Combining radiation therapy with anti-PD-1 for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: An open-label, single-center, single-arm clinical study.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16117-e16117
Author(s):  
Jian-Xu Li ◽  
Ting-Shi Su ◽  
Xiao-Feng Lin ◽  
Yi-Tian Chen ◽  
Shi-Xiong Liang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Clinical Study ◽  
Cancer Staging ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Single Center ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Clinical Trial Information

e16117 Combining radiation therapy with anti-PD-1 for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: an open-label, single-center, single-arm clinical study Jian-Xu Li, Ting-Shi Su, Xiao-Feng Lin, Yi-Tian Chen, Shi-Xiong Liang, Bang-De Xiang; Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, China Abstract Research Funding: Jiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China. Guangxi Medical and Health Appropriate Technology Development and Application Project (No. S2019039), Guangxi, China. Background: Based on the results of recent studies, the PD-1 monoclonal antibodies have been approved to treat the patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) by the FDA. Radiation therapy (RT) can enhance responsiveness to PD-1 monoclonal antibody by potential mechanisms. A phase Ⅱa study was conducted to assess the safety and the efficacy of combining RT with anti-PD-1 for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Methods: Patients with advanced HCC were eligible. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) were adopted, and the dose of radiation were Dt-PGTV 30-50 Gy/10fractions. Camrelizumab (200mg) were given intravenously every 3 weeks since the first day of RT until disease progression, or intolerable toxicity. Adverse events (AEs) and objective response rate (ORR) were summarized to assess the safety and efficacy. Results: From April 2020 to November 2020, 17 patients were enrolled (median age 54, range 32-69). 15 (88%) patients were male. 14 (82%) had ECOG performance score of 0. All the patients had Child-Pugh score A. 16 patients staged as Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging C or China Liver Cancer staging Ⅲ. Extrahepatic metastases were identified in 11 (65%) patients. 13 (77%) patients were Hepatitis B virus infected. 15 (88%) patients had previously 2 lines or more chemotherapy. 9 (53%) patients had Alpha-fetoprotein level≥400 ng/ml. The ORR was 47%. The best response assessed by RECIST 1.1 was partial response (8 patients). Four patients had grade 3 immune-related adverse events (irAEs), including increased aspartate aminotransferase and alanine transaminase (n =1)，decreased hemoglobin (n =1)，decreased platelet count (n =1)，decreased neutrophil count (n =1). All grade 3 irAEs were mitigated with proper treatment. None treatment-related deaths occurred. Conclusions: In this study, RT combined with anti-PD-1 had an acceptable safety profile and indicated an effective treatment option in patients with unresectable HCC. Clinical trial information: NCT04193696. Clinical trial information: NCT04193696.

Sorafenib-Regorafenib Sequential Therapy in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Single-Institute Experience

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (6) ◽  
pp. 611-617 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazuomi Ueshima ◽  
Naoshi Nishida ◽  
Masatoshi Kudo
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Sequential Therapy ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Effective Treatment Option ◽  
Sorafenib Treatment ◽  
Advanced Hcc ◽  
Grade 3

Objectives: Previously, no therapeutic agent has been known to improve the overall survival compared with placebo in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), who have progressed after sorafenib. In this patient population, regorafenib was first demonstrated to confer a survival benefit in the RESORCE trial, and subsequently it was approved as a second-line treatment for patients with advanced HCC. An open-label expanded access program (EAP) of regorafenib was implemented for compassionate use. We investigated the efficacy and safety of regorafenib based on our experience of the RESORCE trial and the EAP. Methods: Data from 5 patients from the RESORCE trial and 6 from the EAP were analyzed retrospectively. All patients had tolerated prior sorafenib and were progressing during sorafenib treatment. Results: The median progression-free survival was 9.2 months (95% CI 2.3-16.1). One patient achieved a partial response and 7 achieved stable disease. The objective response rate was 9.1%, and the disease control rate was 72.7%. No treatment-associated mortalities were observed. Grade 3 hypophosphatemia was observed in 2 patients, grade 2 anorexia was observed in 5 patients, and grade 3 neutropenia was observed in 2 patients. Grade 2 and grade 3 thrombocytopenia were observed in 2 and 3 patients, respectively. All treatment-related adverse events were improved by reduction or interruption of regorafenib. Five patients showed decreased serum albumin levels. Conclusion: Sorafenib and regorafenib sequential therapy presents a safe and effective treatment option for patients with advanced HCC.

