Policy Responses to the Addiction Crisis

Author(s):  
Richard G. Frank ◽  
Keith N. Humphreys ◽  
Harold A. Pollack

Abstract The COVID-19 pandemic is just one of two public health crises the new Biden administration will confront. The addiction crisis is the other. The opioid epidemic has already killed more Americans than World Wars I and II combined. And it is but the most visible sign of a broader population health challenge that includes methamphetamine, cocaine, benzodiazepines, and alcohol. This essay presents practical legislative and executive actions required to address these challenges. We focus on two broad policy challenges: (1) improving financing and delivery of treatment for substance use disorders (SUDs) and (2) reducing population exposure to addictive and lethal substances. Through both of these channels, a portfolio of well-implemented, evidence-informed policies can save many thousands of lives every year.

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (Supplement_4) ◽  
Author(s):  

Abstract Substance use disorders are among the priority conditions identified by the World Health Organization mental health gap action program. The health community has taken a range of (non-exclusive) positions on how to respond to them. These include a spectrum from prohibition, through regulation, to harm reduction and another from individually targeted measures to collective policies. Which measures are adopted depend on many factors outside the health system, including beliefs about the relationship between the individual and the state, the power of producer interests (tobacco/ alcohol industries), and the predominant public narrative. In contrast, a public health approach would focus on the risks of harm, to the individual and society, its distribution within the population, and the potential for unintended consequences. In this workshop, we will explore policy responses to four harmful substances, in four different European countries. These are electronic cigarettes (Martin McKee), cannabis (Jean-Pierre Couteron) illegal drugs (Henrique Barros) and alcohol (Jutta Lindert). First, the case of electronic cigarettes have divided the health community. While some groups, mainly in England, have embraced them, others have expressed concerns, with US authorities describing their increasing use by adolescents as a public health emergency. We will ask why these different views exist, exploring the use of different paradigms, the prioritization of different population groups and conditions, and the role of cognitive biases. This presentation will highlight some of the wider divisions in approaches to substance use disorders. Second, the use of cannabis in France will be presented. France ranks fourth in the European Union in terms of monthly consumption of cannabis and second only to Denmark in terms of persons who have ever used cannabis. As of November 2018 the penalty for possession of cannabis in France was reduced to a €200 fine. This presentation will discuss the rationale for and expectations of this policy. Third, we will focus on Portugal which, in 2001, became the first country to decriminalise the possession and consumption of all illicit substances. Rather than being arrested, those caught with a personal supply are given a small fine or told to appear before a local commission. Finally, the challenges for Public health of harmful alcohol use will be presented. The harmful use of alcohol creates a serious health burden in refugees. Germany has among the highest alcohol consumptions in Europe, after Luxembourg, is the European country with the lowest percentage of people who abstain from drinking. Alcohol is widely accepted. This creates challenges for refugees coming from countries with much more restrictive approaches to alcohol. This presentation will explore the challenges that arise when a population coming from a regulated environment move to one that is highly liberalised, including a discussion of the challenges in developing culturally appropriate public health responses. Key messages Substance use is a major public health challenges. Legal and policy responses differ widely in the European Union - evidence based policies are highly beeded.


Author(s):  
Gary Tennis ◽  
Kenneth J. Martz ◽  
Jac A. Charlier

Approximately two-thirds of America’s incarcerated population suffers with untreated or undertreated substance use disorders, and many of those individuals commit several crimes related to drug use and addiction on a daily basis prior to being incarcerated. To end the opioid epidemic in the United States we not only need to bolster our health care and public health response to substance use disorders, we need to engage the criminal justice system as a specific touchpoint for public health intervention in communities and states across the country. The principal argument in the chapter is that while individuals with opioid and/or other substance use disorders should get treatment before ever being involved in crime—if they are justice-involved, it is imperative that the criminal justice system serve as a belated but necessary public health and health care intervention supportive of treatment, recovery, and prevention of addiction.


