Aspects of the Analysis and Reporting of Prevention Trials

2021 ◽  
pp. 551-567
Author(s):  
Ross L. Prentice ◽  
Steven G. Self
Keyword(s):  
2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 1598 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johnny Ludvigsson

Autoantigen treatment has been tried for the prevention of type 1 diabetes (T1D) and to preserve residual beta-cell function in patients with a recent onset of the disease. In experimental animal models, efficacy was good, but was insufficient in human subjects. Besides the possible minor efficacy of peroral insulin in high-risk individuals to prevent T1D, autoantigen prevention trials have failed. Other studies on autoantigen prevention and intervention at diagnosis are ongoing. One problem is to select autoantigen/s; others are dose and route. Oral administration may be improved by using different vehicles. Proinsulin peptide therapy in patients with T1D has shown possible minor efficacy. In patients with newly diagnosed T1D, subcutaneous injection of glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) bound to alum hydroxide (GAD-alum) can likely preserve beta-cell function, but the therapeutic effect needs to be improved. Intra-lymphatic administration may be a better alternative than subcutaneous administration, and combination therapy might improve efficacy. This review elucidates some actual problems of autoantigen therapy in the prevention and/or early intervention of type 1 diabetes.


2021 ◽  
pp. 106425
Author(s):  
Sophie A. Bell ◽  
Hannah R. Cohen ◽  
Seonjoo Lee ◽  
Hyun Kim ◽  
Adam Ciarleglio ◽  
...  

Cancers ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. 1639 ◽  
Author(s):  
Corinne Frere ◽  
Manon Lejeune ◽  
Pierre Kubicek ◽  
Dorothée Faille ◽  
Zora Marjanovic ◽  
...  

Over the past two decades, aspirin has emerged as a promising chemoprotective agent to prevent colorectal cancer (CRC). In 2016, the mounting evidence supporting its chemoprotective effect, from both basic science and clinical research, led the US Preventive Services Task Force to recommend regular use of low-dose aspirin in some subgroups of patients for whom the benefits are deemed to outweigh the risks. In contrast, data on the chemoprotective effect of aspirin against other cancers are less clear and remain controversial. Most data come from secondary analyses of cardiovascular prevention trials, with only a limited number reporting cancer outcomes as a prespecified endpoint, and overall unclear findings. Moreover, the potential chemoprotective effect of aspirin against other cancers has been recently questioned with the publication of 3 long-awaited trials of aspirin in the primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases reporting no benefit of aspirin on overall cancer incidence and cancer-related mortality. Data on the chemoprotective effects of other antiplatelet agents remain scarce and inconclusive, and further research to examine their benefit are warranted. In this narrative review, we summarize current clinical evidence and continuing controversies on the potential chemoprotective properties of antiplatelet agents against cancer.


2015 ◽  
Vol 11 (7S_Part_4) ◽  
pp. P210-P210
Author(s):  
Laura Fratiglioni
Keyword(s):  

2008 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. T263-T264
Author(s):  
Steven D. Edland ◽  
Linda K. McEvoy ◽  
Dominic Holland ◽  
John C. Roddey ◽  
Christine Fennema-Notestine ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 75 (4) ◽  
pp. 317-326 ◽  
Author(s):  
John J. Warren ◽  
Karin Weber-Gasparoni ◽  
Norman Tinanoff ◽  
Terence S. Batliner ◽  
Bonnie Jue ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Klaus Hauer ◽  
Sarah E. Lamb ◽  
Ellen C. Jorstad ◽  
Chris Todd ◽  
Clemens Becker

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document