Oncogenic FGFR3 gene fusions in solid tumors among Chinese cancer patients.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15072-e15072
Author(s):  
Libin Xu ◽  
Ming Liu ◽  
Jingxian Duan ◽  
Tao Wang
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Solid Tumor ◽  
Coiled Coil ◽  
Genetic Alterations ◽  
Chinese Patients ◽  
Driver Mutations ◽  
Gene Fusions ◽  
Fgfr3 Gene ◽  
Tumor Types

e15072 Background: Oncogenic FGFR3 (fibroblast growth factor receptor 3) gene fusions have been identified as driver mutations that lead to the activation of FGFR3 in many solid tumor types and serve as a novel therapeutic target for FGFR inhibitors in clinical development. TACC3 (transforming acid coiled coil 3) is the most common partner of these FGFR3 fusions. Methods: The study enrolled over ten thousand cases of Chinese patients with different types of solid tumors. We performed targeted sequencing assay with our 605 gene panel that covered all the exon and intron regions of the FGFR3 gene, so that we could identify nearly all the FGFR3 translocation events. Results: The prevalence and form of FGFR3 fusions in different tumor types were shown in Table. We identified seven patients harboring FGFR3 fusion events, with six cases of FGFR3-TACC3 and one case of FGFR3-UBE2K. In the seven patients, three of them were also harbored concomitant TP53 gene mutations, and six of them were microsatellite stability (MSS), and one was microsatellite instability-low (MSI-L). Conclusions: FGFR3 gene rearrangements were identified in different solid tumor types in our study, and they were relatively rare compared to other novel mutations. However, clinical testing for the identification of FGFR3 fusions should be prioritized in bladder cancer patients. Consistent with other studies, the most common FGFR3 fusion form was FGFR3-TACC3. Co-occurring genetic alterations in FGFR3 gene fusions cases were also common. From our limited number of cases, most of FGFR3 gene fusions patients were MSS.[Table: see text]

CX1003 quantification by ultra-performance LC–MS/MS in human plasma and its application to a pharmacokinetic study in solid tumor patients

Bioanalysis ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (16) ◽  
pp. 1483-1493
Author(s):  
Yu Li ◽  
Qian Zhao ◽  
Pei Hu ◽  
Ji Jiang
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Human Plasma ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Study ◽  
Solid Tumor ◽  
Receptor Tyrosine Kinase ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Chinese Patients ◽  
Good Sensitivity ◽  
Tumor Patients

Aim: CX1003 is a novel multitargeted receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting cancer patients with relapsed or metastatic malignant solid tumors. The study aimed to develop a robust and rapid assay approach to quantify CX1003 in human plasma. Methodology & results: Samples of plasma were purified by SPE where the diluted eluates were then separated by a Waters Acquity CSH C18 column and thereafter detected using positive electrospray ionization via an ultra performance LC–MS/MS. Conclusion: The method to quantify CX1003 in human plasma was first exploited and validated with good sensitivity and specificity, and successfully fulfilled the requirement of the first-in-human clinical pharmacokinetic study of CX1003 in Chinese patients with relapsed or metastatic malignant solid tumors.

The landscape of gene fusions and the correlation with immunotherapy biomarkers in Chinese patients with advanced solid tumor.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15039-e15039
Author(s):  
Wenshuai Liu ◽  
Yifan Zhou ◽  
Bei Zhang ◽  
Yuezong Bai ◽  
Yueqi Wang
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Solid Tumor ◽  
Chinese Patients ◽  
Fisher Exact Test ◽  
Gene Fusions ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumor ◽  
Tumor Patients ◽  
Potential Biomarker ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Patients

