Direct regulatory interaction of the eyeless protein with an eye-specific enhancer in the sine oculis gene during eye induction in Drosophila

Development ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 126 (10) ◽  
pp. 2253-2260 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Niimi ◽  
M. Seimiya ◽  
U. Kloter ◽  
S. Flister ◽  
W.J. Gehring
Keyword(s):  
Target Genes ◽  
Ectopic Expression ◽  
Direct Interaction ◽  
Loss Of Function ◽  
Eyes Absent ◽  
Sine Oculis ◽  
Dna Binding Domains ◽  
Binding Domains ◽  
Eye Morphogenesis

The Pax-6 gene encodes a transcription factor with two DNA-binding domains, a paired and a homeodomain, and is expressed during eye morphogenesis and development of the nervous system. Pax-6 homologs have been isolated from a wide variety of organisms ranging from flatworms to humans. Since loss-of-function mutants in insects and mammals lead to an eyeless phenotype and Pax-6 orthologs from distantly related species are capable of inducing ectopic eyes in Drosophila, we have proposed that Pax-6 is a universal master control gene for eye morphogenesis. To determine the extent of evolutionary conservation of the eye morphogenetic pathway, we have begun to identify subordinate target genes of Pax-6. Previously we have shown that expression of two genes, sine oculis (so) and eyes absent (eya), is induced by eyeless (ey), the Pax-6 homolog of Drosophila. Here we present evidence from ectopic expression studies in transgenic flies, from transcription activation studies in yeast, and from gel shift assays in vitro that the EY protein activates transcription of sine oculis by direct interaction with an eye-specific enhancer in the long intron of the so gene.

scholarly journals Mediator complex subunit Med19 binds directly GATA transcription factors and is required with Med1 for GATA-driven gene regulation in vivo

2020 ◽  
Vol 295 (39) ◽  
pp. 13617-13629
Author(s):  
Clément Immarigeon ◽  
Sandra Bernat-Fabre ◽  
Emmanuelle Guillou ◽  
Alexis Verger ◽  
Elodie Prince ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Direct Interaction ◽  
Mediator Complex ◽  
Loss Of Function ◽  
Transcriptional Responses ◽  
Rna Pol Ii ◽  
Evolutionarily Conserved

The evolutionarily conserved multiprotein Mediator complex (MED) serves as an interface between DNA-bound transcription factors (TFs) and the RNA Pol II machinery. It has been proposed that each TF interacts with a dedicated MED subunit to induce specific transcriptional responses. But are these binary partnerships sufficient to mediate TF functions? We have previously established that the Med1 Mediator subunit serves as a cofactor of GATA TFs in Drosophila, as shown in mammals. Here, we observe mutant phenotype similarities between another subunit, Med19, and the Drosophila GATA TF Pannier (Pnr), suggesting functional interaction. We further show that Med19 physically interacts with the Drosophila GATA TFs, Pnr and Serpent (Srp), in vivo and in vitro through their conserved C-zinc finger domains. Moreover, Med19 loss of function experiments in vivo or in cellulo indicate that it is required for Pnr- and Srp-dependent gene expression, suggesting general GATA cofactor functions. Interestingly, Med19 but not Med1 is critical for the regulation of all tested GATA target genes, implying shared or differential use of MED subunits by GATAs depending on the target gene. Lastly, we show a direct interaction between Med19 and Med1 by GST pulldown experiments indicating privileged contacts between these two subunits of the MED middle module. Together, these findings identify Med19/Med1 as a composite GATA TF interface and suggest that binary MED subunit–TF partnerships are probably oversimplified models. We propose several mechanisms to account for the transcriptional regulation of GATA-targeted genes.

Cooperative interactions between paired domain and homeodomain

Development ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 122 (9) ◽  
pp. 2639-2650 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Jun ◽  
C. Desplan
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Dna Sequences ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Cooperative Interaction ◽  
Paired Domain ◽  
Cooperative Interactions ◽  
Dna Binding Domains ◽  
Binding Domains

The Pax proteins are a family of transcriptional regulators involved in many developmental processes in all higher eukaryotes. They are characterized by the presence of a paired domain (PD), a bipartite DNA binding domain composed of two helix-turn-helix (HTH) motifs, the PAI and RED domains. The PD is also often associated with a homeodomain (HD) which is itself able to form homo- and hetero-dimers on DNA. Many of these proteins therefore contain three HTH motifs each able to recognize DNA. However, all PDs recognize highly related DNA sequences, and most HDs also recognize almost identical sites. We show here that different Pax proteins use multiple combinations of their HTHs to recognize several types of target sites. For instance, the Drosophila Paired protein can bind, in vitro, exclusively through its PAI domain, or through a dimer of its HD, or through cooperative interaction between PAI domain and HD. However, prd function in vivo requires the synergistic action of both the PAI domain and the HD. Pax proteins with only a PD appear to require both PAI and RED domains, while a Pax-6 isoform and a new Pax protein, Lune, may rely on the RED domain and HD. We propose a model by which Pax proteins recognize different target genes in vivo through various combinations of their DNA binding domains, thus expanding their recognition repertoire.

