Real-world evidence (RWE) study of CAR-T agents in leukemia and lymphoma patients.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e19573-e19573
Author(s):  
Lincy S. Lal ◽  
Cori Blauer-Peterson ◽  
Stacey DaCosta Byfield ◽  
Jennifer Malin
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Resource Utilization ◽  
Real World ◽  
Total Population ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
Car T Cell ◽  
Real World Evidence ◽  
Car T ◽  
Study Population

e19573 Background: Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR T) cell products are considered gene treatments, producing long term results, with just one infusion. Real world evidence on the two available CAR T cell products, tisagenlecleucel (T) and axicabtagene ciloleucel (AC) are limited in leukemia and lymphoma patients, specifically at the individual product level. This study presents treatment outcomes and resource utilization of these products from a payer perspective. Methods: Patients with evidence of CAR T administration per claims algorithm and from documentation from a prior authorization program from January 1, 2017 to May 30, 2020 were included; the CAR T administration was the index event. Baseline demographics and clinical characteristics, healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) for the CART T administration and pre and post CAR T administration for a fixed 6-month period, and previous treatments were captured and presented by product, using descriptive analytics. Results: The study population included 148 patients, mean age (SD): 57.4 (16.9), with 34% female, and 64% Commercial patients versus 36% Medicare patients, with a mean follow-up of 319 days (SD: 210). There were 15 leukemia patients, 119 lymphoma patients, and 14 patients with other indication in the study population; 71(48%) had evidence of being on a clinical trial during the study. The mean Charleson Comorbidity score at baseline was 3.9. Major comorbidities included anemia (71%), diseases of the heart (72%). 29(20%) patients were treated with T of which 24% were for leukemia and 76% for lymphoma and 67 (46%) were treated with AC of which 100% were for lymphoma, and 52 (35%) patients did not differentiate between products. Majority of the CAR T administration took place inpatient (84%). Baseline 6-month HCRU was 52% ER visits and 59% hospitalizations, compared to post 6-month utilization at 45% ER visits and 49% hospitalizations for the total population. 118 (80%) patients had evidence of prior treatment indicating that the CAR T was at least in the second line setting or higher. The most common priming chemotherapy was cyclophosphamide-fludarabine in 69 (47%) patients. Of the total population, 72% did not have any evidence of further treatment in the available follow-up time, specifically, 47% in the leukemia and 76% in the lymphoma populations, respectively. Conclusions: Majority of patients have evidence of prior treatments before the CAR T index date, indicating relapse. There is evidence of decrease in the HCRU subsequent to treatment, compared to pre period and 72% do not have subsequent treatment in the available follow-up time, indicating a high level of efficacy.

REAL-WORLD RESULTS ON CD19 CAR T-CELL FOR 60 FRENCH PATIENTS WITH RELAPSED/REFRACTORY DIFFUSE LARGE B-CELL LYMPHOMA INCLUDED IN A TEMPORARY AUTHORIZATION FOR USE PROGRAM

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 ◽  
pp. 301-301 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Thieblemont ◽  
S. Le Gouill ◽  
R. Di Blasi ◽  
G. Cartron ◽  
F. Morschhauser ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Real World ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Car T Cell ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Car T ◽  
Large B Cell

scholarly journals Long-Term Follow-Up of Anti-CD19 Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (32) ◽  
pp. 3805-3815
Author(s):  
Kathryn M. Cappell ◽  
Richard M. Sherry ◽  
James C. Yang ◽  
Stephanie L. Goff ◽  
Danielle A. Vanasse ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Cell Therapy ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
T Cell Therapy ◽  
Car T Cell ◽  
Car T

