Venous Thromboembolism in Cancer Patients Undergoing Major Surgery

2008 ◽  
Vol 15 (12) ◽  
pp. 3567-3578 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicolas H. Osborne ◽  
Thomas W. Wakefield ◽  
Peter K. Henke
2011 ◽  
pp. 191-204
Author(s):  
Alpesh N. Amin ◽  
Steven B. Deitelzweig

Venous thromboembolism (VTE), a common complication in patients with cancer, is associated with increased risk of morbidity, mortality, and recurrent VTE. Risk factors for VTE in cancer patients include the type and stage of cancer, comorbidities, age, major surgery, and active chemotherapy. Evidence-based guidelines for thromboprophylaxis in cancer patients have been published: the National Comprehensive Cancer Network and American Society for Clinical Oncology guidelines recommend thromboprophylaxis for hospitalized cancer patients, while the American College of Chest Physician guidelines recommend thromboprophylaxis for surgical patients with cancer and bedridden cancer patients with an acute medical illness. Guidelines do not generally recommend routine thromboprophylaxis in ambulatory patients during chemotherapy, but there is evidence that some of these patients are at risk of VTE; some may be at higher risk while on active chemotherapy. Approaches are needed to identify those patients most likely to benefit from thromboprophylaxis, and, to this end, a risk assessment model has been developed and validated. Despite the benefits, many at-risk patients do not receive any thromboprophylaxis, or receive prophylaxis that is not compliant with guideline recommendations. Quality improvement initiatives have been developed by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, National Quality Forum, and Joint Commission to encourage closure of the gap between guideline recommendations and clinical practice for prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of VTE in hospitalized patients. Health-care institutions and providers need to take seriously the burden of VTE, improve prophylaxis rates in patients with cancer, and address the need for prophylaxis across the patient continuum.


2011 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 191
Author(s):  
Alpesh N. Amin ◽  
Steven B. Deitelzweig

Venous thromboembolism (VTE), a common complication in patients with cancer, is associated with increased risk of morbidity, mortality, and recurrent VTE. Risk factors for VTE in cancer patients include the type and stage of cancer, comorbidities, age, major surgery, and active chemotherapy. Evidence-based guidelines for thromboprophylaxis in cancer patients have been published: the National Comprehensive Cancer Network and American Society for Clinical Oncology guidelines recommend thromboprophylaxis for hospitalized cancer patients, while the American College of Chest Physician guidelines recommend thromboprophylaxis for surgical patients with cancer and bedridden cancer patients with an acute medical illness. Guidelines do not generally recommend routine thromboprophylaxis in ambulatory patients during chemotherapy, but there is evidence that some of these patients are at risk of VTE; some may be at higher risk while on active chemotherapy. Approaches are needed to identify those patients most likely to benefit from thromboprophylaxis, and, to this end, a risk assessment model has been developed and validated. Despite the benefits, many at-risk patients do not receive any thromboprophylaxis, or receive prophylaxis that is not compliant with guideline recommendations. Quality improvement initiatives have been developed by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, National Quality Forum, and Joint Commission to encourage closure of the gap between guideline recommendations and clinical practice for prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of VTE in hospitalized patients. Health-care institutions and providers need to take seriously the burden of VTE, improve prophylaxis rates in patients with cancer, and address the need for prophylaxis across the patient continuum.


2013 ◽  
Vol 131 (1) ◽  
pp. e1-e5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thierry H. Toledano ◽  
Dimple Kondal ◽  
Susan R. Kahn ◽  
Vicky Tagalakis

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 128-134
Author(s):  
Omar Riyadh Abdullah ◽  
Agnieszka Ignatowicz ◽  
Rania Abdulsalam Mahdi ◽  
Annie M Young

Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE), comprising deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), presents an extra challenge in the management of patients with cancer, given the increase in morbidity and mortality in having both conditions. Cancer patients are well known to have a high risk of VTE; particularly; those who have had major surgery, chemotherapy and/or hormonal therapy. These groups of patients need to understand the risk factors and the prophylactic measures to prevent developing VTE. This review aims to provide an overview of the literature on cancer patients’ understanding of VTE and their experiences of cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT). Method: A scoping review was carried map the literature and explore the types of evidence available. A structured electronic search was conducted in Embase, Scopus and Medline in June 2020. All titles and abstracts from the search were evaluated independently by two reviewers and disagreements were resolved by a third arbitrator. Eligible papers were qualitative studies and reviews of adult patients' experience of cancer-associated thrombosis. Results:  Ten articles met the inclusion criteria, nine primary qualitative studies and one systematic review that explored cancer patients’ experiences of living with CAT. Participants had various cancer types. Most had advanced disease and were receiving palliative care. Four major themes emerged from the data: Lack of meaningful information on CAT, cancer patients unaware of signs and symptoms of VTE, limited awareness of CAT amongst HCPs and acceptability of anticoagulant. Conclusion: All the studies explored patients’ experience of VTE in the cancer context, and all included studies showed that participants had limited information about VTE, VTE risk and VTEs’ signs and symptoms. However, no qualitative studies explored patients' understanding of VTE in prophylactic settings in high-risk cancer patients.


Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 3342-3342
Author(s):  
Aurelien Delluc ◽  
Patrice Crenn ◽  
Emmanuelle Le Moigne ◽  
Francis Couturaud ◽  
Gregoire Le Gal ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 3342 Background: In patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) provoked by major surgery, the risk of recurrence is low during and after the anticoagulation period. Conversely, cancer patients with VTE have a very high risk of VTE recurrence even under anticoagulant therapy. Some cancer patients develop VTE within three months following surgical treatment of their malignancy. It is unknown whether these patients have a low risk of recurrence of VTE, or if they have the high risk of recurrence associated with cancer. Methods: We analyzed data of a single center cohort study conducted at the Brest University Hospital, France. All consecutive cancer patients with pulmonary embolism and/or deep vein thrombosis of the lower limbs diagnosed between January 2000 and July 2009 in our center were followed-up for VTE recurrence. Patients were classified as “surgical” patients if they had major surgery for cancer in the three months before VTE. Probabilities of recurrence of VTE in surgical patients and in non-surgical patients were estimated according to Kaplan-Meier method and were compared by log-rank test. Hazard Ratios (HR) for VTE recurrence and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were obtained using Cox proportional hazard regression models with adjustments on age, sex, past history of VTE, cancer site, and metastases. Results: We followed 220 cancer patients with symptomatic VTE (mean age 69.9 ± 11.0 years, male sex n=127 (57.7%)). Of these patients, 42 (19.1%) had major surgery for cancer three months before the index VTE and 178 (80.9%) were non-surgical cancer patients. Surgical patients were more often men (30/42 (71.4%) vs. 97/178 (54.5%), p=0.05) and had less metastases at baseline (7/42 (16.7%) vs. 61/178 (34.3%), p=0.03) than non-surgical patients. Mean age was not different between surgical and non-surgical patients (70.1±10.5 vs. 69.8±11.2, p=0.90). Most surgical patients discontinued anticoagulation after six months of treatment, whereas non-surgical patients were receiving long term anticoagulation. At two years, 29 patients had a recurrence of VTE (2/44 surgical patients and 27/180 non-surgical patients). The cumulative probability of recurrence of VTE was lower in surgical patients than in non-surgical patients (2.8% (95% CI −2.5 to 8.1) vs. 11.3% (95% CI 5.8 to 16.8) at 6 months (p=0.14), 3.0% (95% CI −2.3 to 8.3) vs. 16.2% (95% CI 9.3 to 23.1) at 1 year (p=0.06), and 9.3% (95% CI −4.0 to 22.6) vs. 27.5% (95% CI 18. To 36.9) at 2 years (p=0.04)). At two years, the adjusted hazard ratio for recurrence of VTE was 0.20 (95% CI 0.05 to 0.91) in surgical patients compared with non-surgical cancer patients. There was a trend for a lower cumulative probability of death in surgical patients than in non-surgical patients after two years of follow-up (40.2% (95% CI 23.0 to 57.4) vs. 57.7% (95% CI 49.5 to 65.9), p=0.06). Conclusion: In this study, patients with cancer who develop VTE after major cancer surgery had a lower risk of recurrence of VTE than non-surgical cancer patients. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 2940-2940
Author(s):  
Christine Klimowicz White ◽  
Jessica Langholtz ◽  
Zackory T. Burns ◽  
Susan Kruse Sullivan ◽  
Kimberly Sallee ◽  
...  

