Vaginal birth after Caesarean section: what information should women be given?

Clinical Risk ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 127-130 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leroy Edozien
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Vaginal Delivery ◽  
Unmet Need ◽  
Informed Choice ◽  
Subsequent Pregnancy ◽  
Vaginal Birth ◽  
Sufficient Information ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Random Allocation ◽  
Vaginal Birth After Caesarean

With rising Caesarean section (CS) rates, more women are having to consider the choice between an elective CS and a vaginal delivery (VBAC) in their subsequent pregnancy. This paper argues that there is an unmet need for clinicians to provide sufficient information to women in this position, so that the woman's choice can be an informed one. Consent should be evidence-based, but there are currently no published random-allocation studies comparing VBAC with elective repeat CS. However the available evidence could be better used by clinicians to facilitate informed choice.

scholarly journals Vaginal birth after caesarean section: why and how?

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (12) ◽  
pp. 5554
Author(s):  
Vidyadhar B. Bangal ◽  
Satyajit Gavhane ◽  
Vishesha Yadav ◽  
Kunal Aher ◽  
Dhruval Bhavsar
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Vaginal Delivery ◽  
Caesarean Section Rate ◽  
Mode Of Delivery ◽  
Vaginal Birth ◽  
Maternal Complications ◽  
History Of ◽  
Spontaneous Onset ◽  
Vaginal Birth After Caesarean

Background: With the significant rise in the incidence of primary caesarean section(CS) for various indications, an increasing proportion of the pregnant women coming for antenatal care, report with a history of a previous CS. This necessitates definite need to bring down the caesarean section rate, either by judicious selection of cases for primary caesarean section or by attempting vaginal delivery, following previous caesarean section (VBAC).Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted to find out the success of VBAC and the common predictive factors leading to successful VBAC. A total of 136 pregnant women with full term pregnancy, having history of previous one lower segment caesarean section and without any other medical and obstetrical complication were enrolled in the study.Results: Majority of the women (95.59%) had spontaneous onset of labor. The success of VBAC was 75 percent. The commonest maternal complications were fever (7.35%), scar dehiscence (3.68%), PPH (1.47%) and wound infection (2.21%).There was significantly higher number of women who had history of previous successful VBAC, had vaginal delivery (91.67%; p=0.038).It was observed that the rate of vaginal delivery was significantly high in women with Bishop’s score between 10 to 13 (94.64%) compared to 6 to 9 (61.25%) (p<0.001).The baby weight determined by ultrasound scan was significantly associated with mode of delivery (p=0.049).Conclusions: Vaginal Birth After Caesarean section is relatively safe, provided it is conducted in carefully selected cases, under constant supervision. Spontaneous onset of labour, good Bishops score and average baby weight were good predictors of successful VBAC.

scholarly journals VAGINAL BIRTH AFTER CAESAREAN SECTION;

2013 ◽  
Vol 20 (05) ◽  
pp. 759-764
Author(s):  
SANA ZAHIRUDDIN ◽  
SUMERA RAUF QURESHI ◽  
UMER FAROOQ
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Vaginal Delivery ◽  
Breech Presentation ◽  
Vaginal Birth ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Study Results ◽  
Previous Cesarean ◽  
Vaginal Birth After Caesarean

Background: Cesarean section is the commonest obstetrical procedure, associated with increase in maternal morbidity,the cesarean section rate is steadily on the rise in our country which can give rise to a number of complications. Objective: To determinethe factors associated with successful vaginal delivery after previous cesarean section. Study Design: Cross sectional study. Period:May 2009 to October 2009. Setting: Liaquat university hospital, Hyderabad. Material and Methods: a total of 96 women which fulfilledthe selection criteria were included in the study. Results: The women included in the study had a mean age of+SD(range),29.94+4.41successful vaginal birth was observed in 57(59.5%) women and 39(40.6%) had an emergency repeat cesareandelivery. The factors favoring successful vaginal delivery were history of previous vaginal delivery and previous cesarean due to fetaldistress or breech presentation, and patients having cesarean due to non progress of labor and no prior vaginal delivery were less likely tohave a successful vaginal birth after having previous cesarean delivery. Conclusions: vaginal birth after caesarean section can berecommended in patients having prior vaginal delivery and previous caesarean due to fetal distress and breech presentation.