Identification of androgen-selective androgen-response elements in the human aquaporin-5 and Rad9 genes

2008 ◽  
Vol 411 (3) ◽  
pp. 679-686 ◽  
Author(s):  
Udo Moehren ◽  
Sarah Denayer ◽  
Michael Podvinec ◽  
Guy Verrijdt ◽  
Frank Claessens
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Glucocorticoid Receptors ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Aquaporin 5 ◽  
Band Shift ◽  
Strong Activity ◽  
Response Elements ◽  
Dna Binding Domains ◽  
Binding Domains

The AR (androgen receptor) is known to influence the expression of its target genes by binding to different sets of AREs (androgen-response elements) in the DNA. One set consists of the classical steroid-response elements which are partial palindromic repeats of the 5′-TGTTCT-3′ steroid-receptor monomer-binding element. The second set contains motifs that are AR-specific and that are proposed to be partial direct repeats of the same motif. On the basis of this assumption, we used an in silico approach to identify new androgen-selective AREs in the regulatory regions of known androgen-responsive genes. We have used an extension of the NUBIScan algorithm to screen a collection of 85 known human androgen-responsive genes compiled from literature and database searches. We report the evaluation of the most promising hits resulting from this computational search by in vitro DNA-binding assays using full-size ARs and GRs (glucocorticoid receptors) as well as their isolated DBDs (DNA-binding domains). We also describe the ability of some of these motifs to confer androgen-, but not glucocorticoid-, responsiveness to reporter-gene expression. The elements found in the aquaporin-5 and the Rad9 (radiation-sensitive 9) genes showed selective AR versus GR binding in band-shift assays and a strong activity and selectivity in functional assays, both as isolated elements and in their original contexts. Our data indicate the validity of the hypothesis that selective AREs are recognizable as direct 5′-TGTTCT-3′ repeats, and extend the list of currently known selective elements.

scholarly journals RIP-140 interacts with multiple nuclear receptors by means of two distinct sites.

1996 ◽  
Vol 16 (11) ◽  
pp. 6029-6036 ◽  
Author(s):  
F L'Horset ◽  
S Dauvois ◽  
D M Heery ◽  
V Cavaillès ◽  
M G Parker
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Receptors ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Dna Binding Domains ◽  
Binding Domains ◽  
Vitro Binding ◽  
Mutant Receptors

We have characterized two distinct binding sites, called site 1 and site 2, in the nuclear protein RIP-140 which interact with the ligand binding domain of the estrogen receptor both in solution and when the receptor is bound to DNA. Both sites are capable of independently interacting with other nuclear receptors, including the thyroid hormone and retinoic acid receptors, but they are not identical since the interaction with retinoid X receptor is mediated primarily by site 1. The interaction is enhanced by agonists but not by antagonists, and the in vitro binding activities to a number of mutant receptors correlate with their abilities to stimulate transcription in vivo. When RIP-140 is fused to heterologous DNA binding domains, it is able to stimulate the transcription of reporter genes in both yeast and mammalian cells. Thus, RIP-140 is likely to function as a bridging protein between receptors and the basal transcription machinery and thereby stimulate the transcription of target genes.

scholarly journals Pioneering, chromatin remodeling, and epigenetic constraint in early T-cell gene regulation by PU.1

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonas Ungerbäck ◽  
Hiroyuki Hosokawa ◽  
Xun Wang ◽  
Tobias Strid ◽  
Brian A. Williams ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Dynamic Properties ◽  
Chromatin Accessibility ◽  
Site Quality ◽  
Open Chromatin ◽  
Loss Of Function ◽  
Dna Binding Domains ◽  
Binding Domains

AbstractPU.1 is a dominant but transient regulator in early T-cell precursors and a potent transcriptional controller of developmentally important pro-T cell genes. Before T-lineage commitment, open chromatin is frequently occupied by PU.1, and many PU.1 sites lose accessibility when PU.1 is later downregulated. Pioneering activity of PU.1 was tested in in this developmentally dynamic context, by quantitating the relationships between PU.1 occupancy and site quality and accessibility as PU.1 levels naturally declined in pro-T cell development, and by using stage-specific gain and loss of function perturbations to relate binding to effects on target genes. PU.1 could bind closed genomic sites, but rapidly opened many of them, despite the absence of its frequent collaborators, C/EBP factors. The dynamic properties of PU.1 engagements implied that PU.1 binding affinity and concentration determine its occupancy choices, but with quantitative tradeoffs for occupancy between site sequence quality and stage-dependent site accessibility in chromatin. At non-promoter sites PU.1 binding criteria were more stringent than at promoters, and PU.1 was also much more effective as a transcriptional regulator at non-promoter sites where local chromatin accessibility depended on the presence of PU.1. Runx motifs and Runx1 binding were often linked to PU.1 at open sites, but highly expressed PU.1 could bind its sites without Runx1. Notably, closed chromatin presented a qualitative barrier to occupancy by the PU.1 DNA binding domain alone. Thus, effective pioneering at closed chromatin sites also depends on requirements beyond site recognition served by non-DNA binding domains of PU.1.

