scholarly journals OSSMAR: An Observational Study to Describe the Use of Sunitinib in Real-Life Practice for the Treatment of Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

2019 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marwan Ghosn ◽  
Roland Eid ◽  
Emad Hamada ◽  
Hamdy Abdel Azim ◽  
Jamal Zekri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Middle East ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Routine Clinical Practice ◽  
The Mean

PURPOSE Sunitinib offers improved efficacy for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). To provide better disease management in the Middle East, we studied its use in mRCC in real-life practice in this region. MATERIAL AND METHODS Patients diagnosed with mRCC and started on sunitinib between 2006 and 2016 from 10 centers in Africa and the Middle East region were studied in this regional, multicenter, observational, retrospective trial to obtain routine clinical practice data on the usage patterns and outcomes of sunitinib in mRCC in real-life practice. RESULTS A total of 289 patients were enrolled. Median age at diagnosis was 58.7 years. The patient characteristics were as follows: 73.6% of patients were males; 85.8% had clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC); 97.5% had unilateral RCC; 66.3% had metastatic disease at initial diagnosis; 56.3% received previous treatment for RCC, among which 98.7% had undergone surgery; and 15.2% and 31.4% were classified in the favorable and poor-risk groups (expanded Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center criteria), respectively. On treatment initiation, the mean total sunitinib dose was 48.1 mg, and 87.6% of patients were started on a sunitinib dose of 50 mg. The mean duration of sunitinib treatment was 9.6 months. Overall response rate was 20.8%, with a median duration of 8.2 months. Median time to progression was 5.7 months. Median follow-up time was 7.8 months. By months 12 and 24, 34.3% and 11.4% of patients, respectively, were still alive. Seventy-six patients (60.9%) experienced 314 adverse events. Twenty-three patients (8.0%) experienced 28 serious adverse events. Overall, 83 patients (28.7%) discontinued their sunitinib treatment. CONCLUSION The results are indicative of the general treatment outcomes of patients with mRCC in the Middle East using sunitinib in routine clinical practice. Reported adverse events are similar to those described in the literature but at lower frequencies.

The impact of UGT1A1 and SLCO1B1 genetic polymorphisms and pharmacokinetics of axitinib on clinical safety and efficacy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 448-448
Author(s):  
Shintaro Narita ◽  
Ryoma Igarashi ◽  
Norihiko Tsuchiya ◽  
Takamitsu Inoue ◽  
Nobuhiro Fujiyama ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Genetic Polymorphisms ◽  
Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Clinical Safety ◽  
The Mean ◽  
The Impact

448 Background: We investigated the impact of genetic polymorphisms and pharmacokinetics of axitinib on adverse events, objective responses, and survival in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Methods: In total, 53 patients with mRCC treated with axitinib were analyzed. Patient was classified as favorable (n = 5), intermediate (n = 36), and poor (n = 12) using the MSKCC risk classification system. High-performance liquid chromatography was used to measure serum axitinib levels. AUC0–12 (ng∙h/mL) was calculated using various serum levels at 0 to 12 h (C0–C12) following administration on day 7 of treatment. The genetic polymorphisms related to the drug pharmacokinetics, including SLCO1B1, SLCO1B3, SLCO2B1, ABCB1, ABCG2, CYP2C19, CYP3A5, and UGT1A1, were analyzed using PCR-RFLP analysis. Results: The most frequently reported ≥ G3 adverse events were hypertension (43.3%), proteinuria (30.2%), and anorexia (20.1%). The axitinib trough levels (C0) were significantly correlated with AUC0–12 of axitinib. Patients with axitinib C0 ≥ 10 ng/mL had a significantly higher rate of hand-foot syndrome ≥ G2 and hypothyroidism ≥ G2 than those with axitinib C0 < 10 ng/mL (p = 0.013, p = 0.005). The overall survival in patients with axitinib C0 ≥ 5 ng/mL was significantly better than that in those with axitinib C0 < 5 ng/mL (p = 0.022). The mean C0 and AUC0–12 values in patients with a poor metabolizer (*6/*6, *6/*28, and *28/*28) of UGT1A1 polymorphism were significantly higher than those in patients with an extensive metabolizer (p = 0.045, p = 0.035, respectively). The mean AUC0–12 value in patients with the SLCO1B1 *15 was significantly higher than that in those without the SLCO1B1 *15 (p = 0.038). Conclusions: Serum axitinib levels were associated with adverse events and overall survival of patients with mRCC. The genetic polymorphisms in UGT1A1 and SLCO1B1 may affect serum axitinib levels in patients with mRCC. Pharmacokinetics and genetic polymorphisms play important roles in the outcomes of patients with mRCC treated with axitinib.

Correlation Between the Tyrozinkinazine Inhibitor Sunitinib - Dose, Schedule of Administration and Adverse Events

2017 ◽  
Vol 68 (7) ◽  
pp. 1652-1659
Author(s):  
Dana Lucia Stanculeanu ◽  
Raluca Ioana Mihaila ◽  
Daniela Zob ◽  
Oana Catalina Toma ◽  
Raluca Ioana Mihaila ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Dose Reduction ◽  
Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Dose Schedule ◽  
Prophylactic Measures ◽  
Hand Foot Syndrome

