scholarly journals Nivolumab in Metastatic Adrenocortical Carcinoma: Results of a Phase 2 Trial

2019 ◽  
Vol 104 (12) ◽  
pp. 6193-6200 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benedito A Carneiro ◽  
Bhavana Konda ◽  
Rubens B Costa ◽  
Ricardo L B Costa ◽  
Vinay Sagar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adrenocortical Carcinoma ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Preliminary Evidence ◽  
Comprehensive Cancer Center ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy

Abstract Context Systemic treatment of metastatic adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) remains limited to chemotherapy and mitotane. Preliminary evidence suggesting that antitumor immune responses can be elicited in ACC has fostered interest in checkpoint inhibitors such as anti–PD-1 nivolumab. Objective The primary endpoint was objective response rate according to the response evaluation criteria in solid tumors. Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, and safety. Design Single-arm, multicenter, phase 2 clinical trial with two-stage design. Setting Comprehensive cancer center. Patients Ten adult patients with metastatic ACC previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy and/or mitotane as well as patients who declined front-line chemotherapy. Intervention Nivolumab (240 mg) IV every 2 weeks. Results Ten patients with metastatic ACC were enrolled between March and December 2016. The median number of doses of nivolumab administered was two. Three patients only received one treatment [one died of disease progression, one discontinued due to adverse events (AEs), one withdrew after beginning treatment]. The median PFS was 1.8 months. The median follow-up was 4.5 months (range, 0.1 to 25.6 months). Two patients had stable disease for a duration of 48 and 11 weeks, respectively. One patient had an unconfirmed partial response but discontinued the study due to an AE. Most AEs were grade 1/2. The most common grade 3/4 treatment-related AEs were aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase elevations, mucositis, and odynophagia. Conclusion Nivolumab demonstrated modest antitumor activity in patients with advanced ACC. The nivolumab safety profile was consistent with previous clinical experience without any unexpected AEs in this population.

Investigate the efficacy of immunotherapy for treatment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) with mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 415-415
Author(s):  
Arish Noor ◽  
Luis E. Aguirre ◽  
Kirsten Blue ◽  
Trenton Avriett ◽  
Estrella M. Carballido ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Metastatic Disease ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Duration Of Response

415 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have been approved in solid tumors with dMMR. However, only limited data are available for PDAC with dMMR given the rarity of dMMR in PDAC. We evaluated efficacy of ICIs in PDAC with dMMR. Methods: Retrospective clinical and pathologic data were collected for patients (pts) with pancreatic adenocarcinoma from May 2017 to June 2020 at Moffitt cancer center. Results: We identified 10 pts with dMMR PDAC. The median age was 64.5 years (range: 42-86) and 4 pts were male. 4 pts had resectable disease, 3 had locally advanced and 3 had metastatic disease at initial diagnosis. MSH6 deficiency (def) was found in 2 cases, PMS2 def in 2, MLH/PMS2 def in 5, and MSH2/MSH6 in 1. 7 pts were treated with ICIs. 3 pts had locally advanced and 4 had metastatic disease when they started ICIs. 5 received Pembrolizumab (pem), 1 received ipilimumab/ nivolumab (ipi/nivo), and 1 received pem then ipi/nivo after progressive disease (PD) on pem. The median number of prior lines of chemotherapy was 1 (range 0-2). 6 pts were evaluable, and 1 had rapid disease progression after 1 dose of pem. Among 6 evaluable pts, 3 had an objective response (1: complete response and 2: partial response), and 2 had stable disease (SD). Median progression-free survival was 8.2 mo, and median overall survival was not reached with median follow-up (FU) of 6.8 mo. The median duration of response was not reached with a median FU of 22.6 mo. The pt with CR remained disease-free for up to 22 months. The pt whose treatment was switched to ipi/nivo after PD on pem achieved SD > 4mo on ipi/nivo. While on immunotherapy, one patient with ipi/nivo developed immunotherapy associated rash requiring systemic steroids, and another on pem developed hypothyroidism requiring levothyroxine. Conclusions: This series suggest ICIs can provide durable clinical efficacy in pts with dMMR PDAC.

Phase 1/2 study of safety/efficacy using trabectedin, ipilimumab, and nivolumab as first-line treatment of advanced soft tissue sarcoma (STS).