A real-world study of camrelizumab in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16121-e16121
Author(s):  
Yong-Yi Zeng ◽  
Wu-hua Guo ◽  
Zhibo Zhang ◽  
Xi Shi ◽  
Yongjie Su ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Real World ◽  
Group Performance ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Chinese Patients ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Phase Ii Studies ◽  
Clinical Trial Information

e16121 Background: Programmed cell death protein‐1(PD-1) targeted immunotherapy is a promising treatment strategy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Anti-PD-1 inhibitor camrelizumab showed antitumour activity in phase II studies of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, with manageable toxicities. This study evaluates safety and efficacy of camrelizumab in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Methods: This is a multicentre, real‐world trial done at thirty-three centres in Fujian Province, China. Eligible patients were aged 18 to 75 years was diagnosed by China Liver Cancer Staging(CNLC) 2019 clinical diagnostic criteria or with a histological or cytological diagnosis of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, unresectable or had progressed on or were intolerant to previous systemic treatment, and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score of 0-1. Patients were received camrelizumab 200 mg intravenously every 2 weeks plus other treatments, such as molecular targeted drug, transcatheyer artetial chemoembolization, radiotherapy and chemotherapy. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival. Safety was analysed in all treated patients. Follow-up is ongoing. Results: Between Mar 12, 2020, and Dec 25, 2020, 63 patients were screened for eligibility, of whom 41 eligible patients received camrelizumab were recruited and among whom 15 received apatinib, 16 received lenvatinib, 2 received sorafenib and 1 received regorafenib. Median followup was 5.28 months (IQR 1.63–10.20). Objective response was reported in 12 (29.3%; 95% CI 16.1–45.5) of 41 patients. Disease control was reported in 34 (82.9%; 95% CI 67.9–92.8) of 41 patients. The median PFS was not reached, and expected more than 9 months. Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 21 (51.2%) of 41 patients; the most common were increased gamma-glutamyltransferase (15 [36.6%]) and increased aspartate aminotransferase (7 [17%]). One death was judged by the investigators to be potentially treatment-related (due to upper gastrointestinal bleeding). Conclusions: Camrelizumab showed promising efficacy and safety in pretreated Chinese patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, and might represent a new treatment option for these patients. Clinical trial information: ChiCTR2000041405. Research Sponsor: Jiangsu Hengrui Medicine Co., Ltd. Clinical trial information: ChiCTR2000041405.

Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy with low-dose cisplatin and doxorubicin (PIPAC C/D) in patients with gastric cancer and peritoneal metastasis (PIPAC-GA1).

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 99-99 ◽  
Author(s):  
Florian Struller ◽  
Philipp Horvath ◽  
Wiebke Solass ◽  
Frank Jurgen Weinreich ◽  
Alfred Konigsrainer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Peritoneal Metastasis ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Tumor Regression ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Secondary Endpoints ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Clinical Trial Information

99 Background: Efficacy of 2nd and 3rdline chemotherapy in recurrent gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis (RGCPM) is limited. We assessed the feasibility, safety and activity of intraperitoneal chemotherapy as PIPAC C/D in RGCPM after > 1 line of intravenous chemotherapy. Methods: Open-label, single-arm, Phase II ICH-GCP Clinical Trial (NCT01854255) Patients were scheduled for 3 courses q42 days of low-dose PIPAC with doxorubicin 1.5 mg/m2 and cisplatin 7.5 mg/m2. Primary endpoint was objective tumor response (RECIST 1.1). Secondary endpoints were safety (CTCAE 4.0), histological tumor regression (PRGS) and overall survival. Results: 25 patients were enrolled. 10/25 (40 %, ITT) patients had an OTR. Complete or major regression on histology was observed in 9/12 (75 %) patients who underwent at least 2 PIPAC cycles. Mean overall survival was 8.4 months (13.1 months in patients with PCI < 12). There were no treatment-related deaths, no grade 4 toxicity and four (16%) grade 3 toxicities. Conclusions: PIPAC C/D is well tolerated and active in patients with RGCPM. Survival is encouraging. Randomized controlled trials should now be designed. Clinical trial information: NCT01854255. [Table: see text]

Real-Life Clinical Practice with Sorafenib in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Single-Center Experience Second Analysis

