Maturation promoting factor and cell cycle regulation

Development ◽  
1985 ◽  
Vol 89 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. 271-284
Author(s):  
C. C. Ford

Cell cycles in early amphibian embryos are characterized by the absence of G1 and G2 phases. The simple cycle of S phase and mitosis does show similarities with other systems, particularly in the presence of cytoplasmic components advancing nuclei into DNA synthesis and mitosis. Maturation-promoting factor induces nuclear envelope breakdown and subsequent chromosome condensation. Cytoplasmic factors appear during maturation which are capable of inducing DNA synthesis, and arrest of the nuclear division cycle in metaphase (cytostatic factor). The timing of appearance of these activities is considered and their relationship in integrating DNA synthesis during early cleavage is discussed.

1992 ◽  
Vol 3 (6) ◽  
pp. 687-698 ◽  
Author(s):  
D H Walker ◽  
A A DePaoli-Roach ◽  
J L Maller

Using cytostatic factor metaphase II-arrested extracts as a model system, we show that protein phosphatase 1 is regulated during early embryonic cell cycles in Xenopus. Phosphatase 1 activity peaks during interphase and decreases shortly before the onset of mitosis. A second peak of activity appears in mitosis at about the same time that cdc2 becomes active. If extracts are inhibited in S-phase with aphidicolin, then phosphatase 1 activity remains high. The activity of phosphatase 1 appears to determine the timing of exit from S-phase and entry into M-phase; inhibition of phosphatase 1 by the specific inhibitor, inhibitor 2 (Inh-2), causes premature entry into mitosis, whereas exogenously added phosphatase 1 lengthens the interphase period. Analysis of DNA synthesis in extracts treated with Inh-2, but lacking the A- and B-type cyclins, shows that phosphatase 1 is also required for the process of DNA replication. These data indicate that phosphatase 1 is a component of the signaling pathway that ensures that M-phase is not initiated until DNA synthesis is complete.


1994 ◽  
Vol 107 (11) ◽  
pp. 3005-3013 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Ohsumi ◽  
W. Sawada ◽  
T. Kishimoto

Meiotic cell cycles differ from mitotic cell cycles in that the former lack S-phase in the interphase between meiosis I and meiosis II. To obtain clues for mechanisms involved in the cell cycle regulation unique to meiosis, we have examined changes in chromosomal morphology and H1 kinase activity during a meiotic period from metaphase I (MI) to metaphase II (MII) in Xenopus oocytes. Using populations of oocytes that underwent germinal vesicle breakdown (GVBD) within a 10 minute interval, we found that the kinase activity declined gradually during the 60 minute period after GVBD and then increased steadily during the following 80 minute interval, showing remarkable differences from the rapid drop and biphasic increase of the kinase activity in intermitotic periods (Solomon et al. (1990) Cell 63, 1013–1024; Dasso and Newport (1990) Cell 61, 811–823). We also found that the exit from MI lagged, by more than 30 minutes, behind the time of lowest H1 kinase activity, whereas the two events took place concomitantly at the end of meiosis II and mitosis. Consequently, the H1 kinase activity was already increasing during the first meiotic division. When H1 kinase activation at MII was delayed by a transient inhibition of protein synthesis after GVBD, oocytes were able to support formation of interphase nuclei and DNA replication between the first meiotic division and the MII arrest, indicating that the cell cycle entered S-phase between meiosis I and meiosis II. These results strongly suggest that the machinery required for entering S-phase has been established in maturing oocytes by the end of meiosis I.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


2019 ◽  
Vol 116 (48) ◽  
pp. 23891-23893 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tatiana N. Moiseeva ◽  
Chenao Qian ◽  
Norie Sugitani ◽  
Hatice U. Osmanbeyoglu ◽  
Christopher J. Bakkenist

WEE1 kinase is a key regulator of the G2/M transition. The WEE1 kinase inhibitor AZD1775 (WEE1i) induces origin firing in replicating cells. We show that WEE1i induces CDK1-dependent RIF1 phosphorylation and CDK2- and CDC7-dependent activation of the replicative helicase. WEE1 suppresses CDK1 and CDK2 kinase activities to regulate the G1/S transition after the origin licensing is complete. We identify a role for WEE1 in cell cycle regulation and important effects of AZD1775, which is in clinical trials.


2001 ◽  
Vol 67 (2) ◽  
pp. 782-790 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stéphan Jacquet ◽  
Frédéric Partensky ◽  
Dominique Marie ◽  
Raffaella Casotti ◽  
Daniel Vaulot

ABSTRACT The effect of light on the synchronization of cell cycling was investigated in several strains of the oceanic photosynthetic prokaryote Prochlorococcus using flow cytometry. When exposed to a light-dark (L-D) cycle with an irradiance of 25 μmol of quanta · m−2 s−1, the low-light-adapted strain SS 120 appeared to be better synchronized than the high-light-adapted strain PCC 9511. Submitting L-D-entrained populations to shifts (advances or delays) in the timing of the “light on” signal translated to corresponding shifts in the initiation of the S phase, suggesting that this signal is a key parameter for the synchronization of population cell cycles. Cultures that were shifted from an L-D cycle to continuous irradiance showed persistent diel oscillations of flow-cytometric signals (light scatter and chlorophyll fluorescence) but with significantly reduced amplitudes and a phase shift. Complete darkness arrested most of the cells in the G1 phase of the cell cycle, indicating that light is required to trigger the initiation of DNA replication and cell division. However, some cells also arrested in the S phase, suggesting that cell cycle controls in Prochlorococcus spp. are not as strict as in marine Synechococcus spp. ShiftingProchlorococcus cells from low to high irradiance translated quasi-instantaneously into an increase of cells in both the S and G2 phases of the cell cycle and then into faster growth, whereas the inverse shift induced rapid slowing of the population growth rate. These data suggest a close coupling between irradiance levels and cell cycling in Prochlorococcus spp.