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (5_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS46-TPS46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erlinda Maria Gordon ◽  
Victoria S. Chua-Alcala ◽  
Katherine Kim ◽  
William W. Tseng ◽  
Doris M Quon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Categorical Variables ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
First Line ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Number Of Patients

TPS46 Background: Sarcoma cells are most immunogenic at the onset of cancer when the immune system can recognize and destroy them. Hence, immune checkpoint inhibitors would be most effective when given as first line therapy. Objectives: (1) To investigate the maximum tolerated dose of trabectedin, an alkylating agent, when given sequentially with ipilimumab, a CTLA4 inhibitor, and nivolumab, a PD-1 inhibitor, in advanced STS, (2) To investigate the objective response rate (ORR), progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) , and (3) To correlate PFS with PD-L1 and other biomarker expression in patients’ tumors. Methods: Forty patients ≥18 years of age with advanced STS will be enrolled. This is a phase 1/2 study using a defined dose of ipilimumab (1 mg/kg i.v. q 12 weeks), nivolumab (3 mg/kg i.v. q 2 weeks), and escalating doses of trabectedin (1.0, 1.3, 1.5 mg/m2 i.v. q 3 weeks). I. Dose Escalation Phase 1 (previously treated patients): The study will employ the standard “cohort of three” design. The maximum tolerated dose is defined as the highest safely tolerated dose, where not more than one patient experienced DLT, with the next higher dose level having at least two patients who experienced DLT. II. Expansion Phase 2 (previously untreated patients): An additional 22-28 patients will receive trabectedin at the MTD and defined doses of ipilimumab and nivolumab to assess overall safety and potential efficacy in a greater number of patients. Patients may continue treatment until significant disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurs. Statistical Considerations: NIH CTCAE v4.03 and RECIST v1.1 will be used. Categorical variables will be summarized by the n and percent in each category. Point estimates for efficacy endpoint incidences will be accompanied by a 2-sided 95% exact binomial CI. Time to event endpoints will be summarized descriptively using the KM method. The analyses of all study objectives will be descriptive and hypothesis generating, for planning Phase 2/3 studies. Clinical trial information: NCT 03138161.

Real-world (rw) clinical outcomes for advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) patients (pts) treated with second line (2L) ramucirumab plus docetaxel (R+D) post frontline (1L) platinum based chemotherapy plus immune checkpoint inhibitors (Pt + ICI).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e20727-e20727
Author(s):  
Jeffrey Melson Clarke ◽  
Raina Mathur ◽  
Cliff Molife ◽  
Marta Batus ◽  
Victoria Jennifer Stefaniak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Disease Control ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Community Practice ◽  
Best Response ◽  
First Response ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Duration Of Response

e20727 Background: R+D is approved for use in pts with aNSCLC after Pt chemotherapy. With recent approvals, ICI can now be added to Pt chemotherapy (Pt + ICI) in 1L. This retrospective observational study provides an exploratory view of baseline characteristics and rw clinical effectiveness outcomes for pts receiving 2L R+D post 1L Pt + ICI. Methods: All adult pts treated with 2L R+D after 1L Pt + ICI therapy between 03/01/2015 and 06/30/2018, with ≥ 3 months follow up, were selected from the Flatiron Health EHR-derived de-identified database (n = 15). Rw clinical endpoints during R+D therapy included rw objective response rate (rwORR), rw disease control rate (rwDCR), rw best response, as well as Kaplan-Meier estimates of rw time to first response & rw duration of response. Results: Median age was 62 years, 10 pts (66.6%) were aged < 65 years, 11 (73.3%) were men, 3 (20.0%) had no history of smoking, 14 (93.3%) had non-squamous histology, 4 (26.7%) were EGFR positive, 3 (20.0%) were KRAS positive and 6 (85.7%) were PD-L1 negative. Of the 8 pts with a documented rw tumor response assessment, 3 (37.5%) had partial response (PR), 3 (37.5%) had stable disease (SD), & 2 (25.0%) had progressive disease as their rw best response. The rwORR (PR or complete response [CR]) & rwDCR (PR, CR, or SD) were 37.5% and 75.0%, respectively. Among responding pts, median time to first response was 2.2 months (95% CI, 1.3 - not reached [NR]) & median duration of response was 2.3 months (95% CI, 1.5 - NR). Patient numbers were too small (n = 15) and duration of follow-up was too short (3.4 months [IQR, 0.7 - 5.4]) to make robust estimation of overall survival or rw progression free survival. Conclusions: Data from this small patient cohort in US community practice are not conclusive and should be considered exploratory, but do show high rates of rw objective response and rw disease control rates during 2L R+D following 1L Pt + ICI. Data with larger sample sizes and additional follow-up are needed to better understand outcomes of R+D following the addition of ICI to 1L Pt chemotherapy regimens.

