A randomized controlled phase III trial of comparing local field with additional prophylactic irradiation in chemoradiotherapy for clinical-T1bN0M0 esophageal cancer:JCOG1904/ARMADILLO study.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS257-TPS257
Author(s):  
Motoo Nomura ◽  
Katsuyuki Sakanaka ◽  
Ken Kato ◽  
Tomohiro Kadota ◽  
Yoshinori Ito ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Endoscopic Resection ◽  
Locoregional Recurrence ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Random Component ◽  
Old Patients ◽  
Concurrent Radiotherapy ◽  
Radio Therapy

TPS257 Background:Parallel-group controlled trial of esophagectomy versus chemoradiotherapy (JCOG0502) showed chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is considered as a standard treatment option for clinical-T1bN0M0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) with organ preservation. However, locoregional recurrence after CRT occurs in 20% of patients and requires salvage treatment including salvage surgery, chemo(radio)therapy, and endoscopic resection. Salvage treatments can cause complications and treatment-related death. CRT with elective nodal irradiation (ENI) have been reported to reduce the locoregional recurrence of esophageal cancer. We conduct the clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of modified CRT with ENI compared with CRT without ENI for the patients with cTbN0M0 ESCC. The primary purpose of this study is to investigate whether modified CRT with ENI reduces the locoregional recurrence that cannot be completely resected by salvage endoscopic resection and preserve esophagus without compromising overall survival. Methods:Eligibility criteria include the followings; thoracic ESCC, adenosquamous, or basaloid cell carcinoma with clinical-T1bN0M0, age 20 or older, performance status 0 or 1, adequate organ function, and patient who do not have a preference to receive a surgical resection as an initial therapy. Patients are randomly assigned to following two arms using the minimization method with a random component to balance institution, tumor length (≤4cm versus > 4cm), and age (≤65 years old versus > 65 years old). Patients in arm A receive CRT consisted of CDDP (70 mg/m2/day, days 1 and 29) and 5-FU (700 mg/m2/day, days 1-4 and 29-32, civ) with concurrent radiotherapy (60 Gy/30 fr without ENI). Patients in arm B receive CRT consisted of CDDP (75 mg/m2/day, days 1 and 29) and 5-FU (1000 mg/m2/day, days 1-4 and 29-32, civ) with concurrent radiotherapy (50.4 Gy/ 28 fr with ENI of 41.4 Gy/23 fr). Primary endpoint is major progression-free survival (MPFS), defined as the time from randomization to the date of death or disease progression except achieving curative resection by salvage endoscopic resection. We assumed 5-year MPFS with arm A to be 70% and expected a 10% improvement for arm B. The planned sample size was calculated as a total of 280 patients (140 patients per arm) with a one-sided alpha of 5%, power of 70%, an accrual period of 4 years, and a follow-up period of 5 years. This trial was activated in July 2020. The study was also registered at the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCT) as study number jRCTs031200067. Clinical trial information: jRCTs031200067.

scholarly journals TROG 18.01 phase III randomised clinical trial of the Novel Integration of New prostate radiation schedules with adJuvant Androgen deprivation: NINJA study protocol

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. e030731 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jarad Martin ◽  
Paul Keall ◽  
Shankar Siva ◽  
Peter Greer ◽  
David Christie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Androgen Deprivation ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
High Dose ◽  
The Novel ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Initial Portion ◽  
The Impact

IntroductionStereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is a non-invasive alternative to surgery for the treatment of non-metastatic prostate cancer (PC). The objectives of the Novel Integration ofNew prostate radiation schedules with adJuvant Androgen deprivation (NINJA) clinical trial are to compare two emerging SBRT regimens for efficacy with technical substudies focussing on MRI only planning and the use of knowledge-based planning (KBP) to assess radiotherapy plan quality.Methods and analysisEligible patients must have biopsy-proven unfavourable intermediate or favourable high-risk PC, have an Eastern Collaborative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-1 and provide written informed consent. All patients will receive 6 months in total of androgen deprivation therapy. Patients will be randomised to one of two SBRT regimens. The first will be 40 Gy in five fractions given on alternating days (SBRT monotherapy). The second will be 20 Gy in two fractions given 1 week apart followed 2 weeks later by 36 Gy in 12 fractions given five times per week (virtual high-dose rate boost (HDRB)). The primary efficacy outcome will be biochemical clinical control at 5 years. Secondary endpoints for the initial portion of NINJA look at the transition of centres towards MRI only planning and the impact of KBP on real-time (RT) plan assessment. The first 150 men will demonstrate accrual feasibility as well as addressing the KBP and MRI planning aims, prior to proceeding with total accrual to 472 patients as a phase III randomised controlled trial.Ethics and disseminationNINJA is a multicentre cooperative clinical trial comparing two SBRT regimens for men with PC. It builds on promising results from several single-armed studies, and explores radiation dose escalation in the Virtual HDRB arm. The initial component includes novel technical elements, and will form an important platform set for a definitive phase III study.Trial registration numberANZCTN 12615000223538.

