Effectiveness of osimertinib plus chemotherapy and avastin for untreated EGFR-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e21178-e21178
Author(s):  
Fang Wang ◽  
Hui Liu ◽  
Zhen Zeng ◽  
Shasha Wang ◽  
Haifeng Qin
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Egfr Mutation ◽  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Nsclc Patients ◽  
Egfr Mutated

e21178 Background: Osimertinib is recommended as a novel first-line standard treatment for advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) patients with EGFR mutation. However, there are also patients with concurrent mutation or/and metastases have limited benefits. According to the current remission rate, regression depth and PFS data, the main mechanism of the benefit of combined anti-angiogenesis or chemotherapy is to reduce tumor load and heterogeneous reserve to a greater extent, so as to extend the remission time, that is, to delay the occurrence of drug resistance to extend PFS. This prospective study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of Osimertinib plus chemotherapy and Avastin for Untreated EGFR-Mutated advanced NSCLC. Methods: The study enrolled 22 patients diagnosed with untreated advanced NSCLC and tested with EGFR mutation, who received osimertinib ( 80mg QD) plus pemetrexed (500mg/m2), cisplatin (75mg/m2) and bevacizumab (7.5mg/kg) for 6 cycles, then maintained with osimertinib/pemetrexed/bevacizumab. The primary endpoint was progression free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Treatment was continued until disease progression and the tumor response was determined according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1. The toxicity was determined according to CTCAE 4.0. Results: From February, 2018 to July, 2020, 22 patients enrolled. All the patients were evaluated and showed partial response(PR) when make efficacy evaluation at the first time. The target lesions reduction were shown. The average reduction is 48%, ranged from 32% of Pt12 to 71% of Pt11. Up to January, 2021, all the patients are still under the treatment. Especially for Pt7 who has already benefited from the treatment protocol by 35months. The toxicities associated with this protocols were manageable. Only 1 patient was 3/4-grade Anemia, 1 patient was 3/4-grade Diarrhea and 3 patients was 3/4-grade Lymphopenia. Conclusions: Osimertinib in combination with chemotherapy and Bevacizumab. exhibits superior activity and generally manageable toxicities for the naive advanced NSCLC patients with EGFR mutant, especially for the patients with concurrent mutation or/and metastases. It may provide a new and effective therapy strategy for them, but large sample and additional clinical trials are also needed.

Anti-PD-1 antibody monotherapy or anti-PD-1 antibody combination with chemotherapy treated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with EGFR mutation: A retrospective analysis.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e21691-e21691
Author(s):  
Shaorong Yu ◽  
Ran Hu ◽  
Meiqi Shi
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Egfr Mutation ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Combined Chemotherapy ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Egfr Mutant ◽  
Nsclc Patients

e21691 Background: Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibody has been approved as first- or second-line therapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients and modified the management of patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC. However, anti-PD-1 treatment shows less effective in patients with EGFR mutation than in those without driver gene mutation. To determine the activity of anti-PD-1 antibody in EGFR mutant NSCLC, we retrospectively evaluated response patterns among EGFR mutant NSCLC patients. Methods: We identified 58 patients with EGFR mutation who were treated with anti-PD-1 monotherapy or anti-PD-1 antibody combined with chemotherapy from March 2018 to December 2019. All of patients have received more than one treatment regimen including EGFR-TKI treatment. Objective response rates (ORR) were assessed using RECIST v1.1. Results: A total of 58 patients including 53 cases of lung adenocarcinoma, 4 cases of squamous cell carcinoma and 1 case of adenosquamous carcinoma were analyzed. Among them 26 patients received nivolumab treatment, 9 patients with pembrolizumab treatment, 9 patients with sintilimab treatment, 8 patients with JS001 treatment and 6 patients with camrelizumab treatment. Seven patients received anti-PD-1 monotherapy and the other 51 patients received anti-PD-1 combined chemotherapy. The main chemotherapeutic drugs contain docetaxel, pemetrexed, paclitaxel and paclitaxel-albumin. ORR was observed in 6 out of 58 (10%) patients. The disease control rate was 50% (29/58). The median PFS was 2.82 months. All six patients who achieved PR were received anti-PD-1 combined chemotherapy. Four patients died during treatment with anti-PD-1 therapy and we can’t confirm if these were due to cancer progress or immune related tumor hyperprogression. The adverse events were immune related pneumonia (two cases with grade 2 and one case with grade 3) and immune related hepatitis (one case with grade 2). Conclusions: Anti-PD-1 antibody combined chemotherapy seems showed moderate effect on NSCLC patients with EGFR mutation who have received anti-EGFR therapy.

