scholarly journals Genomic Profiles of De Novo High- and Low-Volume Metastatic Prostate Cancer: Results From a 2-Stage Feasibility and Prevalence Study in the STAMPEDE Trial

2020 ◽  
pp. 882-897 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clare Gilson ◽  
Fiona Ingleby ◽  
Duncan C. Gilbert ◽  
Marina A. Parry ◽  
Nafisah B. Atako ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Chromatin Remodeling ◽  
Metastatic Prostate Cancer ◽  
De Novo ◽  
High Volume ◽  
Pi3k Pathway ◽  
Mismatch Repair Gene ◽  
Copy Number Loss ◽  
Hormone Sensitive ◽  
Low Volume

PURPOSE The STAMPEDE trial recruits men with newly diagnosed, high-risk, hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. To ascertain the feasibility of targeted next-generation sequencing (tNGS) and the prevalence of baseline genomic aberrations, we sequenced tumor and germline DNA from patients with metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa) starting long-term androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT). METHODS In a 2-stage approach, archival, formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) prostate tumor core biopsy samples were retrospectively subjected to 2 tNGS assays. Prospective enrollment enabled validation using tNGS in tumor and germline DNA. RESULTS In stage 1, tNGS data were obtained from 185 tumors from 287 patients (65%); 98% had de novo mPCa. We observed PI3K pathway aberrations in 43%, due to PTEN copy-number loss (34%) and/or activating mutations in PIK3 genes or AKT (18%) and TP53 mutation or loss in 33%. No androgen receptor ( AR) aberrations were detected; RB1 loss was observed in < 1%. In stage 2, 93 (92%) of 101 FFPE tumors (biopsy obtained within 8 months) were successfully sequenced prospectively. The prevalence of DNA damage repair (DDR) deficiency was 14% (somatic) and 5% (germline). BRCA2 mutations and mismatch repair gene mutations were exclusive to high-volume disease. Aberrant DDR (22% v 15%), Wnt pathway (16% v 4%), and chromatin remodeling (16% v 8%) were all more common in high-volume compared with low-volume disease, but the small numbers limited statistical comparisons. CONCLUSION Prospective genomic characterization is feasible using residual diagnostic tumor samples and reveals that the genomic landscapes of de novo high-volume mPCa and advanced metastatic prostate cancer have notable similarities (PI3K pathway, DDR, Wnt, chromatin remodeling) and differences ( AR, RB1). These results will inform the design and conduct of biomarker-directed trials in men with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer.

scholarly journals Chemohormonal Therapy in Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer: Long-Term Survival Analysis of the Randomized Phase III E3805 CHAARTED Trial

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (11) ◽  
pp. 1080-1087 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christos E. Kyriakopoulos ◽  
Yu-Hui Chen ◽  
Michael A. Carducci ◽  
Glenn Liu ◽  
David F. Jarrard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
High Volume ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Cancer Trial ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Chemohormonal Therapy ◽  
Androgen Ablation ◽  
Hormone Sensitive ◽  
Low Volume

Purpose Docetaxel added to androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) significantly increases the longevity of some patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. Herein, we present the outcomes of the CHAARTED (Chemohormonal Therapy Versus Androgen Ablation Randomized Trial for Extensive Disease in Prostate Cancer) trial with more mature follow-up and focus on tumor volume. Patients and Methods In this phase III study, 790 patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer were equally randomly assigned to receive either ADT in combination with docetaxel 75 mg/m2 for up to six cycles or ADT alone. The primary end point of the study was overall survival (OS). Additional analyses of the prospectively defined low- and high-volume disease subgroups were performed. High-volume disease was defined as presence of visceral metastases and/or ≥ four bone metastases with at least one outside of the vertebral column and pelvis. Results At a median follow-up of 53.7 months, the median OS was 57.6 months for the chemohormonal therapy arm versus 47.2 months for ADT alone (hazard ratio [HR], 0.72; 95% CI, 0.59 to 0.89; P = .0018). For patients with high-volume disease (n = 513), the median OS was 51.2 months with chemohormonal therapy versus 34.4 months with ADT alone (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.50 to 0.79; P < .001). For those with low-volume disease (n = 277), no OS benefit was observed (HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.70 to 1.55; P = .86). Conclusion The clinical benefit from chemohormonal therapy in prolonging OS was confirmed for patients with high-volume disease; however, for patients with low-volume disease, no OS benefit was discerned.