scholarly journals The Outcome of Vaginal Birth After Caesarean Section (VBAC): A Descriptive Study

2013 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 14-17
Author(s):  
R Rahman ◽  
NN Khanam ◽  
N Islam ◽  
KF Begum ◽  
HH Pervin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Vaginal Delivery ◽  
Post Partum ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Breech Presentation ◽  
Vaginal Birth ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Lower Segment Cesarean Section ◽  
Medicine Today ◽  
Vaginal Birth After Caesarean

The study, conducted in the tertiary care hospital of Dhaka Bangladesh, describes the outcome of vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC) in women with a previous caesarean. A prospective study was carried out from 1st January 2007 to 31st December, 2007 on 126 women with one prior lower segment cesarean section (LSCS) for a nonrecurrent cause. All unbooked women and those with estimated fetal weight more than 3.5 kg, breech presentation, history of postoperative wound infection after previous LSCS, anemia (Hb < 10 gm%), pregnancy induced hypertension, diabetes, heart disease, renal disease, cephalopevic disproportion abnormal presentation and placenta praevia were excluded from the study. An informed consent was taken for allowing a trial of vaginal delivery. Spontaneous onset of labor was awaited up to 41 weeks. Induction of labor was considered only in highly selected cases. Labor was constantly supervised by competent staff and meticulously monitored by cardiotocography (CTG). Out of the 126 women enrolled for the study, 26 had to leave the station leaving a total of 100 patients; 72 patients underwent elective repeat C/S, 28 patients (28%) of these underwent trial of labour, among them 15 had successful vaginal delivery (53.57) but 13 patients failed the attempt and had to undergo emergency caesarean section. To assist in the 2nd stage of labour, 6 had ventouse application. In total 85 cases needed repeat caesarean section. Among the cases there was one case of scar dehiscence (6.6%), one case of cervical tear (6.6%), two cases of manual removal of placenta (13.3%), one case of post partum hemorrhage (6.6) and one case of puerperal pyrexia (6.6).Perinatal morbidity was comparable with the elective repeat C/S group. VBAC should be considered in cases of previous one cesarean delivery for nonrecurrent indication. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/medtoday.v25i1.15902 Medicine Today 2013 Vol.25(1): 14-17

scholarly journals Pregnancy Outcome in Women with One Previous Caesarean Delivery - A Prospective Longitudinal Study in a Peripheral Medical College of West Bengal

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (21) ◽  
pp. 1608-1613
Author(s):  
Saheli Chandra ◽  
Anjan Dasgupta ◽  
Pradip Kumar Saha ◽  
Kamal Kumar Dash ◽  
Abirbhab Pal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Vaginal Delivery ◽  
Caesarean Delivery ◽  
West Bengal ◽  
Vaginal Birth ◽  
Safe Procedure ◽  
Prospective Longitudinal Study ◽  
Medical College ◽  
Prospective Longitudinal ◽  
Vaginal Birth After Caesarean

