Successful treatment of pulmonary lymphangitic carcinomatosis by anlotinib in 14 Chinese patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e21064-e21064
Author(s):  
Shencun Fang ◽  
Wanwan Cheng ◽  
Yingming Zhang ◽  
Haitao Zhang ◽  
Si Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Lymphatic Metastasis ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Smoking History ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Lymphangitic Carcinomatosis

e21064 Background: Pulmonary lymphangitic carcinomatosis (PLC) occurs in 6%-8% of intrathoracic metastases among malignant tumor. The median survival was only 2.0 months from time of pulmonary symptoms to death in cases during 2000-2018, which is a poor prognosis. Effective interventions were needed besides standard chemotherapy and symptomatic support. Anlotinib showed a critical effect on lymphangiogenesis, and lymphatic metastasis in mouse models of lung adenocarcinoma, it might be a therapeutic option for tumor lymphatic metastasis. In this study, we retrospectively analyzed the efficacy and safety of anlotinib for PLC in patients with Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC). Methods: We retrospectively investigated NSCLC patients with PLC at our hospital between May 2018 and November 2020, who received anlotinib monotherapy or combined therapy for PLC. Data were analyzed for progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate(ORR), disease control rate(DCR) and adverse events (AE). The impact of clinical and genomic factors on PFS and OS were also assessed. Results: A total of 14 patients were enrolled with a median age of 64 years. 10(71.4%) were male, 4(28.6%) has smoking history, 10(71.4%) of patients had a performance status of 2-3. 9, 3, 2 patients had TP53 mutation, EGFR mutation, ALK fusion respectively. 9(64.3%) patients received anlotinib monotherapy. Of 14 patients, 8 achieved partial response (PR), 5 presented stable disease (SD), 1 had progressed disease. The ORR and DCR were 57.1% and 92.9% respectively. The median PFS was 3.1 months (95% CI: 2.0-4.2), the median OS for 1, 2, ≥3 line were 13 months, 7.2 months, 5.2 months, respectively. Median PFS and OS (≥3 line) were significantly longer for patients with TP53-mutant tumors compared with those with TP53–wild-type tumors (median PFS: 7 vs. 1.1 months, median OS (≥3 line): 6.8 vs. 1.9 months). No difference of PFS and OS (≥3 line) was found between EGFR or ALK alteration and the corresponding wild type patients. The most frequently reported AEs were high blood pressure (11, 78.6%), hand foot syndrome (6, 42.9%), diarrhea (5, 35.7%), fatigue (4, 28.6%), hoarseness (3, 21.4%), proteinuria (2, 14.3%) and stomatitis (2, 14.3%). Conclusions: Anlotinib presented favorable efficacy in patients with pulmonary lymphangitic carcinomatosis and conferred considerable survival benefit compared with previous studies, especially in patients harboring TP53 mutations. The AEs were manageable. These indicated that anlotinib can be a promising therapeutic treatment of PLC. More clinical data is needed to validate this finding.

scholarly journals Risk of SARS-CoV2-related Mortality in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated With First-line Immunotherapy Alone or in Combination With Chemotherapy

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giuseppe Luigi Banna ◽  
Ornella Cantale ◽  
Alex Friedlaender ◽  
Harliana Yusof ◽  
Alfredo Addeo
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Smoking History ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
First Line ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Related Mortality

Abstract Background: Patients with cancer are vulnerable to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), although the impact of solid cancer types and systemic anticancer treatments on its related mortality is still debatable.Methods: To weigh the real impact of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) by exploring the risk of SARS-CoV-2-related mortality in a retrospective analysis of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with first-line Pembrolizumab or in combination with chemotherapy (ChT) during the first surge of the pandemic. Results: The risk of death was significantly higher in the group of patients treated with ChT+Pembrolizumab than with Pembrolizumab alone (OR 2.43 (1.23-4.82, p=0.01). The SARS-CoV-2-related mortality rate was 8% and significantly associated with ChT+Pembrolizumab as compared to Pembrolizumab alone (18% vs. 0%, respectively, p=0.03). Patients dead because of SARS-CoV-2 were older than 70 years (100 vs. 34%, respectively, p=0.03) and tended to have a heavier smoking history (67 vs. 29% of current smokers, respectively, p=0.17). Higher baseline values of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (with 67 vs. 50% ≥ 4.0, p=0.58) and systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) (with 67 vs. 50% ≥ 1236, p=0.58) were observed in patients dead due to the SARS-CoV-2.Conclusions: Immunotherapy might not impact the risk of SARS-CoV-2-related mortality, whilst the addition of ChT was either associated with an overall increased risk of mortality and to the risk of SARS-CoV-2-related mortality. The co-existence of other clinical factors may have contributed to the latter.

