Risk of urinary morbidity associated with photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP) in prostate cancer patients undergoing a combined radiotherapy regimen consisting of dynamic adaptive radiotherapy (DART) and brachytherapy boost.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 231-231
Author(s):  
Michael J. Dattoli ◽  
Joseph M Kaminski ◽  
Gregory Lawrence ◽  
Daniel Kaplon

231 Background: Recent studies have shown PVPs to be associated with diminished perioperative and postoperative complications compared to transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). This is the first study to evaluate the timing of PVP intervention and post-treatment morbidity related to a combined regimen of DART and Pd-103 brachytherapy for treatment of prostate cancer. Methods: Between 12/05 and 04/20, 51 consecutive patients underwent Greenlight Laser (GLL) or Olympus Plasma Button (OPB) PVP after DART (median dose: 45 Gy) and before Pd-103 brachytherapy (median dose: 90 Gy). 27 patients received GLL PVP and 24 patients received OPB PVP. Peripheral seed loading designs were utilized to achieve optimal urethral sparing. The time from DART to PVP ranged from 1 to 81 days (median: 18 days). For 12 patients, the interval between DART and PVP was ≤7 days. The time from PVP to seed implant ranged from 0 to 55 days (median: 18 days). For 13 patients, the interval between PVP and implant was ≤7 days. American Urological Association (AUA) symptom scores were compiled prior to PVP and on the last post-brachytherapy follow-up. Post-implant follow-up ranged from 6 months to 15 years (median: 6.4 years). Results: No patient experienced post-implant urinary retention or incontinence. Morbidity was limited to RTOG grade 1-2 symptoms, with the exception of one patient who experienced protracted dysuria, which was identified to be secondary to a pre-existing prostate anomaly (steep urethral curvature). Only that patient required dilation for urethral stricture. AUA scores improved or remained the same in 43 of 51 patients. Only 1 patient of the remaining 8 experienced an increase in AUA > 8 points. Conclusions: In our experience, there have been remarkably few adverse urinary sequelae following Pd-103 implantation in patients with prior PVP and DART. In contrast to TURPs, PVPs are safe even with short intervals between DART and brachytherapy. Based upon these results, pre-implant PVP is preferred, rather than PVPs or TURPs in the post-implant setting.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 328-328
Author(s):  
Andrew Loblaw ◽  
Bindu Musunuru ◽  
Patrick Cheung ◽  
Danny Vesprini ◽  
Stanley K. Liu ◽  
...  

328 Background: The ASCO/CCO guidelines recommend brachytherapy boost for all eligible intermediate- or high-risk localized prostate cancer patients. We present efficacy, survival and late toxicity outcomes in patients treated on a prospective, single institutional protocol of MRI dose painted HDR brachytherapy boost (HDR-BT) followed by pelvic stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Methods: A phase I/II study was performed where intermediate (IR) or high-risk (HR) prostate cancer patients received HDR-BT 15Gy x 1 to the prostate and up to 22.5Gy to the MRI nodule and followed by gantry-based SBRT 25Gy in 5 weekly fractions delivered to pelvis, seminal vesicles and prostate. ADT was used for 6-18 months. CTCAEv3 was used to assess toxicities and was captured q6months x 5 years. Biochemical failure (BF; nadir + 2 definition), nadir PSA, proportion of patients with PSA < 0.4 ng/ml at 4 years (4yPSARR), incidence of salvage therapy, cause specific survival and overall survival were calculated. Day 0 was HDR-BT date for all time-to-event analyses. Results: Thirty-two patients (NCCN 3% favorable IR, 47% unfavorable IR and 50% HR) completed the planned treatment with a median follow-up of 50 months; 31 of these had an MRI nodule. Four patients had BF with actuarial 4-year BF rate of 11.5%; 3 of these received salvage ADT. Median nPSA was 0.02 ng/ml; 4yPSARR was 68.8%. One patient died (of prostate cancer) at 45 months. For late toxicities, grade 1, 2 and 3+ GU and GI toxicities were: 40.6%, 37.5%, 3% and 28.1%, 0%, 0%, respectively. Conclusions: This novel treatment protocol incorporating MRI-dose painted HDR brachytherapy boost and SBRT pelvic radiation for intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer in combination with ADT is feasible, effective and well tolerated. Clinical trial information: 12345678. [Table: see text]


2007 ◽  
Vol 46 (7) ◽  
pp. 909-917 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karl Mikael Kälkner ◽  
Thomas Wahlgren ◽  
Marianne Ryberg ◽  
Gabriella Cohn-Cedermark ◽  
Enrique Castellanos ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 60-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hima Bindu Musunuru ◽  
Andrea Deabreu ◽  
Melanie Davidson ◽  
Ananth Ravi ◽  
Joelle Antoine Helou ◽  
...  