e15039 Background: Due to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval of larotrectinib, a tumor or tissue-agnostic cancer treatment, gene fusions and fusion-driven cancer were identified as indications. Exploration of the gene fusions might be essential in both target therapy and immunotherapy in advanced solid tumor. However, the landscape of gene fusions in Chinese solid tumor patients is poorly reported. Methods: Tissue samples were obtained from 7514 Chinese patients with advanced solid tumor. Genomic alterations were identified via the next generation sequencing (NGS) with a validated commercial 381-cancer-gene panel (panel size over 0.5 MB), including 100 MSI loci. TMB was calculated according to NGS results. Statistical analysis was performed by Fisher exact test using R 3.6.1. Results: There were 162 pathologic or very like pathologic gene fusions observed in 249 (3.31%) patients, covering 30 cancer types. Top frequent fusion genes were ALK (93), RET (32), FGFR2 (26), FGFR3 (13), ROS1 (10), TMPRSS2 (10) and NTRK1 (9). Their main partner genes were EML4 (66/ 93), KIF5B (15/32), BICC1 (5/26), TACC3 (13/13), CD47 (3/10), ERG (9/10) and TPM3 (5/9), respectively. Mostly, only one fusion was detected in one patient. Three patients harbored 3 gene fusions and 35 patients harbored 2 gene fusions, among which 21 patients were observed harboring both fusion and its reciprocal fusion. In the group of patients harboring gene fusions, the prevalence of MSI-H was 4.0% (10/ 249). Especially, the prevalence was significant high (41.2%, 7/ 17) in colorectal cancer patients (P < 0.001). In MSI-H colorectal cancer patients, 4 carried NTRK1 fusions, 2 RET fusions and 1 ALK fusion. And all of them had high tumor mutation burden (TMB). As another immunotherapy response predictor, TMB was low in most solid tumor patients in this study, except for the patients harboring gene fusions involving NTRK1, NTRK2 or STK11, whose TMB-H proportion were 67%, 50% and 33%, respectively. Conclusions: Gene fusions might be associated with MSI-H. In colorectal cancer patients, gene fusions involved either NTRK1 or NTRK2 might be associated with TMB-H, which revealed a potential biomarker for both target and immunotherapy.

Abstract 2721: Establishment of a catalog of somatic genetic alterations of Japanese cancer patients across multiple tumor types at Shizuoka Cancer Center

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hirotsugu Kenmotsu ◽  
Masakuni Serizawa ◽  
Takeshi Nagashima ◽  
Keiichi Ohshima ◽  
Keiichi Hatakeyama ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Genetic Alterations ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Multiple Tumor ◽  
Tumor Types

Characteristics and outcomes of cancer patients ≥80 years treated with chemotherapy at a comprehensive cancer center

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8548-8548
Author(s):  
P. Jiang ◽  
M. Choi ◽  
D. Smith ◽  
L. Heilbrun ◽  
S. M. Gadgeel
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Solid Tumor ◽  
Hematologic Malignancy ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
The United States ◽  
Comprehensive Cancer Center ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Tumor Patients ◽  
Hematologic Cancer

8548 Background: The percentage of cancer patients ≥ 80 years old is expected to rise in the United States. However data are limited on use of chemotherapy in this group of patients. Methods: Retrospective identification of patients who received systemic chemotherapy at our cancer center between 1/1/2000 to 12/31/2004 was performed using the computer generated pharmacy data and medical records. Patients who had diagnosis of cancer and ≥ 80 years were included in the study; patients receiving only supportive care, hormonal therapy, or oral chemotherapy were excluded. The protocol for this study was approved by the Wayne State University IRB. Results: A total of 133 patients ≥ 80 years who received chemotherapy was analyzed. The median age was 83 and 31% of the patients were ≥ 85 years. There were more females (61%) than males (39%). The gender distribution was more even (47% v. 53%) after excluding gender specific tumors. The racial distribution was diverse- Whites 65 (49%); Blacks 41 (31%); Other 18 (13%); Unknown 9 (7%). 16% of the patients had hematologic malignancy and 84% had solid tumors. Gynecological cancers (32%) followed by aerodigestive cancers (26%) were the most common solid tumors. Solid tumor patients primarily had regional (48%) or distant (45%) disease. During the first regimen, 512 cycles of chemotherapy was delivered with a median of 3 cycles per patient (range 1–24 cycles); 40% of patients received only 2 cycles of chemotherapy. 64% of patients were able to receive chemotherapy without 2nd cycle delay. The distribution of single or multidrug regimens was fairly similar; Solid tumors 52% v. 48%; Hematologic cancers 43% v. 57%. Carboplatin and paclitaxel (22%) was the most common regimen among solid tumor patients. 26% of all patients received a second regimen. The 1 year survival rates among hematologic cancer and solid tumor patients were 65% and 48%, respectively. Stage of disease was the only statistically significant factor predicting survival. Conclusions: In this diverse group of cancer patients ≥ 80 years old and selected for chemotherapy, the treatment was feasible. The survival outcomes in this elderly population were comparable to those of a younger patient population suggesting that the treatment is beneficial. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Prospective agnostic germline testing in pediatric cancer patients.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1589-1589
Author(s):  
Elise Fiala ◽  
Jennifer Kennedy ◽  
Yelena Kemel ◽  
Audrey Mauguen ◽  
Diana Mandelker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Pediatric Cancer ◽  
Spinal Tumors ◽  
Cancer History ◽  
Pediatric Solid Tumors ◽  
Pediatric Cancer Patients ◽  
High Penetrance ◽  
Tumor Types ◽  
Dominant Genes