PURPOSE Anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) are artificial fusion proteins that cause CD19-specific T-cell activation. Durability of remissions and incidence of long-term adverse events are critical factors determining the utility of anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy, but long-term follow-up of patients treated with anti-CD19 CAR T cells is limited. This work provides the longest follow-up of patients in remission after anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy. METHODS Between 2009 and 2015, we administered 46 CAR T-cell treatments to 43 patients (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00924326 ). Patients had relapsed B-cell malignancies of the following types: diffuse large B-cell lymphoma or primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL/PMBCL; n = 28), low-grade B-cell lymphoma (n = 8), or chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL; n = 7). This report focuses on long-term outcomes of these patients. The CAR used was FMC63-28Z; axicabtagene ciloleucel uses the same CAR. Cyclophosphamide plus fludarabine conditioning chemotherapy was administered before CAR T cells. RESULTS The percentages of CAR T-cell treatments resulting in a > 3-year duration of response (DOR) were 51% (95% CI, 35% to 67%) for all evaluable treatments, 48% (95% CI, 28% to 69%) for DLBCL/PMBCL, 63% (95% CI, 25% to 92%) for low-grade lymphoma, and 50% (95% CI, 16% to 84%) for CLL. The median event-free survival of all 45 evaluable treatments was 55 months. Long-term adverse effects were rare, except for B-cell depletion and hypogammaglobulinemia. Median peak blood CAR-positive cell levels were higher among patients with a DOR of > 3 years (98/µL; range, 9-1,217/µL) than among patients with a DOR of < 3 years (18/µL; range, 0-308/μL, P = .0051). CONCLUSION Complete remissions of a variety of B-cell malignancies lasting ≥ 3 years occurred after 51% of evaluable anti-CD19 CAR T-cell treatments. Remissions of up to 9 years are ongoing. Late adverse events were rare.

scholarly journals Feasibility, and Efficacy of Donor-Derived cd19-Targeted Car t-Cell Therapy in Refractory/Relapsed(r/r)b-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (b-all) Patients

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4-6
Author(s):  
Xian Zhang ◽  
Junfang Yang ◽  
Wenqian Li ◽  
Gailing Zhang ◽  
Yunchao Su ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Cell Therapy ◽  
T Cell Therapy ◽  
Car T Cells ◽  
Car T Cell ◽  
Car T Cell Therapy ◽  
Car T ◽  
Grade 3

Backgrounds As CAR T-cell therapy is a highly personalized therapy, process of generating autologous CAR-T cells for each patient is complex and can still be problematic, particularly for heavily pre-treated patients and patients with significant leukemia burden. Here, we analyzed the feasibility and efficacy in 37 patients with refractory/relapsed (R/R) B-ALL who received CAR T-cells derived from related donors. Patients and Methods From April 2017 to May 2020, 37 R/R B-ALL patients with a median age of 19 years (3-61 years), were treated with second-generation CD19 CAR-T cells derived from donors. The data was aggregated from three clinical trials (www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT03173417; NCT02546739; and www.chictr.org.cn ChiCTR-ONC-17012829). Of the 37 patients, 28 were relapsed following allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HSCT) and whose lymphocytes were collected from their transplant donors (3 HLA matched sibling and 25 haploidentical). For the remaining 9 patients without prior transplant, the lymphocytes were collected from HLA identical sibling donors (n=5) or haploidentical donors (n=4) because CAR-T cells manufacture from patient samples either failed (n=5) or blasts in peripheral blood were too high (&gt;40%) to collect quality T-cells. The median CAR-T cell dose infused was 3×105/kg (1-30×105/kg). Results For the 28 patients who relapsed after prior allo-HSCT, 27 (96.4%) achieved CR within 30 days post CAR T-cell infusion, of which 25 (89.3%) were minimal residual disease (MRD) negative. Within one month following CAR T-cell therapy, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) occurred in 3 patients including 1 with rash and 2 with diarrhea. A total of 19 of the 28 (67.9%) patients had cytokine release syndrome (CRS), including two patients (7.1%) with Grade 3-4 CRS. Four patients had CAR T-cell related neurotoxicity including 3 with Grade 3-4 events. With a medium follow up of 103 days (1-669days), the median overall survival (OS) was 169 days (1-668 days), and the median leukemia-free survival (LFS) was 158 days (1-438 days). After CAR T-cell therapy, 15 patients bridged into a second allo-HSCT and one of 15 patients (6.7%) relapsed following transplant, and two died from infection. There were 11 patients that did not receive a second transplantation, of which three patients (27.3%) relapsed, and four parents died (one due to relapse, one from arrhythmia and two from GVHD/infection). Two patients were lost to follow-up. The remaining nine patients had no prior transplantation. At the time of T-cell collection, the median bone marrow blasts were 90% (range: 18.5%-98.5%), and the median peripheral blood blasts were 10% (range: 0-70%). CR rate within 30 days post CAR-T was 44.4% (4/9 cases). Six patients developed CRS, including four with Grade 3 CRS. Only one patient had Grade 3 neurotoxicity. No GVHD occurred following CAR T-cell therapy. Among the nine patients, five were treated with CAR T-cells derived from HLA-identical sibling donors and three of those five patients achieved CR. One patient who achieved a CR died from disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) on day 16. Two patients who achieved a CR bridged into allo-HSCT, including one patient who relapsed and died. One of two patients who did not response to CAR T-cell therapy died from leukemia. Four of the nine patients were treated with CAR T-cells derived from haploidentical related donors. One of the four cases achieved a CR but died from infection on day 90. The other three patients who had no response to CAR T-cell therapy died from disease progression within 3 months (7-90 days). Altogether, seven of the nine patients died with a median time of 19 days (7-505 days). Conclusions We find that manufacturing CD19+ CAR-T cells derived from donors is feasible. For patients who relapse following allo-HSCT, the transplant donor derived CAR-T cells are safe and effective with a CR rate as high as 96.4%. If a patient did not have GVHD prior to CAR T-cell therapy, the incidence of GVHD following CAR T-cell was low. Among patients without a history of transplantation, an inability to collect autologous lymphocytes signaled that the patient's condition had already reached a very advanced stage. However, CAR T-cells derived from HLA identical siblings can still be considered in our experience, no GVHD occurred in these patients. But the efficacy of CAR T-cells from haploidentical donors was very poor. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Is Critical to Maintain Remissions after CD19-CAR T-Cell Therapy for Pediatric ALL: A Single Center Experience