2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 226-236 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie Yarnell ◽  
Luming Li ◽  
Brian MacGrory ◽  
Louis Trevisan ◽  
Paul Kirwin

Pain Medicine ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Servis ◽  
Scott M Fishman ◽  
Mark S Wallace ◽  
Stephen G Henry ◽  
Doug Ziedonis ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective The University of California (UC) leadership sought to develop a robust educational response to the epidemic of opioid-related deaths. Because the contributors to this current crisis are multifactorial, a comprehensive response requires educating future physicians about safe and effective management of pain, safer opioid prescribing, and identification and treatment of substance use disorder (SUD). Methods The six UC medical schools appointed an opioid crisis workgroup to develop educational strategies and a coordinated response to the opioid epidemic. The workgroup had diverse specialty and disciplinary representation. This workgroup focused on developing a foundational set of educational competencies for adoption across all UC medical schools that address pain, SUD, and public health concerns related to the opioid crisis. Results The UC pain and SUD competencies were either newly created or adapted from existing competencies that addressed pain, SUD, and opioid and other prescription drug misuse. The final competencies covered three domains: pain, SUD, and public health issues related to the opioid crisis. Conclusions The authors present a novel set of educational competencies as a response to the opioid crisis. These competencies emphasize the subject areas that are fundamental to the opioid crisis: pain management, the safe use of opioids, and understanding and treating SUD.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victoria N. Mutiso ◽  
Prof. David M. Ndetei ◽  
Esther N. Muia ◽  
Rita K. Alietsi ◽  
Lydia Onsinyo ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Changing lifestyles in Kenya can lead to eating related behaviors and problems. The more severe problems are likely to manifest in clinical settings, but the majority and less severe forms will remain unrecognized. There is therefore the need to take a public health awareness approach to identify cases at community level and initiate appropriate intervention. This requires characterization of Eating Disorders (ED) and its associations in the local context. Our focus will be on the more common Binge Eating Disorder (BED). The overarching objective of this study is to generate Kenyan data on BED and fill a gap that exists not only in Kenya but Africa in general. The specific aims are: (1) To document the patterns and prevalence of different symptoms of BED in a student population whose age range represents a significant proportion of the population. (2) To determine associated psychiatric and substance use disorders (3) To determine independent predictors of BED. Method: We administered to a total of 9742 participants following tools: A researcher designed socio-demographic and economic indicators questionnaire; an instrument on DSM-IV diagnosis of BED and its various symptoms; instruments to determine DSM-IV psychiatric disorders, substance abuse, affectivity, psychosis and stress indicators. The participants were high school, college and university students in four out of the 47 counties in Kenya. We used descriptive and inferential analysis to determine prevalence and association of the different variables. The independent predictors of BED were generated from the generalized linear model (p<0.05). Results: We found a prevalence of 3.2% of BED and a wide range of BED symptoms varying from 8.1% to 19.0%. There were significant (p<0.05) associations between BED with various socio-demographic variables and psychiatric and substance use disorders. However, only some of these disorders were independent predictors of BED. Conclusion: Our findings on prevalence of BED and significant associations with various psychiatric disorders and substance use disorders are similar to those obtained in HICs using similar large scale samples in non-clinical populations. Economic status is not a predictor of BED. Our findings suggest a public health approach to awareness and management.


Author(s):  
Michael R. Fraser ◽  
Jay C. Butler

A public health guide to ending the opioid crisis is needed to help frame efforts to go “upstream” and address the root causes of substance use disorder and addiction. In this introduction, the editors provide an overview of the book’s three parts (Fundamentals and Frameworks; Connecting Clinical Perspectives and Public Health Practice; Moving Upstream—Prevention, Partnership, and Public Health). While a great deal of prior work has focused on the clinical aspects of the opioid epidemic, more is needed to address the community-level aspects, including addressing the root causes of addiction, and where public health professionals can intervene at the primary, secondary, and tertiary levels of prevention. The case is made for increasing effort in the areas of primary prevention and policy change to support effective opioid stewardship at the local, state, and federal levels. The editors conclude by stating that communities will not “arrest” or “treat” their way out of this crisis. Instead, we have to redouble efforts to prevent addiction and address the clinical and community aspects of what drives an individual to become addicted in the first place.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document