scholarly journals Local and systemic morbidities of de novo metastatic prostate cancer in Singapore: insight from 685 consecutive patients from a large prospective Uro-oncology registry

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. e034331 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu Guang Tan ◽  
Leonard Pang ◽  
Farhan Khalid ◽  
Randy Poon ◽  
Hong Hong Huang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Metastatic Prostate Cancer ◽  
Group Performance ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
High Volume ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Systemic Complications

ObjectiveTo evaluate the incidence and management of local and systemic complications afflicting patients with de novo metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa) in Singapore.DesignRetrospective analysis of a large prospective Uro-oncology registry of mPCa.SettingThis study is carried out in a tertiary hospital in Singapore.ParticipantsWe reviewed our institution’s prospectively maintained database of 685 patients with mPCa over a 20-year period (1995–2014). Patients with non-mPCa or those progressed to metastatic disease after previous curative local treatments were excluded.Primary and secondary outcome measuresThe primary outcome was to evaluate the systemic and local morbidity rates associated with mPCa. Local complication was defined as the need for palliative procedures to relieve urinary obstruction, worsening renal function or refractory haematuria, while systemic complication was related to radiographic evidence of skeletal-related pathological fractures. Secondary outcomes analysed were the management and overall survival patterns over 20 years.Results237 (34.6%) patients required local palliative treatments. 88 (12.8%) patients presented with acute urinary retention, 23 patients (9.7%) required repetitive local palliative treatments. On multivariate analyses, prostate-specific antigen >100 (p=0.02) and prostate volume >50 g (p=0.03) were independent prognostic factors for significant obstruction requiring palliative procedures. 118 (17.2%) patients developed skeletal fractures, with poor Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) status (p=0.01) and high volume bone metastasis (p<0.01) independently predictive of skeletal fractures. Altogether, 653 (95.3%) patients received androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), with the median time to castrate resistance of 21.4 months (IQR 7–27). The median overall survival was 45 months (IQR 20–63), with prostate cancer mortality of 81.4%. Improved overall survival was observed from 41.6 months (1995–1999) to 47.8 months (2010–2014) (p<0.01).ConclusionMorbidities and complications arising from mPCa are more common and debilitating than we thought, often requiring immediate palliative treatments, while many necessitate repeated interventions with progression.

Cost-effectiveness of upfront therapeutic options in low-volume de novo metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 211-211
Author(s):  
Neil Rohit Parikh ◽  
Eric M. Chang ◽  
Nicholas George Nickols ◽  
Matthew Rettig ◽  
Ann C. Raldow ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Systemic Therapy ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Therapeutic Options ◽  
Oral Drug ◽  
Hormone Sensitive ◽  
Low Volume

211 Background: Low-volume de novo metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) has historically been treated with lifelong androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Recently, however, the addition of several advanced therapeutic options – radiation therapy (RT) to the primary, advanced hormonal therapy agents such as abiraterone acetate/prednisone (AAP), and chemotherapy – to ADT have been shown to improve survival in low-volume mHSPC. The objective of this study was to compare the cost-effectiveness of treating low-volume mHSPC patients upfront with RT+ADT, AAP+ADT, or docetaxel+ADT. Methods: A Markov-based cost-effectiveness analysis was constructed comparing three treatment strategies for low-volume mHSPC patients: (1) upfront RT+ADT --> salvage AAP+ADT --> salvage docetaxel+ADT; (2) upfront AAP+ADT --> salvage docetaxel+ADT, and (3) upfront docetaxel+ADT --> salvage AAP+ADT. Transition probabilities were calculated using data from STAMPEDE arms C/G/H, COU-AA-301, COU-AA-302, and TAX-327. RT was delivered via five-fraction stereotactic body radiation therapy. The analysis utilized a 10-year time horizon, and a $100,000/quality adjusted life year (QALY) willingness-to-pay threshold. Utilities were extracted from the literature; costs were taken from Medicare fee schedules and VA oral drug contracts. Results: At 10 years, total cost was $140K, $259K, and $189K, with total QALYs of 4.66, 5.03, and 3.72 for strategies (1) upfront RT+ADT, (2) upfront AAP+ADT, and (3) upfront docetaxel+ADT, respectively. Compared to upfront RT+ADT, upfront AAP+ADT was not cost-effective (ICER: $321K/QALY). This result remained unchanged even after modification of various model inputs in 1-way sensitivity analysis. Upfront docetaxel+ADT was both more costly and less effective than upfront RT+ADT (ICER: -$53K/QALY). Conclusions: At 10 years, RT+ADT is cost-effective compared to other advanced systemic therapy options alone, and should be considered as a viable treatment strategy in all patients with a low-burden of metastatic disease. Additional studies are needed to determine whether any benefit exists in combining RT to the primary with upfront advanced systemic therapy.