scholarly journals Effect of antibiotic use on the efficacy of nivolumab in the treatment of advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis

Open Medicine ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 728-736
Author(s):  
Geng-wei Huo ◽  
Ran Zuo ◽  
Ying Song ◽  
Wei-dong Chen ◽  
Wen-ming Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Smoking History ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Metastatic Nsclc ◽  
The Impact

Abstract This study evaluates the impact of the use of antibiotics on the effectiveness of nivolumab in the treatment of advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A literature search was conducted in various electronic databases to identify studies, which evaluated the impact of antibiotic use on the survival of patients with advanced/metastatic NSCLC who have been treated with nivolumab. Six studies, comprising a total of 787 patients with 37.2% females and of age range 30–90 years, were included in the study. A lack of smoking history was reported in 14.4% of the patients. A meta-analysis was conducted in 678 and 713 patients for PFS and OS, respectively. The pooled HR was 1.95 (95% CI: 1.13–3.37, P = 0.016) for PFS and 2.70 (95% CI: 1.81–4.02, P < 0.001) for OS. Among patients exposed to antibiotics, the median PFS and OS were reduced by 1.6 months (95% CI: 1.5–1.7) and 8.8 months (95% CI: 8.5–9.1), respectively. Our study indicates that, among patients with advanced/metastatic NSCLC, the use of antibiotics with nivolumab led to a decrease in the median OS by more than 8 months. Studying the mechanism of the effect of antibiotics on the efficacy of nivolumab in patients with NSCLC should also be prioritized.

scholarly journals KEAP1/NFE2L2 Mutations of Liquid Biopsy as Prognostic Biomarkers in Patients With Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Results From Two Multicenter, Randomized Clinical Trials

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hongyuan Zhu ◽  
Daipeng Xie ◽  
Yunfang Yu ◽  
Lintong Yao ◽  
Bin Xu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
T Cells ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Therapeutic Benefits ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Impact

PurposeThe KEAP1-NFE2L2 (Kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1 (KEAP1)-Nuclear factor (erythroid-derived 2)-like 2 (NFE2L2)) mutations are associated with resistance to chemotherapy or immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Conversely, it has been reported that NFE2L2 mutations potentiate improved clinical outcome with immunotherapy. However, therapeutic benefits for patients with KEAP1/NFE2L2 mutations remain unclear. The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between KEAP1/NFE2L2 and NSCLC prognosis, and to explore whether immunotherapy can improve prognosis in populations with KEAP1/NFE2L2 mutations.Experimental DesignThe impact of KEAP1/NFE2L2 mutations on survival outcomes in NSCLC patients received immunotherapy and chemotherapy was verified in the randomized phase II/III POPLAR/OAK trials (blood-based sequencing, bNGS cohort, POPLAR (n = 211) and OAK (n = 642)). The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) NSCLC cohort (n=998) and an in-house Chinese NSCLC cohort (n=733) was used For the analysis of immune-related markers.ResultsCompared with KEAP1/NFE2L2 wild-type, patients with KEAP1/NFE2L2 mutations were significantly associated with poorer overall survival (OS, HR = 1.97, 95% CI 1.48–2.63, P &lt; 0.001) on atezolizumab and docetaxel (HR = 1.66, 95% CI 1.28–2.16, P &lt; 0.001). In KEAP1/NFE2L2 mutant group, there was no significant difference in median OS between atezolizumab and docetaxel (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.53–1.03, P = 0.07). NFE2L2/KEAP1 mutations were significantly associated with higher TMB values and PD-L1 expression in the OAK/POPLAR and in-house Chinese NSCLC cohorts. GSEA revealed that KEAP1/NFE2L2mutant subgroup was associated with deficient infiltration of CD4+ T cells, NK T cells and natural Treg cells, and lower expression of DNA damage response genes in TCGA NSCLC cohort.ConclusionsOur study revealed that patients with KEAP1/NFE2L2 mutations have a worse prognosis than wild-type patients, both on immunotherapy and chemotherapy. In addition, in patients with KEAP1/NFE2L2 mutations, immunotherapy did not significantly improve prognosis compared to chemotherapy.

A Case of EGFR-wild-type Adenocarcinoma of Recurrent Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Responding to Erlotinib

Haigan ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 52 (3) ◽  
pp. 315-319
Author(s):  
Masami Morimoto ◽  
Naoki Hino ◽  
Hisashi Matsuoka ◽  
Takanori Miyoshi ◽  
Masaru Tsuyuguchi
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Small Cell Lung

Do we Need Maintenance Chemotherapy in Advanced NSCLC in the Era of Immune and Targeted Therapy?

