Biomechanical analysis for the study of muscle contributions to support load carrying

Author(s):  
A Selk Ghafari ◽  
A Meghdari ◽  
G R Vossoughi

The objective of this study was to quantify individual muscle function differences between level walking and backpack load carriage at the same speed by using a muscle-actuated forward dynamics simulation. As experimental investigations have revealed that backpack loads of up to 64 per cent of an individual's body mass have little effect on the sagittal plane gait kinema-tics, further biomechanical analyses are necessary to investigate the contributions of individual muscle coordination strategies to achieve a given motor task by mechanical power generation, absorption, and transference to each body segment. A biomechanical framework consisting of a musculoskeletal model actuated by 18 Hill-type musculotendon actuators per leg and a non-linear suspension model of a backpack equipped with shoulder straps and waist belt was utilized to perform the simulation study. An optimization framework based on minimizing the muscle energy consumption was employed to investigate the muscle load sharing mechanism during simulation of the movements under investigation. Estimated muscle activations were in good agreement with the salient features of the corresponding electromyographic recordings of the major lower extremity muscles. Furthermore, simulated joint kinematics closely tracked experimental quantities with root-mean-squared errors less than one degree. Segmental power analysis for individual muscles was performed to elucidate the muscle's contribution to body support and forward progression in load carriage. Comparing muscle functions during the activities under investigation illustrated the different functional performance of the lower extremity muscles and the capability of the joints and segments to reduce the transmission of force during load carriage.

2005 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 181-188 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sean P. Flanagan ◽  
George J. Salem

In the analysis of human movement, researchers often sum individual joint kinetics to obtain a single measure of lower extremity function. The extent to which these summed measures relate to the mechanical objectives of the task has not been formally validated. The criterion validity of these measures was established with comparisons to the mechanical objective of two multiple-joint tasks. For the Work task 18 participants performed a loaded barbell squat using 4 resistances while instrumented for biomechanical analysis. For the Power they performed 2 predetermined amounts of work at both self-selected and fast speeds. Using inverse dynamics techniques, the peak net joint moment (PM) was calculated bilaterally in the sagittal plane at the ankle, knee, and hip and was summed into a single measure. This measure was correlated with the task objectives using simple linear regression. Similar procedures were used for the average net joint moment (AM), peak (PP), and average (AP) net joint moment power, and the net joint moment impulse (IM) and work (IP). For the Work task all 6 measures were significantly correlated with the task objective, but only AM, PM, and IP had correlation coefficients above 0.90. For the Power task, IM was not significantly correlated with the task objective, and only AP had a correlation coefficient above 0.90. These findings indicate that the validity of summing individual kinetic measures depends on both the measure chosen and the mechanical objective of the task.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. 5318
Author(s):  
Christophe Lecomte ◽  
Anna Lára Ármannsdóttir ◽  
Felix Starker ◽  
Kristin Briem ◽  
Sigurður Brynjólfsson

Energy-storing-and-returning prosthetic feet are frequently recommended for lower limb amputees. Functional performance and stiffness characteristics are evaluated by state-of-the-art biomechanical testing, while it is common practice for design engineers and researchers to use test machines to measure stiffness. The correlation between user-specific biomechanical measures and machine evaluation has not been thoroughly investigated, and mechanical testing for ramps is limited. In this paper, we propose a novel test method to assess prosthetic foot stiffness properties in the sagittal plane. First, biomechanical data were collected on five trans-tibial users using a variable stiffness prosthetic foot on a split-belt treadmill. Gait trials were performed on level ground and on an incline and a decline of 7.5°. The same prosthetic foot was tested on a roll-over test machine for the three terrains. The sagittal ankle moment and angle were compared for the two test methods. The dorsiflexion moment and angle were similar, while more variability was observed in the plantarflexion results. A good correlation was found for level-ground walking, while decline walking showed the largest differences in the results of the maximum angles. The roll-over test machine is a useful tool to speed up design iterations with a set design goal prior to user testing.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 1871
Author(s):  
Xuanzhen Cen ◽  
Zhenghui Lu ◽  
Julien S. Baker ◽  
Bíró István ◽  
Yaodong Gu

Although values of arch stiffness index (ASI) have been used to evaluate arch structure and injury susceptibility, investigations are limited regarding the influence of ASI on biomechanical characteristics during gait termination, which involves a challenging balance transition from walking to standing. This study aimed to explore plantar pressure distribution and lower extremity joint kinematic differences between individuals with both a stiff and flexible arch (SA and FA, respectively) during planned and unplanned gait termination (PGT and UGT, respectively). Following the calculation of ASI, sixty-five asymptomatic male subjects were classified and participated in two types of gait termination tests to acquire kinematic and plantar pressure data. Parameters were compared between SA and FA using a two-way ANOVA during PGT and UGT, respectively. UGT was found to have a larger range of motion on the hip joint in the sagittal plane and the knee joint in the transverse plane when compared with PGT. The differences in the kinematic characteristics of the lower limb joints caused by the difference in arch stiffness are mainly concentrated in the ankle and metatarsophalangeal joints. Plantar pressure data, represented by the maximum pressure, showed significant differences in the forefoot and rearfoot areas. These results suggest that ASI could change freedom of motion of the lower limb joints, and UGT tends to conduct a compensatory adjustment for the lower extremity kinetic chain. An understanding of the biomechanical characteristics of arch structures may provide additional insights into foot function and injury prediction during gait termination.


2019 ◽  
Vol 45 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marina Machado Cid ◽  
Ana Beatriz Oliveira ◽  
Leticia Bergamin Januario ◽  
Julie N. Côté ◽  
Roberta de Fátima Carreira Moreira ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 635-641 ◽  
Author(s):  
MITCHELL L. CORDOVA ◽  
BRADY D. SCOTT ◽  
CHRISTOPHER D. INGERSOLL ◽  
MICHAEL J. LEBLANC

2007 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 214-218 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahyar Salavati ◽  
Mojgan Moghadam ◽  
Ismaeil Ebrahimi ◽  
Amir Massoud Arab

2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 56-63 ◽  
Author(s):  
D.S. Blaise Williams ◽  
Jonathan H. Cole ◽  
Douglas W. Powell

Running during sports and for physical activity often requires changes in velocity through acceleration and deceleration. While it is clear that lower extremity biomechanics vary during these accelerations and decelerations, the work requirements of the individual joints are not well understood. The purpose of this investigation was to measure the sagittal plane mechanical work of the individual lower extremity joints during acceleration, deceleration, and steady-state running. Ten runners were compared during acceleration, deceleration, and steady-state running using three-dimensional kinematics and kinetics measures. Total positive and negative joint work, and relative joint contributions to total work were compared between conditions. Total positive work progressively increased from deceleration to acceleration. This was due to greater ankle joint work during acceleration. While there was no significant change in total negative work during deceleration, there was a greater relative contribution of the knee to total negative work with a subsequent lower relative ankle negative work. Each lower extremity joint exhibits distinct functional roles in acceleration compared with deceleration during level running. Deceleration is dominated by greater contributions of the knee to negative work while acceleration is associated with a greater ankle contribution to positive work.


1997 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 148
Author(s):  
Chin Youb Chung ◽  
Young Min Kim ◽  
In Ho Choi ◽  
Duk Yong Lee ◽  
Hee Joong Kim ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document