scholarly journals Postoperative Outcomes Associated With Procedural Sedation Conducted by Physician and Nonphysician Anesthesia Providers: Findings From the Prospective, Observational African Surgical Outcomes Study

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Freliza van der Merwe ◽  
Nicola J. Vickery ◽  
Hyla-Louise Kluyts ◽  
Dongsheng Yang ◽  
Yanyan Han ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 64 (2) ◽  
pp. E196-E204
Author(s):  
Saba Balvardi ◽  
Etienne St-Louis ◽  
Yasmine Yousef ◽  
Asra Toobaie ◽  
Elena Guadagno ◽  
...  

Background: Grading scales for adverse surgical outcomes have been poorly characterized to date. The primary aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review to enumerate the various frameworks for grading adverse postoperative outcomes; our secondary objective was to outline the properties of each grading system, identifying its strengths and weaknesses. Methods: We searched 9 databases (Africa Wide Information, Biosis, Cochrane, Embase, Global Health, LILACs, Medline, PubMed and Web of Science) from 1992 (the year the Clavien–Dindo classification system was developed) until Mar. 2, 2017, for studies that aimed to develop or improve on an already existing generalizable system for grading adverse postoperative outcomes. Study selection was duplicated as per PRISMA recommendations. Procedure-specific grading systems were excluded. We assessed the framework, strengths and weaknesses of the systems qualitatively. Results: We identified 9 studies on 8 adverse outcome grading systems with frameworks generalizable to any surgical procedure. Most systems have not been widely incorporated in the literature. Seven of the 8 systems were produced without including patients’ perspectives. Four allowed the derivation of a composite morbidity score, which had limited tangible significance for patients. Conclusion: Although each instrument identified offered its own advantages, none satisfied the need for a patient-centred tool capable of generating a composite score of all possible postoperative adverse outcomes (complications, sequelae and failure) that enables comparison of noninterventional and surgical management of disease. There is a need for development of a more comprehensive, patient-centred grading system for adverse postoperative outcomes.


2020 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 404-416
Author(s):  
Hyla-Louise Kluyts ◽  
Wilhelmina Conradie ◽  
Estie Cloete ◽  
Sandra Spijkerman ◽  
Oliver Smith ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 160-166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ankur S. Narain ◽  
Fady Y. Hijji ◽  
Brittany E. Haws ◽  
Krishna T. Kudaravalli ◽  
Kelly H. Yom ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVEGiven the increasing prevalence of obesity, more patients with a high body mass index (BMI) will require surgical treatment for degenerative spinal disease. In previous investigations of lumbar spine pathology, obesity has been associated with worsened postoperative outcomes and increased costs. However, few studies have examined the association between BMI and postoperative outcomes following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) procedures. Thus, the purpose of this study was to compare surgical outcomes, postoperative narcotics consumption, complications, and hospital costs among BMI stratifications for patients who have undergone primary 1- to 2-level ACDF procedures.METHODSThe authors retrospectively reviewed a prospectively maintained surgical database of patients who had undergone primary 1- to 2-level ACDF for degenerative spinal pathology between 2008 and 2015. Patients were stratified by BMI as follows: normal weight (< 25.0 kg/m2), overweight (25.0–29.9 kg/m2), obese I (30.0–34.9 kg/m2), or obese II–III (≥ 35.0 kg/m2). Differences in patient demographics and preoperative characteristics were compared across the BMI cohorts using 1-way ANOVA or chi-square analysis. Multivariate linear or Poisson regression with robust error variance was used to determine the presence of an association between BMI category and narcotics utilization, improvement in visual analog scale (VAS) scores, incidence of complications, arthrodesis rates, reoperation rates, and hospital costs. Regression analyses were controlled for preoperative demographic and procedural characteristics.RESULTSTwo hundred seventy-seven patients were included in the analysis, of whom 20.9% (n = 58) were normal weight, 37.5% (n = 104) were overweight, 24.9% (n = 69) were obese I, and 16.6% (n = 46) were obese II–III. A higher BMI was associated with an older age (p = 0.049) and increased comorbidity burden (p = 0.001). No differences in sex, smoking status, insurance type, diagnosis, presence of neuropathy, or preoperative VAS pain scores were found among the BMI cohorts (p > 0.05). No significant differences were found among these cohorts as regards operative time, intraoperative blood loss, length of hospital stay, and number of operative levels (p > 0.05). Additionally, no significant differences in postoperative narcotics consumption, VAS score improvement, complication rates, arthrodesis rates, reoperation rates, or total direct costs existed across BMI stratifications (p > 0.05).CONCLUSIONSPatients with a higher BMI demonstrated surgical outcomes, narcotics consumption, and hospital costs comparable to those of patients with a lower BMI. Thus, ACDF procedures are both safe and effective for all patients across the entire BMI spectrum. Patients should be counseled to expect similar rates of postoperative complications and eventual clinical improvement regardless of their BMI.


Author(s):  
ET Ayebale ◽  
NJ Kassebaum ◽  
AM Roche ◽  
BM Biccard

Critical care capabilities in affluent countries have been overwhelmed by the 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. Data from the African Surgical Outcomes Study (ASOS)1 suggests that this critical care crisis will be significantly worse in Africa.


2012 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 151-152 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Feigelson ◽  
A. Onitilo ◽  
T. James ◽  
E. A. Bowles ◽  
R. Single ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document