1589 Background: We report our large cohort of pediatric cancer patients undergoing prospective agnostic germline sequencing. Our dataset is a significant addition to the 1,573 children reported to date who have undergone agnostic germline sequencing in previous large sequencing studies, each with ascertainment bias. Methods: 676 patients with pediatric solid tumors underwent matched tumor-normal targeted DNA sequencing from July 2015 to February 2020. At least 76 genes associated with cancer predisposition were analyzed in the germline, and variants were classified per American College of Medical Genetics guidelines. Pathogenic and likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants were reported to patients/families, who were offered genetic counseling and cascade testing with screening recommendations and referral to a surveillance clinic as appropriate. Results: One or more P/LP variants were found in 17% (115/676) of individuals when including low, moderate and high penetrance mutations in recessive and dominant genes, or 12% (81/676) when including moderate and high penetrance mutations in dominant genes. P/LP variants were detected in 40% (21/53) of patients with retinoblastomas, 8% (13/161) with neuroblastomas/ganglioneuroblastomas, 13% (14/112) with brain/spinal tumors, 8% (20/245) with sarcomas, and 12% (13/105) with other solid tumors. The most frequent mutations were in RB1 (n = 28) and TP53 (n = 8) in patients with associated tumors. Of patients with moderate/high penetrance mutations, 30% (24/81) had unexpected tumor types, with potential therapeutic relevance in 58% (14/24) including BRCA1 n = 2, BRCA2 n = 3, RAD51D n = 1, ATM n = 1 MLH1 n = 1, MSH2 n = 1, MSH6 n = 1, PMS2 n = 3, and SUFU n = 1. Two patients received immunotherapy based on their germline finding. Conclusions: P/LP germline variants are frequently present in patients with pediatric cancer. We are contributing significantly to the cohort size of agnostic sequencing in pediatric cancers. Our experience is similar to other studies with a ~12% detection rate of moderate and high penetrance mutations. Moderate/high penetrance mutations were concordant with the patient’s cancer history in 70% of cases, higher than previously reported, likely due to an enrichment of retinoblastoma. While many mutations are identified in patients with associated tumor types, a large proportion of mutations are unexpected based on the patient’s history. Clinical actionability of these findings may include screening, risk reduction, family planning, and increasingly targeted therapies.

Phase I study of SNK01 (autologous non-genetically modified natural killer cells with enhanced cytotoxicity) in refractory metastatic solid tumors.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15024-e15024
Author(s):  
Sant P. Chawla ◽  
Katherine M Kim ◽  
Victoria S. Chua ◽  
Omid Jafari ◽  
Paul Y. Song
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Nk Cells ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Nk Cell ◽  
Heavily Pretreated ◽  
Tumor Types