Abstract In current medical practice, duration of hospitalizations and readmission rates have become focal points, often determining hospital reimbursements and acting as a measure of the quality of patient care. Oncology patients and patients undergoing major surgery have an increased risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE), a serious clinical problem with potentially fatal and costly consequences. It is the most common cause of death in oncology patients within the first 30 days post-operatively, and the second most common cause of death in cancer patients after cancer itself. The national guidelines currently recommend thromboprophylaxis for cancer patients undergoing major surgery for at least 7 to 10 days postoperatively with either unfractionated heparin (UFH) or low molecular weight heparin (LMWH). Cancer patients undergoing major abdominopelvic surgery with high-risk features should have extended prophylaxis for 4 weeks. To study this problem, we examined the incidence of VTE in cancer patients after abdominopelvic surgery. The primary study outcome was to define the most common causes of 30-day readmission rates. Secondary outcomes were to determine if VTE prophylaxis was prescribed for this patient population upon discharge, to assess compliance with VTE guidelines, and to agree or disagree with these guidelines. We identified 6949 patients who underwent abdominopelvic surgeries at Pennsylvania Hospital between 2010 and 2012. Patients were excluded if they did not have a proven abdominopelvic malignancy or if the surgery was an outpatient procedure. During hospitalization, 4 patients died and were excluded, resulting in 264 patients for final analysis. Electronic medical records were used to collect patient demographics and disease characteristics. We reviewed inpatient and outpatient records to account for hospital readmissions. The median patient age was 67 years, 48.5% were male, and 42% had metastatic disease. The most common malignancy locations were colorectal (44%) and pancreas (11%). During hospitalization, 99% (262/264) received perioperative anticoagulation for a median of 5.5 days. Upon discharge, 14 patients (5%) received anticoagulation with LMWH or Coumadin, but only 2 received it primarily for VTE prevention. Patients were also discharged on aspirin and/or clopidogrel (Table 1). Within 30 days of discharge, 35 patients (13%) were readmitted to hospital after a median of 7 days. Fourteen patients were lost to follow up. Reasons for readmission were abdominal symptoms (11), post-operative complications or surgical problems (11), infectious causes (8), cardiopulmonary symptoms (6), and electrolyte disturbances (2). Three patients were readmitted with multiple presenting symptoms, and 2 had planned surgeries. Two patients were readmitted with a VTE, but 1 VTE was previously known and excluded. The remaining patient was readmitted 4 days post-discharge for chest pain, later found to be a symptomatic pulmonary embolism. As current guidelines recommend extended 4-week thromboprophylaxis in oncology patients after major abdominopelvic surgery, we anticipated that VTE as cause of 30-day readmission would be much more common. In our study, 95% were not discharged from the hospital on anticoagulation, which shows that the guidelines are not routinely followed in this surgical setting. Only 1 patient, not discharged on anticoagulation, was readmitted within 30 days for symptomatic VTE, indicating that the incidence of symptomatic VTE in post-operative oncology patients may not be as high as previously suggested. Furthermore, these recommendations are primarily based on decreased incidence of asymptomatic VTE, despite a lack of clear evidence proving a benefit to the patient in reducing asymptomatic VTE and limited data assessing this recommendation for those with symptomatic VTE. Extended anticoagulation may also lead to increased costs and potential for bleeding. Due to the low incidence of symptomatic VTE in our findings, we recommend that further multicenter studies will need to be conducted to better quantify the need for extended VTE prophylaxis in post-operative patients with abdominopelvic malignancies. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (34) ◽  
pp. 5490-5505 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gary H. Lyman ◽  
Alok A. Khorana ◽  
Anna Falanga ◽  
Daniel Clarke-Pearson ◽  
Christopher Flowers ◽  
...  