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 39-40
Author(s):  
Aimee C Talleur ◽  
Renee M. Madden ◽  
Amr Qudeimat ◽  
Ewelina Mamcarz ◽  
Akshay Sharma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Cell Therapy ◽  
T Cell Therapy ◽  
Allogeneic Hct ◽  
Car T Cells ◽  
Car T Cell ◽  
Car T Cell Therapy ◽  
Car T

CD19-CAR T-cell therapy has shown remarkable efficacy in pediatric patients with relapsed and/or refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (r/r ALL). Despite high short-term remission rates, many responses are not durable and the best management of patients who achieve a complete response (CR) post-CAR T-cell therapy remains controversial. In particular, it is unclear if these patients should be observed or proceed to consolidative allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). To address this question, we reviewed the clinical course of all patients (n=22) who received either an investigational CAR T-cell product (Phase I study: SJCAR19 [NCT03573700]; n=12) or tisagenlecleucel (n=10) at our institution. The investigational CD19-CAR T cells were generated by a standard cGMP-compliant procedure using a lentiviral vector encoding a 2nd generation CD19-CAR with a FMC63-based CD19 binding domain, CD8a stalk and transmembrane domain, and 41BB.ζ signaling domain. Patients received therapy between 8/2018 and 3/2020. All products met manufacturing release specifications. Within the entire cohort, median age at time of infusion was 12.3 years old (range: 1.8-23.5) and median pre-infusion marrow burden using flow-cytometry minimal residual disease (MRD) testing was 6.8% (range: 0.003-100%; 1 patient detectable by next-generation sequencing [NGS] only). All patients received lymphodepleting chemotherapy (fludarabine, 25mg/m2 daily x3, and cyclophosphamide, 900mg/m2 daily x1), followed by a single infusion of CAR T-cells. Phase I product dosing included 1x106 CAR+ T-cells/kg (n=6) or 3x106 CAR+ T-cells/kg (n=6). Therapy was well tolerated, with a low incidence of cytokine release syndrome (any grade: n=10; Grade 3-4: n=4) and neurotoxicity (any grade: n=8; Grade 3-4: n=3). At 4-weeks post-infusion, 15/22 (68.2%) patients achieved a CR in the marrow, of which 13 were MRDneg (MRDneg defined as no detectable leukemia by flow-cytometry, RT-PCR and/or NGS, when available). Among the 2 MRDpos patients, 1 (detectable by NGS only) relapsed 50 days after CAR T-cell infusion and 1 died secondary to invasive fungal infection 35 days after infusion. Within the MRDneg cohort, 6/13 patients proceeded to allogeneic HCT while in MRDneg/CR (time to HCT, range: 1.8-2.9 months post-CAR T-cell infusion). All 6 HCT recipients remain in remission with a median length of follow-up post-HCT of 238.5 days (range 19-441). In contrast, only 1 (14.3%) patient out of 7 MRDneg/CR patients who did not receive allogeneic HCT, remains in remission with a follow up of greater 1 year post-CAR T-cell infusion (HCT vs. no HCT: p&lt;0.01). The remaining 6 patients developed recurrent detectable leukemia within 2 to 9 months post-CAR T-cell infusion (1 patient detectable by NGS only). Notably, recurring leukemia remained CD19+ in 4 of 5 evaluable patients. All 4 patients with CD19+ relapse received a 2nd CAR T-cell infusion (one in combination with pembrolizumab) and 2 achieved MRDneg/CR. There were no significant differences in outcome between SJCAR19 study participants and patients who received tisagenlecleucel. With a median follow up of one year, the 12 month event free survival (EFS) of all 22 patients is 25% (median EFS: 3.5 months) and the 12 month overall survival (OS) 70% (median OS not yet reached). In conclusion, infusion of investigational and FDA-approved autologous CD19-CAR T cells induced high CR rates in pediatric patients with r/r ALL. However, our current experience shows that sustained remission without consolidative allogeneic HCT is not seen in most patients. Our single center experience highlights not only the need to explore maintenance therapies other than HCT for MRDneg/CR patients, but also the need to improve the in vivo persistence of currently available CD19-CAR T-cell products. Disclosures Sharma: Spotlight Therapeutics: Consultancy; Magenta Therapeutics: Other: Research Collaboration; CRISPR Therapeutics, Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Novartis: Other: Clinical Trial PI. Velasquez:St. Jude: Patents & Royalties; Rally! Foundation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Gottschalk:Patents and patent applications in the fields of T-cell & Gene therapy for cancer: Patents & Royalties; TESSA Therapeutics: Other: research collaboration; Inmatics and Tidal: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck and ViraCyte: Consultancy.

