Full Mortality risk in patients with adrenal insufficiency using Prednisolone or Hydrocortisone: A Retrospective Cohort study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kanchana Ngaosuwan ◽  
Desmond G Johnston ◽  
Ian F Godsland ◽  
Jeremy Cox ◽  
Azeem Majeed ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adrenal Insufficiency ◽  
Practice Research ◽  
Clinical Practice Research Datalink ◽  
Secondary Adrenal Insufficiency ◽  
Duration Of Action ◽  
Statistical Adjustment ◽  
Expected Mortality ◽  
Care Database

Abstract Context Prednisolone has been recommended rather than hydrocortisone for glucocorticoid replacement in adrenal insufficiency due its longer duration of action and lower cost. Objective To determine mortality rates with prednisolone versus hydrocortisone. Design Observational study. Setting A UK primary care database (Clinical Practice Research Datalink). Participants Patients with primary and secondary adrenal insufficiency, treated with either prednisolone or hydrocortisone, and controls individually matched for age, sex, period and place of follow-up. Interventions Nil Outcomes Mortality relative to individually matched controls. Results As expected, mortality in adrenal insufficiency irrespective of cause was increased, based on 5478 patients (4228 on hydrocortisone; 1250 on prednisolone) and 54314 controls (41934 and 12380, respectively). Overall, the adjusted hazard ratio (HR) was similar with the two treatments (prednisolone, 1.76 [95% CI, 1.54-2.01] vs. hydrocortisone 1.69 [1.57-1.82]; p=0.65). This was also the case for secondary adrenal insufficiency. In primary disease (1405 on hydrocortisone vs. 137 on prednisolone:13965 and 1347 controls, respectively), prednisolone-users were older, more likely to have another autoimmune disease and malignancy, and less likely to have mineralocorticoid replacement. Nevertheless, after adjustment, the HR for prednisolone-treated patients remained higher than for those taking hydrocortisone (2.92 [2.19-3.91] vs. 1.90 [1.66-2.16]; p=0.0020). Conclusions In primary but not in secondary adrenal insufficiency mortality was higher with prednisolone. The study was large, but the number of prednisolone-treated patients was small, and they had greater risk factors. Nonetheless the increased mortality associated with prednisolone persisted despite statistical adjustment. Further evidence is needed regarding the long-term safety of prednisolone as routine replacement.

scholarly journals MON-304 Prolactin as a Surrogate Marker to Predict Long Term Postoperative Hypopituitarism After Transsphenoidal Resection of Pituitary Adenomas

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Massiell German ◽  
Devaprabu Abraham ◽  
William Couldwell ◽  
Debra L Simmons ◽  
Anu Sharma
Keyword(s):  
Adrenal Insufficiency ◽  
Pituitary Adenomas ◽  
Surrogate Marker ◽  
Older Age ◽  
Pituitary Function ◽  
Secondary Adrenal Insufficiency ◽  
Secondary Hypothyroidism ◽  
Tertiary Center

