Requirement of Sox2-mediated signaling for differentiation of early Xenopus neuroectoderm

Development ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 127 (4) ◽  
pp. 791-800 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Kishi ◽  
K. Mizuseki ◽  
N. Sasai ◽  
H. Yamazaki ◽  
K. Shiota ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Glucocorticoid Receptor ◽  
Ligand Binding ◽  
Cell Fate ◽  
Neural Differentiation ◽  
Dominant Negative ◽  
Gastrula Stage ◽  
Blastula Stage ◽  
Sensory Epithelia ◽  
Neural Tissues

From early stages of development, Sox2-class transcription factors (Sox1, Sox2 and Sox3) are expressed in neural tissues and sensory epithelia. In this report, we show that Sox2 function is required for neural differentiation of early Xenopus ectoderm. Microinjection of dominant-negative forms of Sox2 (dnSox2) mRNA inhibits neural differentiation of animal caps caused by attenuation of BMP signals. Expression of dnSox2 in developing embryos suppresses expression of N-CAM and regional neural markers. We have analyzed temporal requirement of Sox2-mediated signaling by using an inducible dnSox2 construct fused to the ligand-binding domain of the glucocorticoid receptor. Attenuation of Sox2 function both from the late blastula stage and from the late gastrula stage onwards causes an inhibition of neural differentiation in animal caps and in whole embryos. Additionally, dnSox2-injected cells that fail to differentiate into neural tissues are not able to adopt epidermal cell fate. These data suggest that Sox2-class genes are essential for early neuroectoderm cells to consolidate their neural identity during secondary steps of neural differentiation.

Notch1 inhibits differentiation of hematopoietic cells by sustaining GATA-2 expression

Blood ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 98 (12) ◽  
pp. 3283-3289 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keiki Kumano ◽  
Shigeru Chiba ◽  
Kiyoshi Shimizu ◽  
Tetsuya Yamagata ◽  
Noriko Hosoya ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Notch Signaling ◽  
Cell Fate ◽  
Hematopoietic Cells ◽  
Erythroid Differentiation ◽  
Inhibitory Effect ◽  
Dominant Negative ◽  
Granulocytic Differentiation ◽  
Cell Fate Decisions ◽  
Delayed Differentiation

Abstract Notch signaling is involved in cell fate decisions in many systems including hematopoiesis. It has been shown that expression of an activated form of Notch1 (aNotch1) in 32D mouse myeloid progenitor cells inhibits the granulocytic differentiation induced by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). Results of the current study show that aNotch1, when expressed in F5-5 mouse erythroleukemia cells, also inhibits erythroid differentiation. Comparison of the expression levels of several transcription factors after stimulation for myeloid and erythroid differentiation, in the presence or absence of aNotch1, revealed that aNotch1 did not change its regulation pattern with any of the transcription factors examined, except for GATA-2, despite its inhibitory effect on differentiation. GATA-2 was down-regulated when the parental 32D and F5-5 were induced to differentiate into granulocytic and erythroid lineages, respectively. In these induction procedures, however, the level of GATA-2 expression was sustained when aNotch1 was expressed. To ascertain whether maintenance of GATA-2 is required for the Notch-induced inhibition of differentiation, the dominant-negative form of GATA-3 (DN-GATA), which acted also against GATA-2, or transcription factor PU.1, which was recently shown to be the repressor of GATA-2, was introduced into aNotch1-expressing 32D (32D/aNotch1) cells that do not express GATA family proteins other than GATA2. Both DN-GATA and PU.1 reversed the phenotype of 32D/aNotch1 inducing its differentiation when G-CSF was added. Furthermore, enforced expression of HES-1, which is involved in Notch signaling, delayed differentiation of 32D, and again this phenotype was neutralized by DN-GATA. These results indicate that GATA-2 activity is necessary for the Notch signaling in hematopoietic cells.

scholarly journals p63 and p53: Collaborative Partners or Dueling Rivals?

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dana L. Woodstock ◽  
Morgan A. Sammons ◽  
Martin Fischer
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Cell Fate ◽  
Chromatin Structure ◽  
Paradigm Shift ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Tumor Development ◽  
Dominant Negative ◽  
Tumor Suppressor P53 ◽  
Common Goal ◽  
Direct Cell

The tumor suppressor p53 and its oncogenic sibling p63 (ΔNp63) direct opposing fates in tumor development. These paralog proteins are transcription factors that elicit their tumor suppressive and oncogenic capacity through the regulation of both shared and unique target genes. Both proteins predominantly function as activators of transcription, leading to a paradigm shift away from ΔNp63 as a dominant negative to p53 activity. The discovery of p53 and p63 as pioneer transcription factors regulating chromatin structure revealed new insights into how these paralogs can both positively and negatively influence each other to direct cell fate. The previous view of a strict rivalry between the siblings needs to be revisited, as p53 and p63 can also work together toward a common goal.

scholarly journals Single-cell RNA-seq reveals dynamic transcriptome profiling in human early neural differentiation