scholarly journals B Cell Maturation Antigen-Specific CAR T Cells for Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma: A Meta-Analysis

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 3113-3113 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nico Gagelmann ◽  
Francis Ayuketang Ayuk ◽  
Djordje Atanackovic ◽  
Nicolaus Kroeger
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Response Rates ◽  
Overall Response ◽  
Car T Cells ◽  
Car T Cell ◽  
Car T

Background Cellular immunotherapies represent an enormously promising strategy for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells targeting B cell maturation antigen (BCMA) have shown impressive results in early-phase clinical studies. Here, we summarize the current body of evidence on the role of anti-BCMA CAR T cell therapy for RRMM. Methods We performed a systematic literature review to identify all publicly available prospective studies. We searched Medline, Cochrane trials registry, and www.clinicaltrials.gov. To include the most recent evidence, meeting abstracts from international hematology congresses were added. A conventional meta-analysis was conducted using meta and metafor packages in R statistical software. Pooled event rates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using the inverse variance method within a random-effects framework. Main efficacy outcomes were overall response, complete response (CR), and minimal residual disease (MRD). Furthermore, relapse rates, progression-free survival, and overall survival were evaluated. In terms of safety, outcomes were cytokine release syndrome (CRS), neurotoxicity, and hematologic toxic effects. Results Fifteen studies comprising a total of 285 patients with heavily pretreated RRMM were included in quantitative analyses. Patients received a median of seven prior treatment lines (such as proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory drugs, monoclonal antibodies, stem cell transplantation) which included autologous stem cell transplantation in 90% of patients. The median age of patients was 59 years and median follow-up duration ranged from 1.1 to 11.3 months. Most studies used 4-1BB (or CD137), a member of the TNF receptor superfamily, as an activation-induced T-cell costimulatory molecule. Most studies used fludarabine and cyclophosphamide for lymphodepletion while one study used busulfan and cyclophosphamide and one study used cyclophosphamide only. Most studies used the former Lee criteria for CRS grading. Anti-BCMA CAR T cells resulted in a pooled overall response of 82% (95% CI, 74-88%). The pooled proportion of CR in all evaluable patients was 36% (95% CI, 24-50%). Within responders, the pooled proportion of MRD negativity was 77% (95% CI, 67-85%). Higher dose levels of infused CAR+ cells were associated with higher overall response rates resulting in a pooled proportion of 88% (95% CI, 78-94%). In addition, peak CAR T cell expansion appeared to be associated with responses.The presence of high-risk cytogenetics appeared to be associated with lower overall response rates resulting in a pooled proportion of 68% (95% CI, 47-83%). The presence of extramedullary disease at time of infusion did not influence outcome and was associated with similar response rates compared with RRMM patients who did not have extramedullary disease, resulting in a pooled proportion of 78% (95% CI, 47-93%). The pooled relapse rate of all responders was 45% (95% CI, 27-64%) and the median progression-free survival was 10 months. In terms of overall survival, pooled survival rates were 84% (95% CI, 60-95%) at last follow-up (median, 11 months). In terms of safety, the pooled proportion of CRS of any grade was 69% (95% CI, 51-83%). Notably, the pooled proportions of CRS grades 3-4 and neurotoxicity were 15% (95% CI, 10-23%) and 18% (95% CI, 10-31%). Peak CAR T cell expansion appeared to be more likely in the setting of more severe CRS in three studies. Most hematologic toxic effects of grade 3 or higher were neutropenia (85%), thrombocytopenia (70%), and leukopenia (60%). Conclusion Anti-BCMA CAR T cells showed high response rates, even in high-risk features such as high-risk cytogenetics and extramedullary disease at time of CAR T cell infusion. Toxicity was manageable across all early-phase studies. However, almost half of the patients who achieved a response eventually relapsed. Larger studies with longer follow-up evaluating the association of response and survival are needed. Disclosures Ayuk: Novartis: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding. Kroeger:Medac: Honoraria; Sanofi-Aventis: Honoraria; Neovii: Honoraria, Research Funding; Riemser: Research Funding; JAZZ: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; DKMS: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Systematic Literature Review of the Clinical Evidence in Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) Large B-Cell Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 5821-5821
Author(s):  
David G. Maloney ◽  
Fei Fei Liu ◽  
Lisette Nientker ◽  
Cathelijne Alleman ◽  
Brian Hutton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
T Cell Therapy ◽  
Car T Cell ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Car T ◽  
Large B Cell