Purpose To develop guideline recommendations for the use of anticoagulation in the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with cancer. Methods A comprehensive systematic review of the medical literature on the prevention and treatment of VTE in cancer patients was conducted and reviewed by a panel of content and methodology experts. Following discussion of the results, the panel drafted recommendations for the use of anticoagulation in patients with malignant disease. Results The results of randomized controlled trials of primary and secondary VTE medical prophylaxis, surgical prophylaxis, VTE treatment, and the impact of anticoagulation on survival of patients with cancer were reviewed. Recommendations were developed on the prevention of VTE in hospitalized, ambulatory, and surgical cancer patients as well as patients with established VTE, and for use of anticoagulants in cancer patients without VTE to improve survival. Conclusion Recommendations of the American Society of Clinical Oncology VTE Guideline Panel include (1) all hospitalized cancer patients should be considered for VTE prophylaxis with anticoagulants in the absence of bleeding or other contraindications; (2) routine prophylaxis of ambulatory cancer patients with anticoagulation is not recommended, with the exception of patients receiving thalidomide or lenalidomide; (3) patients undergoing major surgery for malignant disease should be considered for pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis; (4) low molecular weight heparin represents the preferred agent for both the initial and continuing treatment of cancer patients with established VTE; and (5) the impact of anticoagulants on cancer patient survival requires additional study and cannot be recommended at present.


Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 1767-1767
Author(s):  
Beng H. Chong ◽  
Ajay K. Kakkar ◽  
Victor F. Tapson ◽  
Gordon Fitzgerald ◽  
Frederick A. Anderson ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Patients with previous or current cancer have an increased risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, little data is available on physician’s practices for providing VTE prophylaxis to these patients. The aim of this analysis of the International Medical Prevention Registry on Venous Thromboembolism (IMPROVE) was to characterize VTE prophylaxis practices in acutely ill hospitalized medical patients who had previous cancer or currently active cancer. Methods Patient recruitment began in July 2002. Patients ≥18 years old and hospitalized for ≥3 days with an acute medical illness are enrolled consecutively. Exclusion criteria are: therapeutic antithrombotic agents or thrombolytics at admission, major surgery or trauma during 3 months prior to admission, and VTE treatment within 24 hours of admission. Results Data were from 4315 patients enrolled up to 30 June 2004 in 37 hospitals in 11 countries. 578 (13%) patients had currently active cancer (6% as the primary admission diagnosis). Patients with current cancer, previous cancer only, and no cancer were: 40%, 54% and 51% female, median (IQR) ages 72 (60–79), 77 (64–82) and 66 (47–80) years, median length of hospital stay 9 (5–18), 8 (5–12) and 8 (5–14) days, median duration of immobility 8 (5–19), 5 (4–11) and 6 (4–14) days (including immobility immediately prior to hospital admission). The percentages of patients with current or no cancer who received any pharmacologic prophylaxis were similar (see Table 1). However, aspirin was less likely to be prescribed, and intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) more likely to be used in patients with current cancer than in those without cancer. Patients with previous cancer were more likely to receive pharmacologic prophylaxis, with increased use of unfractionated heparin (UFH) and aspirin, compared with patients without cancer. Conclusions Despite acutely ill medical patients with previous or current cancer having a higher risk for VTE, less than half received VTE prophylaxis, reflecting poor awareness of the benefits of prophylaxis. Physician’s perceptions of bleeding risks in cancer patients may influence prophylaxis practices; patients with current cancer were less likely to receive aspirin, but more likely to receive IPC, than patients without cancer. However, patients with previous cancer were more likely to receive pharmacologic prophylaxis than those without cancer, reflecting recognition by some physicians that these patients have an increased risk for VTE. Table 1. VTE prophylaxis in acutely ill medical patients with current, previous or no cancer VTE prophylaxis Current cancer (%) n=578 Previous cancer (%) n=266 No cancer (%) n=3471 *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001 (compared with patients with no cancer); †Some patients received >1 type of prophylaxis; ‡Without concomitant pharmacologic prophylaxis; ES, elastic stockings LMWH 24 24 23 UFH 10 21*** 13 Aspirin 1** 9** 4 Warfarin 0 1 1 Any pharmacologic prophylaxis† 34 46** 37 IPC‡ 7* 5 4 ES‡ 2 3 2


Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 5253-5253
Author(s):  
Tierry Haim Toledano ◽  
Dimple Kondal ◽  
Susan R. Kahn ◽  
Vicky Tagalakis

Abstract Abstract 5253 Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE), encompassing deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), is common in cancer patients and surgery is an important risk factor. The timing of post-operative VTE in cancer patients is uncertain. Objectives: We used the administrative health claims (RAMQ) and hospital discharge (MED ECHO) databases of Quebec, Canada to describe the occurrence of post-operative VTE in cancer patients and to explore anticoagulant use following hospital discharge. Methods: Using a previously defined cohort of individuals with a discharge diagnosis of VTE between January 1, 1994 and December 31, 2004 in MED ECHO which systematically records information on all hospital admissions in the province of Quebec, we identified patients with a cancer diagnosis in the 12 months preceding the VTE and who had major surgery in the 3 months prior to the VTE. Discharge diagnoses were defined according to the 9th edition International Classification of Diseases codes and surgical procedures according to the Canadian classification of diagnostic, therapeutic, and surgical procedures. Results: In all, 2706 patients with VTE had a cancer diagnosis and underwent major surgery in the 3 months preceding the VTE. The mean age was 65.9 years (SD=12.6) and 54% were female. The most common cancer was gastrointestinal (38%), and general surgery was the most frequent procedure (48%). The mean hospital stay was 29.8 days (SD=35.3). The mean time to VTE was 34.8 days (SD=68.3). In all, 34% of VTE events occurred after discharge. Among patients with post-discharge VTE (n=917), 4% had an out-patient anticoagulant prescription at discharge. Conclusions: Post-operative VTE in cancer patients often occurs after hospital discharge. This suggests that the risk of VTE extends beyond the immediate postoperative period. Prospective studies are needed to determine the effectiveness and safety of thromboprophylaxis beyond discharge in cancer patients undergoing surgery. Disclosures: Tagalakis: Sanofi Aventis: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding.


2012 ◽  
Vol 03 (03) ◽  
pp. 121-125
Author(s):  
I. Pabinger ◽  
C. Ay

SummaryCancer is a major and independent risk factor of venous thromboembolism (VTE). In clinical practice, a high number of VTE events occurs in patients with cancer, and treatment of cancerassociated VTE differs in several aspects from treatment of VTE in the general population. However, treatment in cancer patients remains a major challenge, as the risk of recurrence of VTE as well as the risk of major bleeding during anticoagulation is substantially higher in patients with cancer than in those without cancer. In several clinical trials, different anticoagulants and regimens have been investigated for treatment of acute VTE and secondary prophylaxis in cancer patients to prevent recurrence. Based on the results of these trials, anticoagulant therapy with low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWH) has become the treatment of choice in cancer patients with acute VTE in the initial period and for extended and long-term anticoagulation for 3-6 months. New oral anticoagulants directly inhibiting thrombin or factor Xa, have been developed in the past decade and studied in large phase III clinical trials. Results from currently completed trials are promising and indicate their potential use for treatment of VTE. However, the role of the new oral thrombin and factor Xa inhibitors for VTE treatment in cancer patients still has to be clarified in further studies specifically focusing on cancer-associated VTE. This brief review will summarize the current strategies of initial and long-term VTE treatment in patients with cancer and discuss the potential use of the new oral anticoagulants.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document