Abstract Transsphenoidal surgery (TSS) is the first line treatment for pituitary adenoma. A well-known complication of TSS is hypopituitarism with a reported risk of 5-25% after resection of pituitary adenomas. A decrease in postoperative prolactin concentration was shown to be associated with postoperative hypopituitarism in a previous report. We hypothesized that in addition to clinical factors (preoperative hypofunction and adenoma size), biochemical factors (change in prolactin concentration and immediate post-operative hypofunction) can aid in predicting long term hypopituitarism as defined as ≥1 biochemically confirmed hypofunctioning pituitary axes 3 years after resection. A retrospective analysis of all patients undergoing TSS for both functioning and non-functioning pituitary adenomas at a tertiary center from January 2013 through December 2015 was performed. Prolactinomas were excluded. Of the 75 patients included, 21.3% (n=16) had at least one pituitary axis requiring replacement at 3 years post operatively. Mean age at presentation was 55 ± 16 years, 55% were female and 81% were Caucasian. Mean adenoma size was no different between normal pituitary function and hypopituitary groups (24.0 ± 11.9 mm versus 25.3 ± 10, p=0.7). Factors associated with long term hypopituitarism were older age (mean age 64 ± 4 years versus 53 ± 2 years, p = 0.02), preoperative secondary adrenal insufficiency (AM cortisol 6.4 ± 3.7 vs 12.0 ± 6.5 µg/dL; p = 0.03), preoperative secondary hypothyroidism (0.8 ± 0.2 vs 12.0 ± 6.5 ng/dL; p < 0.01), low immediate postoperative cortisol (5.3±3.1 vs 26.1±18.3 µg/d; p<0.01), and persistence of adrenal insufficiency (10.7% vs 2.7%; p<0.01) and secondary hypothyroidism (13.3% vs 5.3%; p<0.01) at 3 months. Change in prolactin concentration from preoperative to postoperative day 1-7 was not significantly different between groups (p=0.09) due to the higher variability in the hypopituitary group (median 0.2 ng/mL, IQR -0.5 - 0.8 ng/mL) compared to the normal pituitary function group (median 0.7 ng/mL, IQR 0.5-0.8 ng/mL). Adenoma size, optic chiasm and cavernous sinus involvement were not associated with long term hypopituitarism. In patients who developed postoperative hypopituitarism, there was a higher frequency of adenoma persistence or recurrence (20% vs 47%). There was a high rate of patients lost to follow up (56%). Older age, the presence of preoperative secondary adrenal insufficiency and hypothyroidism, and low day 1-7 postoperative cortisol concentration are factors that can be used to deem a patient high risk for future hypopituitarism. These patients should have close follow up with continued screening postoperatively. Contrary to prior reports, adenoma size and parasellar involvement were not associated which may be suggestive of surgical expertise. Prolactin concentrations proved not to be a good surrogate marker to predict long term hypopituitarism.

scholarly journals Co-prescription of gabapentinoids and opioids among adults with and without osteoarthritis in the United Kingdom between 1995 and 2017

Rheumatology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dahai Yu ◽  
Tom Appleyard ◽  
Elizabeth Cottrell ◽  
George Peat
Keyword(s):  
Event Rate ◽  
Practice Research ◽  
Clinical Practice Research Datalink ◽  
The United Kingdom ◽  
Regional Estimates ◽  
Strong Opioids ◽  
The Uk ◽  
New Diagnosis

Abstract Objectives To produce national and regional estimates and trends for gabapentinoid–opioid co-prescribing rates in patients with OA, both in absolute terms and relative to matched controls without OA. Methods Using the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink database we first constructed age–sex–practice–date 1:1 matched cohorts of patients aged ≥40 years with and without a new diagnosis of OA between 1995–2017 and estimated the relative incidence of a first gabapentinoid prescription. Incident gabapentinoid users in both cohorts were followed to estimate and compare the event rate of gabapentinoid–opioid co-prescription (prescription from both classes within the same 28-day window). Results The incidence of first gabapentinoid prescription was 3-fold higher in patients with OA than in matched controls [n = 215 357; incidence rate ratio (IRR) 2.93; 95% CI: 2.87, 3.00]. Among incident gabapentinoid users with OA (n = 27 374, median follow-up 3.9 years) the event rate of gabapentinoid–opioid co-prescription was 4.03 (4.02–4.05) per person-year. The rate was higher in OA patients classed as long-term gabapentinoid users (6.24; 6.22–6.26). These rates were significantly higher than in incident gabapentinoid users without OA [adjusted-IRR: 1.29 (1.28–1.30)]. This elevated risk was observed across age, sex, geographic regions, and calendar years, when restricted to strong opioids and to long-term gabapentinoid users, and when co-prescription was defined as within 14 days and same-day prescribing. Conclusions Patients with OA not only have a higher risk of being prescribed a gabapentinoid but, once prescribed a gabapentinoid, are also at greater risk of opioid co-prescription. Strict restriction of gabapentinoid–opioid co-prescription, and improved access to, and uptake of, effective non-pharmacological and surgical alternatives for OA are required.