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhouchun Shang ◽  
Dongsheng Chen ◽  
Quanlei Wang ◽  
Shengpeng Wang ◽  
Qiuting Deng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Cell Fate ◽  
Neural Tube ◽  
Neural Differentiation ◽  
Embryoid Body ◽  
Single Cells ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Cell Subpopulation ◽  
Cellular Interactions ◽  
Neural Lineage

AbstractBackgroundInvestigating cell fate decision and subpopulation specification in the context of the neural lineage is fundamental to understanding neurogenesis and neurodegenerative diseases. The differentiation process of neural-tube-like rosettes in vitro is representative of neural tube structures, which are composed of radially organized, columnar epithelial cells and give rise to functional neural cells. However, the underlying regulatory network of cell fate commitment during early neural differentiation remains elusive.ResultsIn this study, we investigated the genome-wide transcriptome profile of single cells from six consecutive reprogramming and neural differentiation time points and identified cellular subpopulations present at each differentiation stage. Based on the inferred reconstructed trajectory and the characteristics of subpopulations contributing the most towards commitment to the central nervous system (CNS) lineage at each stage during differentiation, we identified putative novel transcription factors in regulating neural differentiation. In addition, we dissected the dynamics of chromatin accessibility at the neural differentiation stages and revealed active c/s-regulatory elements for transcription factors known to have a key role in neural differentiation as well as for those that we suggest are also involved. Further, communication network analysis demonstrated that cellular interactions most frequently occurred among embryoid body (EB) stage and each cell subpopulation possessed a distinctive spectrum of ligands and receptors associated with neural differentiation which could reflect the identity of each subpopulation.ConclusionsOur study provides a comprehensive and integrative study of the transcriptomics and epigenetics of human early neural differentiation, which paves the way for a deeper understanding of the regulatory mechanisms driving the differentiation of the neural lineage.

scholarly journals Probing Dominant Negative Behavior of Glucocorticoid Receptor β through a Hybrid Structural and Biochemical Approach

2018 ◽  
Vol 38 (8) ◽  
pp. e00453-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jungki Min ◽  
Lalith Perera ◽  
Juno M. Krahn ◽  
Christine M. Jewell ◽  
Andrea F. Moon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Glucocorticoid Receptor ◽  
Ligand Binding ◽  
Binding Pocket ◽  
Dominant Negative ◽  
Ru 486 ◽  
Dominant Negative Inhibitor ◽  
Helix 12 ◽  
Binding Energy Analysis ◽  
Biochemical Approach ◽  
Biochemical Analyses

ABSTRACT Glucocorticoid receptor β (GRβ) is associated with glucocorticoid resistance via dominant negative regulation of GRα. To better understand how GRβ functions as a dominant negative inhibitor of GRα at a molecular level, we determined the crystal structure of the ligand binding domain of GRβ complexed with the antagonist RU-486. The structure reveals that GRβ binds RU-486 in the same ligand binding pocket as GRα, and the unique C-terminal amino acids of GRβ are mostly disordered. Binding energy analysis suggests that these C-terminal residues of GRβ do not contribute to RU-486 binding. Intriguingly, the GRβ/RU-486 complex binds corepressor peptide with affinity similar to that of a GRα/RU-486 complex, despite the lack of helix 12. Our biophysical and biochemical analyses reveal that in the presence of RU-486, GRβ is found in a conformation that favors corepressor binding, potentially antagonizing GRα function. This study thus presents an unexpected molecular mechanism by which GRβ could repress transcription.

scholarly journals Human Glucocorticoid Receptor β Binds RU-486 and Is TranscriptionallyActive

2007 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 2266-2282 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura J. Lewis-Tuffin ◽  
Christine M. Jewell ◽  
Rachelle J. Bienstock ◽  
Jennifer B. Collins ◽  
John A. Cidlowski
Keyword(s):  
Confocal Microscopy ◽  
Glucocorticoid Receptor ◽  
Ligand Binding ◽  
Cellular Localization ◽  
Fluorescent Protein ◽  
Yellow Fluorescent Protein ◽  
Dominant Negative ◽  
Orphan Receptor ◽  
Computational Docking ◽  
Ru 486

ABSTRACT Human glucocorticoid receptor (hGR) is expressed as two alternately spliced C-terminal isoforms, α and β. In contrast to the canonical hGRα, hGRβ is a nucleus-localized orphan receptor thought not to bind ligand and not to affect gene transcription other than by acting as a dominant negative to hGRα. Here we used confocal microscopy to examine the cellular localization of transiently expressed fluorescent protein-tagged hGRβ in COS-1 and U-2 OS cells. Surprisingly, yellow fluorescent protein (YFP)-hGRβ was predominantly located in the cytoplasm and translocated to the nucleus following application of the glucocorticoid antagonist RU-486. This effect of RU-486 was confirmed with transiently expressed wild-type hGRβ. Confocal microscopy of coexpressed YFP-hGRβ and cyan fluorescent protein-hGRα in COS-1 cells indicated that the receptors move into the nucleus independently. Using a ligand binding assay, we confirmed that hGRβ bound RU-486 but not the hGRα ligand dexamethasone. Examination of the cellular localization of YFP-hGRβ in response to a series of 57 related compounds indicated that RU-486 is thus far the only identified ligand that interacts with hGRβ. The selective interaction of RU-486 with hGRβ was also supported by molecular modeling and computational docking studies. Interestingly, microarray analysis indicates that hGRβ, expressed in the absence of hGRα, can regulate gene expression and furthermore that occupation of hGRβ with the antagonist RU-486 diminishes that capacity despite the lack of helix 12 in the ligand binding domain.

