Restricted Mouth Opening in Head and Neck Cancer: Etiology, Prevention, and Treatment

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (10) ◽  
pp. 643-653
Author(s):  
Waseem A. Abboud ◽  
Sharon Hassin-Baer ◽  
Eran E. Alon ◽  
Iris Gluck ◽  
Alex Dobriyan ◽  
...  

Restricted mouth opening or trismus is often encountered in patients with head and neck cancer. The restriction may be the presenting sign of malignancy, a sequela of tumor site or growth, an adverse effect of oncologic treatment, or a first sign of tumoral recurrence. In general, any insult to the temporomandibular joint, masticatory muscles, or their neural innervation may cause limitation in mouth opening. The etiologies leading to trismus are as follows: myospasm secondary to tumor infiltration; reflectory myospasm; radiation-induced myositis and myofibrosis; temporomandibular joint involvement with tumor; unfavorable postsurgical scarring; muscle and joint atrophy secondary to immobilization; pain; jaw fracture and hardware failure; and infection. Preventive measures should be implemented before, during, and after treatment. These measures include identification of high-risk patients, utilization of dose-sculpting radiation techniques whenever possible, performing reconstruction at the same time of resective surgery whenever feasible, and initiating mobilization exercises as early as possible. When trismus develops, treatments are often challenging and disappointing. These include physical therapy, mouth opening appliances, drug therapy, and release surgery. All medical specialties dealing with head and neck cancer should be familiar with the diagnosis and prevention of trismus and make an effort to ensure patients are referred to the appropriate care when needed. Trismus should not be considered a trivial sequela of head and neck cancer.

2021 ◽  
pp. e20200068
Author(s):  
Joni Nedeljak ◽  
Susan Armijo-Olivo ◽  
Ivonne A. Hernandez ◽  
Suresh Nayar ◽  
Margaret L. McNeely

Purpose: Trismus, or restricted mouth opening, is a common side effect of treatment for head and neck cancer. This scoping review examined the characteristics, extent, and nature of existing research on manual therapy and jaw-mobilizing devices to prevent and manage trismus related to head and neck cancer. Method: Six electronic databases were searched using the terms trismus, head and neck cancer, and physical therapy and the associated MeSH terms. The review focused on the factors related to intervention delivery: timing, adherence, completion rates, and adverse events. Results: Nine studies were included. Eight examined the use of a jaw-mobilizing device, and one explored the benefit of remote telephone support. Two studies involved cancer survivors at risk of trismus, five involved survivors with trismus, and two included survivors both with and at risk of trismus. No studies were found examining physiotherapist provision of manual therapy. Within-group comparisons supported the benefit of using a jaw-mobilizing device to manage trismus, whereas significant between-groups differences were found only in non-randomized controlled trials. Survivor symptoms and intervention burden were reported reasons for poor adherence and completion rates. Conclusions: No benefit was found for the use of jaw-mobilizing devices for the prevention of trismus. Given the potential of manual therapy to enhance outcomes, physical therapist–led research is warranted.


Head & Neck ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 42 (9) ◽  
pp. 2696-2721 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah J. Geer ◽  
Phillip V. Rijn ◽  
Jan L.N. Roodenburg ◽  
Pieter U. Dijkstra

BMJ Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. e021938
Author(s):  
Rana Lee ◽  
Alex Molassiotis ◽  
Simon N Rogers ◽  
Rhiannon Tudor Edwards ◽  
David Ryder ◽  
...  

IntroductionPatients can develop trismus from their head and neck cancer or as a result of treatment. Trismus affects the jaw muscles and makes mouth opening difficult. To potentially combat trismus, patients could undertake proactive jaw stretching exercises prior to, during and after radiotherapy, although currently these are not the standard of care.Methods and analysisThis is a randomised, open-label, controlled, two-centre feasibility study, to assess the objective and subjective effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of therabite use compared with wooden spatula in ameliorating trismus in patients treated for stage 3 and 4 oral and oropharyngeal cancer, managed either by primary surgery followed by (chemo)radiotherapy or primary (chemo)radiotherapy. The principal objective assessment is measurement of maximum jaw opening. Assessments in all cases will be performed preradiotherapy and again at 3 and 6 months postintervention.Secondary aims of the study will be (1) to assess whether therabite or the wooden spatula intervention improves patients’ quality of life, (2) reduce the level of post-treatment clinical management/healthcare use and (3) a nested qualitative study will explore the experience of the patient taking part in the intervention; data will be transcribed verbatim and analysis will be based on content analysis methods using the interview questions as the framework for examination.Ethics and disseminationNorth West Greater Manchester granted ethical approval (REC Reference 11/NW/0744). Good Clinical Practice and the Declaration of Helsinki have been adhered to. The results will be presented internationally and submitted to a peer-reviewed journal. Head and neck cancer charities and information websites will also be approached.Trial registration numberNCT01733797.


