Severe Protracted Hypophosphatemia in a Patient with Persistent Vegetative State on Long-Term Assisted Respiratory Support

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yulia Namestnic ◽  
Hamza Shwieke ◽  
Samuel N. Heyman ◽  
Esther-Lee Marcus
Keyword(s):  
Vegetative State ◽  
Persistent Vegetative State ◽  
Respiratory Support

scholarly journals Long-Term (Six Years) Clinical Outcome Discrimination of Patients in the Vegetative State Could be Achieved Based on the Operational Architectonics EEG Analysis: A Pilot Feasibility Study

2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-79 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew A. Fingelkurts ◽  
Alexander A. Fingelkurts ◽  
Sergio Bagnato ◽  
Cristina Boccagni ◽  
Giuseppe Galardi
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Vegetative State ◽  
Clinical Care ◽  
Persistent Vegetative State ◽  
Minimally Conscious State ◽  
Conscious State ◽  
Post Injury ◽  
Term Outcome ◽  
Long Term Outcome

Electroencephalogram (EEG) recordings are increasingly used to evaluate patients with disorders of consciousness (DOC) or assess their prognosis outcome in the short-term perspective. However, there is a lack of information concerning the effectiveness of EEG in classifying long-term (many years) outcome in chronic DOC patients. Here we tested whether EEG operational architectonics parameters (geared towards consciousness phenomenon detection rather than neurophysiological processes) could be useful for distinguishing a very long-term (6 years) clinical outcome of DOC patients whose EEGs were registered within 3 months post-injury. The obtained results suggest that EEG recorded at third month after sustaining brain damage, may contain useful information on the long-term outcome of patients in vegetative state: it could discriminate patients who remain in a persistent vegetative state from patients who reach a minimally conscious state or even recover a full consciousness in a long-term perspective (6 years) post-injury. These findings, if confirmed in further studies, may be pivotal for long-term planning of clinical care, rehabilitative programs, medical-legal decisions concerning the patients, and policy makers.

Acts, Omissions and Keeping Patients Alive in a Persistent Vegetative State

1995 ◽  
Vol 38 ◽  
pp. 99-119
Author(s):  
Sophie Botros
Keyword(s):  
Technological Progress ◽  
Vegetative State ◽  
New Technology ◽  
Persistent Vegetative State ◽  
Term Outcome ◽  
Long Term Outcome ◽  
Ethical Decisions ◽  
Technological Developments ◽  
The Impact

There are many conflicting attitudes to technological progress: some people are fearful that robots will soon take over, even perhaps making ethical decisions for us, whilst others enthusiastically embrace a future largely run for us by them. Still others insist that we cannot predict the long term outcome of present technological developments. In this paper I shall be concerned with the impact of the new technology on medicine, and with one particularly agonizing ethical dilemma to which it has already given rise.

Persistent vegetative state in head injury

2005 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 81-85
Author(s):  
Deepak Kumar Gupta ◽  
AK Mahapatra
Keyword(s):  
Head Injury ◽  
Vegetative State ◽  
Persistent Vegetative State

Long-term Outcome after Vegetative State due to Near-Drowning and Quality of Life of the Families

2012 ◽  
Vol 43 (02) ◽  
Author(s):  
G Kluger ◽  
A Kirsch ◽  
M Hessenauer ◽  
M Granel ◽  
A Müller ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Vegetative State ◽  
Term Outcome ◽  
Long Term Outcome ◽  
Near Drowning

scholarly journals Persistent vegetative state: an overview

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriel Alexander Quiñones-Ossa ◽  
Yeider A. Durango-Espinosa ◽  
Tariq Janjua ◽  
Luis Rafael Moscote-Salazar ◽  
Amit Agrawal
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care ◽  
Vegetative State ◽  
Persistent Vegetative State ◽  
Clinical History ◽  
Main Body ◽  
Disorder Of Consciousness ◽  
Family Perspective ◽  
Patient Status ◽  
History Of ◽  
State Diagnosis

Abstract Background Disorder of consciousness diagnosis, especially when is classified as persistent vegetative state (without misestimating the other diagnosis classifications), in the intensive care is an important diagnosis to evaluate and treat. Persistent vegetative state diagnosis is a challenge in the daily clinical practice because the diagnosis is made mainly based upon the clinical history and the patient behavior observation. There are some specific criteria for this diagnosis, and this could be very tricky when the physician is not well trained. Main body We made a literature review regarding the persistent vegetative state diagnosis, clinical features, management, prognosis, and daily medical practice challenges while considering the bioethical issues and the family perspective about the patient status. The objective of this overview is to provide updated information regarding this clinical state’s features while considering the current medical literature available. Conclusions Regardless of the currently available guidelines and literature, there is still a lot of what we do not know about the persistent vegetative state. There is a lack of evidence regarding the optimal diagnosis and even more, about how to expect a natural history of this disorder of consciousness. It is important to recall that the patients (despite of their altered mental state diagnosis) should always be treated to avoid some of the intensive care unit long-stance complications.

scholarly journals Treating Traumatic Brain Injuries with Electroceuticals: Implications for the Neuroanatomy of Consciousness

NeuroSci ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 254-265
Author(s):  
Jihad Aburas ◽  
Areej Aziz ◽  
Maryam Butt ◽  
Angela Leschinsky ◽  
Marsha L. Pierce
Keyword(s):  
Brain Stimulation ◽  
Brain Injuries ◽  
Vegetative State ◽  
Minimally Conscious State ◽  
Conscious State ◽  
Permanent Disability ◽  
United States Food ◽  
Control And Prevention ◽  
Minimally Conscious

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), traumatic brain injury (TBI) is the leading cause of loss of consciousness, long-term disability, and death in children and young adults (age 1 to 44). Currently, there are no United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved pharmacological treatments for post-TBI regeneration and recovery, particularly related to permanent disability and level of consciousness. In some cases, long-term disorders of consciousness (DoC) exist, including the vegetative state/unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (VS/UWS) characterized by the exhibition of reflexive behaviors only or a minimally conscious state (MCS) with few purposeful movements and reflexive behaviors. Electroceuticals, including non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS), vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), and deep brain stimulation (DBS) have proved efficacious in some patients with TBI and DoC. In this review, we examine how electroceuticals have improved our understanding of the neuroanatomy of consciousness. However, the level of improvements in general arousal or basic bodily and visual pursuit that constitute clinically meaningful recovery on the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R) remain undefined. Nevertheless, these advancements demonstrate the importance of the vagal nerve, thalamus, reticular activating system, and cortico-striatal-thalamic-cortical loop in the process of consciousness recovery.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document