Pazopanib-associated secondary adrenal insufficiency in a patient with malignant solitary fibrous tumor

2021 ◽  
pp. 107815522110160
Author(s):  
Muhammed Muhiddin Er ◽  
Murat Araz ◽  
Meryem Karabacak ◽  
Muzaffer Uğraklı ◽  
Melek Karakurt Eryılmaz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adrenal Insufficiency ◽  
Solitary Fibrous Tumor ◽  
Single Case ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcomas ◽  
Pituitary Hormones ◽  
Secondary Adrenal Insufficiency ◽  
Primary Adrenal Insufficiency ◽  
Hypoglycemic Attack ◽  
Fibrous Tumor

Introduction Pazopanib is an agent that is being successfully used in soft tissue sarcomas. Some endocrine side effects may develop during pazopanib treatment. Here, we presented a case diagnosed with secondary adrenal insufficiency while being investigated for etiology of hypoglycemia which developed after pazopanib. Case report A 69-year-old male patient was operated in June 2019 due to a lung mass 26 × 18 × 10 cm in size. Pathological diagnosis revealed a solitary fibrous tumor with malignant behavior. The patient received three lines of chemotherapy. After pazopanib treatment, a hypoglycemic attack was reported. Management and outcome: Blood cortisol and ACTH (Adrenocorticotropic hormone) levels were not increased at the time of the hypoglycemic attack, and levels of other pituitary hormones were found to be normal. Electrolyte levels were in normal range. Since the counteracting hormone did not reach a sufficient level, it was considered secondary adrenal insufficiency. Hypoglycemic attacks did not occur during follow-up while taking steroid therapy and pazopanib. Discussion A single case of primary adrenal insufficiency has been reported in the literature. We here present a case who developed hypoglycemia after pazopanib and was diagnosed with drug-associated secondary adrenal insufficiency. When hypoglycemia develops during pazopanib treatment, we must be aware of adrenal insufficiency.

Low Incidence of Adrenal Insufficiency after Transsphenoidal Surgery in Patients with Acromegaly: A Long-Term Follow-Up Study

2011 ◽  
pp. P3-284-P3-284
Author(s):  
AnneMarij G Burgers ◽  
Nieke E Kokshoorn ◽  
Alberto M Pereira ◽  
Ferdinand Roelfsema ◽  
Johannes WA Smit ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adrenal Insufficiency ◽  
Transsphenoidal Surgery ◽  
Follow Up Study ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Low Incidence

scholarly journals Secondary Adrenal Insufficiency after Treatment with Budesonide for Autoimmune Hepatitis

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 597-601 ◽  
Author(s):  
Filip De Maeyer ◽  
Bruno Lapauw ◽  
Anne Hoorens ◽  
Anja Geerts ◽  
Hans Van Vlierberghe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Autoimmune Hepatitis ◽  
Adrenal Insufficiency ◽  
Attractive Alternative ◽  
Secondary Adrenal Insufficiency ◽  
Systemic Activity ◽  
Immunosuppressive Medication ◽  
Systemic Corticosteroids ◽  
First Case ◽  
First Pass

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a rare cause of chronic liver disease. The backbone of treatment is immunosuppressive medication, typically prednisolone as induction therapy and azathioprine as a maintenance therapy. Side effects of the long-term use of systemic corticosteroids are well known and have led to the use of alternative induction regimens. An attractive alternative is budesonide, a nonhalogenated glucocorticosteroid characterized by a high first-pass effect in the liver (90%), resulting in a high topical anti-inflammatory activity and a low systemic activity. It should be stressed that budesonide is contraindicated in patients with established cirrhosis with portal hypertension and portocaval shunting. In this case report, we present the first case of adrenal insufficiency following treatment with budesonide for AIH.

scholarly journals Epidemiology and current treatment patterns of treatment-resistant depression in Scotland: a CPRD study

BJPsych Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (S1) ◽  
pp. S334-S334
Author(s):  
Timothy Ming ◽  
Tom Denee ◽  
Gemma Scott ◽  
Joachim Morrens ◽  
Christopher Weatherburn
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Incidence Rates ◽  
Practice Research ◽  
Clinical Practice Research Datalink ◽  
Treatment Resistant Depression ◽  
Augmentation Therapy ◽  
Treatment Resistant ◽  
First Line ◽  
Resistant Depression

