC-THP and 92.7% with AC-KP. Results were similar in the ITT population (stratified hazard ratio = 0.98; 95%CI 0.72–1.32; 3-year IDFS: 94.2% vs 93.1%). OS data are immature with an event rate of ~4%–5% in each arm. During the study overall, there was a similar incidence of grade ≥3 AEs (55.4% vs 51.8%) and SAEs (23.3% vs 21.4%) with AC-THP and AC-KP, respectively. More patients receiving AC-KP than AC-THP discontinued T-DM1 or trastuzumab, respectively, because of AEs (26.8% vs 4.0%). PRO data will be presented. Conclusions: Replacing adjuvant taxane and trastuzumab with T-DM1 did not result in significantly improved efficacy or overall safety. Nonetheless, in this high-risk population, a favorable IDFS outcome was achieved in both study arms. HP + chemotherapy remains the standard of care for patients with high-risk HER2-positive EBC. Clinical trial information: NCT01966471 .

scholarly journals Randomized Phase III Postoperative Trial of Platinum-Based Chemotherapy Versus Capecitabine in Patients With Residual Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: ECOG-ACRIN EA1131

2021 ◽  
pp. JCO.21.00976
Author(s):  
Ingrid A. Mayer ◽  
Fengmin Zhao ◽  
Carlos L. Arteaga ◽  
William F. Symmans ◽  
Ben H. Park ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Invasive Disease ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Basal Subtype ◽  
Platinum Agents

PURPOSE Patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and residual invasive disease (RD) after completion of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) have a high-risk for recurrence, which is reduced by adjuvant capecitabine. Preclinical models support the use of platinum agents in the TNBC basal subtype. The EA1131 trial hypothesized that invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) would not be inferior but improved in patients with basal subtype TNBC treated with adjuvant platinum compared with capecitabine. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with clinical stage II or III TNBC with ≥ 1 cm RD in the breast post-NAC were randomly assigned to receive platinum (carboplatin or cisplatin) once every 3 weeks for four cycles or capecitabine 14 out of 21 days every 3 weeks for six cycles. TNBC subtype (basal v nonbasal) was determined by PAM50 in the residual disease. A noninferiority design with superiority alternative was chosen, assuming a 4-year iDFS of 67% with capecitabine. RESULTS Four hundred ten of planned 775 participants were randomly assigned to platinum or capecitabine between 2015 and 2021. After median follow-up of 20 months and 120 iDFS events (61% of full information) in the 308 (78%) patients with basal subtype TNBC, the 3-year iDFS for platinum was 42% (95% CI, 30 to 53) versus 49% (95% CI, 39 to 59) for capecitabine. Grade 3 and 4 toxicities were more common with platinum agents. The Data and Safety Monitoring Committee recommended stopping the trial as it was unlikely that further follow-up would show noninferiority or superiority of platinum. CONCLUSION Platinum agents do not improve outcomes in patients with basal subtype TNBC RD post-NAC and are associated with more severe toxicity when compared with capecitabine. Participants had a lower than expected 3-year iDFS regardless of study treatment, highlighting the need for better therapies in this high-risk population.

Phase III trial of adjuvant sunitinib in patients with high-risk renal cell carcinoma (RCC): Validation of the 16-gene Recurrence Score in stage III patients.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4508-4508 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernard J. Escudier ◽  
Brian I. Rini ◽  
Jean-Francois Martini ◽  
Wayne Yen-Hwa Chang ◽  
Jan Breza ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Recurrence Score ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Primary Analysis ◽  
Time To Recurrence ◽  
Gene Assay ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazard Regression