60 Background: ASCENDE-RT has provided level 1 evidence supporting the use of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy boost in intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer. The objectives of this study are to report early toxicity and quality of life (QOL) outcomes in patients treated on a hybrid protocol using five-fraction pelvic stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) with a MRI dose painted HDR brachytherapy boost (HDR-BT). Methods: A phase I/II study was performed where intermediate (IR) and high-risk (HR) prostate cancer patients received HDR-BT 15Gy in single fraction to the prostate and up to 22.5Gy to the MRI nodule. Gantry-based 25Gy SABR was delivered to pelvis, seminal vesicles and prostate in 5 weekly fractions. ADT was used for 6-18 months. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0 was used to assess toxicities. QOL was captured using EPIC at every follow-up. A minimally clinically important change (MCIC) definition was triggered if the EPIC QOL score at each time point decreases > 0.5 SD, where SD is the standard deviation of baseline scores. Results: Thirty-three patients (NCCN 6.0% low IR, 45.5% high IR and 48.5% HR) completed this treatment with a median follow-up of 13.8 months (IQR 12.1, 18.8). The incidence of worst toxicities is shown in Table 1.The 3 grade 3 GU patients were due to temporary urinary catheterization in the acute period following HDR-BT. Mean (95% SD) EPIC urinary QOL scores were 82.5 (16.5), 83.2 (12.9) and 83.7 (16.3) at baseline, 3 months and 12 months and the bowel scores were 95.9 (3.8), 92.6 (8.2) and 90.5 (8.3), respectively. Proportion of patients experiencing MCIC at 3 months and 12 months were 20.8% and 14.3% for urinary domain, 47.8% and 53.9% for bowel domain; respectively (see Table). Conclusions: This novel treatment protocol incorporating MRI dose painted HDR brachytherapy boost and SABR pelvic radiation for intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer in combination with ADT is feasible and well tolerated in the acute setting. Clinical trial information: REB 269-2014. [Table: see text]


2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tae Hoon Lee ◽  
Changhoon Song ◽  
In Ah Kim ◽  
Jae-Sung Kim ◽  
Yong Beom Kim ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The purpose of this study was to analyze the treatment efficacy and safety of stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) boost for cervical cancer patients not amenable to brachytherapy. Methods A retrospective review of the medical records from single institution of 25 eligible patients was performed. The patients underwent pelvic radiotherapy (RT) in 25 or 28 fractions with a median dose of 45 Gy (range 44–50.4 Gy). SABR boost was delivered after pelvic RT, with a median dose of 25 Gy (range 20–33 Gy), and a median fraction number of 5 (range 4–6). 21 patients with a follow-up period of more than one year were included in the toxicity analysis, and hematuria and hematochezia that occurred later than 3 months after the RT were graded. Results The median follow-up period after radiotherapy was 2.85 years (range 0.33–6.60). The 3-year local control, locoregional control, disease-free survival, and overall survival rates were 80.9%, 75.8%, 40.9%, and 77.1%, respectively. 5 patients experienced grade 3 toxicity (3 genitourinary, 3 gastrointestinal), and no grade 4–5 toxicity was reported. Univariate analysis showed that cumulative D2cc in equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2) of rectum was marginally predictive for any grade of hematochezia (P = 0.051). Cumulative D2cc EQD2 of bladder was not predictive for hematuria. In the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, the optimal threshold of cumulative rectal D2cc EQD2 was 81.2 Gy for any grade of hematochezia. Conclusion SABR boost for cervical cancer was effective and tolerable. Although it cannot substitute brachytherapy, it can be a treatment option when brachytherapy is not possible.


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 323-323
Author(s):  
Claire Marie de la Calle ◽  
Albert Chang ◽  
Ghezal Rashid ◽  
Anthony C. Wong ◽  
Alice Choi ◽  
...  

