Examining racial disparities in male breast cancer.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6555-6555
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Shurell Linehan ◽  
Navendu D. Samant ◽  
Juleon W Rabbani

6555 Background: Male breast cancer (MBC) accounts for approximately 1% of all breast cancers. Racial disparities have not been examined in MBC. Methods: Within a large, integrated health delivery system, all adult female and male patients who were diagnosed with breast cancer from 01-01-2010 to 12-31-2018 were examined. Bivariate analysis was performed to examine clinical and demographic factors associated with breast cancer-related mortality. We conducted more detailed chart review in the MBC-only group (data period 01-01-2010 to 12-31-2019) to assess the mean time to treatment (from diagnosis to surgery, surgery to chemotherapy, and surgery to radiation) stratified by race using bivariate (t-test, one way ANOVA) analyses. Results: 32,848 female breast cancer and 226 MBC patients were evaluated; MBC patients represented 0.63% of all breast cancer patients. Between males and females, there was no statistically significant difference in race, with an overall distribution of 62% White, 19% Asian, 8% Black, and 11% Hispanic. To our knowledge, this is the largest and most racially diverse sample of MBC patients to date. MBC patients at diagnosis were significantly older (p <.0001), more obese (p < 0.0018), and sicker according to the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) (p < 0.0001) compared to female breast cancer patients. Males were more likely to be diagnosed at an advanced stage (19.2%) compared to females (12.5%) (p = 0.0037). With a mean follow up of 5 years, overall mortality was statistically significantly worse in MBC (23.0%) compared to female breast cancer patients (12.0%) (p < 0.0001). Furthermore, breast cancer-related mortality was significantly higher in males (8.1%) than in females (4.5%) (p = 0.0124). In the MBC-only analysis, stage at diagnosis was not influenced by patient race. Asian and White MBC patients had the shortest mean time from diagnosis to surgery (27 and 29 days, respectively), with Hispanic MBC patients experiencing the longest time to surgery (46 days). Black MBC patients experienced the shortest mean time to chemotherapy after surgery (39 days), whereas Asian MBC patients experienced the longest time to chemotherapy (50 days). In survivorship, Black and Asian patients were least likely to undergo screening mammography (33.3%, and 43.3%, respectively), compared to 52% of White and 50% of Hispanic MBC patients. Ultimately, 13% of Asian and 11% of Hispanic MBC patients died of breast cancer, compared to 6.7% of Black and 6.2% of White MBC patients. Conclusions: While we found no statistically significant differences in mortality by race among MBC patients, our findings indicate that non-white patients had longer time to treatments, less survivorship screening, and worse disease related mortality than their white counterparts. Future study can elucidate these racial inequalities, enabling more equitable breast cancer treatment among patient subgroups.

Author(s):  
Kamal Eldin Ahmed Abdelsalam ◽  
Mohammed Asad ◽  
Monjid Ahmed Ibrahim Ahmed ◽  
Syed Mohammed Basheeruddin Asdaq ◽  
Yahya Mohzari ◽  
...  

The global incidence of breast cancer among men is steadily growing. Despite this, compared to female breast cancer patients, there are very few studies on biomarkers in male breast cancer patients. A cross-sectional case control study was carried out to determine the serum levels of melatonin, ghrelin, dopamine, serotonin, epinephrine, and GABA in male breast cancer. All the recruited patients were obese, old, and had recently been diagnosed with the disease. They had not received any treatment for the cancer until the time of the study. Melatonin and epinephrine serum levels were significantly higher in breast cancer patients compared to their age-matched controls, whereas ghrelin, dopamine, GABA, and serotonin serum levels were lower in patients compared to the control group. The serum levels of most of the studied biomarkers in male breast cancer patients were similar to those observed in female breast cancer patients, except for serum melatonin levels.


2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e11618-e11618
Author(s):  
R. D. Botan ◽  
M. N. Alvares ◽  
A. Hassan