Introduction: Large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) is the most common subtype of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Frontline treatment is curative in ~60% of patients (pts); however, ~30% of pts relapse and ~10% are refractory to frontline treatment. Treatment options for pts with relapsed/refractory (R/R) disease, especially in the third-line or greater (3L+) setting, have been primarily salvage chemotherapies (CTs). Recently, 2 CAR T cell products, axicabtagene ciloleucel (Yescarta®) and tisagenlecleucel (Kymriah®), and the antibody-drug conjugate, polatuzumab vedotin (Polivy®), were approved in the 3L setting. A systematic literature review (SLR) of R/R LBCL was conducted to identify relevant evidence on clinical outcomes in LBCL pts, including these new therapies, within the second-line and greater (2L+) or 3L+ setting, and to define the unmet medical need. Methods: This SLR was conducted in accordance with the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions and European Union Health Technology Assessment requirements. The review identified randomized and nonrandomized/observational studies within R/R LBCL, including diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), follicular lymphoma grade 3B (FL3B), primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL), DLBCL transformed from indolent lymphomas, and R/R DLBCL with secondary central nervous system (SCNS) involvement. Sources were EMBASE, MEDLINE, The Cochrane Library, and clinical conferences (ASCO, ESMO, EHA, ASH, ICML, AACR, and EORTC) from Jan 2000 to Apr 2019. Results : Following screening of 8683 database records and additional sources, 103 publications covering 78 unique studies were identified. Studies identified were characterized by line of treatment and R/R LBCL subtype (Figure). OS, PFS, DOR, OR, and safety observed from the identified studies were described. Disease subtypes, pt eligibility criteria, and length of follow-up varied notably across studies. In the 3L+ population, 11 salvage CT and 2 CAR T cell therapy studies reported survival outcomes. With salvage CT, the reported ORR across studies ranged from 0% to 54%, while CR ranged from 5.6%-31%. Median OS (mOS) ranged between 3-9 months, with one outlying study reporting mOS at 20 months. Median PFS (mPFS) reported within the salvage CT studies ranged from 2-6 months. Among CAR T cell therapies, pts treated with axicabtagene ciloleucel (n=101) reported a CR rate of 58% and median DOR (mDOR) was 11.1 months after a median follow-up of 27.1 months. mPFS was 5.9 months and mOS was not reached. At a median follow-up of 19.3 months, pts treated with tisagenlecleucel (n=115) had a CR of 40% but the mDOR was not reached. mOS was 11.1 months for all infused patients. In the 2L+ transplant-eligible population (36 studies), pts who received high-dose CT + HSCT achieved mOS between 9 months to 5 years. In the transplant noneligible population, 16 studies reported mOS between 3-20 months. Studies involving mixed transplant-eligible and noneligible populations (30 studies) reported mOS of 1-17 months. A few studies with limited sample sizes were found to report outcomes in LBCL subtypes (eg, PMBCL, SCNS lymphoma, DLBCL transformed from non-FL indolent lymphoma, FL3B). In the 3L+ setting, 1 study reported that mOS was not reached after a median of 6.6 months. In the 2L+ setting, 4 studies reported mPFS and mOS outcomes ranging between 2-9 months and 10-16 months, respectively. Among studies assessing safety of salvage CTs in R/R LBCL, neutropenia, leukocytopenia, thrombocytopenia, and infections were the most commonly reported adverse events (AEs), with neutropenia being the most reported. Among the 3 studies reporting safety outcomes of CAR T cell therapy, data suggest that hematologic AEs (possibly related to lymphodepleting CT), cytokine release syndrome, and neurotoxicity are the most reported. Conclusions : Despite the availability of new therapies for 2L+ and 3L + LBCL, examination of the current evidence has shown that there exists a high unmet need for additional therapeutic options that provide favorable benefit/risk and durable response for these patients. Furthermore, limited data are available for the rarer subtypes of LBCL. Both findings represent important treatment gaps for R/R LBCL that must be addressed in future research geared toward improvement of the current treatment landscape. Disclosures Maloney: Juno Therapeutics: Honoraria, Patents & Royalties: patients pending , Research Funding; Celgene,Kite Pharma: Honoraria, Research Funding; BioLine RX, Gilead,Genentech,Novartis: Honoraria; A2 Biotherapeutics: Honoraria, Other: Stock options . Liu:Celgene Corporation: Employment. Nientker:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy; Pharmerit Cöoperatief U.A.: Employment. Alleman:Pharmerit Cöoperatief U.A.: Employment; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy. Garcia:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership.