A global phase III multicenter, randomized, double-arm, open label trial of ASP-1929 photoimmunotherapy versus physician’s choice standard of care for the treatment of patients with locoregional, recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (rHNSCC).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS6094-TPS6094 ◽  
Author(s):  
Merrill A. Biel ◽  
Ann M. Gillenwater ◽  
David M. Cognetti ◽  
Jennifer Maria Johnson ◽  
Athanassios Argiris ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Light Treatment ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Tumor Cell Death ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Combination Drug ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Curative Therapy

TPS6094 Background: rHNSCC commonly affects local or regional sites and is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality. Outcomes of these patients remain poor with limited curative treatment options and low response rates. New modalities that are targeted, minimally invasive, and provide improved tumor response and control while having limited systemic side effects are needed. Photoimmunotherapy (PIT) is a new cancer-targeted platform technology. It is a combination drug and device treatment that utilizes monoclonal antibodies conjugated to a dye (IRDye 700DX) that is photoactivated using nonthermal red light to induce rapid and selective tumor cell death. The objective of this phase 3 study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ASP-1929 (EGFR-directed antibody cetuximab-IR700 conjugate) PIT treatment as a monotherapy in patients with locoregional rHNSCC. Methods: A global, multicenter phase 3, randomized, double-arm, open-label, controlled trial of ASP-1929 PIT vs physician’s choice standard of care (SOC) for the treatment of locoregional, rHNSCC in patients who have failed or progressed on or after at least two lines of therapy, of which at least one line must be systemic therapy, is currently underway. Primary endpoints of the study are PFS and OS and the key secondary endpoint is ORR. Key inclusion criteria include: disease not amenable to curative therapy; tumor(s) accessible for PIT light treatment and measurable by CT or MRI; male or female ≥ 18 yrs old with life expectancy > 6 months; ECOG score of 0 to 1. Key exclusion criteria include: history of ≥ Grade 3 cetuximab infusion reaction; distant metastatic disease; tumors invading a major blood vessel unless embolized. The study will include ~275 subjects in a 2:1 randomization (ASP-1929 PIT: Physician’s choice SOC). The physician’s choice SOC arm includes cetuximab, methotrexate, or docetaxel. Tumor(s) are illuminated with 690 nm PIT light treatment 24 hrs following completion of ASP-1929 infusion (640 mg/m²). Clinical trial sites will be in the USA, EU and Asia. Clinical trial information: NCT03769506.

scholarly journals HYPOfractionated Radiation Therapy Comparing A Standard Radiotherapy Schedule (Over Three Weeks) with A Novel One Week Schedule in Adjuvant Breast Cancer: An Open-Label Randomised Controlled Study (HYPORT- Adjuvant): Study Protocol for a Multicenter, Randomized Phase III Trial.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanjoy Chatterjee ◽  
Santam Chakraborty ◽  
HYPORT Adjuvant Author Group
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Recurrence Rate ◽  
Adjuvant Radiotherapy ◽  
Locoregional Recurrence ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Locoregional Recurrence Rate

