Flutter Project Structure

2021 ◽  
pp. 35-46
Author(s):  
Priyanka Tyagi
Keyword(s):  
Project Structure

Spring Framework for Testing

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Darshak Mota ◽  
Neel Zadafiya ◽  
Jinan Fiaidhi
Keyword(s):  
Web Application ◽  
Application Development ◽  
Spring Framework ◽  
Java Application ◽  
Development Framework ◽  
Development Life Cycle ◽  
Form Model ◽  
Project Structure ◽  
Model View ◽  
The Web

Java Spring is an application development framework for enterprise Java. It is an open source platform which is used to develop robust Java application easily. Spring can also be performed using MVC structure. The MVC architecture is based on Model View and Controller techniques, where the project structure or code is divided into three parts or sections which helps to categorize the code files and other files in an organized form. Model, View and Controller code are interrelated and often passes and fetches information from each other without having to put all code in a single file which can make testing the program easy. Testing the application while and after development is an integral part of the Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC). Different techniques have been used to test the web application which is developed using Java Spring MVC architecture. And compares the results among all the three different techniques used to test the web application.

Implementing the right project structure to achieve coopetitive innovation projects

2018 ◽  
Vol 51 (2) ◽  
pp. 384-405 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne-Sophie Fernandez ◽  
Frédéric Le Roy ◽  
Paul Chiambaretto
Keyword(s):  
Innovation Projects ◽  
The Right ◽  
Project Structure

scholarly journals The Swedish Context Bringing Support Structures to Scale: The Role of the State and School Districts

2021 ◽  
pp. 117-131
Author(s):  
Olof Johansson ◽  
Helene Ärlestig
Keyword(s):  
School Districts ◽  
School Improvement ◽  
Improvement Program ◽  
Roles And Responsibilities ◽  
Role Of The State ◽  
Key Stakeholders ◽  
Problems And Solutions ◽  
System Improvement ◽  
Project Structure

AbstractThis chapter explores the “theory of action” underlying the Swedish government’s national school improvement program called Cooperation for Better Schools. We discuss particularly the assumptions about the roles and responsibilities of key stakeholders, including schools, school districts, and universities. Our analysis focuses on the issue of institutional capacity for sustained system improvement. In this regard, our approach draws on the perspectives associated with contemporary policy analysis, which includes greater attention to qualitative and interpretive methods to understand the complexity of policy-induced change in contemporary society. We start by describing the project structure and our method. Thereafter, we analyze the government’s understanding and arguments for why it is important to help underperforming schools, before we give examples about how involved actors define problems and solutions in project documents. In the conclusion, we highlight strengths and deficits in the improvement process.

scholarly journals Assessing determinants of PPP project performance

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 67-85 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raghu Rama D.T.V. Swamy ◽  
Piyush Tiwari ◽  
Anil Sawhney
Keyword(s):  
Drinking Water ◽  
Project Performance ◽  
Specific Reference ◽  
Water Sector ◽  
Content Type ◽  
The Public ◽  
Baseline Information ◽  
Implementation Models ◽  
Urban Drinking Water ◽  
Project Structure

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to understand the factors that affect the performance of projects being implemented on the public-private partnership (PPP) framework, with specific reference to urban drinking water sector in India. Design/methodology/approach A listing of factors that have a bearing on project performance have been developed based on a review of the literature. Through a survey, seven factors that are relevant to the Indian context were determined. Interviews were then conducted across a cross-section of government agencies, financial institutions, development agencies, private sector entities and consultants to understand the relative importance of these attributes. The analytical hierarchy process was used to develop relative weights of these factors. Findings Ranking and relative weights of the factors in descending order are stakeholder consent and support for water PPP projects (22.1 percent), appropriate project structure (17.4 percent), availability of realistic baseline information (16.2 percent), reasonable water tariffs (13.9 percent), public sector capacity (13.0 percent), well-developed market (9.5 percent) and water sector regulator (7.9 percent). Differences in perceptions amongst various stakeholder groups were also found. Research limitations/implications Water sector has not matured, and with the advent of newer formats of implementation models, there could be significant changes in the sector. As the number of projects available for study is limited, this exercise can be undertaken periodically and updated in relation to experiences in other infrastructure sectors. Practical implications This analysis provides inputs to policymakers and project proponents for structuring more sustainable urban drinking water PPP projects. Originality/value Indian infrastructure PPP market is attracting increased attention from researchers, though not much emphasis is being given to urban drinking water sector. This paper aims to contribute toward filling this research gap.