323 Background: Adding enzalutamide to standard LHRH agonist and primary radiation therapy may improve the outcomes in patients with high-risk prostate cancer. Methods: All patients met at least 2 of the following criteria: stage cT3a/b, PSA≥20 ng/mL, Gleason Grade 8-10, ≥33% core involvement on biopsy; or had pelvic lymph node involvement ≥1cm on CT or MRI. All patients were started on 24 months of leuprolide and enzalutamide and then underwent 5 weeks of IMRT (whole pelvis, 45Gy total) followed by a brachytherapy boost. PSA, Testosterone (T) and basic labs were followed during and after treatment. Primary outcome was to assess the safety, tolerability, and feasibility of the protocol and PSA complete response (PSA-CR, defined as PSA nadir ≤0.3). Secondary outcomes included: time to biochemical recurrence (BCR) and progression free survival (PFS). Results: 16 patients were enrolled, 2 were not eligible and 3 withdrew before starting treatment. Mean age at enrollment was 68.6 years (SD 9.4). Median follow up time was 28.27 months (IQR 27.3 – 29.1 months). Median time to PSA-CR was 4.20 months (IQR 3.47 – 4.87 months). Currently all patients still have PSA-CR (Table), and none have BCR per ASTRO Phoenix criteria. All-cause, any grade adverse events (AE) were reported in all 11 (100%) patients with 4 (36.4%) experiencing grade 3 AE. One (9.09%) treatment related serious AE (seizure) occurred. There were no grade 5 AE (death related to AE). 4 subjects stopped treatment early due to: seizure, myalgias, hematuria and social reasons. Most patients however were able to complete the 24 months of leuprolide and enzalutamide: median treatment duration was 24.0 months (IQR 12.1 – 24.0 months). Conclusions: Most patients were able to tolerate and complete the entire 24 months of treatment as originally planned. Currently no patients have met criteria for PSA recurrence. Will plan to follow up patients until month 36 to help determine true BCR rates and PFS. Clinical trial information: NCT02508636. [Table: see text]


2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. 290-290
Author(s):  
Alexis Lepinoy ◽  
Etienne Martin ◽  
Magali Quivrin ◽  
Mélanie Gauthier ◽  
Philippe Maingon ◽  
...  

290 Background: 1) To establish the feasibility of salvage nodal radiotherapy in patients with 18F Fluoro-choline (FCH) PET+ nodal recurrence only from a prostate cancer. 2) To compare salvage focal FCH PET+ stereotactic radiation therapy (sf-SRT) with salvage elective nodal irradiation with a protracted FCH PET+ nodal boost (seni-PRT) . Methods: Between 2009 and 2014, 42 patients out of 102 patients with FCH PET for a rising PSA after RP or radiotherapy had positive lymph nodes only. Twenty nine patients had sf-SRT and 13 patients had seni-PRT in a curative intent. Acute and late genito urinary (GU) and gastro intestinal (GI) toxicities were assessed with CTCAE v4. Failure was defined as a rising PSA higher than the maximal pre-therapeutic PSA value followed by 2 consecutive rises or a nodal or distant metastatic failure or the initiation of any salvage therapy. Results: Seventy-six nodes were diagnosed with FCH PET/CT with a median PSA value of 2.8 [0.3 -29.2] at time of failure. Mean number of nodes was higher in the seni-PRT group than in the sf-SRT group (2.8 vs 1.6). The median prophylactic dose of WPRT and/or LA was 48.0 Gy [36.0-54.0] and the median dose delivered to involved FCH PET+ nodes was 66.0 Gy [46.0-70.0] with a median dose per fraction of 2.0 [1.8-2.2]. In the sf-SRT group, the median dose to the involved nodes was 36 Gy [18-45] with a median dose per fraction of 7.5 Gy [6-15]. After a median follow-up of 19.1 months [2.9-74.1], no difference was observed for GI or GU toxicities between the 2 groups (p = 0.26 and p = 0.19). One grade 4 GI and GU toxicity occurred in 1 patient in the seni-PRT group. The median freedom from failure (FFF) time was 14.8 months for sf-SRT and 37.6 months for seni-PRT with 2-year FFF rates of 47.8 % and 72.7 %, respectively. Conclusions: FCH PET+ node-targeted salvage radiotherapy is feasible with very low rates of toxicity. Freedom from failure was significantly improved with protracted elective nodal irradiation, suggesting that nodal disease diagnosed on FCH PET may not be an oligometastatic disease. Dose escalated seni-PRT is currently being investigated in a French phase II trial (Oligopelvis- GETUG P07).


2007 ◽  
Vol 177 (4S) ◽  
pp. 245-245
Author(s):  
Jochen Walz ◽  
Andrea Gallina ◽  
Felix K.-H. Chun ◽  
Luigi F. Da Pozzo ◽  
Alwyn M. Reuther ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document