subject k(i) gets formulation R, ε if response Y is from formulation T and ε if response Y is from formulation R. The means of T and R are then µ and µ , respectively. Then Var[s ] = σ , the between-subject variance for T , Var[s ] = σ , the between-subject variance for R, Var[s ] = σ , the subject-by-formulation interaction variance, Cov[s ] = ρσ σBR = σ , Var[ε ] = σ and Var[ε ] = σ . Further, we assume that all ε’s are pairwise independent, both within and between subjects. For the special case [ of equal group sizes (n Var[µˆ ] = [ σ − 2σ + ] (σ +σ )/2 /N = σ + (σ )/2 /N where N = 4n. The variances and interactions needed to assess IBE can easily be ob-tained by fitting an appropriate mixed model using proc mixed in SAS. The necessary SAS code for our example will be given below. However, before doing that we need some preliminary results. Using the SAS code we will obtain estimates σˆ , ωˆ , σˆ and σˆ , where ω is the between-subject covariance of R and T, and was earlier denoted by σ . These are normally distributed in the limit with a variance-covariance matrix appropriate to the structure of the fitted model. The model is fitted using REML (restricted maximum likelihood, see Section 6.3 of Chapter 6) and this can be done with SAS proc mixed with the REML option. In addition we fit an unstructured covariance structure using the type =UN option in proc mixed. The estimates of the vari-

2016 ◽  
Vol 96 (3) ◽  
pp. 439-447 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmad Ismaili ◽  
Farhad Karami ◽  
Omidali Akbarpour ◽  
Abdolhossein Rezaei Nejad

In estimation of genetic parameters in perennial tree species on the basis of analysis of variance (ANOVA), heterogeneity of years and genotype × environment interaction for data sets during the juvenility to maturity life period is ignored. Therefore, a linear mixed model based on restricted maximum likelihood (REML) approximation for modeling of covariance structure of longitudinal data can improve our ability to analyze repeated measures data. In the present research, a modeling of variance-covariance structure by mixed model based on the REML approach has been used for characteristics of 26 apricot genotypes recorded during three years. Fitting unstructured covariance (UN) models for all traits indicated a great heterogeneity of variances among repeated years and the trends of response variables in the genotypes (except for RWC) was due to imperfect correlation of subjects measured in different years. Based on the same structure, positive correlations were estimated among fruit set, potassium content, and yield of pistil in repetitive years, and most traits showed high heritability estimation. To our knowledge, this is the first report in plant that genotypic correlation and heritability and their standard errors are estimated in a repeated measures data over years using REML approximation.


1979 ◽  
Vol 28 (1-4) ◽  
pp. 125-142 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kalyan Das

In this paper we study the asymptotic optimality of the restricted maximum likelihood estimates of variance components in the mixed model of analysis of variance. Using conceptual design sequences of Miller (1977), under slightly stronger conditions, we show that the restricted maximum likelihood estimates are not only asymptotically normal, but also asymptotically equivalent to the maximum likelihood estimates in a reasonable sense.


2015 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 1355-1396 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. F. Müller ◽  
S. E. Thompson

Abstract. We introduce TopREML as a method to predict runoff signatures in ungauged basins. The approach is based on the use of linear mixed models with spatially correlated random effects. The nested nature of streamflow networks is taken into account by using water balance considerations to constrain the covariance structure of runoff and to account for the stronger spatial correlation between flow-connected basins. The restricted maximum likelihood (REML) framework generates the best linear unbiased predictor (BLUP) of both the predicted variable and the associated prediction uncertainty, even when incorporating observable covariates into the model. The method was successfully tested in cross validation analyses on mean streamflow and runoff frequency in Nepal (sparsely gauged) and Austria (densely gauged), where it matched the performance of comparable methods in the prediction of the considered runoff signature, while significantly outperforming them in the prediction of the associated modeling uncertainty. TopREML's ability to combine deterministic and stochastic information to generate BLUPs of the prediction variable and its uncertainty makes it a particularly versatile method that can readily be applied in both densely gauged basins, where it takes advantage of spatial covariance information, and data-scarce regions, where it can rely on covariates, which are increasingly observable thanks to remote sensing technology.


2015 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 2925-2942 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. F. Müller ◽  
S. E. Thompson

Abstract. We introduce topological restricted maximum likelihood (TopREML) as a method to predict runoff signatures in ungauged basins. The approach is based on the use of linear mixed models with spatially correlated random effects. The nested nature of streamflow networks is taken into account by using water balance considerations to constrain the covariance structure of runoff and to account for the stronger spatial correlation between flow-connected basins. The restricted maximum likelihood (REML) framework generates the best linear unbiased predictor (BLUP) of both the predicted variable and the associated prediction uncertainty, even when incorporating observable covariates into the model. The method was successfully tested in cross-validation analyses on mean streamflow and runoff frequency in Nepal (sparsely gauged) and Austria (densely gauged), where it matched the performance of comparable methods in the prediction of the considered runoff signature, while significantly outperforming them in the prediction of the associated modeling uncertainty. The ability of TopREML to combine deterministic and stochastic information to generate BLUPs of the prediction variable and its uncertainty makes it a particularly versatile method that can readily be applied in both densely gauged basins, where it takes advantage of spatial covariance information, and data-scarce regions, where it can rely on covariates, which are increasingly observable via remote-sensing technology.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document