BACKGROUND Pregnancy with one prior Caesarean section (CS) constitutes a high-risk group with associated medical and legal implications. The dictum ‘once a Caesarean always a Caesarean’ has now judiciously been replaced with ‘once a Caesarean, trial of labour after selection’ because low transverse uterine incision has much lesser chance of scar rupture. Though vaginal birth after Caesarean (VBAC) or trial of scar (TOS) brings a significant change in modern obstetric practice in terms of lower maternal and perinatal morbidities, apprehension of accidental scar rupture during trial of labour with its undesirable consequences still prevents a good number of obstetricians adopting this process. The purpose of the study was to determine the outcome of pregnancy in relation to mode of delivery, i.e., either elective repeat Caesarean section (ERCS) or vaginal birth after Caesarean (VBAC) with maternal and perinatal complications in each mode. METHODS A hospital based prospective, longitudinal, and observational study of 300 pregnant women with previous one Caesarean delivery attended labour emergency or out-patient department (OPD) at Midnapore Medical College of West Bengal, was carried out, approved by the institutional ethical committee. Gestational age < 37 weeks and > 42 weeks and h\o previous uterine surgery like myomectomy, hysterotomy, classical CS were excluded from the study. Data collected was analysed using statistical package for the social sciences (SPSS) software version 20. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse the continuous and categorical data and expressed in the form of mean and percentage whereas proportions were analysed using chi-square test. A P - value ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS Out of 300 pregnancies, 140 subjects were given trial of labour (TOL). Of which 89 subjects (63.6 %) had successful VBAC and 51 subjects (36.4 %) had repeat Caesarean sections. Among 211 subjects of repeat Caesarean section, 53 subjects (25.12 %) had indicated for scar tenderness and 73 subjects (34.59 %) had elective repeat Caesarean section (ERCS) due to protracted or arrested cervical dilatation. Those having previous vaginal delivery (VD), had more incidences of VBAC in present pregnancy than those who had no previous VD (P ≤ 0.005); Maternal morbidity (33.65 % ERCS versus 10.11 % VD group, P ≤ 0.05) and neonatal morbidity (12.3 % ERCS versus 2.46% VD group, P ≤ 0.05) was significantly higher in ERCS group. CONCLUSIONS Trial of labour (TOL) should be given in well-equipped hospital. In carefully selected cases, it is a safe procedure and often rewarding, thus incidence of repeat CS can be reduced. Those who had a history of vaginal delivery, VBAC often successful. KEYWORDS VBAC, Trial of Scar, Elective Repeat Caesarean Section, Trial of Labour

scholarly journals Assessing the pros and cons of vaginal birth after caesarean relative to elective repeat caesarean section

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 1350
Author(s):  
Sangeeta G. Prasad ◽  
Preeti Malhotra
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Vaginal Delivery ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Fetal Distress ◽  
Vaginal Birth ◽  
Maternal Complications ◽  
Neonatal Complications ◽  
Trial Of Labor ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Vaginal Birth After Caesarean

Background: Recent years have witnessed a rise in rate of primary caesarean section (CS). No. of women reporting with a previous CS scar is also increasing. Judicious trial of labor in such patients can prevent repeat caesarean section. Aim of this study was to assessing the safety and success rate of vaginal birth after caesarean (VBAC) in selected cases of patients who have undergone previous lower segment CS (LSCS) is the main aim of this study.Methods: In this prospective observational study carried out in a tertiary care teaching hospital over a period of 1 year. 375 pregnant women with a history of one previous LSCS for non-recurrent indications were enrolled. The statistical technique of t-test was administered for relative comparison with respect to maternal and neonatal complications across the two groups, i.e. repeat LSCS and vaginal delivery.Results: Out of 375 patients 187 patients (49.9%) underwent elective LSCS for recurrent indication and for non-recurrent indication associated with some complicating factor. Trial of labor in 188 (50.10%) was given out of which 59.3% had spontaneous vaginal delivery,7.20% had instrumental delivery and 33.50% landed into emergency CS. Commonest cause of Em. LSCS being Fetal distress. As regards maternal complications, no statistically significant difference was found between the Repeat LSCS and Vaginal delivery groups (t = 0.779, p > 0.05). On similar lines, there was no statistically significant difference across both groups as regards neonatal complications (t = 0.632, p > 0.05).Conclusions: Taking into account the increased trend of primary CS, trial of VBAC in selected cases is very important. It can be concluded that VBAC has chances of success in cases with previous one LSCS but it must be carefully investigated and monitored.