e15024 Background: Natural Killer (NK) cells possess the innate ability to detect transformed cancer cells and kill them, thus playing a key role in cancer immunosurveillance and antitumor immunity. In general, prior NK cell therapies have not shown efficacy in solid tumors and the expansion of NK cells in cancer patients to clinically therapeutic doses is quite challenging, making allogenic preferable to autologous treatment. SNK01 is a first-in-kind, autologous non-genetically modified NK cell therapy with enhanced cytotoxicity which can be consistently produced even from heavily pretreated cancer patients, and has been shown to have efficacy against numerous solid tumor types in preclinical studies. Methods: In this single-arm Phase I study (NCT03941262) to investigate the safety and efficacy of SNK01, patients with refractory metastatic solid tumors were treated in a 3 + 3 dose escalation study with five weekly infusions of SNK01 at 1, 2, or 4 x 109 cells per infusion. Primary endpoint is safety and quality of life (QoL), and secondary endpoint is objective response rate (ORR). Results: Seven of nine planned patients have been enrolled up to date and five have completed treatment. All patients have rapidly progressive metastatic disease and have received an average of five lines of prior therapy. Tumor types include one non-small lung cancer, one colorectal cancer, and five sarcomas. Median age is 52 (32-62). All patients have had successful expansion and cytotoxic enhancement of their NK cells. Three patients have completed 1 x 109 SNK01 and two patients have completed 2 x 109 SNK01. There have been no adverse events according to NCI-CTCAE v 5.0 or any cytokine release syndrome, and all patients have reported an overall improvement in QoL. At week 9, three of three patients at the 1 x 109 dose and one of two at the 2 x 109 achieved a best overall response of stable disease as per RECIST 1.1. Conclusions: Expanding and increasing the cytotoxicity of NK cells in our heavily pretreated patients has been consistently reliable. SNK01 monotherapy has been very safe and well tolerated in patients with rapidly progressive solid tumors. MTD has not been reached and dose escalation is ongoing. Evaluation of anti-tumor activity is ongoing, but at a minimum, SNK01 appears to slow and possibly halt progression in very aggressive disease and improve quality of life while improving the overall quality of life. The remaining two planned patients are currently being enrolled and a full update will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT03941262 .

The alteration of TERT in 10,000 Chinese patients with solid tumors.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e13655-e13655
Author(s):  
Jie Lin ◽  
Yuehua Li ◽  
Hao Zou ◽  
Li Zhang ◽  
Yanbin Xiao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Biliary Tract ◽  
Solid Tumor ◽  
Promoter Region ◽  
Chinese Patients ◽  
Tumor Patients ◽  
Lung Cancers ◽  
Liver Cancers ◽  
Biliary Tract Tumors ◽  
And Gender

e13655 Background: The reactivation of telomerase reverse transcriptase ( TERT) is one of the characters that make cancer cells immortal. TERT expression has been shown in various human cancers.However, the landscape of TERT alterations in Chinese patients with solid tumors still remains unclear. Here, we illustrated the profile of TERT variations of Chinese solid tumor patients by using next generation sequencing (NGS)-based targeted sequencing. Methods: Formalin fixed, paraffin embedded (FFPE) tumor tissues and matching blood samples were collected from 9874 Chinese patients and subjected to a NGS-based panel at a College of American Pathologists (CAP) accredited and Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) certified laboratory. All classes of alterations were assessed. Results: FFPE samples from 9874 Chinese solid tumor patients included lung cancers (39.7%), liver cancers (12.5%), colorectal cancers (10.8%), gastric cancers (5.7%), pancreatic cancers (4.9%), biliary tract tumors (4.6%), and other 18 cancer types (21.7%) were assessed. And 1187 (12.0%) out of 9874 cancer samples had TERT variations. TERT variations occurred in all types of cancer with various frequencies: urothelial neoplasms (52.0%), central nervous system tumors (40.0%), melanomas (38.9%), liver cancers (30.7%), thyroid tumors (24.3%), cervical cancers (20.6%), biliary tract tumors (16.3%), head and neck tumors (14.6%), soft tissue tumors (12.2%) and lung cancers (10.3%). Substitution was the most common variation of TERT and accounted for 58.7% of all the alterations, followed by gene amplification (38.8%) and fusions (2.4%). There were 86.8% of substitution variations presented in TERT promoter region comprising of c.-124C > T (70.7%) and c.-146C > T (13.1%). Patients with TERT alterations included 414 females and 773 males with a median age of 59 years old (range: 8-88). Tumors included stage IV (34.0%), stage III (22.2%), stage II (12.7%), stage I (18.7%) and stage 0 (12.3%). TERT variations were correlated with patients’ age (p = 0.00083) and gender (p = 5.59×10−7). There was no significant correlation of TERT alterations with the highly mutated TP53. The frequencies of TERT alterations were similar in patients with mutated and wild type TP53 (12.7% vs 11.1%). Conclusions: Our study revealed that 12.0% Chinese solid tumor patients harbored TERT alterations, especially two hotspots mutations (c.-124C > T and c.-146C > T) in the promoter region. TERT variations had a correlation with patients’ age and gender, but no correlation with hotspot TP53 mutations.