AimsTo assess the incidence and treatments currently used in clinical practice for the treatment of treatment-resistant depression (TRD) in Scotland.BackgroundPatients with major depressive disorder (MDD) who have not responded to at least two successive antidepressant (AD) treatments in a single episode are described as having Treatment-Resistant Depression (TRD). Epidemiological data on TRD in Scotland is lacking. Furthermore, there is no data to our knowledge on therapies prescribed in Scottish clinical practice to treat TRD.MethodA retrospective, longitudinal cohort study was conducted using Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) medical records. Adult patients were indexed on AD prescription, requiring MDD diagnosis within 90 days, from Jan 2011-May 2018 with 360-day baseline and 180-day minimum follow-up periods. Failure of ≥2 adequate oral AD regimens following indexing constituted TRD classification. Incidence rates of MDD and TRD (within the MDD cohort) and treatment lines following TRD classification were derived.ResultThe analysis included 20,059 patients with MDD (mean age 44 years, 63% female, median follow-up 59 months); 1,374 (6.8%) were classified as TRD. Median time-to-TRD classification was 25 months. The incidence rate of MDD was 15.9 per 1,000 patient-years and for TRD was 14.7 per 1,000 MDD-patient-years. For all first four post-TRD treatment lines, SSRI monotherapy was the most commonly prescribed therapy, followed by combination (dual/triple) therapy and augmentation therapy (at least one oral AD supplemented with lithium, an antipsychotic or an anticonvulsant therapy). At first-line of TRD treatment, 1,050 (76.4%) patients received monotherapy AD, 212 (15.4%) received combination AD therapy and 112 (8.2%) received augmentation therapy. The most common monotherapy treatments at first-line TRD were sertraline (15.6%), mirtazapine (13.8%), fluoxetine (12.2%) and venlafaxine (11.6%). Among combination therapies, mirtazapine, venlafaxine, sertraline and amitriptyline were frequently used. Among the TRD and MDD cohort, no somatic treatments were coded in CPRD, although the use of these treatments was likely underestimated.ConclusionMonotherapy AD treatment was the most common therapy type for all four post-TRD treatment lines. These data support the need for new treatments that can achieve and maintain therapeutic response, and avoid continuous cycling through similar AD therapies.This study was sponsored by Janssen Cilag Ltd.

Therapy persistence in newly diagnosed non-valvular atrial fibrillation treated with warfarin or NOAC

2016 ◽  
Vol 115 (01) ◽  
pp. 31-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anja Katholing ◽  
Christopher Wallenhorst ◽  
Saul Benedict Freedman ◽  
Carlos Martinez
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Guideline Adherence ◽  
Practice Research ◽  
First Year ◽  
Clinical Practice Research Datalink ◽  
Supplementary Material ◽  
One Year ◽  
The Uk ◽  
Physician Adherence

SummaryEfforts to reduce stroke in atrial fibrillation (AF) have focused on increasing physician adherence to oral anticoagulant (OAC) guidelines, but high early vitamin K antagonist (VKA) discontinuation is a limitation. We compared persistence of non-VKA OAC (NOAC) with VKA treatment in the first year after OAC inception for incident AF in real-world practice. We studied 27,514 anticoagulant-naïve patients with incident non-valvular AF between January 2011 and May 2014 in the UK primary care Clinical Practice Research Datalink, with full medication use linkage: mean age 74.2 ± 12.4, 45.7 % female, mean follow-up 1.9 ± 1.1 years. After treatment initiation and follow-up until 1/2015, the proportion remaining on OAC at one year (persistence) was estimated using competing risk survival analyses. OAC was commenced ≤90 days after incident AF in 13,221 patients (48.1 %): 12,307 VKA and 914 NOAC (apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban). Amongst those treated with OAC, the proportion commencing NOAC increased from zero in 1/2011 to 27.0 % in 5/2014, and OAC prescriptions for CHA2DS2VASc score ≥2 (guideline adherence) increased from 41.2 % to 65.5 %. Persistence with OAC declined over 12 months to 63.6 % for VKA and 79.2 % for NOAC (p< 0.0001). Persistence for those with CHA2DS2VASc ≥2 was significantly greater for NOAC (83.0 %) than VKA (65.3 %, p< 0.0001) at one year and all earlier time points. Comparison of VKA and NOAC cohorts matched on individual CHA2DS2VASc components showed consistent results. In conclusion, persistence was significantly higher with NOAC than VKA, and could alone lead to fewer cardioembolic strokes. Increased guideline adherence following NOAC introduction could further decrease AF stroke burden.Supplementary Material to this article is available online at www.thrombosis-online.com.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document