Abstract Background Hypofractionated radiotherapy is the current standard for adjuvant radiotherapy across many centres. Further hypofractionation may be possible but remains to be investigated in non-caucasian populations with more advanced disease, with a higher proportion of patients requiring mastectomy as well as tumour bed boost. We are reporting the design of randomized controlled trial testing the hypothesis that a one week (5 fractions) regimen of radiotherapy will be non-inferior to a standard three week (15 fractions) schedule. Methods We describe a multicenter, randomized controlled trial recruiting patients at large academic centres across India. Patients without distant metastases who merit adjuvant radiotherapy will be eligible for inclusion in the study. Patients in the control arm will receive adjuvant radiotherapy to the breast or chest wall (with/without regional nodes) to a dose of 40 Gy / 15 fractions / 3 weeks, while those in the experimental arm will receive a dose of 26 Gy / 5 fractions / 1 week (to the same volume). Use of a simultaneous integrated boost (dose of 8 Gy and 6 Gy respectively) is allowed in patients who have undergone breast conservation. A sample size of 2100 patients provides an 80% power to detect a non-inferiority of 3% in the 5-year locoregional recurrence rate with a one-sided type I error of 2.5%, assuming that the locoregional recurrence rate in the control arm is 5% at 5 years (corresponding to a hazard ratio of 1.63). Patients will be recruited over a period of 5 years, and followed up for a further 5 years thereafter. Discussion If a five-fraction regimen of breast cancer is proven to be non-inferior, this will result in a significant improvement in the access to radiotherapy, as well as reduced costs of treatment. The trial gives an opportunity to standardize and quality assure radiotherapy practices across the nation at the same time. Along with the results of the FAST Forward trial, the safety of this intervention in advanced node-positive disease requiring regional nodal radiation will be established. Trial Registration The trial has been registered at the Clinical Trial Registry of India (CTRI) vide registration number: CTRI/2018/12/016816 (31/12/2018) as well as the clinical trial.gov website at NCT03788213 (28/12/2018).

scholarly journals HYPOfractionated Radiation Therapy comparing a standard radiotherapy schedule (over three weeks) with a novel one week schedule in Adjuvant breast cancer: An open-label randomised controlled study (HYPORT- Adjuvant): study protocol for a multicenter, randomized phase III trial.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanjoy Chatterjee ◽  
Santam Chakraborty ◽  
HYPORT Adjuvant Author Group
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Recurrence Rate ◽  
Adjuvant Radiotherapy ◽  
Locoregional Recurrence ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Locoregional Recurrence Rate

Abstract Background Hypofractionated radiotherapy is the current standard for adjuvant radiotherapy across many centres. Further hypofractionation may be possible but remains to be investigated in non-caucasian populations with more advanced disease, with a higher proportion of patients requiring mastectomy as well as tumour bed boost. We are reporting the design of randomized controlled trial testing the hypothesis that a one week (5 fractions) regimen of radiotherapy will be non-inferior to a standard three week (15 fractions) schedule. Methods We describe a multicenter, randomized controlled trial recruiting patients at large academic centres across India. Patients without distant metastases who merit adjuvant radiotherapy will be eligible for inclusion in the study. Patients in the control arm will receive adjuvant radiotherapy to the breast or chest wall (with/without regional nodes) to a dose of 40 Gy / 15 fractions / 3 weeks, while those in the experimental arm will receive a dose of 26 Gy / 5 fractions / 1 week (to the same volume). Use of a simultaneous integrated boost (dose of 8 Gy and 6 Gy respectively) is allowed in patients who have undergone breast conservation. A sample size of 2100 patients provides an 80% power to detect a non-inferiority of 3% in the 5-year locoregional recurrence rate with a one-sided type I error of 2.5%, assuming that the locoregional recurrence rate in the control arm is 5% at 5 years (corresponding to a hazard ratio of 1.63). Patients will be recruited over a period of 5 years, and followed up for a further 5 years thereafter. Discussion If a five-fraction regimen of breast cancer is proven to be non-inferior, this will result in a significant improvement in the access to radiotherapy, as well as reduced costs of treatment. The trial gives an opportunity to standardize and quality assure radiotherapy practices across the nation at the same time. Along with the results of the FAST Forward trial, the safety of this intervention in advanced node-positive disease requiring regional nodal radiation will be established. Trial Registration The trial has been registered at the Clinical Trial Registry of India (CTRI) vide registration number: CTRI/2018/12/016816 (31/12/2018) as well as the clinical trial.gov website at NCT03788213 (28/12/2018).

A phase III randomized controlled trial of short-course radiotherapy with or without concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide in elderly patients with glioblastoma (CCTG CE.6, EORTC 26062-22061, TROG 08.02, NCT00482677).

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. LBA2-LBA2 ◽  
Author(s):  
James R. Perry ◽  
Normand Laperriere ◽  
Christopher J. O'Callaghan ◽  
Alba Ariela Brandes ◽  
Johan Menten ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Adjuvant Temozolomide ◽  
Short Course ◽  
Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Short Course Radiotherapy ◽  
Clinical Trial Information