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 728-734 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tadaaki Arizumi ◽  
Kazuomi Ueshima ◽  
Mina Iwanishi ◽  
Hirokazu Chishina ◽  
Masashi Kono ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Tumor Response ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Single Center ◽  
Grade 3

Objectives: Sorafenib has become a standard therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma following the demonstration of significant increase in progression-free survival as well as overall survival (OS) in the 2-phase III trials. We examined efficacy and adverse events (AEs) in patients treated with sorafenib over a 6-year period since approval in Japan. Methods: Two hundred and forty-one patients treated with sorafenib at the Kinki University Hospital were retrospectively analyzed clinically for the factors related to survival periods, tumor response evaluated by the Response Evaluation Criteria In Cancer of the Liver (RECICL) and AEs. Results: OS was 14.3 months. According to the RECICL, the objective response and disease control rates were 18.6% (43 of 241) and 61.1% (137 of 241), respectively. AEs were seen in 77.3% (187 of 241), with Grade 3 or higher in 23.6% (57 of 241). The most frequent AE was hand-foot skin reaction in 109 patients (45.0%), and 28 patients (11.8%) showed Grade 3 or higher. Significant factors contributing to the OS were treatment duration (p = 0.0204), up-to-7 criteria (p = 0.0400), increase of Child-Pugh score (p = 0.0008) and tumor response determined by the RECICL (p = 0.0007). Conclusion: Based on the analysis, using many cases at a single center, we concluded that continuation of treatment with sorafenib for ≥90 days without decrease of liver function was critical if tumor response was determined as stable disease or higher.

A clinical trial for the safety and immunogenicity of a DNA-based immunotherapy in men with biochemically (PSA) relapsed prostate cancer.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 80-80 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neal D. Shore ◽  
Elisabeth I. Heath ◽  
Luke T. Nordquist ◽  
Heather H. Cheng ◽  
Kamalnayan Bhatt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Immunological Response ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Definitive Therapy ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Levels ◽  
Site Pain ◽  
Clinical Trial Information

80 Background: Introducing amino acid sequence changes in highly expressed self-antigens for androgen sensitive prostate cancer pts might be sufficient to break tolerance, thus a DNA vaccine was developed using SynCon PSA and PSMA (INO-5150) that share 96.8 and 91.6% sequence identities to these native antigens, respectively. Administration of these antigens to prostate cancer pts along with plasmid encoded adjuvant IL-12 (INO-9012) via electroporation (EP) using the CELLECTRA5P device is postulated to break tolerance, resulting in an antigen-specific immune response which could lead to stabilization of disease progression. Methods: This Phase I, open-label, multicenter study included prostate cancer pts post-definitive therapy with a rising PSA ≥ 1.0 ng/ml after surgery, or ≥ 2.0 ng/ml above nadir after RT and PSA doubling time > 3 months, testosterone > 150 ng/dL and no evidence of metastasis within 12 months. INO-5150 with or without INO-9012 was administered IM followed by EP in 4 arms: low (2 mg) or high dose (8.5 mg) INO-5150 alone or with 1 mg INO-9012 on Day 0 and at week 3, 12, and 24 in 60 planned pts (15 pts/arm). DLT assessments were performed after dosing of the first 3 pts of each arm at Week 4. Results: Enrollment is complete in all 4 arms and at data cut-off (10Oct16), 62 enrolled pts received at least one, 60 pts received 3 and about half, 28 pts (10 in arm A, 8 in B, 7 in C, and 3 in D) received all 4 vaccinations. Safety: there were no DLTs noted. Four pts had five Grade 3 SAEs noted as pre-syncope, cardiac disorder, hospitalization for fall, ALT and AST elevation. No Grade 4-5 AEs were noted. Grade 1-3 treatment-emergent AEs occurred in 50 (81%) pts: 12 (75%) in arm A, 13 (87%) B, 13 (87%) C, and 12 (75%) in D. The most common AEs were injection site pain (24/39%), erythema (13/21%), swelling (12/19%), bruising (10/16%), hyperglycemia (8/13%) and fatigue (6/10%), all Grade 1-2. Assessments of immunological response, PSA kinetics and correlation with clinical outcome are ongoing and will be presented. Conclusions: INO-5150 (+) or (-) INO-9012 is generally safe and well-tolerable at all 4 dose levels in a biochemically relapsed prostate cancer patient population. Clinical trial information: NCT02514213.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document