scholarly journals Real-World Outcome of Platinum-Based Chemotherapy in Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC): A Retrospective Study from a Tertiary Cancer Center in India

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Indhuja Muthiah Vaikundaraja ◽  
Manikandan Dhanushkodi ◽  
Venkatraman Radhakrishnan ◽  
Jayachandran Perumal Kalaiarasi ◽  
Nikita Mehra ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Progressive Disease ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Tertiary Cancer Center

Abstract Introduction There is a paucity of data on platinum-based chemotherapy in advanced breast cancer (ABC) from developing countries like India. Objectives The objectives were to analyze the efficacy and safety of platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with ABC. Materials and Methods This was a retrospective study of 35 patients with ABC who were treated with platinum-based chemotherapy (gemcitabine and carboplatin, [GC]) in a tertiary cancer center in India from August 2015 to November 2019. The inclusion criteria were patients with ABC, who had received palliative chemotherapy with GC. The exclusion criteria were patients who had received less than two cycles of GC and patients who received platinum-based chemotherapy for neuroendocrine carcinoma of the breast. Results The median age was 45 years (range: 28–68 years). All patients were female (97%) except one male (3%). The histology was ductal carcinoma (77%), mixed (17%), and others (6%). Out of the 12 patients tested for breast cancer (BRCA) gene mutation, six patients had a BRCA mutation. Patients with metastatic and locally progressive disease were 91 and 9%, respectively. The median number of prior lines of systemic therapy for metastatic disease was 1 (range: 0–5). The median number of sites of metastasis was 2 (range: 0–5). Patients with visceral crises were 23%. The median number of cycles of GC chemotherapy received was 6 (range: 2–6). A dose reduction in chemotherapy was done in 74%. The responses among 34 evaluable patients were complete response (11%), partial response (24%), stable disease (41%), and progressive disease (24%). Grade 3 or more hematological and nonhematological toxicities were observed in 69 and 9%, respectively. The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 6 and 8 months, respectively. The 1-year progression-free survival and overall survival were 19 and 34%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that patients who had received more than 3 cycles had a better outcome. Conclusion GC was an active and well-tolerated regimen in ABC regardless of the receptor status. Further prospective randomized studies are warranted to assess the optimal regimen in patients with triple-negative breast cancer.

scholarly journals RaPiDS (GOG-3028): randomized Phase II study of balstilimab alone or in combination with zalifrelimab in cervical cancer

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
David M O’Malley ◽  
Leslie M Randall ◽  
Camille Gunderson Jackson ◽  
Robert L Coleman ◽  
John L Hays ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Chemotherapy Patients ◽  
Investigational Agents

Balstilimab (anti-programmed death 1) and zalifrelimab (anti-CTLA-4) are two new checkpoint inhibitors that have emerged as promising investigational agents for the treatment of cervical cancer, particularly in the setting of previously-treated, recurrent/metastatic disease. Here we describe the rationale and design of RaPiDS (NCT03894215), a two-arm Phase II study evaluating the safety, tolerability and efficacy of balstilimab administered alone or in combination with zalifrelimab in patients with advanced cervical cancer who progressed after first-line, platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio. The primary end point is objective response rate, and key secondary objectives include safety, duration of response, progression-free survival, overall survival and quality of life outcomes.