4508 Background: Adjuvant therapy with sunitinib (SU) compared with placebo (PBO) prolonged disease-free survival (DFS) in 615 patients (pts) with high-risk RCC (hazard ratio [HR] 0.76; P= 0.03) in the S-TRAC trial. The 16-gene Recurrence Score (RS) was developed and validated to predict risk of recurrence of RCC after nephrectomy in 2 cohorts of stage I–III pts (Rini et al., Lancet Oncol 2015;16:676-85). We present further validation of RS results in high-risk stage III pts from S-TRAC. Methods: The study was prospectively designed with prespecified genes, algorithm, endpoints, analytical methods, and analysis plan using primary RCC tissues from 212 evaluable pts with informed consent. Gene expression was quantitated by RT-PCR; primary analysis focused on stage III (n = 193 pts). Time to recurrence (TTR) and DFS were analyzed using Cox proportional hazard regression. Results: Baseline characteristics were similar in SU and PBO arms and in pts with and without gene expression data; effect of SU was numerically similar to that in the entire trial (DFS HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.48–1.24; P= 0.29). RS predicted TTR and DFS in both treatment arms with the strongest results observed in PBO arm where high RS group had significantly higher risk (Table). Interaction of RS with treatment was not significant (TTR P= 0.192; DFS P= 0.219); however, the number of events was relatively low. Conclusions: The prognostic value of the 16-gene assay was confirmed in S-TRAC. RS is now validated with consistent results in 2 separate studies (level IB evidence). RS results may help identify patients at high risk who could derive higher absolute benefit from adjuvant treatment. The predictive value of RS to select patients for adjuvant SU requires further investigation in independent adjuvant trials. [Table: see text]

Phase III postneoadjuvant study evaluating sacituzumab govitecan, an antibody drug conjugate in primary HER2-negative breast cancer patients with high relapse risk after standard neoadjuvant treatment: SASCIA.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS602-TPS602
Author(s):  
Frederik Marmé ◽  
Elmar Stickeler ◽  
Jenny Furlanetto ◽  
Carsten Denkert ◽  
Marcus Schmidt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Invasive Disease ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Nodal Involvement ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Risk Of Recurrence ◽  
Disease Free

TPS602 Background: Women with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) having residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) as well as HR-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer (BC) with a CPS (clinical and post treatment pathological stage) +EG (estrogen receptor status and grade) score ≥ 3 or score 2 and nodal involvement after NACT (ypN+) are at high risk of recurrence. Sacituzumab govitecan is approved for the treatment of patients with metastatic TNBC who received at least two prior therapies for metastatic disease and has shown activity in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic HR-positive/HER2-negative BC. Therefore, sacituzumab govitecan may represent a new option against the resistant residual disease after standard NACT. Methods: SASCIA is a phase III, prospective, international, multi-center, randomized, open label, parallel group study in patients with HER2-negative BC with residual disease after NACT (NCT04595565). Eligible patients must have received taxane-based NACT for 16 weeks, including at least 6 weeks of a taxane. Patients should be at high risk of recurrence after treatment, defined as having centrally confirmed HER2-negative BC (IHC score 0-1 or FISH negative according to ASCO/CAP guideline) assessed preferably on tissue from postneoadjuvant residual invasive disease of the breast and either HR-negative (<1% positive stained cells), with any residual invasive disease > ypT1mi after NACT or HR-positive (≥1% positive stained cells), with a CPS+EG score ≥ 3 or CPS+EG score 2 and ypN+ using local ER and grade assessed on core biopsies taken before NACT. Radiotherapy should be delivered before the start of study treatment. Patients are randomized 1:1 to receive either sacituzumab govitecan 10 mg/kg body weight (days 1, 8 q3w for eight cycles) or treatment of physician´s choice (capecitabine 2000 mg/m² day 1-14 q21 or platinum-based chemotherapy i.e. carboplatin AUC 5 q3w or AUC 1.5 weekly for eight 3 weekly cycles or observation). Randomization is stratified by HR status (HR-positive vs negative) and nodal involvement after NACT (ypN+ vs ypN0). In patients with HR-positive BC, endocrine-based therapy will be administered according to local guidelines. The primary endpoint is invasive disease-free survival (iDFS). Secondary endpoints include comparison of overall survival (OS, key secondary endpoint), distant disease-free survival, locoregional recurrences-free interval, safety, compliance, iDFS and OS according to stratified and - predefined subgroups, patient reported outcome, and quality of life between treatment arms. As of February 2 2021, 7/1200 patients have been randomized in Germany. International study groups will join soon. Clinical trial information: NCT04595565.