scholarly journals Stratification of Prognoses based on Criteria from Clinical Trials of Metastatic Hormone-sensitive Prostate Cancer

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyun Kyu Ahn ◽  
Jeong Woo Yoo ◽  
Kyo Chul Koo ◽  
Byung Ha Chung ◽  
Kwang Suk Lee
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Liver Metastasis ◽  
Bone Metastasis ◽  
High Volume ◽  
Classification Systems ◽  
Oncologic Outcomes ◽  
Visceral Metastasis ◽  
Hormone Sensitive ◽  
Low Volume

Abstract Background: Oncologic outcomes in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) are extremely heterogeneous. We aimed to (1) stratify the prognosis in mHSPC patients according to criteria for high-volume disease, as defined in clinical trials, and (2) identify the combinations of unfavorable risk factors.Methods: This retrospective study reviewed 623 patients who were diagnosed with mHSPC between 1996 and 2014. The prognoses of mHSPC patients were stratified by criteria from the GETUG15, CHAARTED, STAMPEDE, and LATITUDE trials. The exclusion criteria were incomplete clinical data, docetaxel chemotherapy with upfront options, and metastatic disease without proper management after initial diagnosis.Results: All 485 patients (median follow-up=36.1 months) were categorized according to stage: M1a (70, 14.4%), M1b (367, 75.7%), and M1c (48, 9.9%). Significant differences in overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were found among the groups with low-volume disease, as classified by four clinical trials (log-rank p=0.001 and p<0.001, respectively). Bone metastasis volume and liver metastasis were independent predictors of prognosis. According to disease classification under NCCN guidelines, the prognosis of CSS between low-volume disease patients and M1c patients (no bone metastasis and low-volume bone metastasis) was not significantly different. Additionally, the prognosis of CSS did not significantly differ between M1c (high-volume bone metastasis and visceral metastasis, except liver) and M1b (high-volume bone metastasis) patients.Conclusions: The prognoses of patients with low-volume disease, based on several classification systems, were heterogeneous. Except for lung or liver metastasis, the combination of visceral metastasis with no/low-volume bone disease should be considered as a proxy of less aggressive disease in patients presenting with mHSPC.

Why Chemotherapy Should be Given Early for Men with Metastatic Prostate Cancer

2015 ◽  
pp. e263-e269 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leonel F. Hernandez-Aya ◽  
Maha Hussain
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
De Novo ◽  
High Volume ◽  
High Response Rate ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Incurable Disease ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Castrate Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Hormone Sensitive ◽  
Castrate Resistant

Metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) is an incurable disease, and despite a high response rate to androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT), outcomes have not significantly changed for many decades. Earlier attempts at multitargeted strategies with the addition of cytotoxic chemotherapy to ADT did not affect survival. As more effective therapies are emerging, including cytotoxic therapy for patients with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), there is increasing interest for testing these drugs earlier in the disease course. The premise is that agents with clinical benefit in advanced mCRPC may have a better effect if used preemptively before the development of significant resistance and to attack earlier de novo androgen resistant/independent clones. The recent results of the phase III clinical trial E3805 investigating ADT with or without docetaxel in mHSPC provide compelling support for this strategy. Docetaxel combined with ADT significantly improved overall survival from 44 to 57.6 months (p = 0.0003), particularly in patients with high-volume disease (from 32.2 to 49.2 months; p = 0.0006). Longer follow-up is needed to assess the effect on patients with low disease burden. Further studies are needed to further maximize the antitumor effect in patients with mHSPC and to investigate the effects of advancing therapy to this disease setting on the efficacy of respective agents in the castration-resistant setting.