1975 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 455-490
Author(s):  
R.T. Johnson ◽  
A.M. Mullinger

Induction of DNA synthesis in embryonic chick red cells has been examined during the first and second cell cycles after fusion with HeLa cells synchronized in different parts of G1 and S-phase. The data indicate that: (i) the younger the embryonic blood the more rapidly the red cells are induced into DNA synthesis; (ii) the greater the ratio of HeLa to chick nuclei in the heterokaryon, the more rapidly the induction occurs; (iii) DNA synthesis in the chick nucleus can continue after the HeLa nucleus has left S-phase and entered either G2 or mitosis; (iv) the induction potential of late S-phase HeLa is somewhat lower than that of early or mid S-phase cells; (v) less than 10% of the chick DNA is replicated during the first cycle after fusion and only a small proportion (15%) of the chick nuclei approach the 4C value of DNA during the second cycle after fusion; (vi) the newly synthesized DNA is associated either with the condensed regions of the nucleus or with the boundaries between condensed and non-condensed regions; (vii) the chick chromosomes at the first and second mitosis after fusion are in the form of PCC prematurely condensed chromosomes); they are never fully replicated and are often fragmentary; (viii) DNA synthesis in the chick nuclei is accompanied by an influx of protein (both G1 and S-phase protein) from the HeLa component of the heterokaryon.


2016 ◽  
Vol 36 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ajeena Ramanujan ◽  
Swati Tiwari

The ubiquitin (Ub) ligase anaphase promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C) and the tumour suppressor retinoblastoma protein (pRB) play key roles in cell cycle regulation. APC/C is a critical regulator of mitosis and G1-phase of the cell cycle whereas pRB keeps a check on proliferation by inhibiting transition to the S-phase. APC/C and pRB interact with each other via the co-activator of APC/C, FZR1, providing an alternative pathway of regulation of G1 to S transition by pRB using a post-translational mechanism. Both pRB and FZR1 have complex roles and are implicated not only in regulation of cell proliferation but also in differentiation, quiescence, apoptosis, maintenance of chromosomal integrity and metabolism. Both are also targeted by transforming viruses. We discuss recent advances in our understanding of the involvement of APC/C and pRB in cell cycle based decisions and how these insights will be useful for development of anti-cancer and anti-viral drugs.


Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 637-637
Author(s):  
Nicole Baeumer ◽  
Sven Diederichs ◽  
Steffen Koschmieder ◽  
Boris V. Skryabin ◽  
Feng Zhang ◽  
...  

Abstract Cell cycle progression is driven by the kinase activity of cyclin/CDK complexes. Dysregulation of the cell cycle leads to altered cell growth and contributes to tumorigenesis. Recently, we identified p26INCA1 as novel interaction partner of Cyclin A1/CDK2. Here, we characterize the phenotype of Inca1-null mice to uncover the cellular and molecular function of Inca1. Inca1-knockout mice were viable and fertile. FACS analyses revealed that aging mutant animals harbored an increased hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) pool. Bone marrow cells of young mice exhibited enhanced clonogenic replating efficiency in colony formation assays as compared to wildtype mice. Weekly administration of the myeloablative agent 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) led to a significantly shorter life span of Inca1−/ − mice compared to wildtype littermates. The increased 5-FU toxicity might thus be related to a higher number of cycling HSC in Inca1−/ − bone marrow. Analysis of the impact of Inca1 on cell cycle regulation demonstrated that the fraction of Inca1−/ − embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) in S phase was significantly increased. Ectopic INCA1 expression reduced proliferation and colony formation of proliferating cells such as primary bone marrow cells, HeLa, HuTu80 and 32D cell lines. Serum starvation rapidly induced and mitogenic signals inhibited Inca1 expression providing a further link to cell cycle regulation. To identify the molecular mechanism of cell cycle regulation by Inca1, we investigated the influence of Inca1 on the direct inhibition of CDK2. In spleen lysates from Inca1-deficient mice, cellular CDK2 kinase activity towards Histone H1 was significantly induced compared to lysates of wildtype littermates. In in vitro kinase assays, recombinant INCA1 strongly inhibited CDK2 activity. In addition, we hypothesized that other cyclin kinase inhibitors (CKI) could partially compensate in vivo for the loss of Inca1 function. p21cip1/waf1 mRNA and protein expression were induced in Inca1−/ − MEFs compared to wildtype cells hinting at a partial compensation of the loss of Inca1 by induction of p21. Loss of Inca1 combined with p21 knockdown synergistically increased S-phase. These results indicate that Inca1 could be functionally related to p21 and that the rather mild phenotype observed in Inca1−/ − mice and the modest differences in Cdk activity observed in cell lysates lacking Inca1 could be due to compensatory induction of the CKI p21. In summary, loss of Inca1 increased cell proliferation, replating efficiency, S-phase progression, and Cdk2 activity whereas gain of Inca1 suppressed these cell functions. Inca1 expression was induced during cell cycle arrest. We conclude that Inca1 could be a novel cell cycle suppressor regulating the quiescence of HSCs through the inhibition of Cdk2.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document