Prospective pooled analysis of four randomized trials investigating duration of adjuvant (adj) oxaliplatin-based therapy (3 vs 6 months {m}) for patients (pts) with high-risk stage II colorectal cancer (CC).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3501-3501 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy Iveson ◽  
Alberto F. Sobrero ◽  
Takayuki Yoshino ◽  
Ioannis Sougklakos ◽  
Fang-Shu Ou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Cox Model ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Pooled Analysis ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Primary Analysis ◽  
Nodal Harvest

3501 Background: 6m of oxaliplatin-based treatment is an option as adj chemotherapy for patients with high risk stage II CC (T4, inadequate nodal harvest, poorly differentiated, obstruction, perforation or vascular/perineural invasion). The IDEA collaboration showed shorter treatment duration to be appropriate for most pts with stage III colon cancer. The results of the 4 IDEA studies with stage II pts are presented here. Methods: A prospective, pre-planned pooled analysis of high-risk stage II patients from 4 concurrently conducted randomized phase III trials (SCOT, TOSCA, ACHIEVE-2, HORG) was performed to evaluate non-inferiority (NI) of 3m compared with 6m (ref) of adj FOLFOX/CAPOX (regimen preselected, not randomized). The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS), NI was to be declared if the 2-sided 80% confidence interval (CI) for DFS hazard ratio (HR 3m v 6m) estimated by a stratified Cox model was below 1.2. 542 DFS events were required to provide 80% power to declare NI. NI was also examined within regimen, T4 (Yes v No) and inadequate nodal harvest (Yes v No) as pre-planned subgroups. Results: The primary analysis included 3273 randomised pts of which 1254 had FOLFOX and 2019 had CAPOX. There were 552 events and the median follow-up was 60.2 m. There was significantly less grade 3-5 toxicity with 3m treatment (p < .0001). The 5-year DFS rate was 80.7% and 84.0% for 3m and 6m treatment with an estimated DFS HR of 1.18 (80% CI:1.05-1.31, p for NI = 0.404). For CAPOX the estimated HR was 1.02 (80% CI: 0.88-1.17, p for NI = 0.087) and for FOLFOX the estimated HR was 1.42 (80% CI: 1.19-1.70, p for NI = 0.894). The test for interaction between duration and regimen was not statistically significant (p = .174 adjusted for multiple testing) but was stronger than that for the other subgroups examined. Conclusions: In the overall population non-inferiority for 3m adj treatment in pts with high-risk stage II CC was not shown. As with the stage III population the choice of adj regimen appears important (although this did not reach statistical significance) with a small difference in DFS between 3 and 6 m treatment if CAPOX is used. Clinical trial information: ISRCTN59757862.

IMvigor010: Primary analysis from a phase III randomized study of adjuvant atezolizumab (atezo) versus observation (obs) in high-risk muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma (MIUC).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5000-5000 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maha H. A. Hussain ◽  
Thomas Powles ◽  
Peter Albers ◽  
Daniel Castellano ◽  
Siamak Daneshmand ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Tumor Stage ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Primary Analysis ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Resected Tissue ◽  
Muscle Invasive ◽  
Ecog Ps