scholarly journals Msn2- and Msn4-Like Transcription Factors Play No Obvious Roles in the Stress Responses of the Fungal Pathogen Candida albicans

2004 ◽  
Vol 3 (5) ◽  
pp. 1111-1123 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan Nicholls ◽  
Melissa Straffon ◽  
Brice Enjalbert ◽  
André Nantel ◽  
Susan Macaskill ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Candida Albicans ◽  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Stress Responses ◽  
Ectopic Expression ◽  
Heavy Metal Stress ◽  
Luciferase Reporter ◽  
Response Element ◽  
Dna Binding Domains ◽  
Binding Domains ◽  
Adverse Environmental Conditions

ABSTRACT In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the (C2H2)2 zinc finger transcription factors Msn2 and Msn4 play central roles in responses to a range of stresses by activating gene transcription via the stress response element (STRE; CCCCT). The pathogen Candida albicans displays stress responses that are thought to help it survive adverse environmental conditions encountered within its human host. However, these responses differ from those in S. cerevisiae, and hence we predicted that the roles of Msn2- and Msn4-like proteins might have been functionally reassigned in C. albicans. C. albicans has two such proteins: CaMsn4 and Mnl1 (for Msn2- and Msn4-like). CaMSN4, but not MNL1, weakly complemented the inability of an S. cerevisiae msn2 msn4 mutant to activate a STRE-lacZ reporter. Also, the disruption of CaMsn4 and Mnl1 had no discernible effect upon the resistance of C. albicans to heat, osmotic, ethanol, nutrient, oxidative, or heavy-metal stress or upon the stress-activated transcriptome in C. albicans. Furthermore, although Cap1-dependent activation of a Yap response element-luciferase reporter was observed, a STRE reporter was not activated in response to stresses in C. albicans. Ectopic expression of CaMsn4 or Mnl1 did not affect the cellular or molecular responses of C. albicans to stress. Under the conditions tested, the putative activation and DNA binding domains of CaMsn4 did not appear to be functional. These data suggest that CaMsn4 and Mnl1 do not contribute significantly to stress responses in C. albicans. The data are consistent with the idea that stress signaling in this fungus has diverged significantly from that in budding yeast.

scholarly journals Role of Papillomavirus E1 Initiator Dimerization in DNA Replication

2005 ◽  
Vol 79 (13) ◽  
pp. 8661-8664 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen Schuck ◽  
Arne Stenlund
Keyword(s):  
Dna Replication ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Dna Binding Domains ◽  
Binding Domains ◽  
Severe Effect ◽  
Origin Of Dna Replication ◽  
Initiation Of Dna Replication

ABSTRACT Viral initiator proteins are polypeptides that form oligomeric complexes on the origin of DNA replication (ori). These complexes carry out a multitude of functions related to initiation of DNA replication, and although many of these functions have been characterized biochemically, little is understood about how the complexes are assembled. Here we demonstrate that loss of one particular interaction, the dimerization between E1 DNA binding domains, has a severe effect on DNA replication in vivo but has surprisingly modest effects on most individual biochemical activities in vitro. We conclude that the dimer interaction is primarily required for initial recognition of ori.

N-terminal DNA-binding domains contribute to differential DNA-binding specificities of NF-kappa B p50 and p65

1993 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 852-860
Author(s):  
M B Toledano ◽  
D Ghosh ◽  
F Trinh ◽  
W J Leonard
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Point Mutations ◽  
Terminal Region ◽  
Sequence Motif ◽  
Structural Determinants ◽  
Nf Kappa B ◽  
Dna Binding Domains ◽  
Binding Domains ◽  
Dna Binding Specificity

