Multi-center randomized study of pembrolizumab/carboplatin versus carboplatin alone in patients with chest wall disease from breast cancer: TBCRC 044.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS1111-TPS1111
Author(s):  
Neelima Vidula ◽  
Rita Nanda ◽  
Kathy D. Miller ◽  
Leisha A. Emens ◽  
Paula R Pohlmann ◽  
...  

TPS1111 Background: Chest wall recurrence is a subtype of breast cancer that is challenging to treat, and associated with a short duration of response to treatment and an increased risk of development of distant metastases. Given the inflammatory nature of this disease and the association of chest wall disease with lymphovascular invasion, which is correlated with higher programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) expression, we hypothesized that immunotherapy may be beneficial as treatment. Combinations of immunotherapy and chemotherapy have a synergistic effect and demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of metastatic triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). This study is evaluating the efficacy of pembrolizumab, an anti-PD-1 antibody, in combination with carboplatin, in patients with chest wall infiltration from breast cancer. This drug combination has shown efficacy in advanced lung cancer. Methods: This is a multicenter, 2:1 randomized phase II study of pembrolizumab/carboplatin (Arm A, 56 patients) vs. carboplatin (Arm B, 28 patients) in 84 patients with chest wall disease from breast cancer, with or without distant metastases. Patients may have TNBC, hormone receptor positive/HER2 negative (following receipt of 2 prior hormone therapies), or HER2 positive breast cancer (with option to continue trastuzumab on study). Pembrolizumab is administered as 200 mg IV every 3 weeks, and carboplatin as AUC 5 IV every 3 weeks. Patients on Arm A may continue pembrolizumab +/- carboplatin (Arm Ax) after completion of 6 cycles of treatment, while patients in Arm B can cross-over to pembrolizumab (+/- carboplatin) on progression (Arm Bx). Patients must have adequate organ function, performance status ≤ 2, and may have received any number of lines of prior chemotherapy. Patients undergo serial chest wall photography and imaging (CT chest, abdomen, and pelvis, and bone scan) at baseline and every 6 weeks, as well as blood collection for correlative studies and chest wall biopsies at baseline and after 2 cycles of treatment. The primary endpoint is disease control rate (RECIST 1.1) at 18 weeks of treatment, and the study is powered to determine a 20% difference in disease control rates between arms (HR 0.52, a = 0.10, ß = 0.20). An interim analysis will occur for Arm B after 18 patients are enrolled, with a stopping rule for futility. Secondary endpoints include progression-free survival, toxicity (NCI CTCAE), and response based on irRECIST and tumor programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression. Exploratory objectives include evaluating changes in soluble PD-L1, tumor and peripheral blood immune composition, circulating tumor cells and cell-free DNA, and MYC oncogene expression. This study (NCT03095352) is open at 7 sites in the Translational Breast Cancer Research Consortium (TBCRC). 52 patients are enrolled. Grant funding is provided by Merck and UCSF. Clinical trial information: NCT03095352 .

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (10) ◽  
pp. 975-980 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather B. Neuman ◽  
Jessica R. Schumacher ◽  
Amanda B. Francescatti ◽  
Taiwo Adesoye ◽  
Stephen B. Edge ◽  
...  

Purpose National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines recommend systemic staging imaging at the time of locoregional breast cancer recurrence. Limited data support this recommendation. We determined the rate of synchronous distant recurrence at the time of locoregional recurrence in high-risk patients and identified clinical factors associated with an increased risk of synchronous metastases. Methods A stage-stratified random sample of 11,046 patients with stage II to III breast cancer in 2006 to 2007 was selected from the National Cancer Database for participation in a Commission on Cancer special study. From medical record abstraction of imaging and recurrence data, we identified patients who experienced locoregional recurrence within 5 years of diagnosis. Synchronous distant metastases (within 30 days of locoregional recurrence) were determined. We used multivariable logistic regression to identify factors associated with synchronous metastases. Results Four percent experienced locoregional recurrence (n = 445). Synchronous distant metastases were identified in 27% (n = 120). Initial presenting stage ( P = .03), locoregional recurrence type ( P = .01), and insurance status ( P = .03) were associated with synchronous distant metastases. The proportion of synchronous metastases was highest for women with lymph node (35%), postmastectomy chest wall (30%), and in-breast (15%) recurrence; 54% received systemic staging imaging within 30 days of a locoregional recurrence. Conclusion These findings support current recommendations for systemic imaging in the setting of locoregional recurrence, particularly for patients with lymph node or chest wall recurrences. Because most patients with isolated locoregional recurrence will be recommended locoregional treatment, early identification of distant metastases through routine systemic imaging may spare them treatments unlikely to extend their survival.


2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS3122-TPS3122
Author(s):  
Maxwell Dale Janosky ◽  
Sandra Demaria ◽  
Yelena Novik ◽  
Ruth Oratz ◽  
Amy Tiersten ◽  
...  