Diagnostic and prognostic significance of circulating endothelial cell in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18116-e18116
Author(s):  
Dongmei Yuan ◽  
Yanling Lv ◽  
Xingqun Ma ◽  
Hongbing Liu ◽  
Yi Shi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Nsclc Patients

e18116 Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic and prognostic value of circulating endothelial cells (CECs) during first-line therapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: 102 newly diagnosed advanced NSCLC patients were enrolled in this study. The amount of CECs (CD45- CD31+ CD146+) was enumerated by flow cytometry at baseline and after two cycles of treatment. We correlated CEC counts and the reduction of CECs with objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS). Results: The CECs level was significantly higher in advanced NSCLC patients, ranging from 57 to 1300 cells/105 cells (n=102, mean±SD=299±221 cells/105 cells), than patients with benign lesions (n=35, 205±97 cells/105 cells), and healthy volunteers (n=34, 117±33 cells/105 cells). When the cut off value of CEC counts was 210 cells/105 cells, there was no significant association between CEC counts and OR/PFS of the enrolled patients. However, patients with CECs response after chemotherapy has more chances to achieve OR (P<0.001), and such patients showed longer PFS than those without CECs response (P = 0.041). In the multivariate analysis, the independent prognostic roles of performance status (HR: 3.245, 95% CI: 1.189-8.854), brain metastasis (HR: 3.673, 95% CI: 1.062-12.704), and CECs response (HR: 0.046, 95% CI: 0.188-0.984) were found. Conclusions: The CEC counts could be considered as the diagnostic biomarker for advanced NSCLC patients. And the reduction of CECs after treatment might be more ideal than the CEC counts as a predictive or prognostic factor in patients treated with platinum-based chemotherapy.

Adjuvant gefitinib versus cisplatin/vinorelbine in Japanese patients with completely resected, EGFR-mutated, stage II-III non-small cell lung cancer (IMPACT, WJOG6410L): A randomized phase 3 trial.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8501-8501
Author(s):  
Hirohito Tada ◽  
Tetsuya Mitsudomi ◽  
Takeharu Yamanaka ◽  
Kenji Sugio ◽  
Masahiro Tsuboi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Egfr Mutation ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Egfr Mutated

8501 Background: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitor is a standard of care for EGFR mutation-positive, untreated metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the efficacy and safety of adjuvant gefitinib for patients with completely resected lung cancer harboring EGFR mutation over cisplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy were not known in 2011 when this study was initiated. Methods: From September 2011 to December 2015, we randomly assigned 234 patients with completely resected, EGFR mutation-positive (exon 19 deletion or L858R), stage II–III NSCLC to receive either gefitinib (250 mg, once daily) for 24 months or cisplatin (80 mg/m2 on day 1) plus vinorelbine (25 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8) (cis/vin) every 3 weeks for four cycles. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS) according to a central review in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Results: Two patients in the gefitinib arm withdrew consent and were excluded from the ITT population. No treatment-related deaths were seen in the gefitinib arm, but three treatment-related deaths were reported in the cis/vin arm. Median duration of follow-up was 71 months. Median DFS was numerically longer in the gefitinib arm (36 months) than in the cis/vin arm (25.2 months). However, Kaplan-Meier curves began to overlap around 5 years after surgery, and no significant difference in DFS was seen, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.92 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.67–1.28; P = 0.63). Overall survival was also not significantly different (median not reached in either arm). Five-year survival rates for gefitinib and cis/vin arms were 78.0% and 74.6%, respectively, with an HR for death of 1.03; 95%CI, 0.65–1.65; P = 0.89. Exploratory subset analysis revealed that patients ³70 years old in the gefitinib arm (n = 19/27 with G to cis/vin) survived longer than those in the cis/vin arm (HR 0.31; 95%CI, 0.10–0.98; P = 0.046). Conclusions: Adjuvant gefitinib appeared to prevent early relapse, but did not significantly prolong DFS or OS in patients with completely resected stage II–III, EGFR-mutated NSCLC. The apparent non-inferiority of DFS/OS may justify the use of adjuvant gefitinib in selected subset of patients, especially those deemed unsuitable for cis/vin adjuvant therapy. Clinical trial information: UMIN000006252.

scholarly journals Circulating mRNA Expression of astrocyte-Elevated Gene-1 Associated with Treatment Response and Survival in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated with Pemetrexed

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
You-Lung Chang ◽  
Yen-Fu Chen ◽  
Ying-Yin Chen ◽  
Shih-Chieh Chang ◽  
Cheng-Yu Chang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Mrna Expression ◽  
Treatment Response ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis ◽  
Nsclc Patients