scholarly journals Efficacy and Safety of JWCAR029 in Adult Patients with Relapsed and Refractory B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4187-4187 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zixun Yan ◽  
Wen Wang ◽  
Zhong Zheng ◽  
Ming Hao ◽  
Su Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Car T Cells ◽  
Car T Cell ◽  
Non Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Car T

Abstract Introduction JWCAR029 is a novel CD19-directed 4-1BB stimulated chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell type, which is different from JWCAR017 with independent production of CD4 and CD8 T cells and transfusion in non-fixed ratio. We conducted a single arm, open-label, dose escalation Phase I trial of JWCAR029 in relapsed and refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NCT03355859). Methods From January to July 2018, 10 patients have been enrolled in this trial, including eight diffused large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and two MALT lymphoma, with median age of 47 years (range 32 to 59 years). All the patients received immunochemotherapy as induction and more than two lines of salvage treatment. Two patients received bridging chemotherapy after T-cell collection due to rapid tumor progression, followed by re-evaluation before CAR-T cell infusion. Lymphodepletion preconditioning was accomplished by fludarabine 25mg/m2/d and cyclophosphamide 250mg/m2/d on Day-4 to D-2, followed by CAR-T cell infusion on Day0. JWCAR029 was administrated as a single infusion in escalation dose levels, from 2.5×107 CAR-T cells (dose level 1, DL1) to 5.0×107 CAR-T cells (dose level 2, DL2) and to 1.0×108 CAR-T cells (dose level 3, DL3) according to mTPI-2 algorithm. Circulating blood count, serum biochemistry, and coagulation status were follow-up after infusion. Cytokines were assessed on a Luminex platform. Tumor evaluation was performed on Day 29 by PET-CT. PK data were detected by flow cytometry and real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction system. All the adverse events were recorded. The study was approved by the Shanghai Rui Jin Hospital Review Board with informed consent obtained in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Results The demographic characteristics of the patients were demonstrated in Table 1. Among six evaluable patients (3 of DL1 and 3 of DL2), the ORR was 100% on Day 29, including four complete remission and 2 partial remission. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) was 100% in Gr 1, with main symptoms as fever (<39.0 degrees), fatigue, and muscle soreness. No neurotoxicity was observed. Four of the six patients with fever >38.0 degrees used prophylactic IL-6 Inhibitor (8mg/kg, ACTEMRA, two patients administered twice). No patients received steroids. The CRS showed no difference between dose level groups (p>0.99). Adverse effects included leukopenia (Gr 3-4: 83.3%, Gr 1-2: 16.7%), hypofibrinogenemia (Gr 1: 16.7%, Gr 2-4: 0%), liver dysfunction (Gr 1: 33.3%, Gr 2-4: 0%), elevated CRP (Gr 1: 83.3%, Gr 2-4: 0%), ferritin (Gr 1-2: 83.3%, Gr 2-4: 0%), or IL-6 (Gr 1-2:100%, Gr 3-4: 0%, Table 2). Conclusion Although long-term follow-up was needed, the preliminary data of six patients in this trial have demonstrated high response rates and safety of JWCAR029 in treating relapsed and refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Disclosures Hao: JW Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Updated outcomes with axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) retreatment (reTx) in patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory (R/R) indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (iNHL) in ZUMA-5.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7548-7548
Author(s):  
Julio C. Chavez ◽  
Caron A. Jacobson ◽  
Alison Sehgal ◽  
Sattva Swarup Neelapu ◽  
David G. Maloney ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Neutralizing Antibodies ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Tumor Burden ◽  
Primary Analysis ◽  
T Cell Therapy ◽  
Car T Cell ◽  
Car T ◽  
Grade 3