A phase II trial of the Wee1 inhibitor adavosertib (AZD1775) in recurrent uterine serous carcinoma.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6009-6009
Author(s):  
Joyce F. Liu ◽  
Niya Xiong ◽  
Susana M. Campos ◽  
Alexi A. Wright ◽  
Carolyn N. Krasner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Serous Carcinoma ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Targeted Next Generation Sequencing ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Uterine Serous Carcinoma ◽  
Grade 3

6009 Background: Uterine serous carcinoma (USC) is an aggressive subtype of endometrial carcinoma characterized by TP53 mutations ( > 90%), often concomitantly with oncogenic mutations or amplifications that can increase replication stress. As such, USC may therefore be uniquely sensitive to further interference of cell cycle regulation by Wee1 inhibition. This two-stage single arm Phase 2 study was conducted to assess the activity of the Wee1 inhibitor adavosertib as monotherapy in recurrent USC. Methods: Women with recurrent USC (defined as non-carcinosarcoma uterine cancers with any serous component) were eligible. Patients (pts) were required to have had at least one prior platinum-based chemotherapy regimen; those with known MSI-H/MMRd disease were required to have received prior PD1/PDL1 therapy or to be ineligible for such therapy. There was no upper limit on the number of prior lines pts could have received. All pts were required to have RECIST measurable disease. Pts received adavosertib 300mg daily on days 1 through 5 and 8 through 12 of a 21-day cycle. Coprimary endpoints were objective response and progression-free survival at 6 months (PFS6). Results: Between OCT-11-2018 and SEP-30-2019, 35 pts enrolled on study. Median follow-up is 4.6 months. The median number of prior lines was 3 (range 1-8). 34 pts were considered evaluable for response. In these pts, 9 confirmed and 1 unconfirmed responses were observed, for an ORR of 29.4% (95% CI 15.1-47.5%). The PFS at 6 months was 58.7% (95% CI: 39.5-73.7%). The median PFS is 6.1 months and the median duration of response is 9.0 months. Frequently observed Grade 3 or higher related adverse events included neutropenia (32.3%), anemia (20.6%), and fatigue (23.5%). Immunohistochemistry and targeted next-generation sequencing were performed to investigate potential biomarkers of response. Conclusions: Adavosertib monotherapy demonstrates promising clinical activity in women with USC. The observed monotherapy activity is higher than in other diseases, and additional exploration of the biology of Wee1 inhibition in USC is needed. Further studies of adavosertib in this patient population are planned. Clinical trial information: NCT03668340.

Rucaparib for recurrent, locally advanced, or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC): Results from ATLAS, a phase II open-label trial.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 440-440 ◽  
Author(s):  
Petros Grivas ◽  
Yohann Loriot ◽  
Susan Feyerabend ◽  
Rafael Morales-Barrera ◽  
Min Yuen Teo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Parp Inhibitor ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Previously Treated

440 Background: ATLAS (NCT03397394) evaluated the efficacy/safety of the PARP inhibitor (PARPi) rucaparib in patients (pts) with previously treated locally advanced/unresectable UC or mUC. Methods: Pts with measurable disease who had progressed after 1–2 prior regimens (ie, platinum-based chemotherapy [PBC] and/or immune checkpoint inhibitors [ICI]) were enrolled regardless of tumor homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) status. Prior PARPi was not allowed. Pts received rucaparib 600 mg PO BID. Baseline tumor tissue or archival tissue ≤6 mo without intervening therapy was required; serial circulating tumor DNA samples were collected. Primary endpoint was investigator-assessed objective response rate (RECIST v1.1) in the intent-to-treat and HRD-positive (defined as genomic loss of heterozygosity ≥10%) populations. Key secondary endpoints: progression-free survival (PFS) and safety. Clinical benefit rate (CBR) was defined as complete or partial response or stable disease (SD) lasting ≥16 weeks. Results: As of Oct 7, 2019, 97 pts were enrolled (median age 66 y [range, 39–87]); most were men (n=76, 78.4%) and had ECOG PS 1 (n=65, 67.0%). Sixty-six pts (68.0%) had both prior PBC and ICI. Twenty pts (20.6%) were HRD-positive, 30 (30.9%) were HRD-negative and 47 (48.5%) had unknown HRD status; 4 pts had a deleterious BRCA1/2 alteration. Median time on treatment was 54 d (range, 2–224). There were no confirmed responses. Of 96 evaluable pts, 27 (28.1%) had a best response of SD; CBR was 12.5% and median PFS was 1.8 mo. No relationship was observed between HRD status and clinical activity. Treatment was discontinued by 93 pts (95.9%), mainly due to radiologic or clinical progression (73.1%). Most frequent any grade treatment-emergent (any cause) adverse events were asthenia/fatigue (n=56, 57.7%), nausea (n=40, 41.2%), and anemia (n=34, 35.1%). Conclusions: Single agent rucaparib did not show activity in pts with previously treated advanced UC and enrollment was suspended at the first interim analysis. The safety profile was consistent with that observed in pts with ovarian cancer. Next generation sequencing–based characterization of the genomic landscape of mUC will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT03397394.