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 50-55
Author(s):  
Ahmed Nagy ◽  
Omar Abdel Rahman ◽  
Heba Abdullah ◽  
Ahmed Negida
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Maintenance Chemotherapy ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
The Impact

Background: Although well established for the effective management of hematologic cancers, maintenance chemotherapy has only been recently incorportated as a treatment paradigm for advanced non–small-cell lung cancer. Maintenance chemotherapy aims to prolong a clinically favorable response state achieved after finishing induction therapy which is usually predefined in number before startng treatment. There are 2 modalities for maintenance therapy; continuation maintenance (involving a non-platinum component which was a part of the induction protocol or a targeted agent) and switch maintenance therapy (utilizing a new agent which was not a part of the induction regimen). Methods: The purpose of this article is to review the role of maintenance therapy in the treatment of advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) and provide a brief overview about induction chemotherapy in NSCLC to address the basis of maintenance therapy as a treatment option. We will also compare the impact of maintenance chemotherapy with the now evolving role of immunotherapy in NSCLC. Results: There have been 4 maintenance studies to date showing prolonged PFS and OS with statistical significance. However, Three out of the four studies (ECOG4599, JMEN, and PARAMOUNT) did not report tumor molecular analysis. As regard Immunotherapy, current data is in favour of strongly an increasing role for immunotherapy in NSCLC. Conclusion: Maintenance therapy in NSCLC continues to be an important therapeutic line to improve outcome in patients with metastatic and recurrent disease.

scholarly journals 479P The impact of initial symptoms on survival time in advanced non-small cell lung cancer

2016 ◽  
Vol 27 ◽  
pp. ix153-ix154
Author(s):  
T. Miyawaki ◽  
S. Yagishita ◽  
R. Ko ◽  
Y. Suzuki ◽  
N. Matsumoto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Survival Time ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Initial Symptoms ◽  
The Impact

scholarly journals Differential influence of antibiotic therapy and other medications on oncological outcomes of patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated with first-line pembrolizumab versus cytotoxic chemotherapy

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. e002421
Author(s):  
Alessio Cortellini ◽  
Massimo Di Maio ◽  
Olga Nigro ◽  
Alessandro Leonetti ◽  
Diego L Cortinovis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
First Line ◽  
Metastatic Nsclc ◽  
The Impact

BackgroundSome concomitant medications including antibiotics (ATB) have been reproducibly associated with worse survival following immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in unselected patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (according to programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression and treatment line). Whether such relationship is causative or associative is matter of debate.MethodsWe present the outcomes analysis according to concomitant baseline medications (prior to ICI initiation) with putative immune-modulatory effects in a large cohort of patients with metastatic NSCLC with a PD-L1 expression ≥50%, receiving first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy. We also evaluated a control cohort of patients with metastatic NSCLC treated with first-line chemotherapy. The interaction between key medications and therapeutic modality (pembrolizumab vs chemotherapy) was validated in pooled multivariable analyses.Results950 and 595 patients were included in the pembrolizumab and chemotherapy cohorts, respectively. Corticosteroid and proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy but not ATB therapy was associated with poorer performance status at baseline in both the cohorts. No association with clinical outcomes was found according to baseline statin, aspirin, β-blocker and metformin within the pembrolizumab cohort. On the multivariable analysis, ATB emerged as a strong predictor of worse overall survival (OS) (HR=1.42 (95% CI 1.13 to 1.79); p=0.0024), and progression free survival (PFS) (HR=1.29 (95% CI 1.04 to 1.59); p=0.0192) in the pembrolizumab but not in the chemotherapy cohort. Corticosteroids were associated with shorter PFS (HR=1.69 (95% CI 1.42 to 2.03); p<0.0001), and OS (HR=1.93 (95% CI 1.59 to 2.35); p<0.0001) following pembrolizumab, and shorter PFS (HR=1.30 (95% CI 1.08 to 1.56), p=0.0046) and OS (HR=1.58 (95% CI 1.29 to 1.94), p<0.0001), following chemotherapy. PPIs were associated with worse OS (HR=1.49 (95% CI 1.26 to 1.77); p<0.0001) with pembrolizumab and shorter OS (HR=1.12 (95% CI 1.02 to 1.24), p=0.0139), with chemotherapy. At the pooled analysis, there was a statistically significant interaction with treatment (pembrolizumab vs chemotherapy) for corticosteroids (p=0.0020) and PPIs (p=0.0460) with respect to OS, for corticosteroids (p<0.0001), ATB (p=0.0290), and PPIs (p=0.0487) with respect to PFS, and only corticosteroids (p=0.0033) with respect to objective response rate.ConclusionIn this study, we validate the significant negative impact of ATB on pembrolizumab monotherapy but not chemotherapy outcomes in NSCLC, producing further evidence about their underlying immune-modulatory effect. Even though the magnitude of the impact of corticosteroids and PPIs is significantly different across the cohorts, their effects might be driven by adverse disease features.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document