5000 Background: Radical surgery ± cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemo (NAC) is the mainstay treatment (tx) for MIUC, with no conclusive level 1 evidence for adjuvant chemo (AC). Here we present the primary analysis from IMvigor010, a global, open-label, multicenter, randomized trial of adjuvant atezo (anti–PD-L1; approved in metastatic UC [mUC] settings) in pts with MIUC at high risk of recurrence following primary resection. Methods: Pts with MIUC (bladder, upper tract [UT]), ECOG PS 0-2 and resected tissue for PD-L1 testing on immune cells (IC; VENTANA SP142 assay) were enrolled ≤ 14 wks after radical cystectomy/nephroureterectomy with lymph node (LN) dissection. Pathologic stage: 1) ypT2-4a or ypN+ if pts had NAC or 2) pT3-4a or pN+ if pts did not have NAC. No postsurgical radiation or AC was allowed; if no NAC was given, pts must have been ineligible for or declined cisplatin-based AC. Pts were randomized 1:1 to atezo 1200 mg IV q3w or obs for 16 cycles or 1 y (stratification factors: no. of LNs resected, pathologic nodal status, pathologic tumor stage, PD-L1 status, prior NAC). Disease-free survival (DFS) was the primary endpoint (EP). Final DFS, first interim overall survival (OS; secondary EP) and safety are reported. Results: The ITT population included 809 pts (median follow-up, 21.9 mo). In the atezo and obs arms, respectively, 48% and 47% had NAC; 7% and 6% had UTUC as primary disease; 48% each had LN+ disease. DFS and OS are in Table. Baseline prognostic/clinical factors did not influence DFS tx benefit; stratified HR was 0.81 (95% CI: 0.63, 1.05) in IC0/1 pts (PD-L1 < 5%; n = 417) and 1.01 (0.75, 1.35) in IC2/3 pts (PD-L1 ≥ 5%; n = 392). 16% of atezo-treated pts had a tx-related G3-4 AE. Skin and gastrointestinal toxicities most commonly led to tx discontinuation. Conclusions: IMvigor010, the first phase 3 adjuvant study of a checkpoint inhibitor in MIUC, did not meet its primary EP of DFS. More tx discontinuation due to AEs was seen vs mUC studies. Safety was generally consistent with previous studies. Clinical trial information: NCT02450331 . [Table: see text]

CONTACT-01: A phase III, randomized study of atezolizumab plus cabozantinib versus docetaxel in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) previously treated with PD-L1/PD-1 inhibitors and platinum-containing chemotherapy.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS9134-TPS9134
Author(s):  
Joel W. Neal ◽  
Palak Kundu ◽  
Tomohiro Tanaka ◽  
Ida Enquist ◽  
Sid Patel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Recist 1.1 ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Previously Treated

TPS9134 Background: Patients with mNSCLC who progress on anti–PD-L1/PD-1 therapy administered in combination with or after platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC) are mainly treated with docetaxel or pemetrexed monotherapy. These therapies only have modest clinical activity, leaving a high unmet medical need. Cabozantinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), promotes an immune-permissive environment and may enhance the efficacy of PD-L1/PD-1 inhibitors, offering a promising second/third-line therapeutic opportunity for patients with mNSCLC. In a Phase Ib multi-cohort study (COSMIC-021; NCT03170960), cabozantinib plus atezolizumab (anti–PD-L1) showed an acceptable safety profile and promising efficacy (ORR: 27%; mDOR: 5.7 mo [range: 2.6-6.9]; disease control rate [CR + PR + SD]: 83%) in 30 patients with mNSCLC who had progressed after prior anti–PD-L1/PD-1 therapy plus chemotherapy (Neal et al. J Clin Oncol 2020). The Phase III CONTACT-01 study will further evaluate the efficacy and safety of atezolizumab plus cabozantinib versus docetaxel monotherapy in patients with mNSCLC who have progressed during or after prior treatment with anti–PD-L1/PD-1 therapy and PBC. Methods: CONTACT-01 (NCT04471428) is a Phase III, multi-center, randomized, open-label study that will enroll ≈350 patients from 150 to 200 sites internationally. Key eligibility criteria include histologically or cytologically confirmed mNSCLC, disease progression with concurrent or sequential anti–PD-L1/PD-1 treatment and PBC, measurable disease (RECIST 1.1), ECOG PS of 0-1 and the availability of tissue specimens for centralized PD-L1 testing or known PD-L1 status using a health authority–approved PD-L1 assay. Patients with NSCLC previously treated with cabozantinib, docetaxel or anti–PD-L1/PD-1 + VEGFR TKIs are excluded. Patients with known sensitizing EGFR/ALK mutations and active or untreated CNS metastases are also excluded. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive either atezolizumab (1200 mg IV every 3 weeks) + cabozantinib (40 mg orally once daily) or docetaxel (75 mg/m2 IV every 3 weeks). The primary endpoint is OS. Secondary endpoints include investigator-assessed PFS, ORR and DOR per RECIST 1.1; TTD in patient-reported physical function and global health status (EORTC QLQ-C30); investigator-assessed PFS rates at 6 months and 1 year; OS rates at 1 and 2 years; safety and PK. Clinical trial information: NCT04471428.

