Transparency in European Union food law

2021 ◽  
pp. 159-180
Author(s):  
Sam Jennings
Keyword(s):  
2012 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 72-80
Author(s):  
Aude Mahy

The Rapid Alert System for Food and Feed (the socalled ‘RASFF’) is at the heart of food risk management within the European Union. It aims at providing authorities with an effective tool for exchanging information on measures taken to ensure food safety. It was created in 2002 by the General Food Law Regulation to help Member States to coordinate their food safety actions. Nearly ten years later, the adoption of Regulation 16/2011 of 10 January 2011, laying down implementing measures for the RASFF, intends to clarify the specific conditions and procedures applicable to the transmission of notifications through this tool, thus providing more legal certainty in the system.


2012 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. VII-VIII
Author(s):  
David Byrne

More often than not, controversy produces reform. Nowhere is this more true than in the regulations of the safe production of food. The publication of the White Paper on Food Safety in early 2000 marked the beginning of the modern era of food safety law. That paper promised enactment of a new fundamental law which ultimately became the General Food Law (178/2002). It also promised the establishment of The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). EFSA was required to be an independent point of scientific reference for the European Union. EFSA has provided that function to a very high standard for the consumers of the European Union and for all stakeholders in the food chain.


2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 324-332 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ricardo Santana ◽  
Enrique Onieva ◽  
Robin Zuluaga ◽  
Aliuska Duardo-Sánchez ◽  
Piedad Gañán

Aim: Given the current gaps of scientific knowledge and the need of efficient application of food law, this paper makes an analysis of principles of European food law for the appropriateness of applying biological activity Machine Learning prediction models to guarantee public safety. Background: Cheminformatic methods are able to design and create predictive models with high rate of accuracy saving time, costs and animal sacrifice. It has been applied on different disciplines including nanotechnology. Objective: Given the current gaps of scientific knowledge and the need of efficient application of food law, this paper makes an analysis of principles of European food law for the appropriateness of applying biological activity Machine Learning prediction models to guarantee public safety. Results: It is concluded Machine Learning could improve the application of nanotechnology food regulation, especially methods such as Perturbation Theory Machine Learning (PTML), given that it is aligned with principles promoted by the standards of Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, European Union regulations and European Food Safety Authority. Conclusion: To our best knowledge this is the first study focused on nanotechnology food regulation and it can help to support technical European Food Safety Authority Opinions for complementary information.


2022 ◽  
pp. 1-14
Author(s):  
Kai P. Purnhagen ◽  
Alexandra Molitorisová

Abstract What type of enforcement is the most effective to punish violations of food law or to prevent them from occurring in the first place? This article examines the question of which mix of private and public enforcement exists in European Union (EU) food law and whether this mix corresponds to the recommendations of existing social science research. Based on this research, we contend that EU-determined enforcement mechanisms differ in effectiveness across Member States. New technologies have the potential to stimulate a novel mix of public and private enforcement tools at the EU and national levels.


2002 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
F Reid

In December 2001, Eurosurveillance Weekly reported on the approval by the European Parliament of the creation of an independent European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) (1). On 21 January 2002, the EFSA became a reality when the Council of Ministers adopted the key legislation that provides the legal basis for establishing the EFSA and general principles and requirements for European Union (EU) food law (2).


2009 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 305 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernd Van der Meulen

<p>The first decade of the twenty-first century has seen a complete recast of the regulatory infrastructure for food in the European Union (EU), changing its previously strict market orientation and turning it into an instrument with the primary objective of ensuring food safety. This article contributes to the comparative study of food law by analysing the new body of EU food law and bringing the underlying structure to the forefront. EU food law applies an holistic approach to the food chain, addressing, on the basis of scientific risk analysis: food as a product in terms of its accepted ingredients and the<br />limits placed on contaminants; the processes of food production, trade and risk management; and the presentation of food in advertising and labelling. The European Commission and the Member States share responsibility for<br />official controls, incident management and enforcement.</p>


2021 ◽  
Vol 67 (1) ◽  
pp. 3281-3292
Author(s):  
Beatrix Kuti ◽  
Márta Horacsek ◽  
Dávid Szakos ◽  
Gyula Kasza

Food labeling is one of the most diverse areas of food law, and special attention is paid to nutrition labeling within this area. This is not a coincidence, as modern nutrition science is evolving year by year, and legal changes must also keep pace with this. Nutrition labeling is particularly important for those who struggle with obesity or certain metabolic diseases or have special nutritional needs for other reasons. In a somewhat unusual way, the regulation of nutrition labeling has not appeared primarily in regulations at the national level, but its development began within an international framework, with the first breakthrough being the Codex Alimentarius and the expert work carried out within it. Hungary has been participating in this work since the beginning, so the Hungarian regulation, regardless of historical periods, has been relatively harmonized with the current best labeling practices in the world, with complete harmonization taking place by the time Hungary was on the verge of joining the European Union. In this study, we look back at the most important international, EU and Hungarian steps in the development of the regulation, not only presenting legal changes, but also comparing them to the changing requirements of the various periods. In addition to the current regulatory environment and challenges for nutrition labeling, key voluntary labeling schemes are also included in this communication.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document