We previously reported that either oxidation or alkylation of NF-kappa B in vitro abrogates DNA binding. We used this phenomenon to help elucidate structural determinants of NF-kappa B binding. We now demonstrate that Cys-62 of NF-kappa B p50 mediates the redox effect and lies within an N-terminal region required for DNA binding but not for dimerization. Several point mutations in this region confer a transdominant negative binding phenotype to p50. The region is highly conserved in all Rel family proteins, and we have determined that it is also critical for DNA binding of NF-kappa B p65. Replacement of the N-terminal region of p65 with the corresponding region from p50 changes its DNA-binding specificity towards that of p50. These data suggest that the N-terminal regions of p50 and p65 are critical for DNA binding and help determine the DNA-binding specificities of p50 and p65. We have defined within the N-terminal region a sequence motif, R(F/G)(R/K)YXCE, which is present in Rel family proteins and also in zinc finger proteins capable of binding to kappa B sites. The potential significance of this finding is discussed.

scholarly journals TEM1 combinatorially binds to FLOWERING LOCUS T and recruits a Polycomb factor to repress the floral transition in Arabidopsis

2021 ◽  
Vol 118 (35) ◽  
pp. e2103895118
Author(s):  
Hongmiao Hu ◽  
Shu Tian ◽  
Guohui Xie ◽  
Rui Liu ◽  
Nana Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Sequences ◽  
Molecular Basis ◽  
Floral Transition ◽  
Flowering Locus T ◽  
Dna Binding Domains ◽  
Adult Transition ◽  
Binding Domains ◽  
Flowering Locus ◽  
Specific Regulation

Arabidopsis TEMPRANILLO 1 (TEM1) is a transcriptional repressor that participates in multiple flowering pathways and negatively regulates the juvenile-to-adult transition and the flowering transition. To understand the molecular basis for the site-specific regulation of FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT) by TEM1, we determined the structures of the two plant-specific DNA-binding domains in TEM1, AP2 and B3, in complex with their target DNA sequences from the FT gene 5′-untranslated region (5′-UTR), revealing the molecular basis for TEM1 specificity for its DNA targets. In vitro binding assays revealed that the combination of the AP2 and B3 binding sites greatly enhanced the overall binding of TEM1 to the FT 5′-UTR, indicating TEM1 combinatorically recognizes the FT gene 5′-UTR. We further showed that TEM1 recruits the Polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2) to the FT 5′-UTR. The simultaneous binding of the TEM1 AP2 and B3 domains to FT is necessary for deposition of H3K27me3 at the FT 5′-UTR and for the flowering repressor function of TEM1. Overall, our data suggest that the combinatorial recognition of FT 5′-UTR by TEM1 ensures H3K27me3 deposition to precisely regulate the floral transition.

Genetic evidence for the transcriptional-activating function of Homothorax during adult fly development

Development ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 128 (18) ◽  
pp. 3405-3413 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adi Inbal ◽  
Naomi Halachmi ◽  
Charna Dibner ◽  
Dale Frank ◽  
Adi Salzberg
Keyword(s):  
Transcriptional Activity ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Genetic Evidence ◽  
In Vivo Studies ◽  
Loss Of Function ◽  
Native Form ◽  
Downstream Target ◽  
Activating Function

Homothorax (HTH) is a homeobox-containing protein, which plays multiple roles in the development of the embryo and the adult fly. HTH binds to the homeotic cofactor Extradenticle (EXD) and translocates it to the nucleus. Its function within the nucleus is less clear. It was shown, mainly by in vitro studies, that HTH can bind DNA as a part of ternary HTH/EXD/HOX complexes, but little is known about the transcription regulating function of HTH-containing complexes in the context of the developing fly. Here we present genetic evidence, from in vivo studies, for the transcriptional-activating function of HTH. The HTH protein was forced to act as a transcriptional repressor by fusing it to the Engrailed (EN) repression domain, or as a transcriptional activator, by fusing it to the VP16 activation domain, without perturbing its ability to translocate EXD to the nucleus. Expression of the repressing form of HTH in otherwise wild-type imaginal discs phenocopied hth loss of function. Thus, the repressing form was working as an antimorph, suggesting that normally HTH is required to activate the transcription of downstream target genes. This conclusion was further supported by the observation that the activating form of HTH caused typical hth gain-of-function phenotypes and could rescue hth loss-of-function phenotypes. Similar results were obtained with XMeis3, the Xenopus homologue of HTH, extending the known functional similarity between the two proteins. Competition experiments demonstrated that the repressing forms of HTH or XMeis3 worked as true antimorphs competing with the transcriptional activity of the native form of HTH. We also describe the phenotypic consequences of HTH antimorph activity in derivatives of the wing, labial and genital discs. Some of the described phenotypes, for example, a proboscis-to-leg transformation, were not previously associated with alterations in HTH activity. Observing the ability of HTH antimorphs to interfere with different developmental pathways may direct us to new targets of HTH. The HTH antimorph described in this work presents a new means by which the transcriptional activity of the endogenous HTH protein can be blocked in an inducible fashion in any desired cells or tissues without interfering with nuclear localization of EXD.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document