scholarly journals Estrus synchronization in microminipig using estradiol dipropionate and prostaglandin F2α

2016 ◽  
Vol 62 (4) ◽  
pp. 373-378 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michiko NOGUCHI ◽  
Tomonobu IKEDO ◽  
Hiroaki KAWAGUCHI ◽  
Akihide TANIMOTO
Keyword(s):  
Estrus Synchronization ◽  
Estradiol Dipropionate ◽  
Prostaglandin F

THE USE OF PROSTAGLANDIN F2α IN NATURALLY BRED BEEF HEIFERS

1988 ◽  
Vol 68 (4) ◽  
pp. 1301-1304 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. D. H. COHEN ◽  
B. D. KING ◽  
E. D. JANZEN
Keyword(s):  
Key Words ◽  
Prostaglandin F2α ◽  
Estrus Synchronization ◽  
Beef Heifers ◽  
Conception Rates ◽  
Prostaglandin F ◽  
Natural Breeding

Heifers injected with prostaglandin F2α had significantly higher pregnancy and conception rates within 11 d of start of breeding than noninjected heifers; 56.9 vs. 45.5 pregnancy as a percent of heifers exposed (P < 0.05) and 74.1 vs. 58.2 conception as a percent of pregnant heifers (P < 0.005). Data were pooled for 422 heifers over 5 yr. However, there were no significant effects on calving distribution or weaning weights of their calves. Key words: Prostaglandin F2α, natural breeding, heifer, estrus synchronization

scholarly journals Estrus Synchronization with Pseudopregnant Gilts Induced by a Single Treatment of Estradiol Dipropionate

2010 ◽  
Vol 56 (4) ◽  
pp. 421-427 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michiko NOGUCHI ◽  
Koji YOSHIOKA ◽  
Chie SUZUKI ◽  
Sachiko ARAI ◽  
Seigo ITOH ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Estrus Synchronization ◽  
Single Treatment ◽  
Estradiol Dipropionate

Comparaison de l'effet de deux analogues de la prostaglandine F2α sur la synchronisation de l'œstrus chez la vache de boucherie

1994 ◽  
Vol 74 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Laverdière ◽  
J. J. Dufour ◽  
G. L. Roy ◽  
D. Lavoie ◽  
J. Proulx
Keyword(s):  
Beef Cattle ◽  
Key Words ◽  
Fertility Rate ◽  
Pregnancy Rates ◽  
Estrus Synchronization ◽  
Fertility Rates ◽  
Prostaglandin F

The objective of this study was to compare the efficiency of cloprostenol and fenprostalene in synchronizing estrus. Before treatment, estrus was detected during 4.5 d for multiparous cows in exp. 1 (n = 105) and 7.5 d for primiparous and nulliparous females in exp. 2 (n = 86). Females that were not in estrus (exp. 1: n = 74 and exp. 2: n = 58) received at random, either 500 μg of cloprostenol (i.m.) or 1 mg of fenprostalene (s.c). Cattle synchronized with cloprostenol or fenprostalene that presented estrus within 5 d showed similar fertility rates (exp. 1: 86.1% vs. 88.0% and exp. 2: 89.3% vs. 72.2% for cloprostenol and fenprostalene, respectively) and PGF2α-estrus intervals (exp. 1: 68 h vs. 73 h and exp. 2: 57 h vs. 57 h). However, the incidence of synchronization (exp. 1: 97.3% vs. 67.6%, P < 0.001; and exp. 2: 93.3% vs. 64.3%, P < 0.01) and pregnancy rates (exp. 1: 83.8% vs. 59.5%, P < 0.05; and exp. 2: 83.3% vs. 46.4%, P < 0.01) were statistically higher for cloprostenol than for fenprostalene. In exp. 2, primiparous cows and heifers obtained similar reproductive performances. The fertility rate of cattle treated with cloprostenol in exp. 2 was higher than that of untreated cattle (89.3% vs. 50.0%, P < 0.001, n = 56). In exp. 1, the variance of interval to estrus was similar for both analogues, but in exp. 2, it was less variable after the administration of cloprostenol (P < 0.05). Intervals between cloprostenol injection and estrus (0–10 and 0–15 d) were shorter (P < 0.05) and less variable (P < 0.001) than fenprostalene–estrus intervals. These results indicate that cloprostenol has a better potential for estrus synchronization than fenprostalene. Key words: Cloprostenol, fenprostalene, estrus synchronization, prostaglandin F2α, beef cattle

A comparison of two estrus synchronization methods in beef heifers

1998 ◽  
Vol 78 (3) ◽  
pp. 437-439
Author(s):  
L. A. Stephens ◽  
R. Rajamahendran
Keyword(s):  
Key Words ◽  
Pregnancy Rate ◽  
Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone ◽  
Estrus Synchronization ◽  
Beef Heifers ◽  
Releasing Hormone ◽  
Prostaglandin F

This study compared the use of two injections of prostaglandin F2α(PGF2α) given 11 d apart with the use of gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) followed by PGF2α after 7 d for synchronizing estrus in beef heifers. Heifers synchronized with GnRH and PGF2α showed weak signs of estrus and were more difficult to inseminate. There were no significant differences in synchronization rate and pregnancy rate. Key words: Estrus synchronization, beef heifers, gonadotropin releasing hormone, prostaglandin F2α

Proceedings: Hormonal changes occurring in cattle following the administration of prostaglandin F 2alpha