Updated safety and efficacy of MSB2311 (an anti-programmed death-ligand 1 antibody) in Chinese patients with advanced solid tumors and hematological malignancies from a phase 1 study.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14547-e14547
Author(s):  
Lin Shen ◽  
Jifang Gong ◽  
Jian Zhang ◽  
Dongmei Ji ◽  
Haijun Zhong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Solid Tumor ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Chinese Patients ◽  
Binding Property ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Tumor Patients ◽  
Durable Response ◽  
Programmed Death ◽  
Grade 3

e14547 Background: MSB2311 is a novel humanized PD-L1 antibody with a unique pH-dependent antigen binding property that enables intra-tumor recycling and potentiates tumor penetration. Methods: Patients with metastatic solid tumors or selected lymphoma progressed on or after standard treatments were enrolled in this phase I study. In dose escalation part, MSB2311 was given at dose levels of 3, 10, and 20 mg/kg intravenously every 3 weeks. At the dose expansion part, patients with enriched biomarker expression, including EBV+, PD-L1+ (TPS≥50%), MSI-High or TMB-High (≥10muts/Mb), were dosed at 20mg/kg Q3W or 10mg/kg Q2W. Primary objectives are to evaluate the safety and tolerability and to identify MTD and RP2D. Secondary objectives include the assessment of pharmacokinetic parameter, immunogenicity, and preliminary anti-cancer activity per RECIST1.1. Results: As of data cutoff by Aug 31, 2020, 33 Chinese patients had been treated, including 27 heavily pre-treated solid tumor patients and 6 lymphoma patients. No dose limiting toxicity was reported and MTD has not been reached. The most common AEs (>20%) included: anemia, hypothyroidism, aspartate aminotransferase elevated, proteinuria, weight loss. 13 patients (39.4%) experienced grade 3 AEs, and 6 patients (18.2%) experienced SAEs. No treatment related grade 4 or 5 event was reported. Of the 17 efficacy evaluable solid tumor patients with biomarker selection, 6 achieved confirmed partial response with 35% ORR: 2/8 (25%) at 10 mg/kg Q2W and 4/9 (44%) at 20 mg/kg Q3W. Additionally, one patient achieved sustained iPR via iRECIST. 4 out of 7 responding patients (including one iPR) achieved tumor shrinkage of more than 50%, 3 of them got durable response (≥24 weeks).1 out of 6 lymphoma patients achieved PR. Conclusions: MSB2311 demonstrated a manageable safety profile and promising preliminary antitumor activity in patients with advanced solid tumors and selected lymphomas. Clinical trial information: NCT04272944.

Clinical activity of the RET inhibitor pralsetinib (BLU-667) in patients with RET fusion–positive solid tumors.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 467-467 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vivek Subbiah ◽  
Mimi I-Nan Hu ◽  
Justin F. Gainor ◽  
Aaron Scott Mansfield ◽  
Guzman Alonso ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Thyroid Cancer ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Solid Tumor ◽  
Drug Application ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Gastrointestinal Malignancies ◽  
Tumor Types ◽  
New Drug Application

