scholarly journals RETRACTED: Consumer perspectives on reproductive health after using the Jakpros smart mobile health application: A cross-sectional, qualitative study

F1000Research ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 1392
Author(s):  
Budi Wiweko ◽  
Aida Riyanti ◽  
Shanty Olivia ◽  
Muhammad Priangga ◽  
Vita Silvana ◽  
...  

The article titled “Consumer perspectives on reproductive health after using the Jakpros smart mobile health application: A cross-sectional, qualitative study” ([version 1; peer review: 1 not approved] F1000Research 2019, 8: 396 https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.17894.1) has been retracted by F1000Research on the grounds of scientific misconduct. On submission to F1000Research, all manuscripts undergo plagiarism checks as standard—this is detailed in our Originality policies. Upon submission, authors are also required to declare that the article is not under consideration or review by another publisher. At this stage in the publication process, our plagiarism detection software did not identify any significant duplication of text. Following publication of the article, the F1000Research editorial team were notified of a high degree of similarity between this manuscript and one already published in the Institute of Physics (IOP) Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (B Wiweko et al 2019 IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 248 012038 https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1755-1315/248/1/012038/pdf). On investigation, the extent of overlap between these two publications was substantial, and this was deemed a case of duplicate publication. Duplicate publication is a major ethical issue and, as a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and a follower of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommendations, F1000Research takes such matters seriously. In response to our concerns, corresponding author Budi Wiweko acknowledged that publication misconduct has taken place and has been informed that, due to the extent and nature of duplication between the articles published in F1000Research and IOP, F1000Research will retract the article and publish a linked retraction notice. In line with COPE guidelines, F1000Research has informed the Publisher of IOP Conference Series about this issue, and our final decision has been communicated to all authors and their respective institutions.

F1000Research ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 396
Author(s):  
Budi Wiweko ◽  
Aida Riyanti ◽  
Shanty Olivia ◽  
Muhammad Priangga ◽  
Vita Silvana ◽  
...  

Background:  Good reproductive health is important for individuals and also for the development of children. Knowledge plays an important role in women’s reproduction health. Our study examined women’s perspectives and knowledge of reproductive health after using the free Jakarta Reproduction Sehat (Jakpros) application (app) on a daily basis for two weeks. Methods: Our study used a cross-sectional, qualitative design. The sample consisted of 12 participants from two sub-district general hospitals in Jakarta. Participants were chosen using purposive sampling and consisted of women of reproductive age who had completed previous questionnaires on their use of Jakpros. We used descriptive analytics and a qualitative method. Data were collected by direct observation in small focus group discussions. Results: Participants said that after they used the Jakpros app, they were more aware of their reproductive health. Their knowledge increased after counselling combined with Jakpros usage. They also said that the features in the app made it easier to contact their doctor and to access their nearest hospital. Conclusion: Jakpros is a convenient way to access reliable reproductive health information.


Author(s):  
Shariq Aziz Butt ◽  
Tauseef Jamal ◽  
Muhammad Ajmal Azad ◽  
Arshad Ali ◽  
Nader Sohrabi Safa

2021 ◽  
Vol 206 (Supplement 3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammed Hassan ◽  
Ekaterina Kruglova ◽  
Eden Gelgoot ◽  
Kirk Lo ◽  
Peter Chan ◽  
...  

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. e024016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tanya Barber ◽  
Behnam Sharif ◽  
Sylvia Teare ◽  
Jean Miller ◽  
Brittany Shewchuk ◽  
...  

ObjectiveTo elicit perspectives of family physicians and patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA) on KOA, its treatment/management and the use of a mobile health application (app) to help patients self-manage their KOA.DesignA qualitative study using Cognitive Task Analysis for physician interviews and peer-to-peer semistructured interviews for patients according to the Patient and Community Engagement Research (PaCER) method.SettingPrimary care practices and patient researchers at an academic centre in Southern Alberta.ParticipantsIntentional sampling of family physicians (n=4; 75% women) and patients with KOA who had taken part in previous PaCER studies and had experienced knee pain on most days of the month at any time in the past (n=5; 60% women).ResultsPhysician and patient views about KOA were starkly contrasting. Patient participants expressed that KOA seriously impacted their lives and lifestyles, and they wanted their knee pain to be considered as important as other health problems. In contrast, physicians uniformly conceptualised KOA as a relatively minor health problem, although they still recognised it as a painful condition that often limits patients’ activities. Consequently, physicians did not regard KOA as a condition to be proactively and aggressively managed. The gap between physicians’ and patients’ conceptualisation of KOA and its treatment extended to the use of an app for self-management. While patients were supportive of the app, physicians were sceptical of its use and focused more on accountability and patient resources.ConclusionsThe clear discord between physicians’ mental models and patients’ lived experience and perceived needs around KOA emphasised a gap in understanding and communication about treatment and management of KOA. As such, this preliminary and formative research will inform a codesign approach to develop an app that will act as a communications tool between patients and physicians, enabling patient–physician discussions regarding modifiable self-management options based on a patient’s perspectives and needs.


2014 ◽  
Vol 64 (624) ◽  
pp. e392-e400 ◽  
Author(s):  
Veronika Williams ◽  
Jonathan Price ◽  
Maxine Hardinge ◽  
Lionel Tarassenko ◽  
Andrew Farmer

Diabetes ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 67 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 860-P
Author(s):  
PING LING ◽  
SIHUI LUO ◽  
JINHUA YAN ◽  
XUEYING ZHENG ◽  
DAIZHI YANG ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document