Preliminary analysis of a phase II, multicenter, randomized, active-control study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of eganelisib (IPI 549) in combination with nivolumab compared to nivolumab monotherapy in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 436-436
Author(s):  
Piotr Tomczak ◽  
Lazar Popovic ◽  
Philippe Barthelemy ◽  
Aleksander Janicic ◽  
Elena Sevillano Fernandez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Urothelial Carcinoma ◽  
Preliminary Data ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Suppressor Cells ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Transaminase Elevation ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma ◽  
To Receive

436 Background: Inhibition of the PD-1 pathway has demonstrated clinical benefit in metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC); however, response rates of 15% to 29% highlight the need for more effective therapies, especially for PD-L1- patients. Eganelisib is a first-in-class, novel, oral agent which selectively inhibits PI3K-γ, with the goal of improving the immune response to checkpoint inhibitors (CPI). Methods: Eligible patients (pts) with mUC who progressed on > 1 platinum-based chemotherapy regimen and were CPI naïve were enrolled. Pts were randomized 2:1 to receive eganelisib in combination with nivolumab (EN) or placebo with nivolumab (PN). Pts were stratified by baseline circulating monocytic myeloid derived suppressor cells (mMDSC) level. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST v1.1 in pts with high baseline mMDSC levels. Other endpoints included ORR, progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in all pts and PD-L1 +/- pts. Results: We report preliminary data (as of 9/1/2020) for the first 49 pts with 33 randomized to receive EN and 16 PN. Preliminary ORR/PFS is presented in the table below. Except for the mMDSC high subgroup, ORR and PFS were improved in the EN arm compared to the PN arm. The duration of exposure was a median of 15 weeks for EN and 11 for PN. Most common all-Gr AEs (EN vs PN %) were pyrexia (33 vs 0), decreased appetite (30 vs 19), pruritis (24 vs 6), rash (24 vs 6), asthenia (21 vs 31), and transaminase elevation (21 vs 6). Most common Gr≥3 AEs (EN vs PN %) include hepatotoxicity (15 vs 0), transaminase elevation (12 vs 6), and rash (9 vs 0). Following an early safety review, eganelisib dose was reduced from 40 to 30 mg, resulting in a reduction of hepatic AEs. Conclusions: Preliminary data demonstrates that the combination of eganelisib, once reduced to 30 mg, and nivolumab was well tolerated with hepatic and skin-related toxicities more common in the EN arm. When compared to PN, the combination demonstrated an improved ORR and PFS, especially in the PD-L1- subset. Updated efficacy, including PFS and OS, safety and translational data will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT03980041 . [Table: see text]

Docetaxel with or without ramucirumab after immune checkpoint inhibition in platinum-refractory metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC): Prespecified subgroup analysis from the phase 3 RANGE trial.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 434-434 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandra Drakaki ◽  
Conor J Kirby ◽  
Michiel Simon Van Der Heijden ◽  
Daniel Peter Petrylak ◽  
Thomas Powles ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Liver Metastases ◽  
Subgroup Analysis ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Platinum Refractory