2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 18572-18572
Author(s):  
D. V. Santos ◽  
K. M. Kiyota ◽  
I. Snitcovsky ◽  
G. M. Leitão ◽  
M. H. Federico

18572 Background: Head and neck cancer (HNC) is a stigmatizing disease. In order to identify special needs in these patients (pts), we evaluated HRQoL and the demographic characteristics of HNC pts who had survived at least one year after chemoradiation. Methods: Our survey, done in may 2005, identified 42 pts alive (from 527 admitted from May 2002 to May 2004 treated with either exclusive (n = 19) or adjuvant (n = 23) chemoradiation. These pts as well 16 normal controls, were interviewed and invited to complete EORTC-QLQ-C30 and HN35. These questionnaires had already been validated for Brazilian Portuguese. Primary site was 12 oral cavity, 14 pharynx, 13 larynx, 3 not determined. Age 60.3 ± 9.0 y, 36 male and 6 female; 39 were squamous cell carcinoma and 3 other type; 28 were stage III or IV; 40 had no evidence of disease and two had recurrent disease at the time of survey. Comparison between groups were done by using the Mann-Whitney test and differences of at least 10 points was considered of clinical significance. Simple correlations were conducted between HRQoL variables and clinical correlates and demographics. The level of significance was established at p < 0.05. This work was conducted according to Helsinki declaration and Brazilian law. Results: Scores relative to global QoL (p = 0.18) and emotional function (p = 0.59) did not differ in pts as compared to controls. Pts presented worse scores in swallowing, senses, speech, pain, dental problems, xerostomia and mouth opening (all p < 0.05). Emotional function (r = 0.316, p = 0.041) and financial worries (r = −0.509, p = 0.001) impacted on global QoL, what did not happen with marital status, income and level of education, age or previous surgery. Chronic pain was more prevalent in oral cavity tumors than in other sites such as pharynx or larynx tumors (p = 0.046 and p = 0.030, respectively). Pts with larynx tumors presented worse cough score as compared to those with pharynx tumors (p = 0.009). Conclusions: Providing continuous oral and dental care seems to be important to address survivors’ concerns. Financial distress could be ameliorated by a better social support system. Tumor site seem to affect differently some domains of HRQoL, in contrast to organ preservation. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


Oral Oncology ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 51 (5) ◽  
pp. 548-555 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.I. Kamstra ◽  
P.U. Dijkstra ◽  
M. van Leeuwen ◽  
J.L.N. Roodenburg ◽  
J.A. Langendijk

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (10) ◽  
pp. 233-240
Author(s):  
Xiangguo Zhang ◽  
Haihui Chen ◽  
Wen Chen ◽  
Brandon A. Dyer ◽  
Quan Chen ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah J. van der Geer ◽  
Harry Reintsema ◽  
Jolanda I. Kamstra ◽  
Jan L. N. Roodenburg ◽  
Pieter U. Dijkstra

Abstract Purpose To compare the effects of two stretching devices, the TheraBite® Jaw Motion Rehabilitation System™ and the Dynasplint Trismus System®, on maximal mouth opening in head and neck cancer patients. Methods Patients were randomly assigned to one of two exercise groups: the TheraBite® Jaw Motion Rehabilitation System™ group or the Dynasplint Trismus System® group. Patients performed stretching exercises for 3 months. During the three study visits, maximal mouth opening was measured and the patients completed questionnaires on mandibular function and quality of life. Results In our study population (n = 27), five patients did not start the exercise protocol, eight patients discontinued exercises, and two patients were lost to follow-up. No significant differences regarding the change in mouth opening between the two devices were found. Patients had an increase in MMO of 3.0 mm (IQR − 2.0; 4.0) using the TheraBite® Jaw Motion Rehabilitation System™ and 1.5 mm (IQR 1.0; 3.0) using the Dynasplint Trismus System®. Exercising with either stretching device was challenging for the patients due to the intensive exercise protocol, pain during the exercises, fitting problems with the stretching device, and overall deterioration of their medical condition. Conclusions The effects of the two stretching devices did not differ significantly in our study population. The factors described, influencing the progression of stretching exercises, need to be taken into account when prescribing a similar stretching regimen for trismus in head and neck cancer patients. Trial registration NTR - Dutch Trial Register number: 5589


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document