Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder presenting as epistaxis

2004 ◽  
Vol 118 (11) ◽  
pp. 906-908 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan D. Clarke ◽  
David Stock ◽  
Vijay Singh

An unusual case of epistaxis resulting from post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder is described.A 30-year-old woman who had undergone renal transplantation 12 years previously presented with profuse, posterior, unilateral epistaxis. The initial findings, workup and treatment are presented. A post-nasal space (PNS) mass was detected and biopsy showed this to be an Epstein-Barrvirus-positive polymorphous B-cell post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder. Computed tomography findings showed a polypoid lesion protruding from the sphenoethmoidal recess and filling the left PNS.Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder is well known to involve tonsil tissue. Commonly, this is the first presentation of the disease in children. However, until now post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder has not been described in the PNS or nasal cavity presenting as epistaxis. We conclude that all transplant patients presenting with epistaxis should be followed up for an accurate examination of the PNS and nasal cavity after the acute episode.

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 37-37
Author(s):  
Mobeen Zaka Haider ◽  
Muhammad Taqi ◽  
Hasan Mahmood Mirza ◽  
Zarlakhta Zamani ◽  
Hafsa Shahid ◽  
...  

Background: Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is a B-cell proliferation disorder that results from disruption in the physiological mechanisms for proliferation in an immunocompromised host after a solid organ transplant. Our study aims to review the demographic characteristics and clinical outcomes after transplantation. We also aim to study the role of immunosuppression induction therapy, the effect of PTLD on survival, and the effective chemotherapy used for B-cell disorders leading to improved survival. Methods: Following the PRISMA guideline, we performed a comprehensive literature search on PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and clinicaltrials.gov from the past decade on May 04, 2020. We used the MeSH terms of organ transplantation and lymphoproliferative disorders. 1741 articles were screened. We excluded all case reports, case series, pre-clinical trials, review articles, and meta-analysis and included three cohort studies and one prospective multicentric study. We extracted the data for baseline characteristics, the reason for transplantation, recipient & donor EBV status, immunosuppression used, type & stage of PTLD, organ system involved, duration between transplant and PTLD diagnosis, treatment, response to therapy, adverse effects of therapy and mortality. Results: We studied 9617 patients in the included four studies, out of which 499 patients developed PTLD. Data in these studies was collected over the last 20-26 years. Median follow-up of patients since transplant was 3-9 years (average 7.5y). Table 1 The age of the patients ranged from 3-18 years with a male: female gender ratio of 48:52% and around 50% of the patients were seronegative to EBV pretransplant. The following drugs were used for immunosuppression: cyclosporin, tacrolimus, azathioprine, mycophenolate, interleukin 2 receptor antagonist (basiliximab), corticosteroids, anti-thymocyte globulins(ATG). Kindel et al. narrated that the development of eosinophilic oesophagitis may be a marker for the development of PTLD.Gajarski et al. concluded that Post-transplant Immunosuppressive induction therapy with cytolytic drugs (e.g OKT3 monoclonal antibody, ATG, thymoglobulin Basiliximab and daclizumab) , lowers the rate of PTLD, graft rejections, and early infections in post-transplant patients as compared patients who did not receive induction therapy . This depends upon the type of induction e.g OKT3 monoclonal antibody was associated with increased PTLDs and graft rejection, while Thymoglobulin/IL-2R antagonists demonstrated to decrease both the outcomes. Claire et al. described that overall mortality is decreasing due to the ongoing better understanding of pathophysiology and treatment options related to solid organ transplant. The mortality of the post-transplant congenital heart disease group was higher as compared to the cardiomyopathy group due to high comorbidities and surgical complications. The study by Christopher et al. showed that EBV seronegativity before transplant is associated with an increased risk of PTLD. PTLD is associated with lower survival rates as compared to non-PTLD groups. Conclusion: Our review illustrates that pretransplant seronegativity, OKT3 monoclonal antibody, and the development of eosinophilic esophagitis during the immunosuppressive regime increase the risk of PTLD. This study demonstrates that with a better understanding of PTLD and tumor behavior, the all-cause mortality rates are falling significantly. PTLD is one of the leading causes of mortality in post-transplant patients. However, the immunosuppressive induction therapy, absence of eosinophilic esophagitis, thymoglobulin/IL-2R antagonists improve survival and outcomes in the post-transplant patient in terms of graft rejection, graft failure, and development of PTLD. Disclosures Anwer: Incyte, Seattle Genetics, Acetylon Pharmaceuticals, AbbVie Pharma, Astellas Pharma, Celegene, Millennium Pharmaceuticals.: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.


Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 4500-4500
Author(s):  
Hillary S Maitland ◽  
George Stukenborg ◽  
Michael E. Williams

Abstract Abstract 4500 Background: Post Transplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder (PTLD) is a rare but potentially fatal complication occurring after solid organ transplant. PTLD is divided pathologically into three subgroups: early lesions, polymorphic PTLD, and monomorphic PTLD. The severity of these complications ranges from reactive lymphoid hyperplasia to aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma and Hodgkin-like lymphoma. Most PTLD are of B cell lineage associated with infection or reactivation of Epstein Barr virus (EBV). Post-transplant patients on immunosuppressive therapy may lack sufficient cytotoxic T cells to clear EBV-infected B cells, allowing unchecked polyclonal B cell proliferation and infection of other cells with EBV. Immunosuppression with cyclosporine and tacrolimus has been associated with a higher risk for development of PTLD. This study examines the relationship between tacrolimus and PTLD among solid-organ transplant patients. Methods: Differences in time to PTLD between patients with and without exposure to tacrolimus were assessed using a retrospective, case-control design. University of Virginia Health System registry records were searched to identify all patients in the post- solid organ transplant population diagnosed with malignancy in the years 1998–2009. Bone marrow transplant patients were excluded. Following IRB approval, data was collected on the type of transplant, immunosuppressive regimen, time from transplant to development of PTLD, and lymphoma treatment; from electronic charts and pathology reports were reviewed. Results: A total of 2841 patients with solid organ transplants were identified, including1486 patients who received tacrolimus for immunosuppression. There were 26 cases of PTLD: 19 with exposure to tacrolimus (1.3%), and 8 without exposure (0.6%). The mean time to PTLD was 2.52 years (SD = 0.65) in the tacrolimus group, and was 6.75 years (SD = 1.80) among those not exposed. This difference in time to event was stat istically significant (Log-Rank = 5.347, p = .0208). Conclusion: In our population of post solid organ transplant patients with PTLD, exposure to tacrolimus was associated with significantly shorter time to development. Prospective studies are needed to better elucidate the relationship between type of immunosuppression and development of PTLD. These results suggest that immunosuppressive regimens using tacrolimus may be associated with increased risk of developing PTLD. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (Supplement_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
George Kurian ◽  
Gauri Shankar Jagadesh ◽  
Sandeep Sreedharan ◽  
Zachariah Paul ◽  
Anil Mathew ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and Aims Cancer is now increasingly recognized as a major cause of death among patients especially after kidney transplantation. Malignancy represent a major burden in transplantation medicine. The Incidence is about 12 fold higher for PTLD and 3.5 fold higher for non-cutaneous malignancy compare to age-matched population. The increased risk is multifactorial and attributed to oncogenic viruses, immunosuppression and altered T cell immunity. In the era of longer graft survival and with the introduction of more potent immunosuppressive medication, malignancy represents a major burden. The incidence of malignancy after renal transplantation is 3 to 5 times higher. Incidence is higher in transplant patients even when compared to patients on hemodialysis. Aim: We attempted to assess the incidence of post-transplant malignancies in patients who underwent renal transplantation at our centre, along with studying the presentation, type and other factors affecting their development. Method We analysed data retrospectively from 626patients who underwent renal transplantation atour centre from January 2003 to September 2018.Pre transplant history, post transplant course including duration on hemodialysis, immunosuppression details and duration till diagnosis of malignancies were collected. Details regarding type of malignancy, histopathology, staging and treatment given and outcome were collected. Results Number of transplant recipient-626. The total number of patients with malignancy is 12. Incidence of malignancy posttransplant is 1.9%.Male-7 and female-6.One patient was detected with 2 malignanciesduring her post transplant period. The types of malignancies encountered were Conclusion The incidence of malignancy – 1.9%.Probable reason for decreased incidence of malignancy is the decreased immunosuppression needed by South Asian people. The most common malignancy was solid organ tumour; tongue being the most common organ. Most common histological variant is squamous cell carcinoma.Non-Hodgkin is more common than Hodgkin. Incidence of malignancy is low. Decision regarding cancer screening should be made on individual basis.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document