Sunitinib, a multi-targeted receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has demonstrated survival benefit in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) and is generally well tolerated with most adverse events, manifesting as mild to moderate in severity. The most frequent related adverse events include hand-foot syndrome (HFS), hypertension, proteinuria, cardiac toxicities, myelosuppression, fatigue/asthenia, hypothyroidism, diarrhea and hepatotoxicity. The study aims to determine incidence of adverse events among patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treated Sunitinib within five years from 2010 to 2015 and comparing the results with data from literature. The study included a total of 56 patients treated with Sunitinib, with a dose of 50 mg (Schedule 4/2). Due to adverse events and individual safety and tolerability, at the indication of the personal clinician, 11 patients needed dose reduction, with a continuous dose of 37.5 mg, daily and 28 patients continued the dose of 50 mg taken daily, on a different schedule (2/1 schedule). The most important toxicities were anemia, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, gastrointestinal effects (diarrhea), fatigue and hypertension. After dose reduction or modified schedule the incidence of the most frequent toxicities (HFS, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia and fatigue) decreased, but hypertension was still observed in 30% of patients. The results are similar with data from literature. Early identification of individuals at risk and monitoring patients during Sunitinib treatment is very important and it can facilitate early intervention with prophylactic measures or supportive treatment, thus increasing quality of life and adherence to treatment. Further studies need to establish which targeted population can benefit the most from adjusted regimens and to correlate them with prognostic factors for survival.

191 Association of immune related adverse events with the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in metastatic renal cell carcinoma

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A205-A206
Author(s):  
Vasilii Bushunow ◽  
Leonard Appleman ◽  
Roby Thomas
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
First Line ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Kaplan Meier

BackgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are first-line therapy for tumors including metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Use of ICI is complicated by diverse immune-related adverse events (irAEs), which can add significant morbidity but are also associated with improved efficacy of therapy.1 2 Risk factors for development of irAE are still poorly understood. We hypothesized that patients with mRCC treated with ICI as first-line therapy have higher rates of developing irAE’s than patients previously treated with other therapies.MethodsWe conducted a single-institution, retrospective medical record review of patients with mRCC treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitors from March 2011 through April 15, 2020. We identified therapy duration, and presence, severity, and treatment of adverse events. We defined overall survival as time elapsed from date of diagnosis until death or until completion of study. We classified severity of adverse events according to CTCAE guidelines. Statistical methods included univariate Cox proportional hazards and logistic regression models, and Kaplan-Meier curves were plotted for subgroups.ResultsA total of 64 unique charts were reviewed. 18 patients (28%) of patients were treated with ICI as first-line therapy. 28 patients (44%) experienced immune-related adverse events with a total of 40 irAE’s identified. Most irAE were grade I-II (78%), with 7 (17%) grade III and 1 (2.4%) grade IV irAE’s. Most common sites were skin (29%), thyroid (20%) and gastrointestinal (15%). Patients with irAE had increased survival compared to those who did not have irAE (median survival not reached, vs 139 weeks, p=0.0004) (figure 1). This finding remained after excluding patients who had only experienced dermatologic irAE (median survival not reached in non-derm irAE subgroup, vs 144 weeks for dermatologic or no irAE, p=0.01) (figure 2). Patients treated with ICI as first line therapy had greater rates of developing irAE (72%) than those who had prior therapies (32%) (OR 5.4; p = 0.006). There was no association between histology type and rate of irAE.Abstract 191 Figure 1Kaplan-Meier survival plot of OS between patients with any irAE and those without any irAEAbstract 191 Figure 2Kaplan-Meier survival plot of OS between patients with non-dermatologic irAE and those without any irAE or only dermatologic irAEConclusionsThe development of irAE’s in patients with mRCC treated with ICI is associated with longer survival. This study joins the growing body of evidence showing that presence of irAE’s is associated with increased treatment efficacy. Use of ICI as first-line therapy is associated with higher risk of irAE. Given growing use of ICI as first-line therapy, further study to predict onset and severity of irAE’s is required.AcknowledgementsHong Wang, PhD, for statistical support.Ethics ApprovalThis study was approved by the University of Pittsburgh Institutional Review Board. Approval number STUDY19100386.ReferencesElias R, Yan N, Singla N, Levonyack N, Formella J, Christie A, et al. Immune-related adverse events are associated with improved outcomes in ICI-treated renal cell carcinoma patients. J Clin Oncol 2019;37(7):S645.Verzoni E, Cartenì G, Cortesi E, et al. Real-world efficacy and safety of nivolumab in previously-treated metastatic renal cell carcinoma, and association between immune-related adverse events and survival: the Italian expanded access program. J Immunother Cancer 2019;7(1):99.

Risk of toxicity with immunotherapy–tyrosine kinase inhibitors for metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandro Rizzo ◽  
Veronica Mollica ◽  
Matteo Santoni ◽  
Matteo Rosellini ◽  
Andrea Marchetti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Tyrosine Kinase ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Relative Risks

Aim: Few data are available regarding the safety profile of immunotherapy–tyrosine kinase inhibitor (IO-TKI) combinations in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. The authors investigated all-grade and grade 3–4 (G3–4) adverse events in trials comparing IO-TKI combinations with sunitinib monotherapy. Methods: The relative risks of several all-grade and G3–4 adverse events were analyzed. Results: Relative risks were similar between patients receiving IO-TKI combinations versus sunitinib monotherapy. However, the use of IO-TKI combinations was associated with a higher risk of all-grade and G3–4 diarrhea, all-grade hypothyroidism, G3–4 decreased appetite, all-grade and G3–4 aspartate transaminase increase and all-grade and G3–4 alanine transaminase increase. Conclusion: The results of the authors' meta-analysis suggest that risks of treatment-related adverse events should be carefully considered when choosing IO-TKI combinations in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document