434 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) targeting PD-1/PD-L1 have shown objective response rates (ORR) of 15-21% in PD-L1 unselected patients (pts) with platinum-refractory mUC. Overall results of RANGE, a randomized, double-blinded phase 3 trial comparing ramucirumab and docetaxel (R+D) to placebo and docetaxel (P+D) in pts with platinum-refractory mUC demonstrated an ORR of 24.5% to R+D and a statistically significant improvement in progression free survival (PFS; median 4.07 vs 2.76 mo; HR 0.757). Here we present a pre-specified subgroup analysis of pts who received a prior ICI. Methods: RANGE enrolled pts with progressive mUC during or after platinum-based chemotherapy. Additional prior treatment with one ICI was permitted. Pts were randomized (1:1) to receive D 75 mg/m2 up to 10 cycles with R 10 mg/kg or P on day 1 of a 21-day cycle until disease progression or other discontinuation criteria. Primary endpoint, investigator-assessed PFS, was analyzed in the first 437 randomized pts. Secondary endpoints included overall survival, objective response, and safety. Radiographic assessment occurred every 6 weeks. Results: Thirty three of the 437 pts (8%) in the PFS population received a prior ICI. The majority (91%) received the ICI immediately following platinum and immediately prior to RANGE. Most pts received atezolizumab (55%) or pembrolizumab (36%); ORR to prior ICI was 6% and the majority (67%) had progressive disease as best response. Median duration of the ICI was 3.5 mo (IQR 1.6-5.2). Disease sites at entry onto RANGE included lymph node (79%), lung (48%), liver (39%) and bone (18%). At data cutoff, responses were achieved by 5/14 (35.7%) on R+D, compared to 2/19 (10.5%) on P+D. Responses to R+D were independent of disease site. Of pts with liver metastases, 3/8 responded to R+D compared to 0/5 on P+D. Overall, median PFS was 5.29 mo on R+D and 2.76 mo on P+D (HR 0.920). The frequency of grade ≥3 adverse events was similar between arms. Conclusions: Acknowledging limitations of sample size, R+D showed higher ORR than P+D in pts who had progressed on platinum and ICI therapy, including those with liver metastases. Clinical trial information: NCT02426125.

A phase Ib study of combination of avelumab and taxane-based chemotherapy in platinum refractory or ineligible metastatic urothelial cancer (AVETAX study).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 487-487 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rohan Garje ◽  
Timothy Ginader ◽  
Douglas Earl Laux ◽  
Kenneth Gerard Nepple ◽  
Mohammed M. Milhem ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Metastatic Urothelial Cancer ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Phase 1B ◽  
Expansion Cohort

487 Background: Advanced bladder cancer is the most common malignancy of the urinary system with 5-year OS rates of 5-7%. Platinum based chemotherapy and checkpoint inhibitors are currently available treatment options but with limited benefit. We hypothesize that combining Avelumab (anti-PD-L1 immunotherapy) with Docetaxel is safe and will lead to cancer cell death releasing neoantigens with enhanced anti-tumor immune mediated cytotoxicity. Methods: This is a phase 1b, single arm, non-randomized, open label prospective clinical trial to evaluate the combination of Avelumab and Docetaxel in adult subjects with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma with disease progression during or following platinum-containing chemotherapy, or within 12 months of neoadjuvant or adjuvant platinum-containing chemotherapy. It has two phases: Phase 1b dose de-escalation of docetaxel (Level 0: 75, Level -1: 60 or Level -2: 45 mg/m2) with standard dose avelumab (10 mg/kg) to establish phase 2 dose in the standard 3+3 design. In the dose expansion phase, the phase 2 dose of docetaxel with avelumab will be evaluated for efficacy. The combination therapy is administered every 3 weeks for 6 cycles and then avelumab alone is continued every 2 weeks. Primary endpoint is safety. Efficacy endpoints include objective response rate, progression free survival and overall survival. Results: At the cutoff date of 10/21/2019, 10 eligible patients were enrolled in the study. Only one of the six patients treated with level 0 dose of docetaxel had a dose limiting toxicity (neutropenic fever). Docetaxel at 75 mg/m2 along the avelumab was deemed safe for dose expansion cohort. Additional 4 patients were enrolled in the dose expansion cohort. Efficacy data is preliminary with 1 patient achieving CR, 2 pts had PR, 2 pts had SD, 1 pt PD and 4 pts are not yet evaluable. The most common Grade 3 or 4 AEs were febrile neutropenia, urinary tract infection and confusion. No treatment related deaths were noted. Conclusions: The combination of docetaxel in combination with avelumab is safe and the preliminary data showed promising efficacy, further data to be presented at the meeting. Clinical trial information: NCT03575013.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document