e11618 Background: Treatment for male breast cancer is based on the results of large clinical trials for female breast cancer. Although peculiar differences do exist between men and women, very little is known about the prognostic factors in male breast cancer, even though female breast cancer practical conducts are widely used in male breast cancer. The rarity of this condition makes very difficult to produce randomized trials. Methods: This study is populational and epidemiological and evaluated male breast cancer patients from January 1974 to December 2001 about its prognostic characteristics. Data were collected retrospectively and the sample has been described using descriptive statistics methods. Survival curve was built using Kaplan-Meier method. Staging system was standardized as in the sixth edition of American Joint Committee on Cancer, independently on when the diagnose was made. Due to differences throughtout 35 years on therapeutic on breast cancer, treatment options were categorized in groups to make the survival evaluation possible. Results: From 45 patients with male breast cancer, 91% presented ductal histology, 26% were negative axillary, 9.1% were T1, 25% were T2, 4.5% were T3, 50% were T4 and 12.12% presented with distant metastasis at diagnose. Seventy nine percent were submitted to radical local treatment, while 34% had not been submitted to any kind of systemic treatment (neoadjuvant, adjuvant e hormone therapy). Forty percent of patients have not presented distant recurrence, while 58.3% have not presented local recurrence. A median survival of 126 months has been observed to the analyzed population, ranging from 69–182 months. Five-year survival was 72% and 10-year survival was 54%. These data agreed with the available data in the published literature. Conclusions: Male breast cancer appears to behave biologically and clinically very similar to female breast cancer, but differences do exist and need to be elucidated. Randomized multi-center clinical trials become necessary, as systematic reviews, to build higher statistic power studies. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher S. Bartlett ◽  
Tulay Koru-Sengul ◽  
Feng Miao ◽  
Stacey L. Tannenbaum ◽  
David J. Lee ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
N Besic ◽  
B Cernivc ◽  
J De Greve ◽  
K Lokar ◽  
M Krajc ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 175883592095835
Author(s):  
Wei-Ping Li ◽  
Hong-Fei Gao ◽  
Fei Ji ◽  
Teng Zhu ◽  
Min-Yi Cheng ◽  
...  

Background and aims: Male breast cancer is an uncommon disease. The benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of male breast cancer patients has not been determined. The aim of this study was to explore the value of adjuvant chemotherapy in men with stage I–III breast cancer, and we hypothesized that some male patients may safely skip adjuvant chemotherapy. Methods: Male breast cancer patients between 2010 and 2015 from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results database were included. Univariate and multivariate Cox analyses were used to analyse the factors associated with survival. The propensity score matching method was adopted to balance baseline characteristics. Kaplan–Meier curves were used to evaluate the impacts of adjuvant chemotherapy on survival. The primary endpoint was survival. Results: We enrolled 514 patients for this study, including 257 patients treated with chemotherapy and 257 patients without. There was a significant difference in overall survival (OS) but not in breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) between the two groups ( p < 0.001 for OS and p = 0.128 for BCSS, respectively). Compared with the non-chemotherapy group, the chemotherapy group had a higher 4-year OS rate (97.5% versus 95.2%, p < 0.001), while 4-year BCSS was similar (98% versus 98.8%, p = 0.128). The chemotherapy group had longer OS than the non-chemotherapy group among HR+, HER2–, tumour size >2 cm, lymph node-positive male breast cancer patients ( p < 0.05). Regardless of tumour size, there were no differences in OS or BCSS between the chemotherapy and non-chemotherapy cohorts for lymph node-negative patients (OS: p > 0.05, BCSS: p > 0.05). Adjuvant chemotherapy showed no significant effects on both OS and BCSS in patients with stage I (OS: p = 0.100, BCSS: p = 0.858) and stage IIA breast cancer (OS: p > 0.05, BCSS: p > 0.05). Conclusion: For stage I and stage IIA patients, adjuvant chemotherapy could not improve OS and BCSS. Therefore, adjuvant chemotherapy might be skipped for stage I and stage IIA male breast cancer patients.


2021 ◽  
Vol 107 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2-2
Author(s):  
H Gadelrab ◽  
M Mokhtar ◽  
H Morsy ◽  
M Elnaggar

Introduction: Breast cancer is the most frequently occurring cancer among females and the second most common cancer overall. Programmed Cell Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) plays an important role in blocking ‘cancer-immunity cycle’ and is considered as a major inhibitory pathway. The aim of the present study was to clarify the alterations of expression of PD-L1 in peripheral blood mononuclear cytes (PBMCs) of female breast cancer patients and analyze its association with clinico-pathological criteria as well as therapeutic response. Materials and Methods: The study was conducted on 45 female breast cancer patients and 45 female controls. Blood samples were collected followed by PBMCs isolation, total RNA extraction, reverse transcription and finally, quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) using SYBR Green DNA binding dye. Expression levels of PD-L1 were calculated and then compared with clinicopathological parameters of the patients in addition to initial therapeutic response. Results: A significant difference was detected for PD-L1 expression levels in breast cancer patients compared to controls. A significant association with age, metastatic breast cancer, estrogen receptor (ER) negative status as well as high concentrations of cancer antigen 15-3 (CA15-3) was detected. On the other hand, no significant association was recognized with tumor size, lymph nodal status, histopathological type, grade, progesterone receptor (PR) status, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2) status, triple negative, among de novo and recurrent metastatic patients and for the number of metastatic sites as well as the therapeutic response. Conclusions: This study paves the way of the use of PD-L1 as a noninvasive prognostic and diagnostic biomarker for poor prognosis of breast cancer.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document