A Visual Analytics Tool for Software Project Structure and Relationships among Classes

2009 ◽  
pp. 203-212 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan García ◽  
Antonio González Torres ◽  
Diego Alonso Gómez Aguilar ◽  
Roberto Therón ◽  
Francisco J. García Peñalvo
Keyword(s):  
Visual Analytics ◽  
Software Project ◽  
Project Structure

A Project Structure Subsystem (PSS)

2020 ◽  
pp. 175-184
Author(s):  
Yuri G. Raydugin
Keyword(s):  
Complex Systems ◽  
Edge Of Chaos ◽  
Complex Projects ◽  
Project Deliverables ◽  
High Level ◽  
Project Structure

This chapter provides a high-level discussion on the project structure subsystem (PSS) through description of main typical ‘project parts’ and their interactions. Project deliverables, labour requirements, locations, technologies, interface points, and stakeholders are reviewed as ‘project parts’. A discussion on interactions in complex systems including risk interactions is reiterated to tell apart intra-risk interactions (internal risk amplifications) and cross-risk interactions (knock-on and compounding interactions). A role of interface points for propagation of cross-risk interactions is accentuated. High-level PSS description for simple, complicated, and complex projects is provided. Chaotic projects are considered complex projects that have been pushed to the edge of chaos and beyond due to overwhelming risk interactions.

Agile IT Outsourcing

2009 ◽  
pp. 299-314
Author(s):  
Boris Roussev
Keyword(s):  
Software Development ◽  
Information Flow ◽  
Management Practices ◽  
Agile Methods ◽  
Development Effort ◽  
Development Projects ◽  
Software Projects ◽  
Software Development Effort ◽  
Iterative Software ◽  
Project Structure

Agile methods are lightweight, iterative software development frameworks used predominantly on small and mid-sized software development projects. This chapter introduces a project structure and management practices creating agile conditions for large software projects outsourced either offshore or onshore. Agility is achieved by slicing a large project into a number of small projects working in agile settings. Development is divided into research and development activities that are located on-site, and production activities located off-site. The proposed approach makes agile methods applicable to the stressed conditions of outsourcing without compromising the quality or pace of the software development effort. Creating an agile environment in an outsourcing project relies on maintaining a balance between the functions and sizes of on-site and off-site teams, on redefining the developers’ roles, and on reorganizing the information flow between the different development activities to compensate for the lack of customers on-site, team colocation, and tacit project knowledge.

scholarly journals Trust at a Distance—Trust in Online Communication in Environmental and Global Health Research Projects

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. 4005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jasper de Vries ◽  
Séverine van Bommel ◽  
Karin Peters
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Relevant Literature ◽  
Online Communication ◽  
Online Collaboration ◽  
Third Party ◽  
Global Health Research ◽  
Trust Development ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Shared Identity ◽  
Project Structure

Online collaboration to deal with (global) environmental and public health problems continues to grow as the quality of technology for communication improves. In these collaborations, trust is seen as important for sustainable collaborations and organizations. However, face-to-face communication, which is often lacking in these contexts, is seen as a pre-requisite for trust development. Therefore, this paper aims to explore empirically which factors influence the emergence of trust in the early stages of online collaboration. Using the relevant literature, we conducted a series of interviews around projects in the field of public health and the environment on the interface between science and practice. The results show that trust does develop between participants. This trust is strongly influenced by perceived ability and integrity, fostered by reputation, third-party perceptions, and project structure. In these contexts, these types of trust facilitate collaboration but are also influenced by a wider set of aspects such as power, expectations, and uncertainty. However, from the results we also conclude that online collaboration does not create benevolence and a shared identity, thereby limiting further trust development and leading to less strong relations. Strong relations, however, are deemed important to reach creative and innovative solutions and long-term sustainable collaboration and organizations.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document