467 Background: Recent tumor-agnostic drug approvals have resulted in a paradigm shift in cancer treatment away from organ/histology specific indications to biomarker-guided tumor-agnostic approaches. Pralsetinib is a potent and selective RET inhibitor, which has recently been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of adults with metastatic RET fusion–positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and is under New Drug Application review for RET mutant thyroid cancers by the FDA. RET fusions occur in up to approximately 7‒8% of patients with gastrointestinal malignancies, including pancreatic, liver, and colorectal cancers. There are currently no approved selective RET inhibitors for patients with RET fusion–positive solid tumors other than NSCLC and thyroid cancer. Here, we present data on the clinical activity of pralsetinib in patients with RET fusion–positive solid tumor types other than NSCLC enrolled in the Phase I/II ARROW study (NCT03037385). Methods: ARROW consists of a phase I dose escalation (30–600 mg once [QD] or twice daily) followed by a phase II expansion (400 mg QD) in patients with advanced RET-altered solid tumors. Primary objectives are overall response rate (ORR), per RECICT v1.1 and safety. Results: A total of 13 patients with RET fusion–positive thyroid cancer (12 papillary, 1 poorly differentiated; enrollment cutoff July 11, 2019) and 14 patients with RET fusion–positive solid tumors other than NSCLC and thyroid (3 pancreatic, 3 colon, 2 cholangiocarcinoma, 6 other; enrollment cutoff November 19, 2019) were enrolled in ARROW and received pralsetinib. At the February 13, 2020, data cutoff, the ORR (blinded central review) in response-evaluable patients with RET fusion–positive thyroid cancer was 91% (10/11; 95% CI: 59‒100) and disease control rate was 100% (95% CI: 72‒100). Treatment was ongoing in 7 of 11 patients. In RET fusion–positive solid tumors other than NSCLC and thyroid, ORR (investigator’s assessment) was 50% (6/12; 95% CI: 21‒79) and responses were observed in all patients with pancreatic cancer (3/3) and cholangiocarcinoma (2/2). Treatment was ongoing in 6 of 12 patients, including 2 of 3 patients with pancreatic cancer and 1 of 2 patients with cholangiocarcinoma. Responses were observed across multiple fusion genotypes. In the 27 patients with RET fusion–positive tumors other than NSCLC, most frequent treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were grade 1–2, and included anemia (33%), increased aspartate aminotransferase (33%), decreased white blood cell count (33%), hypertension (30%), increased alanine aminotransferase (26%), hyperphosphatemia (19%), and neutropenia (19%). No patients discontinued due to TRAEs. Conclusions: Pralsetinib demonstrated broad and durable antitumor activity across multiple advanced solid tumor types, regardless of RET fusion genotype, and was well tolerated. The study is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT03037385.

scholarly journals GPCRs show widespread differential mRNA expression and frequent mutation and copy number variation in solid tumors

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Krishna Sriram ◽  
Kevin Moyung ◽  
Ross Corriden ◽  
Hannah Carter ◽  
Paul A. Insel
Keyword(s):  
Copy Number Variation ◽  
Mrna Expression ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Copy Number ◽  
Driver Mutations ◽  
Specific Tumor ◽  
Elevated Expression ◽  
Number Variation ◽  
Approved Drugs ◽  
Tumor Types

AbstractG protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are the most widely targeted gene family for FDA-approved drugs. To assess possible roles for GPCRs in cancer, we analyzed Cancer Genome Atlas data for mRNA expression, mutations, and copy number variation (CNV) in 20 categories/45 sub-types of solid tumors and quantified differential expression of GPCRs by comparing tumors against normal tissue from the GTEx database. GPCRs are over-represented among coding genes with elevated expression in solid tumors; most tumor types differentially express >50 GPCRs, including many targets for approved drugs, hitherto largely unrecognized as targets of interest in cancer. GPCR mRNA signatures characterize specific tumor types, indicate survival and correlate with expression of cancer-related pathways. Tumor GPCR mRNA signatures have prognostic relevance for survival and correlate with expression of numerous cancer-related genes and pathways. GPCR expression in tumors is largely independent of staging/grading/metastasis/driver mutations and GPCRs expressed in cancer cell lines parallels that measured in tumors. Certain GPCRs are frequently mutated and appear to be hotspots, serving as bellwethers of accumulated genomic damage. CNV of GPCRs while common, does not generally correlate with mRNA expression. We suggest a previously under-appreciated role for GPCRs in cancer, perhaps as functional oncogenes, biomarkers, surface antigens and pharmacological targets.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document