7548 Background: ZUMA-5 is a Phase 2 study of axi-cel anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy in pts with R/R iNHL (follicular lymphoma [FL]; marginal zone lymphoma [MZL]). In the primary analysis, 11 pts (9 FL; 2 MZL) were retreated with axi-cel, achieving an overall response rate (ORR) of 100% (91% complete response [CR] rate) at a median follow-up of 2.3 mo post-reTx, with no Grade ≥3 cytokine release syndrome (CRS) or neurologic events (NEs; Chavez et al. ASH 2020. #2036). Here, we report updated clinical and translational outcomes with longer follow-up in pts retreated with axi-cel in ZUMA-5. Methods: Eligible pts with FL or MZL had R/R disease after ≥2 lines of therapy. Pts were considered for reTx if they progressed after a response at mo 3, had no evidence of CD19-negative relapse in biopsy, had no axi-cel neutralizing antibodies, and had no Grade 4 CRS or NEs with 1st Tx. Retreatment was per investigator discretion. At both Txs, pts received axi-cel (2×106 CAR T cells/kg) after conditioning chemotherapy. Results: As of 9/14/2020, 13 pts with iNHL (11 FL; 2 MZL) received axi-cel reTx, with 2 pts retreated after the primary analysis. Before their 1st Tx, pts had median 4 prior lines of therapy; 85% had stage 3–4 disease; 82% had FLIPI of ≥3; 46% were POD24; 77% had refractory disease. Among the 13 retreated pts, 85% had a CR to 1st Tx. Median 1st duration of response (DOR) was 8.2 mo. Detectable CD19 was confirmed in all evaluable biopsies from retreated pts at relapse, and median time from 1st Tx to reTx was 10.6 mo. Following reTx, the ORR was 100% (77% CR rate). After a median follow-up of 11.4 mo, the median DOR had not yet been reached; 46% of retreated pts had ongoing responses at data cutoff. At 1st Tx, CRS occurred in 9 pts (5 Grade 1, 4 Grade 2); NEs occurred in 5 (3 Grade 1, 1 Grade 2, 1 Grade 3). At reTx, CRS occurred in 8 pts (6 Grade 1, 2 Grade 2); NEs occurred in 4 (3 Grade 1, 1 Grade 2). Median peak levels of biomarkers typically associated with severe CRS and NEs were similar at reTx and 1st Tx (IL-6, 7.7 vs 5.7 pg/mL; IL-2, 1.8 vs 0.9 pg/mL; IFN-γ, 62.9 vs 64.2 pg/mL). In the 11 retreated pts with FL, tumor burden (median sum of product diameters [SPD]) was lower before reTx vs 1st Tx (1416 vs 4770 mm2). Engraftment index (CAR T-cell expansion relative to SPD) is an indirect proxy for effector:target ratio and a key covariate of response to axi-cel (Locke et al. Blood Adv. 2020). Though median peak CAR T-cell levels appeared lower at reTx vs 1st Tx (5.2 vs 14.3 CAR+ cells/µL blood), engraftment index was similar (0.003 vs 0.005 cells/µL×mm2). Conclusions: Axi-cel reTx achieved deep and durable responses, with an acceptable safety profile. Tumor CD19 positivity was maintained at relapse, and engraftment index was similar at both Txs, comparing favorably to previous reports in aggressive lymphomas (Locke et al. ASCO 2020. #8012). These data suggest axi-cel reTx is a promising option for pts with R/R iNHL. Clinical trial information: NCT03105336.