Optimizing Anticancer Therapy in Metastatic Non-Castrate Prostate Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (15) ◽  
pp. 1521-1539 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J. Morris ◽  
R. Bryan Rumble ◽  
Ethan Basch ◽  
Sebastien J. Hotte ◽  
Andrew Loblaw ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Clinical Practice Guideline ◽  
Practice Guideline ◽  
Metastatic Prostate Cancer ◽  
De Novo ◽  
High Volume ◽  
Abiraterone Acetate ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
The Impact

Purpose This clinical practice guideline addresses abiraterone or docetaxel with androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) for metastatic prostate cancer that has not been treated (or has been minimally treated) with testosterone-lowering agents. Methods Standard therapy for newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer has been ADT alone. Three studies have compared ADT alone with ADT and docetaxel, and two studies have compared ADT alone with ADT and abiraterone. Results Three prospective randomized studies (GETUG-AFU 15, STAMPEDE, and CHAARTED) examined overall survival (OS) with adding docetaxel to ADT. STAMPEDE and CHAARTED favored docetaxel (hazard ratio [HR], 0.78; 95% CI, 0.66 to 0.93; n = 2,962 and HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.59 to 0.89; n = 790, respectively). GETUG-AFU 15 was negative. LATITUDE and STAMPEDE examined the impact on OS of adding abiraterone (with prednisone or prednisolone) to ADT. LATITUDE and STAMPEDE favored abiraterone (HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.76; n = 1,199 and HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.52 to 0.76; n = 1,917, respectively). Recommendations ADT plus docetaxel or abiraterone in newly diagnosed metastatic non-castrate prostate cancer offers a survival benefit as compared with ADT alone. The strongest evidence of benefit with docetaxel is in men with de novo high-volume (CHAARTED criteria) metastatic disease. Similar survival benefits are seen using abiraterone acetate in high-risk patients (LATITUDE criteria) and in the metastatic population in STAMPEDE. ADT plus abiraterone and ADT plus docetaxel have not been compared, and it is not known if some men benefit more from one regimen as opposed to the other. Fitness for chemotherapy, patient comorbidities, toxicity profiles, quality of life, drug availability, and cost should be considered in this decision. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/genitourinary-cancer-guidelines .

scholarly journals Prostate Cancer: 2021 ASCO Annual Meeting Highlights for the Advanced Practitioner

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Morgane C. Diven, PharmD, BCOP
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Annual Meeting ◽  
Small Molecule ◽  
Metastatic Prostate Cancer ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Advanced Practitioner ◽  
Hormone Sensitive ◽  
Va Health Care System

Morgane C. Diven, PharmD, BCOP, of Phoenix VA Health Care System, evaluates research on an investigational radiolabeled small molecule, combination therapy in the treatment of de novo metastatic prostate cancer, and a CYP17-lyase inhibitor in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. Coverage provided by The ASCO Post.

Lutetium-177-PSMA-617 in low-volume hormone sensitive metastatic prostate cancer, a prospective pilot study.

2021 ◽  
pp. clincanres.4298.2020
Author(s):  
Bastiaan Michael Privé ◽  
Steffie M.B. Peters ◽  
Constantijn H.J. Muselaers ◽  
Inge M van Oort ◽  
Marcel J.R. Janssen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Pilot Study ◽  
Metastatic Prostate Cancer ◽  
Prospective Pilot Study ◽  
Hormone Sensitive ◽  
Low Volume

scholarly journals Metasztatikus hormonérzékeny prosztatadaganat korszerű kezelése

2018 ◽  
Vol 159 (41) ◽  
pp. 1664-1671
Author(s):  
Zsófia Küronya ◽  
Krisztina Bíró ◽  
Lajos Géczi ◽  
Anikó Maráz
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Prostate Cancer ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Androgen Deprivation ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Radium 223 ◽  
Sensitive Phase ◽  
Hormone Sensitive ◽  
To Receive

Abstract: The treatment of metastatic prostate cancer can be divided into two pathophysiological phases: hormone-sensitive and castration-resistant phases. Huggins’ observation in the year 1941, which was awarded with the Nobel Prize in 1966, has a key role in treatment during the hormone-sensitive phase, stating that if the testicles are removed, the size of the prostate cancer decreases. Inducing androgen deprivation, i.e., testosterone depletion is the basic treatment of metastatic prostate cancer that patients have to receive life-long. In the past eight years, five new agents have been approved besides docetaxel in the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: sipuleucel-T, cabazitaxel, abiraterone, enzalutamide, and radium-223. With the sequential application of these agents, significant improvement can be achieved in survival. Besides the latest developments, the hormone-sensitive phase has become the focus of attention, especially in the treatment of patients with de novo metastases and poor prognosis. Many studies have proven the outstanding efficacy of adding early docetaxel and abiraterone to androgen deprivation therapy. The authors give a detailed overview of clinical studies leading to a paradigm change in treatment during the hormone-sensitive phase, and call attention to the difficulties encountered in Hungarian practice. Orv Hetil. 2018; 159(41): 1664–1671.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document