How Patients and Providers Weigh the Risks and Benefits of Long-Term Opioid Therapy for Cancer Pain

2021 ◽  
pp. OP.20.00679
Author(s):  
Karleen F. Giannitrapani ◽  
Soraya Fereydooni ◽  
Maria J. Silveira ◽  
Azin Azarfar ◽  
Peter A. Glassman ◽  
...  

PURPOSE: To understand how patients and providers weigh the risks and benefits of long-term opioid therapy (LTOT) for cancer pain. METHODS: Researchers used VA approved audio-recording devices to record interviews. ATLAS t.i., a qualitative analysis software, was used for analysis of transcribed interview data. Participants included 20 Veteran patients and 20 interdisciplinary providers from primary care– and oncology-based practice settings. We conducted semistructured interviews and analyzed transcripts used thematic qualitative methods. Interviews explored factors that affect decision making about appropriateness of LTOT for cancer related pain. We saturated themes for providers and patients separately. RESULTS: Factors affecting patient decision-making included influence from various information sources, persuasion from trusted providers, and sometimes deferral of the decision to their provider. Relative prioritization of pain management as the focal patient concern varied with some patients describing comparatively more fear of chemotherapy than opioid analgesics, comparatively more knowledge of opioids in relation to other drugs;patients expressed a preference to spend the limited time they have with their oncologist discussing cancer treatment rather than opioid use. Factors affecting provider decision making included prognosis, patient goals, patient characteristics, and provider experience and biases. Providers differed in how they weigh the relative importance of alleviating pain or avoiding opioids in the face of treating patients with cancer and histories of substance abuse. CONCLUSION: Divergent perspectives on factors need to be considered when weighing risks and benefits. Policies and interventions should be designed to reduce variation in practice to promote equal access to adequate pain management. Improved shared decision-making initiatives will take advantage of patient decision-making factors and priorities.

Cureus ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giancarlo Medina Perez ◽  
Megan M Tran ◽  
Christopher McDonald ◽  
Ryan O'Donnell ◽  
Aristides I Cruz, Jr.

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rattaphol Seangrung ◽  
Thongchai Tempeetikul ◽  
Supasit Pannarunothai ◽  
Supalak Sakdanuwatwong

Abstract Background Opioids are currently prescribed for chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP), and some patients use opioids continuously for long-term treatment. Stakeholders’ awareness about long-term opioid therapy is essential for improving the safety and effectiveness of pain treatment. The purpose of this study is to explore the perspectives of pain specialists, patients, and family caregivers about long-term opioid use in CNCP management. Methods This study was a qualitative study and adhered to the COREQ guidelines. Pain specialists (n = 12), patients (n = 14), and family members (n = 9) were recruited to the study by purposive sampling at the Pain Clinic of Ramathibodi Hospital. Semi-structured interviews were recorded, verbatim transcribed, conceptually coded, and analyzed using Atlas.ti 8.0. Results All groups of participants described opioids as non-first-line drugs for pain management. Opioids should be prescribed only for severe pain, when non-opioid pharmacotherapy and non-pharmacological therapies are not effective. Patients reported that the benefits of opioids were for pain relief, while physicians and most family members highlighted that opioid use should improve functional outcomes. Physicians and family members expressed concerns about opioid-related side effects, harm, and adverse events, while patients did not. Patients confirmed that they would continue using opioids for pain management under supervision. However, physicians stated that they would taper off or discontinue opioid therapy if patients’ pain relief or functional improvement was not achieved. Both patients and family members were willing to consider non-pharmacological therapies if potential benefits existed. Patient education, doctor–patient/family relationships, and opioid prescription policies were proposed to enhance CNCP management. Conclusion Long-term opioid therapy for CNCP may be beneficial in patients who have established realistic treatment goals (for both pain relief and functional improvement) with their physicians. Regular monitoring and evaluation of the risks and benefits, adverse events, and drug-related aberrant behaviors are necessary. Integrated multimodal multidisciplinary therapies and family member collaborations are also important for improving CNCP management.