scholarly journals Cadherins in early neural development

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karolina Punovuori ◽  
Mattias Malaguti ◽  
Sally Lowell
Keyword(s):  
Adhesion Molecules ◽  
Cell Fate ◽  
Neural Development ◽  
Ex Vivo ◽  
Directed Differentiation ◽  
Culture Dish ◽  
Cell Identity ◽  
Cell Fate Decisions ◽  
Neural Tissues ◽  
And Function

AbstractDuring early neural development, changes in signalling inform the expression of transcription factors that in turn instruct changes in cell identity. At the same time, switches in adhesion molecule expression result in cellular rearrangements that define the morphology of the emerging neural tube. It is becoming increasingly clear that these two processes influence each other; adhesion molecules do not simply operate downstream of or in parallel with changes in cell identity but rather actively feed into cell fate decisions. Why are differentiation and adhesion so tightly linked? It is now over 60 years since Conrad Waddington noted the remarkable "Constancy of the Wild Type” (Waddington in Nature 183: 1654–1655, 1959) yet we still do not fully understand the mechanisms that make development so reproducible. Conversely, we do not understand why directed differentiation of cells in a dish is sometimes unpredictable and difficult to control. It has long been suggested that cells make decisions as 'local cooperatives' rather than as individuals (Gurdon in Nature 336: 772–774, 1988; Lander in Cell 144: 955–969, 2011). Given that the cadherin family of adhesion molecules can simultaneously influence morphogenesis and signalling, it is tempting to speculate that they may help coordinate cell fate decisions between neighbouring cells in the embryo to ensure fidelity of patterning, and that the uncoupling of these processes in a culture dish might underlie some of the problems with controlling cell fate decisions ex-vivo. Here we review the expression and function of cadherins during early neural development and discuss how and why they might modulate signalling and differentiation as neural tissues are formed.

scholarly journals Development in the Mammalian Auditory System Depends on Transcription Factors

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (8) ◽  
pp. 4189
Author(s):  
Karen L. Elliott ◽  
Gabriela Pavlínková ◽  
Victor V. Chizhikov ◽  
Ebenezer N. Yamoah ◽  
Bernd Fritzsch
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Cell Fate ◽  
Auditory System ◽  
Hair Cells ◽  
System Development ◽  
Neuronal Cell ◽  
Spiral Ganglion Neuron ◽  
Cochlear Hair Cells ◽  
Cochlear Nuclei ◽  
Bhlh Genes

We review the molecular basis of several transcription factors (Eya1, Sox2), including the three related genes coding basic helix–loop–helix (bHLH; see abbreviations) proteins (Neurog1, Neurod1, Atoh1) during the development of spiral ganglia, cochlear nuclei, and cochlear hair cells. Neuronal development requires Neurog1, followed by its downstream target Neurod1, to cross-regulate Atoh1 expression. In contrast, hair cells and cochlear nuclei critically depend on Atoh1 and require Neurod1 expression for interactions with Atoh1. Upregulation of Atoh1 following Neurod1 loss changes some vestibular neurons’ fate into “hair cells”, highlighting the significant interplay between the bHLH genes. Further work showed that replacing Atoh1 by Neurog1 rescues some hair cells from complete absence observed in Atoh1 null mutants, suggesting that bHLH genes can partially replace one another. The inhibition of Atoh1 by Neurod1 is essential for proper neuronal cell fate, and in the absence of Neurod1, Atoh1 is upregulated, resulting in the formation of “intraganglionic” HCs. Additional genes, such as Eya1/Six1, Sox2, Pax2, Gata3, Fgfr2b, Foxg1, and Lmx1a/b, play a role in the auditory system. Finally, both Lmx1a and Lmx1b genes are essential for the cochlear organ of Corti, spiral ganglion neuron, and cochlear nuclei formation. We integrate the mammalian auditory system development to provide comprehensive insights beyond the limited perception driven by singular investigations of cochlear neurons, cochlear hair cells, and cochlear nuclei. A detailed analysis of gene expression is needed to understand better how upstream regulators facilitate gene interactions and mammalian auditory system development.

scholarly journals New Insights in Glucocorticoid Receptor Signaling—More Than Just a Ligand-Binding Receptor

2017 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karin Scheschowitsch ◽  
Jacqueline Alves Leite ◽  
Jamil Assreuy
Keyword(s):  
Glucocorticoid Receptor ◽  
Ligand Binding ◽  
Receptor Signaling
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document