Abstract Backgrounds: Astrocyte-elevated gene-1 (AEG-1) functions as an oncogene and regulates angiogenesis in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In this prospective study, we assessed the values of plasma AEG-1 mRNA expression by liquid biopsy associated with tumor response and survival in NSCLC patients treated with pemetrexed. Methods: Patients diagnosed advanced NSCLC were enrolled to be treated with pemetrexed combined platinum as first-line chemotherapy. All patients underwent blood sampling before any cancer treatment (C0) and at first response evaluation after two cycles (C2) treatments. Response to chemotherapy and survival were assessed. Plasma mRNA was extracted from peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) and quantification of RNA was performed by real-time PCR.Results: A total of 50 patients with advanced NSCLC were included and 13 of 50 patients combined with bevacizumab. In patient groups of SD (n = 13) and PD (n = 10), the plasma mRNA of AEG-1, thymidylate synthase (TS) and CK19 were elevated significantly at C2 compared to patients in treatment response group (PR, n = 27) (PR v.s. SD or PD, AEG-1: 1.22 ± 0.80 v.s. 4.51 ± 15.45, p = 0.043). NSCLC patients had elevated AEG-1 (AEG-1 ≥ 2) after 2-cycle chemotherapy had shorter PFS and OS (high AEG-1 v.s. low AEG-1, median, PFS: 5.5 v.s. 11.9 months, p = 0.021; OS: 25.9 v.s. 40.8 months, p = 0.019, respectively). In Cox regression analysis, increased plasma mRNA expression of AEG-1indicated poor prognosis in survival.Conclusion: Circulating mRNA concentration of AEG-1 could be a predictive and prognostic biomarker in NSCLC patients treated with pemetrexed. Increased expression of AEG-1 contributed to the chemoresistance and caused lung cancer progression.

Impact of Cancer Cachexia on Treatment With PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors Plus Chemotherapy in Advanced Non-small-Cell Lung Cancer

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Taichi Miyawaki ◽  
Tateaki Naito ◽  
Michitoshi Yabe ◽  
Hiroaki Kodama ◽  
Naoya Nishioka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cancer Cachexia ◽  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Group Performance ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
The Impact

Abstract PurposeProgrammed cell death-1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors plus chemotherapy has become the standard first-line treatment in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, few studies have explicitly focused on the impact of cancer cachexia on the efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy. Thus, we evaluated the clinical implications of cancer cachexia on the survival outcomes in patients who received this treatment.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective review of medical records of patients with advanced NSCLC treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy from December 2018 to December 2020. Cancer cachexia was diagnosed as an unintentional weight loss of 5% or more over six months. We evaluated the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for patients with or without cancer cachexia who received PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy.ResultsAmong the 80 included patients, 37 (46%) had cancer cachexia. Cachectic patients had a lower objective response rate (30 vs 51%, P <0.05), poorer PFS (2.3 vs 12.0 months, P <0.05), and poorer OS (10.8 vs 23.9 months, P <0.05) than non-cachectic patients. The Cox proportional-hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) of cancer cachexia were 1.77 (1.01–3.10) for PFS and 2.90 (1.40–6.00) for OS, with adjustments for Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, PD-L1 tumour proportion score, histology, and central nervous system metastases. ConclusionPre-treatment cancer cachexia may reduce treatment efficacy and shorten survival time in patients receiving PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy. Early evaluation and intervention for cancer cachexia might improve oncological outcomes in patients with advanced NSCLC.

Phase II Study of Weekly Nanoparticle Albumin-Bound Paclitaxel as Second- or Third-Line Therapy in Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Chemotherapy ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 65 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 21-28
Author(s):  
Mie Kotake ◽  
Tomohito Kuwako ◽  
Hisao Imai ◽  
Yoshio Tomizawa ◽  
Kyoichi Kaira ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung

Introduction: Treatment outcomes in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are poor due to limited treatment options. Objective: We conducted a multicenter, single-arm phase II study to prospectively assess the efficacy and safety of weekly nab-PTX in patients with advanced NSCLC with failed cytotoxic chemotherapy. Methods: Patients with advanced NSCLC having adequate organ functions with a performance status of 0–1 were enrolled. A 100 mg/m2 dose of nab-paclitaxel was administered on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints were disease control rate (DCR), toxicity profile, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: Between September 2013 and May 2016, 35 patients were enrolled. The ORR was 31.4%, and the DCR was 74.3%. The median PFS was 3.6 months, and the median OS was 11.4 months. The most common grade 3 or 4 toxicities included neutropenia (54.3%), leukopenia (42.9%), and anemia (11.4%). Two patients discontinued chemotherapy due to pneumonitis. Conclusions: Nab-PTX may be a later-line chemotherapeutic option for previously treated advanced NSCLC.

scholarly journals Efficacy and toxicities of combination maintenance therapy in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: an up-to-date meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 39 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianming Hu ◽  
Jiawei Hu ◽  
Xiaolan Liu ◽  
Long Li ◽  
Xue Bai
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Nsclc Patients