Olaparib maintenance monotherapy for non-germline BRCA1/2-mutated (non-gBRCAm) platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer (PSR OC) patients (pts): Phase IIIb OPINION primary analysis.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5545-5545
Author(s):  
Andres Poveda ◽  
Stephanie Lheureux ◽  
Nicoletta Colombo ◽  
David Cibula ◽  
Kristina Lindemann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Brca Mutation ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Subsequent Treatment ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Primary Analysis ◽  
Platinum Sensitive ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Phase Iiib ◽  
Grade 3

5545 Background: In the Phase II Study 19 trial (NCT00753545; Ledermann et al Lancet Oncol 2014), maintenance olaparib improved progression-free survival (PFS) vs placebo in PSR OC pts, including non-BRCAm pts. A significant PFS benefit was also seen with maintenance olaparib vs placebo in gBRCAm PSR OC pts in the Phase III SOLO2 trial (NCT01874353; Pujade-Lauraine et al Lancet Oncol 2017). To investigate olaparib maintenance monotherapy in non-gBRCAm PSR OC pts who had received ≥2 prior lines of platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC), we performed the Phase IIIb, single-arm, OPINION study (NCT03402841). Methods: Pts had high-grade serous or endometrioid OC and were in complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) to PBC. Pts received maintenance olaparib (tablets; 300 mg bid) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed PFS (modified RECIST v1.1). Secondary endpoints included PFS by homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) and somatic BRCA mutation (sBRCAm) status determined by central Myriad tumor and germline testing; and time to first subsequent treatment (TFST). The primary analysis was planned for 18 months (mo) after the last patient was enrolled. Results: 279 pts were enrolled from 17 countries (mean age: 64 years); 253 pts (90.7%) were confirmed non-gBRCAm. At data cut-off (Oct 2, 2020), median PFS was 9.2 mo (95% CI 7.6–10.9), with 210 PFS events (75.3% maturity). 65.3%, 38.5% and 24.3% of pts were progression-free (PF) at 6, 12 and 18 mo, respectively. The Table shows PFS in key subgroups. Median TFST was 13.9 mo (95% CI 11.5–16.4). Median exposure to olaparib was 9.4 mo (range 0.0–31.9). Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 29.0% of pts and serious TEAEs in 19.7% of pts. TEAEs led to dose interruption, dose reduction and treatment discontinuation in 47.0%, 22.6% and 7.5% of pts, respectively. Conclusions: Our findings support the use of olaparib maintenance therapy in non-gBRCAm PSR OC pts, consistent with our interim analysis and previous trials in this setting. Clinical trial information: NCT03402841. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Adding pertuzumab to adjuvant therapy for high-risk HER2-positive early breast cancer in APHINITY: a GRADE analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 423-430 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alberto Zambelli ◽  
Giovanni Pappagallo ◽  
Paolo Marchetti
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Adjuvant Therapy ◽  
Early Breast Cancer ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Invasive Disease ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Distant Relapse ◽  
Disease Free

Aim: Adding pertuzumab to standard trastuzumab-based adjuvant therapy significantly improved invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) in the APHINITY trial. However, the magnitude of benefit was marginal in the overall population. Methods: We used GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) analysis on data from APHINITY to build summary-of-findings tables to evaluate the efficacy, safety and quality of evidence of predefined clinical outcomes for the addition of pertuzumab to trastuzumab-based adjuvant therapy in patients with high-risk HER2-positive early breast cancer. Results: Pertuzumab significantly improved 3-year, event-free, absolute benefit in disease-free survival, IDFS and distant relapse-free interval (DFRI) in patients with node-positive or hormone receptor-negative disease. The analysis provides strength of evidence supporting the addition of pertuzumab in this patient population.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document