Reproduction ◽  
1974 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 484-485 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Nancarrow ◽  
H Hearnshaw ◽  
P. Mattner ◽  
P. Connell ◽  
B. Restall
Keyword(s):  
Hormonal Changes ◽  
Prostaglandin F

Serum Endocrine Profile in Relation to Estrus Synchronization in Surti Does

2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (03) ◽  
Author(s):  
M. M. Chaudhary ◽  
C. T. Khasatiya ◽  
S. B. Patel ◽  
S. S. Chaudhary ◽  
V. B. Atara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Jugular Vein ◽  
Estrus Synchronization ◽  
Progesterone Concentration ◽  
Serum Progesterone ◽  
Blood Samples ◽  
Group Iii ◽  
Group I ◽  
Endocrine Profile ◽  
Group Ii ◽  
And Control

The serum progesterone and estradiol profiles during synchronization of estrus by buck effect and PGF2α treatments were monitored in Surti does. Total eighteen non-pregnant does selected were evenly divided into 3 groups, 6 does in each group. The does of Group I were teased with a sexuallyactive- apronized buck; and those of Group II were treated with PGF2α, i.e., Inj. Lutalyse® @ 7.5 mg/doe IM twice 11 days apart, while the Group III served as untreated control. Blood samples were collected from all the animals on day 0 (before 1st PGF2α injection), 3rd day (during treatment), 11th day (before 2nd PGF2α injection), 14th day (after treatment) and 40th day (post-service) by jugular vein puncture. The serum separated was stored at -20°C till further analysis. In all the three groups, 83.33% does, conceived at first service in the sampling cycle. The overall mean serum progesterone concentration of Group I does (5.82±0.72 ng/ml) was significantly higher (p less than 0.01) as compared to Group II (2.93±0.38 ng/ml) and III (2.88±0.30 ng/ml). Similarly, the overall mean serum progesterone concentration of Surti does on day 0 (2.65±0.46 ng/ml), 3rd (2.56±0.80 ng/ml), 11th (4.45±0.84 ng/ml) and 14th (3.40±0.63 ng/ml) did not differ significantly, but the overall mean level at day 40 (6.31±0.45 ng/ml) was significantly (p less than 0.01) higher, because most of animals became pregnant at that time. The overall mean serum oestradiol-17β levels of Group I (24.40±2.98 pg/ ml) was significantly higher (p less than 0.01) than in Group II (15.77±1.77 pg/ml) and III (12.21±1.45 pg/ ml). On the other hand, the overall mean serum oestradiol-17β levels of Surti does on day 0 (12.89±1.21 pg/ml), 3rd (15.84±1.74 pg/ml), 11th (14.81±1.96 pg/ml), 14th (22.15±2.97 pg/ml) and 40th (21.64±5.16 pg/ml) did not differ significantly (p>0.05) and the slightly higher overall mean level found at 40th day might be the influence of the non-pregnant does at first service in the cumulative animals. The hormonal profile reflected the initiation of cyclicity and establishment of pregnancy in treated and control animals.

scholarly journals 142 Evaluation of estrus detection patches as a tool to classify postpartum beef cows as estrous cycling or anestrous prior to the start of the breeding season

2020 ◽  
Vol 98 (Supplement_4) ◽  
pp. 116-117
Author(s):  
Emily G Smith ◽  
Rachael C Bonacker ◽  
Carson M Andersen ◽  
Jordan M Thomas
Keyword(s):  
Pregnancy Rate ◽  
Breeding Season ◽  
Beef Cows ◽  
Estrus Synchronization ◽  
Serum Progesterone ◽  
Estrus Detection ◽  
Estrous Cyclicity ◽  
Type Ii Errors ◽  
Estrous Cycling

Abstract Estrus detection patches were evaluated as a tool to classify postpartum cows as estrous cycling or anestrous at the start of the breeding season. EstrotectTM Breeding Indicators were applied to 257 postpartum beef cows in three locations 25 days prior to the start of estrus synchronization. Coincident with the start of estrus synchronization, patches were scored using a 1 to 4 scale (1 = 0–25%; 2 = 25–50%; 3 = 50–75%; 4 = 75–100%) with scores of 3 or 4 considered activated. Blood samples were collected from each cow 10 days prior to, and at the start of the estrus synchronization. Serum progesterone concentrations were determined via radioimmunoassay; cows were considered estrous cycling if one or both samples exceeded a concentration of 0.5 ng/ml. Based on progesterone, 54.9% of cows were estrous cycling at the start of estrus synchronization. When missing patches were considered inconclusive results, use of patches to infer estrous cyclicity resulted in 85.0% sensitivity and 79.2% specificity with a positive predictive value of 87.2%. However, 75.1% of all cows presented with missing patches at the start of synchronization. If missing patches were considered activated, sensitivity was 95.7%, but specificity (16.4%) and PPV (58.2%) were poor, as 47.6% of cows presenting with missing patches were anestrous based on progesterone. Across all cows, pregnancy rate to AI was 58.0% (149/257). Cows with activated patches that were classified as false positives based on serum progesterone concentrations achieved a 71.4% (5/7) pregnancy rate to AI, raising questions as to whether sensitivity was underestimated due to inherent Type II errors in classification of cyclicity via progesterone. In summary, estrus detection aids are a sensitive tool to identify estrous cycling postpartum cows prior to the start of the breeding season; however, poor specificity and patch retention are limitations for this application.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document