Abstract Background: Single agent maintenance therapy has been approved for the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) due to its potential survival benefits, but whether combined maintenance therapy would improve the survival of advanced NSCLC remains undetermined. Methods: Relevant trials were identified by searching electronic databases and conference meetings. Prospective randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing combination maintenance therapy in advanced NSCLC patients were included. Outcomes of interest included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and grade 3–4 toxicities. Results: A total of 1950 advanced NSCLC patients received combination maintenance treatment from six trials were included for analysis. The use of doublet maintenance therapy in NSCLC patients significantly improved PFS (HR 0.74, 95%CI: 0.59–0.93, P = 0.010), but not for OS (HR 0.95, 95%CI: 0.85–1.07, P = 0.40) in comparison with single agent maintenance therapy. Similar results were observed in sub-group analysis according to treatment regimens. In addition, there was no significantly risk difference between doublet and single agent maintenance therapy in terms of grade 3/4 hematologic and non-hematologic toxicities. Conclusion: The findings of the present study show that doublet combination maintenance therapy is superior to single agent maintenance therapy in terms of PFS, without increased grade 3–4 toxicities. Future prospective studies are recommended to clearly assess the long-term clinical benefit of doublet maintenance therapy and its impact on health-related quality of life.

scholarly journals Prognostic significance of peripheral CD8+CD28+ and CD8+CD28− T cells in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with chemo(radio)therapy

2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chao Liu ◽  
Wang Jing ◽  
Ning An ◽  
Aijie Li ◽  
Weiwei Yan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
T Cells ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Natural Killer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Radio Therapy ◽  
Nsclc Patients

Abstract Background Noninvasive prognostic biomarkers are needed for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with different histological types to identify cases with poor survival. Here, we investigated the prognostic values of peripheral CD8+CD28+ T cells and CD8+CD28− T cells in advanced NSCLC patients treated with chemo(radio)therapy and the impact of histological type on them. Methods Of 232 registered advanced NSCLC patients, 101 treatment-naïve individuals were eligible and included in our study. Flow cytometry was used to evaluate CD8+CD28+ T cells, CD8+CD28− T cells, CD4+ CD25hi T cells, B cells, natural killer cells, γδT cells, and natural killer T cells in patients’ peripheral blood. Results The median follow-up time was 13.6 months. Fifty-nine (58.4%) patients died by the end of our study. Fifty-three of the 101 advanced NSCLC cases selected for our study were adenocarcinomas (ADs), and 48 were squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs). Multivariate analyses showed that increased levels of CD8+CD28+ T cells independently predicted favorable overall survival (OS) [hazard ratio (HR): 0.51, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.30–0.89, P = 0.021] and progression-free survival (PFS) (HR: 0.66, 95% CI 0.37–0.93, P = 0.038) in ADs, but the prediction in SCCs was not statistically significant. In contrast, high levels of CD8+CD28− T cells independently predicted unfavorable OS (HR: 1.41, 95% CI 1.17–3.06, P = 0.035) and PFS (HR: 2.01, 95% CI 1.06–3.85, P = 0.029) in SCCs, but the prediction in ADs was not statistically significant. ADs had higher levels of CD4+CD25hi T cells and CD8+CD28− T cells and lower NK cells (all P < 0.05) than SCCs. Conclusions Our findings uncovered the prognostic values of peripheral CD8+CD28+ T cells and CD8+CD28− T cells in advanced NSCLC patients treated with chemo(radio)therapy, which could help to identify patients with poor outcomes and refine treatment strategies.

scholarly journals The New Immunotherapy Combinations in the Treatment of Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Reality and Perspectives

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danilo Rocco ◽  
Luigi D. Gravara ◽  
Cesare Gridelli
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Significant Shift ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Future Directions ◽  
Therapeutic Algorithm ◽  
Nsclc Patients

Background: In the recent years, immunotherapeutics and specifically immunecheckpoints inhibitors have marked a significant shift in the diagnostic and therapeutic algorithm of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), allowing us to use immunotherapeutics alone or combined with chemotherapy for a great subset of patients. However, new interesting approaches are being presently investigated, markedly immunotherapy combinations, that is, the use of two or more immunotherapeutics combined. Methods: In particular, the combination of anti-PD-1 nivolumab and anti-CTLA-4 ipilimumab has already provided groundbreaking positive results in the advanced NSCLC and other combinations are currently under investigation. Results: Therefore, this paper aims to provide a comprehensive state-of-the-art review about immunotherapy combination, along with suggestions about future directions. A comprehensive literature search was carried out to identify eligible studies from MEDLINE/PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov. Conclusion: Nivolumab plus ipilimumab represent the most promising immunotherapy combination for the treatment of advanced NSCLC patients; safety, tolerability and efficacy of new immunotherapeutics (in monotherapy and in immunotherapy combinations) must be further assessed in future studies.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document