scholarly journals VAGINAL BIRTH AFTER CAESAREAN SECTION

2010 ◽  
Vol 17 (04) ◽  
pp. 665-669
Author(s):  
SUNBAL KASHIF ◽  
MALAHAT MANSOOR ◽  
RUBINA TARIQ ◽  
Tayyaba Tahira
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Vaginal Delivery ◽  
Lower Abdominal Pain ◽  
Cardiac Activity ◽  
Fetal Distress ◽  
Vaginal Birth ◽  
Bishop Score ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Vaginal Birth After Caesarean

Introduction: Vaginal birth after caesarean section is currently the preferred method of delivery for pregnant women who had previous one lower segment caesarean section. This common practice warrants some reconsideration in light of recent clinical data on the risks associated with VBAC. Objectives: To evaluate conditions which can achieve successful vaginal birth after one caesarean section. Study Design: Cross-sectional analytic study. Setting: Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Unit-I, Services Hospital, Lahore. Duration of Study with Dates: Study was carried out over a period of six months from 08-06-2006 to 07-12-2006. Subjects and Methods: One hundred pregnant women meeting inclusion criteria were included. During trial of labour patients were closely monitored by vital signs, fetal cardiac activity, lower abdominal pain and tenderness, fetal distress, vaginal bleeding and loss of presenting part. Results: Mean age of the patients was 34.27 + 6.45. According to distribution of cases by parity, maximum number i.e 64 (64.0%) was P 3-6. 79 patients (79.0%) had prior vaginal delivery. Maximum 41.0% patients were due to fetal distress while in 28% indication for previous caesarean were breech presentation. In 71% patient membranes were intact while 29.0% patients presented with per vaginal leaking. 51.0% had dilatation between 3-4cm. VBAC was more successful in patients 58.0% with favourable Bishop score. Conclusions: BMI <20, prior vaginal delivery, non-recurrent indication for previous caesarean, spontaneous onset of labour, cervical dilatation or favourable Bishop score, weight of baby < 3.5kg predict an individual’s likelihood of successful VBAC.

scholarly journals Prediction of successful vaginal birth after caesarean section based on Flamm and Geiger scoring system a prospective observational study

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (10) ◽  
pp. 3998
Author(s):  
Rajshree Sahu ◽  
Naimaa Chaudhary ◽  
Asha Sharma
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Observational Study ◽  
Vaginal Delivery ◽  
Scoring System ◽  
Prospective Observational Study ◽  
Emergency Caesarean Section ◽  
Vaginal Birth ◽  
New Delhi ◽  
Emergency Caesarean ◽  
Vaginal Birth After Caesarean

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the adequacy of Flamm and Geiger scoring system in prediction of successful vaginal birth after caesarean section.Methods: A prospective observational study was carried out on 75 pregnant women with previous one caesarean section in department of obstetrics and Gynecology, St Stephen’s hospital, New Delhi over a period of one year.Results: In the present study, out of 75 patients, 40% patients had successful VBAC and 60% patients had emergency LSCS. Among successful VBAC 70% patients had spontaneous vaginal delivery, while 23.3% patients had vacuum assisted and 6.7% had forceps assisted vaginal delivery. Most of the patients with total Flamm and Geiger score < 3 at the time of admission had emergency caesarean section while most of the patients with score >4 had successful VBAC. There were 53.3%, 75%, 85.7% and 100% probabilities of Successful VBAC with total score 4,5,6 and >8 respectively.  Mean score for successful VBAC was 5±1.66and for emergency caesarean was 2.97±0.83.Conclusions: As total Flamm and Geiger score increases, a chance of successful VBAC increases. Application of Flamm and Geiger scoring gives fare judgment of successful vaginal birth in TOLAC and reduces the rate of failed trial leading to emergency caesarean section, thus improving outcome in a trial of labor.

Evidence-based vaginal birth after Caesarean section

2005 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 117-130 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeanne-Marie Guise ◽  
Jason Hashima ◽  
Patricia Osterweil
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Vaginal Birth ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Vaginal Birth After Caesarean
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document