LBA2 Background: The EORTC (26981-22981)/NCIC CTG (CE.3) RCT in newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GB) showed increased overall survival (OS) with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ) added to radiotherapy (RT). Pts were 18-71 (median 56) years; however, a trend of decreasing benefit from the addition of TMZ with increasing age was noted. Recent RCTs in elderly GB detected non-inferiority of 40 Gy/15 v 60 Gy/30 RT and superior survival was noted for MGMT-methylated pts treated with TMZ alone. However, whether the addition of TMZ to RT improves survival in elderly pts remained unanswered. Methods: We conducted a global randomized phase III clinical trial for patients ≥ 65 yrs with histologically confirmed newly diagnosed GB, ECOG 0-2, randomized 1:1 to receive 40Gy/15 RT v 40Gy/15 RT with 3 weeks of concomitant TMZ plus monthly adjuvant TMZ until progression or 12 cycles. Stratification was by centre, age (65-70, 71-75, or 76+), ECOG 0,1 vs 2, and biopsy vs resection. Results: 562 pts were randomized, 281 on each arm; median age 73 yrs (range 65-90), male 61%, PS 0/1 77%, resection 68%. RT+TMZ significantly improved OS over RT alone (median 9.3m v 7.6m, HR 0.67, 95%CI 0.56-0.80, p < 0.0001) and significantly improved PFS (median 5.3m v 3.9m, HR 0.50, 95%CI 0.41 – 0.60, p < 0.0001). Tissue from 462 pts was provided and adequate for MGMT analysis in 354 to date. In MGMT methylated patients (n = 165) OS for RT+TMZ v RT was 13.5 m and 7.7m respectively (HR: 0.53 (95% C.I. 0.38, 0.73, p = 0.0001). In MGMT unmethylated patients (n = 189) OS for RT + TMZ v RT was 10.0m vs 7.9m respectively (HR 0.75 (95% C.I. 0.56 – 1.01, p = 0.055). QoL analyses showed no differences in functional domains of QLQC30 and BN20 but were worse in the RT/TMZ arm for nausea, vomiting, and constipation. Systemic therapy after PD was reported in 39% on RT+TMZ v 41% on RT. Conclusions: The addition of concomitant and adjuvant TMZ to hypofractionated RT for elderly pts with GB significantly improves OS and PFS in all patients and is well tolerated. Patients with MGMT methylated tumors benefit the most from the addition of TMZ to RT where median OS is nearly doubled. Clinical trial information: NCT00482677.

A multicenter phase II trial of docetaxel, cisplatin and cetuximab (TPE) followed by cetuximab concurrent with radiotherapy in patients with local advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (ECRIPS study).

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6071-6071 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sadamoto Zenda ◽  
Yosuke Ota ◽  
Naomi Kiyota ◽  
Susumu Okano ◽  
Masato Fujii ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Induction Chemotherapy ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Treatment Completion ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Concurrent Radiotherapy

6071 Background: Induction chemotherapy is a treatment option for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (LA-SCCHN). However, Docetaxel, Cisplatin, and 5-FU (TPF) followed by Cisplatin with radiotherapy is currently not recommended due to toxicity concerns. The aim of this phase II study was to assess the feasibility of Docetaxel, Cisplatin, and Cetuximab (TPE) followed by Cetuximab with concurrent radiotherapy for LA-SCCHN. Methods: Patients were eligible if they had histologically proven SCC of oropharynx, hypopharynx or larynx, a PS of 0-1, adequate organ function, and no distant metastasis. Induction chemotherapy consisted of Cisplatin 75mg/m2 and Docetaxel 75mg/m2 on day1 and the induction regimen was repeated every 3 weeks up to a total of 3 courses. Cetuximab was administered at an initial dose of 400mg/m2 followed by 250mg/m2 weekly until the end of radiotherapy. Radiotherapy (70Gy/35fr/7w) was started after last administration of Docetaxel. Primary endpoint was the rate of treatment completion. The planned sample size was 55 with one-sided alpha of 0.025 and the power of more than 90% based on the expected and threshold treatment completion rates of 65% and 40%. Results: Between August 2013 and October 2015, 54 patients with a median age of 58 years were eligible and had the study treatment. There were 50 males, hypopharynx/oropharynx/larynx cancer of 28/19/7 cases, and 48 Stage IV disease. Response rate at induction chemotherapy was 72% while that after radiotherapy was 76% . Of 54 patients, 50 (93%) received > 2 courses of induction chemotherapy, and 41 (76%) had the full dose of radiotherapy. The rate of treatment completion was thus 76% (95%CI, 62–87%). The frequency of grade 3-4 neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, and allergy/infusion reaction was 93%, 39%, and 11%, respectively. One treatment-related death was observed. Conclusions: Induction TPE followed by Cetuximab with concurrent radiotherapy was feasible with a promising efficacy. A phase III study to evaluate this treatment strategy is warranted. Clinical trial information: UMIN000009928.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document