TPS3122 Background: To assess the local and systemic effects of the novel combination of local radiotherapy (RT) with imiquimod (IMQ) applied topically to breast cancer metastatic to skin, and measure immunologic correlates (clinicaltrials.gov NCT01421017). Breast cancer is the 2nd most common tumor to metastasize to the skin. Current therapies for unresectable skin lesions are rarely curative. Patients ultimately die of visceral metastases, necessitating more effective therapies. IMQ, a synthetic TLR-7 agonist has profound effects on the tumor immune microenvironment and can lead to regression of cutaneous breast cancer metastases (Adams, Clin Ca Res, 2012). The trial was designed based on accumulated data supporting the synergy of combined RT/immunotherapy (Formenti, JNCI, 2013), and pre-clinical data demonstrating the synergy of topical IMQ and local RT in a mouse model of mammary adenocarcinoma which ulcerates through the skin, and mimics a chest wall recurrence. In the mouse model, the combination was superior with complete regressions of the treated tumors, responses at untreated sites and improved survival (Dewan, Clin Ca Res, 2012). Methods: Eligibility: patients with biopsy-confirmed breast cancer, measurable disease and skin metastases, ECOG PS 0-2 and adequate organ/marrow function. RT is delivered to 1 area of skin metastases in 5 fractions of 6 Gy (days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10). IMQ cream is applied topically 5 nights/week for 8 weeks, beginning on day 1. Following a brief phase I portion to allow dose optimization in the event of unanticipated adverse events (3-3 design), the phase II study evaluates efficacy with 25 additional patients planned. Primary endpoint is the response rate in untreated distant metastases, assessed by immune-related response criteria. The local tumor responses and safety of the combination will also be determined; tumor biopsies will be studied for immune-mediated rejection signatures and peripheral lymphocytes for antigen-specific T and B cell responses. To date, 10 patients have been enrolled. The phase I portion has been successfully completed with 6 patients without DLT. Phase II enrollment has begun. Clinical trial information: NCT01421017.


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS1114-TPS1114
Author(s):  
Neelima Vidula ◽  
Rita Nanda ◽  
Kathy Miller ◽  
Paula Raffin Pohlmann ◽  
Vandana G Abramson ◽  
...  

TPS1114 Background: Immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy is being studied in metastatic breast cancer, and may have durable outcomes. Chest wall recurrence represents a difficult to treat subtype of breast cancer with a poor prognosis, with lymphovascular invasion in the primary tumor a significant risk factor. Given the inflammatory nature of this disease and the association of programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) expression with lymphovascular invasion, we hypothesized that the combination of pembrolizumab, an anti-PD-1 antibody, with carboplatin may be effective as treatment for breast cancer chest wall recurrences. Methods: This randomized phase II study is enrolling 84 patients with breast cancer involving the chest wall, who may also have distant metastases. Patients receive treatment with pembrolizumab 200 mg and carboplatin AUC 5 every 3 weeks for 6 cycles (Arm A, n = 56) followed by maintenance pembrolizumab +/- carboplatin (Arm Ax), or carboplatin AUC 5 every 3 weeks for 6 cycles (Arm B, n = 28) with an option to cross-over to pembrolizumab +/- carboplatin on progression (Arm Bx). Patients with all disease subtypes, triple-negative, hormone receptor positive/HER2- after 2 prior lines of hormone therapy, and HER2+ disease (with the option to continue trastuzumab) are eligible, with no limit on the number of prior therapies. Prior platinum chemotherapy is allowed in the absence of overt disease progression. Patients undergo clinical assessment with every cycle of treatment including chest wall photography, scans (CT chest, abdomen, and pelvis) every 2 cycles, and have peripheral blood and chest wall biopsies collected at baseline and the start of cycle 3 for correlative studies. The primary endpoint is the disease control rate in the chest wall and distant sites at 18 weeks of treatment based on RECIST 1.1. The study is powered to determine a 20% difference in disease control between arms (hazard ratio 0.52, α = 0.10, β = 0.20). Additional endpoints include response by tumor programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) status and irRECIST, progression-free survival, and toxicity. Chest wall tumor samples will be analyzed for changes in tumor immune composition, and PD-L1 and MYC oncogene expression, based on preclinical data to suggest that PD-L1 may be upregulated by MYC. Peripheral blood samples will be evaluated for changes in PD-L1 expression, cell-free DNA, and circulating tumor cells with treatment. The study is enrolling patients at 7 sites within the Translational Breast Cancer Research Consortium (TBCRC), with current enrollment of 38/84 patients. Clinical trial information: NCT03095352 .


1998 ◽  
Vol 16 (12) ◽  
pp. 3720-3730 ◽  
Author(s):  
H Joensuu ◽  
K Holli ◽  
M Heikkinen ◽  
E Suonio ◽  
A R Aro ◽  
...  

PURPOSE We report results of a randomized prospective study that compared single agents of low toxicity given both as the first-line and second-line chemotherapy with combination chemotherapy in advanced breast cancer with distant metastases. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients in the single-agent arm (n = 153) received weekly epirubicin (E) 20 mg/m2 until progression or until the cumulative dose of 1,000 mg/m2, followed by mitomycin (M) 8 mg/m2 every 4 weeks, and those in the combination chemotherapy arm (n = 150) were first given cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2, E 60 mg/m2, and fluorouracil 500 mg/m2 three times per week (CEF) followed by M 8 mg/m2 plus vinblastine (V) 6 mg/m2 every 4 weeks. Exclusion criteria included age greater than 70 years, World Health Organization (WHO) performance status greater than 2, prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease, and presence of liver metastases in patients younger than 50. RESULTS An objective response (complete [CR] or partial [PR]) was obtained in 55%, 48%, 16%, and 7% of patients treated with CEF, E, M, and MV, respectively. A response to CEF tended to last longer than a response to E (median, 12 v 10.5 months; P = .07). Treatment-related toxicity was less in the single-agent arm and quality-of-life (QOL) analysis favored the single-agent arm. No significant difference in time to progression or survival was found between the two arms. Similarly, no difference in survival was found when the patients who received both the planned first-and second-line treatments were compared or when survival was calculated from the beginning of the second-line therapy. CONCLUSION Patients treated with single-agent E followed by single-agent M had similar survival, but less treatment-related toxicity and better QOL as compared with those treated with CEF followed by MV.


2002 ◽  
Vol 178 (11) ◽  
pp. 633-636 ◽  
Author(s):  
ÁrpÁd Mayer ◽  
Attila Naszály ◽  
Mihály Patyánik ◽  
Pál Zaránd ◽  
István Polgár ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document