2006 ◽  
Vol 77 (4) ◽  
pp. 678-683 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amit M. Patel ◽  
Philip S. Richards ◽  
Hom-Lay Wang ◽  
Marita R. Inglehart

Spine ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 44 (2) ◽  
pp. 143-149 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stina Brogård Andersen ◽  
Regner Birkelund ◽  
Mikkel Ø. Andersen ◽  
Leah Y. Carreon ◽  
Angela Coulter ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 57 (2) ◽  
pp. 453-454
Author(s):  
Karleen Giannitrapani ◽  
Azin Azarfar ◽  
Maria Silveira ◽  
Amanda Midboe ◽  
Peter Glassman ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (31_suppl) ◽  
pp. 32-32
Author(s):  
Maria J. Silveira ◽  
Karleen F Giannitrapani ◽  
Soraya Fereydooni ◽  
Azin Azarfar ◽  
Peter Glassman ◽  
...  

32 Background: Many patients with cancerpain are appropriately managed on long-term opioid therapy (LTOT), but are at similar risk of overdose and addiction as are patients with non-cancer pain. Whether to commence opioids for cancer pain is often a shared decision between patient and provider. Little is known about this process. Methods: Semi-structured interviews with 20 cancer patients on LTOT and 20 interdisciplinary providers who prescribe LTOT from two VA medical centers. Transcripts were coded and analyzed using constant comparison to find common themes. Results: Providers and patients largely weighed the risks and benefits of LTOT similarly, except in the case of cancer patients with past/present substance use disorder (SUD). In those cases, providers felt the risks outweighed the benefits, while patients felt the benefits outweighed the risks. Generally, patients considered pain relief their overarching concern. Other factors that impacted their risk/benefit calculus included: personal/family experience with opioids and the opinions of trusted providers. Only rarely did patients defer decision making to providers. Factors that impacted the risk/benefit calculus of providers included: disease status, patient goals, patient characteristics, and providers' past experiences/biases. Of note, patients with past opioid exposure generally viewed their experience with opioids as positive, and usually anchored their risk assessment for opioids relative to those of chemotherapy. Patients also expressed that they would prefer to spend less physician time discussing LTOT and more time discussing cancer treatment instead. Conclusions: Patients and providers often agree on when it is appropriate to use LTOT for cancer pain. In cases where they disagree, providers are well advised to explore and address patients’ fears about the adequacy of pain management without opioids, as well as their lived experience with opioids. Patients are comfortable having such discussions with physician extenders in order to reserve face-to-face physician time to discuss cancer treatment instead.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rattaphol Seangrung ◽  
Thongchai Tempeetikul ◽  
Supasit Pannarunothai ◽  
Supalak Sakdanuwatwong

Abstract Background: Opioids are currently prescribed for chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP), and some patients use opioids continuously for long-term treatment. Stakeholders’ awareness about long-term opioid therapy is essential for improving the safety and effectiveness of pain treatment. The purpose of this study is to explore the perspectives of pain specialists, patients, and family caregivers about long-term opioid use in CNCP management.Methods: This study was a qualitative study and adhered to the COREQ guidelines. Pain specialists (n = 12), patients (n = 14), and family members (n = 9) were recruited to the study by purposive sampling at the Pain Clinic of Ramathibodi Hospital. Semi-structured interviews were recorded, verbatim transcribed, conceptually coded, and analyzed using Atlas.ti 8.0.Results: All groups of participants described opioids as non-first-line drugs for pain management. Opioids should be prescribed only for severe pain, when non-opioid pharmacotherapy and non-pharmacological therapies are not effective. Patients reported that the benefits of opioids were for pain relief, while physicians and most family members highlighted that opioid use should improve functional outcomes. Physicians and family members expressed concerns about opioid-related side effects, harm, and adverse events, while patients did not. Patients confirmed that they would continue using opioids for pain management under supervision. However, physicians stated that they would taper off or discontinue opioid therapy if patients’ pain relief or functional improvement was not achieved. Both patients and family members were willing to consider non-pharmacological therapies if potential benefits existed. Patient education, doctor–patient/family relationships, and opioid prescription policies were proposed to enhance CNCP management.Conclusion: Long-term opioid therapy for CNCP may be beneficial in patients who have established realistic treatment goals (for both pain relief and functional improvement) with their physicians. Regular monitoring and evaluation of the risks and benefits, adverse events, and drug-related aberrant behaviors are necessary. Integrated multimodal multidisciplinary therapies and family member collaborations are also important for improving CNCP management.