Single-Center Experience with Axicabtagene-Ciloleucel (Axi-cel) and Tisagenlecleucel (Tisa-cel) for Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Comparable Response Rates and Manageable Toxicity

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 34-35
Author(s):  
Veit Buecklein ◽  
Viktoria Blumenberg ◽  
Josephine Ackermann ◽  
Christian Schmidt ◽  
Kai Rejeski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Time Interval ◽  
T Cell Therapy ◽  
Car T Cell ◽  
Single Center Experience ◽  
Car T Cell Therapy ◽  
Car T

The CD19 CAR T-cell products Axi-cel and Tisa-cel induce complete responses (CR) in 40-58% of patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory (r/r) Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL). However, treatment can be associated with significant toxicity, with Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and Immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) as the most prominent and specific adverse events of CAR T-cell therapy. Toxicity profiles differ between both commercially available products, mainly due to their divergent co-stimulatory domain (4-1BB in Tisa-cel vs. CD28 in Axi-cel). Here, we report our single-center experience of DLBCL patients treated with Axi-cel or Tisa-cel at the LMU Munich University Hospital between January 2019 and June 2020. Toxicities, response rates and survival of DLBCL patients were retrospectively assessed. As of June 2020, 48 patients were enrolled for CD19-CAR T-cell therapies at our centre, and 37 DLBCL patients (pts) were apheresed. Median time interval between apheresis and CAR T-cell treatment was 39 days. So far, 31 DLBCL pts were transfused (Axi-cel: 18, Tisa-cel: 13). Median age of transfused pts was 60 years (range 19-74, Axi-cel: 60 years, Tisa-cel: 60 years). ECOG was 0-1 in 19 and 2-3 in 12 pts at time of CAR T-cell transfusion (Axi-cel: 0-1 in 13 and 2-3 in 5 pts, Tisa-cel: 0-1 in 6 and 2-3 in 7 pts). 13 pts had undergone prior stem cell transplant (9 autologous, 3 allogeneic, Axi-cel: 4 auto, 2 allo; Tisa-cel: 5 auto, 1 allo). Median number of prior DLBCL therapy lines was four (range 2-9, Axi-cel: 4, Tisa-cel: 4). Only 9/31 pts (29%) met the inclusion criteria of the pivotal clinical trials (due to e.g. infection, CNS disease, thrombocytopenia) at time of enrolment into our CAR T-cell treatment program. 23 pts (74%) received bridging chemotherapy (Axi-cel: 13/18 pts [72%]; Tisa-cel: 10/13 [77%]). Further details on radiographic response and the incidence of toxicities for all treated pts are summarized in the accompanying table. Response assessment after three months using PET/CT was available for 28 pts. Objective response rate (ORR) was 46%, with CR in eight (28%) and partial remission (PR) in five pts (18%). CRS occurred in 29/31 pts (84% CRS °1-2, 10% °3). Tocilizumab was applied in all CRS pts, with a median of four total infusions (range 1-4). 16 pts (52%) developed ICANS (33% °1-2, 16% °3-4, and 3% °5), which was managed with steroids in 9/16 pts. With a median follow-up of seven months, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 2.4 months for all pts. PFS was significantly longer for pts with normal vs. elevated LDH at time of apheresis (not reached vs. 1.5 mo, p=0.031). PFS of patients with two prior lines of therapy (n=7) was comparable with pts with three (n=5) or more (n=15) lines (2 lines: 3.1 mo, ≥3 lines: 1.9 mo, p=0.520). The time interval of ≤ 12 months (n=8 pts) from initial diagnosis of DLBCL to CAR T-cell transfusion was not prognostic and did not identify patients with worse PFS (≤12 mo: 1.7 months, &gt;12 mo: 2.8 mo, p=0.569). In summary, in our cohort of heavily pretreated patients with a median of four prior DLBCL therapy lines, we observed an ORR of 46% (28% CR) at 3 months after CAR T-cell therapy, with no significant differences between patients treated with Axi-cel and Tisa-cel. In line with results of the pivotal clinical trials, treatment with Axi-cel was associated with a moderately higher incidence of ICANS. Overall, CAR T-cell toxicities were well manageable. Normal LDH levels at time of apheresis identified patients with high probability of sustained remission. In contrast, the number of prior therapy lines or the time interval from initial diagnosis of DLBCL to CAR T-cell transfusion had no impact on PFS. These hypothesis-generating findings might be helpful for future clinical decision-making, but need to be confirmed in a larger cohort. Therefore, we have set up a comprehensive patient monitoring program to identify predictive clinical and immunological markers of response and survival in CAR T-cell treated DLBCL patients. We will present updated results with longer follow-up at the annual meeting. Figure Disclosures Buecklein: Celgene: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy. Blumenberg:Novartis: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Research Funding. Subklewe:Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Morphosys: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche AG: Consultancy, Research Funding; AMGEN: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document