Feasibility of using data collected through the St. Jude Pediatric Oncology Facility integrated local evaluation (PrOFILE) tool to determine previously defined levels of pediatric hematology-oncology care.

e13530 Background: Pediatric hematology and oncology (PHO) facilities are not all equally equipped to diagnose and treat the full range of childhood cancers. Proposed facility tier models have been published to facilitate the context-based adaptation of PHO diagnostic and treatment guidelines. However, a tool to assist facilities in identifying their level of PHO care does not exist. We assessed the feasibility of using the St. Jude Pediatric Oncology Facility Integrated Local Evaluation (PrOFILE) tool to identify (1) facility levels as defined by the International Society of Pediatric Oncology (SIOP) and the Lancet Oncology Commission (LOC) for sustainable care for children with cancer, and (2) treatment strata in the Adapted Resource and Implementation Application (ARIA) Guide. Methods: This study employed a multi-step mapping approach. We mapped the 1,279 PrOFILE tool variables to the nine SIOP service lines, ten LOC domains, and ten ARIA resource groups. Mapping was performed by two teams and carried out in two different rounds. The first round aimed to define if an indicator was fully or partially covered by PrOFILE. Multiple PrOFILE variables could be assigned to each concept to meet its content specificity. Various cut-offs were applied when necessary to assign mutually exclusive responses to each tier. The second round consisted of expert validation for each indicator previously identified. Results: Most (97%) of SIOP’s indicators were partially or fully covered in the PrOFILE tool (Table). Radiation therapy tools and appointment scheduling and call back system could not be mapped. Of the LOC indicators, 89% were covered (Table). Pathology technical staff, chemotherapy complexity (low, moderate, and high), lymph node biopsy, organ preservation, liver transplantation, intensity-modulated radiotherapy, and research infrastructure could not be mapped. Finally, 77% of the indicators used by the ARIA Guide were covered (Table). The ophthalmology resource group could not be fully mapped. Conclusions: This exercise demonstrates the feasibility of using PrOFILE tool variables to identify facility PHO care levels as defined by SIOP and LOC. The tool also contains most of the variables necessary to apply the ARIA Guide to diagnose, treat, and manage childhood cancer. Future PrOFILE versions will address concepts that are not covered or are partially covered in its current version.[Table: see text]