2021 ◽  
Vol 29 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. i48-i49
Author(s):  
S Visram ◽  
J Saini ◽  
R Mandvia

Abstract Introduction Opioid class drugs are a commonly prescribed form of analgesic widely used in the treatment of acute, cancer and chronic non-cancer pain. Up to 90% of individuals presenting to pain centres receive opioids, with doctors in the UK prescribing more and stronger opioids (1). Concern is increasing that patients with chronic pain are inappropriately being moved up the WHO ‘analgesic ladder’, originally developed for cancer pain, without considering alternatives to medications, (2). UK guidelines on chronic non-cancer pain management recommend weak opioids as a second-line treatment, when the first-line non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs / paracetamol) ineffective, and for short-term use only. A UK educational outreach programme by the name IMPACT (Improving Medicines and Polypharmacy Appropriateness Clinical Tool) was conducted on pain management. This research evaluated the IMPACT campaign, analysing the educational impact on the prescribing of morphine, tramadol and other high-cost opioids, in the Walsall CCG. Methods Standardised training material was delivered to 50 practices between December 2018 and June 2019 by IMPACT pharmacists. The training included a presentation on pain control, including dissemination of local and national guidelines, management of neuropathic, low back pain and sciatica as well as advice for prescribers on prescribing opioids in long-term pain, with the evidence-base. Prescribing trends in primary care were also covered in the training, and clinicians were provided with resources to use in their practice. Data analysis included reviewing prescribing data and evaluating the educational intervention using feedback from participants gathered via anonymous questionnaires administered at the end of the training. Prescribing data analysis was conducted by Keele University’s Medicines Management team via the ePACT 2 system covering October 2018 to September 2019 (two months before and three months after the intervention) were presented onto graphs to form comparisons in prescribing trends of the Midland CCG compared to England. Results Questionnaires completed at the end of sessions showed high levels of satisfaction, with feedback indicating that participants found the session well presented, successful at highlighting key messages, and effective in using evidence-based practice. 88% of participants agreed the IMPACT campaign increased their understanding of the management and assessment of pain, and prescribing of opioids and other resources available to prescribers. The majority (85%) wished to see this form of education being repeated regularly in the future for other therapeutic areas. Analysis of the prescribing data demonstrated that the total volume of opioid analgesics decreased by 1.7% post-intervention in the Midlands CCG in response to the pharmacist-led educational intervention. As supported by literature, the use of educational strategies, including material dissemination and reminders as well as group educational outreach was effective in engaging clinicians, as demonstrated by the reduction in opioid prescribing and high GP satisfaction in this campaign. Conclusion The IMPACT campaign was effective at disseminating pain-specific guidelines for opioid prescribing to clinicians, leading to a decrease in overall prescribing of opioid analgesics. Educational outreach as an approach is practical and a valuable means to improve prescribing by continuing medical education. References 1. Els, C., Jackson, T., Kunyk, D., Lappi, V., Sonnenberg, B., Hagtvedt, R., Sharma, S., Kolahdooz, F. and Straube, S. (2017). Adverse events associated with medium- and long-term use of opioids for chronic non-cancer pain: an overview of Cochrane Reviews. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. This provided the statistic of percentage receiving opioids that present to pain centres. 2. Heit, H. (2010). Tackling the Difficult Problem of Prescription Opioid Misuse. Annals of Internal Medicine, 152(11), p.747. Issues with prescriptions and inappropriate moving up the WHO ladder.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document