scholarly journals Evolution of frontline treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a brief review and recent update

F1000Research ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. 1933 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jung Yong Hong ◽  
Cheolwon Suh ◽  
Won Seog Kim

Various strategies have been implemented to improve the outcomes of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). In recent years, remarkable advances have been achieved, based on the discovery of cell-of-origin in DLBCL and on more effective targeted agents. This commentary will summarize recent updates on the evolution of frontline therapies for DLBCL, focusing on the upcoming promising frontline chemotherapy platforms and on activated B-cell subtype DLBCL and double-hit DLBCL.

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 5396-5396
Author(s):  
Ryan Mao Heng Lim ◽  
Natalie Pei Xin Chan ◽  
Lay Poh Khoo ◽  
Chee Leong Cheng ◽  
Leonard Tan ◽  
...  

Abstract Aim Composite follicular lymphoma with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (FL/DLBCL) is an uncommon hematological neoplasm. The aim of this study was to examine clinico-pathological features of patients with FL/DLBCL and investigate relevant predictors of survival outcome. Methodology Patients with histologically-proven FL/DLBCL at diagnosis (n=106) and who were subsequently treated with Rituximab-based chemotherapy from 2002-2017 at the National Cancer Centre Singapore were retrospectively analyzed. Survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and multivariate Cox proportional models. Results The cohort consisted of 72 men and 34 women with a median age of 59 years (range, 24-82). The cell of origin by Han's algorithm was GCB in 37.7%, ABC in 58.5% and unknown in 3.8%. Eight patients (7.5%) were double-hit for c-MYC, BCL2 and/or BCL6 rearrangements. In a multivariate model inclusive of known clinico-pathological parameters at diagnosis, presence of B symptoms (p = 0.0122), stage 3 or 4 lymphoma (p = 0.0166) and double-hit genotype (p = 0.0045) were independently prognostic for worse overall survival (OS). These factors, excluding B symptoms, were similarly prognostic for progression-free survival (PFS). Including first-line treatment data in the multivariate model, lack of complete response (p < 0.0001) and use of chemotherapy regimens other than R-CHOP (p = 0.0360) alongside presence of B symptoms (p = 0.0022), were the only remaining independent prognostic variables for worse OS. Classification by cell of origin was not prognostic. A Clinico-Genotypic Index derived from point-wise addition of all five adverse parameters (score of 0, 1, 2, 3-4) revealed four prognostic risk groups accounting for 25%, 30%, 25% and 20% of the cohort, with a predicted 5-year OS of 100%, 95%, 57% and 19% respectively (p < 0.0001). Conclusion A Clinico-Genotypic Index derived from clinical and molecular factors can classify patients with composite FL/DLBCL into distinct prognostic groups. Han's algorithm has no prognostic value in this disease entity. Figure. Figure. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 ◽  
pp. 353-353
Author(s):  
M. Rodriguez ◽  
I. Fernandez-Miranda ◽  
R. Mondejar ◽  
J. Capote ◽  
S. Rodriguez-Pinilla ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 130 (5) ◽  
pp. 590-596 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan W. Friedberg

Abstract The 2016 revision of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification for lymphoma has included a new category of lymphoma, separate from diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, termed high-grade B-cell lymphoma with translocations involving myc and bcl-2 or bcl-6. These lymphomas, which occur in <10% of cases of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, have been referred to as double-hit lymphomas (or triple-hit lymphomas if all 3 rearrangements are present). It is important to differentiate these lymphomas from the larger group of double-expressor lymphomas, which have increased expression of MYC and BCL-2 and/or BCL-6 by immunohistochemistry, by using variable cutoff percentages to define positivity. Patients with double-hit lymphomas have a poor prognosis when treated with standard chemoimmunotherapy and have increased risk of central nervous system involvement and progression. Double-hit lymphomas may arise as a consequence of the transformation of the underlying indolent lymphoma. There are no published prospective trials in double-hit lymphoma, however retrospective studies strongly suggest that aggressive induction regimens may confer a superior outcome. In this article, I review my approach to the evaluation and treatment of double-hit lymphoma, with an eye toward future clinical trials incorporating rational targeted agents into the therapeutic armamentarium.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (A) ◽  
pp. 98-105
Author(s):  
Hussam Zawam ◽  
Noha E. Ibrahim ◽  
Rasha Salama ◽  
Mai Samir ◽  
Walaa Abdelfattah ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND: Despite the growing landscape of genetic drivers in Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma, yet their clinical implication is still unclear and R-CHOP regimen remains a “one size fits all” therapy. We aimed in this study to examine the prevalence of EZH2, BCL211 and MYD 88 genetic polymorphisms in DLBCL patients and correlate the results with various clinical and survival outcomes. METHODS: Genotyping of MYD88 (rs387907272 T/C), EZH2 (rs3757441 C/T), and BCL2L11 (rs3789068 A/G) polymorphisms were conducted using real time polymerase chain reaction analysis in a total of 75 DLBCL patients. RESULTS: Most of our cases carried the wild TT genotype of MYD88 gene (64%), the mutant TT genotype of EZH2 gene (52%) and the wild AA genotype of BCL2L11 gene (48%). Regarding cell of origin, Germinal Centre (GC) phenotype was present in 56% of cases while 44% expressed the Post-GC (PGC) phenotype. Poor response outcome to first line R-CHOP was significantly correlated with the mutated CC genotype of MYD 88 (p=0.02), while better response to R-CHOP was significantly associated with younger age <50 years (p <0.0001), good PS (p=0.046), normal LDH level (p=0.003), earlier stage (p <0.0001), good IPI score (p=0.009), absence of extranodal disease (p <0.0001) and absence of bulky disease (p=0.004). The median PFS and the 2 year OS were significantly higher in younger age, earlier stage, good IPI score, absence of extranodal disease, absence of bulky disease and in GC phenotype. CONCLUSIONS: Our results emphasized that the mutated genotype of MYD 88 gene polymorphism is significantly associated with poor response to R-CHOP therapy.


Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 29-29
Author(s):  
Fei Yang ◽  
Anup Abraham ◽  
Ju Zhang ◽  
Yan Xiao ◽  
Richard D. Hammer ◽  
...  

Background The distinction of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) into cell-of-origin (COO) subgroups (germinal center B-cell-like [GCB] or activated B-cell-like [ABC]) based on gene expression profiling is associated with prognosis and has potential therapeutic implications to mitigate the worse outcome for patients with DLBCL. Other phenotypic and molecular/cytogenetic features such as concurrent translocations of oncogene MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6 (so-called double-/triple-hit lymphoma, DHL/THL) and coexpression of MYC and BCL2 proteins (so-called double-expressor lymphoma, DEL) are also recognized to have great prognostic impact (Swerdlow SH et al. Blood 2016;127(20):2375-2390). This study investigated the prevalence of COO, DHL/THL and DEL in a real-world cohort of patients with DLBCL who had documented results of diagnostic testing. Methods This study used the Flatiron Health electronic health record-derived de-identified database to abstract information on patients diagnosed with DLBCL between 2011-2019. Information on diagnostic testing from immunohistochemistry (IHC) for expression of MYC, BCL2, BCL6, CD10 or MUM1, and from fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) or karyotype analysis for rearrangement of MYC, BCL2 or BCL6 was abstracted from pathology reports or clinical visit notes, where available. We calculated the proportions of COO subgroups (GCB vs. ABC) that were derived from IHC testing results according to Hans algorithm (Hans C et al., Blood 2004;103(1):275-282), DHL/THL, and DEL. We also examined concordance of COO classification derived from IHC testing results with that directly reported by the healthcare providers. Differences in patient characteristics between IHC testing results-derived COO subgroups (GCB vs. ABC) were assessed using chi-square tests. Results 4400 patients had documented results of IHC and 73% (n=3194) can be classified into either GCB or ABC DLBCL (GCB/ABC ratio of 1.38). 3205 patients had documented results of FISH or karyotype analysis and 8% (n=245) were DHL/THL; only 33 patients were DEL. Within the GCB DLBCL patients derived from IHC testing results (n=1854), 163 patients were DHL/THL and 11 were DEL, whereas 24 DHL/THL and 18 DEL were identified within the ABC type (n=1340). When comparing COO classification derived from IHC testing results (n=3194) with that directly reported by the healthcare providers (n=2765), additional 695 and 439 patients can be classified as GCB and ABC DLBCL by IHC, respectively (Table). Univariate analysis showed that patients who were non-White ethnic group, diagnosed in academic centers, with lower body mass index but elevated serum lactate dehydrogenase levels and worse ECOG performance status, and without transformation from a prior indolent lymphoid malignancy, were more likely to be associated with ABC DLBCL (for all variables, p&lt;0.05). There were no clinically meaningful and/or statistically significant differences in IHC testing results-derived COO classification (GCB vs. ABC) by age, gender, year of DLBCL diagnosis, geographic location of residency, type of insurance plan, tumor group stage, documentation of extranodal site or any other primary cancer history at the time of diagnosis. Discussion In this large real-world DLBCL cohort, a lower-than-expected proportion of DEL patients were identified vs. the 20-35% reported in the literature (Karube K and Campo E. Hematology 2015;52(2):97-106). This is likely due to our cohort of patients requiring clear evidence of coexpression for MYC and BCL2 (≥40% and &gt;50%, respectively) that are not related to underlying chromosomal rearrangements, and few pathologists reported levels of percent staining for IHC testing among those with documented positive results of MYC/BCL2 protein coexpression. In addition, results from this study showed that only half of cases had COO classification documented by healthcare providers, despite available IHC results. Although this study indicated lack of details in the reporting of diagnostic testing (e.g. COO identification, levels of percent staining, methods for DLBCL subgroup identification), findings should be interpreted with caution, as patients with DLBCL might have been tested but not documented in the electronic health record system or might have biomarker testing performed at sites outside of the Flatiron Health network. Disclosures Yang: F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Current Employment. Zhang:F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Current Employment. Xiao:F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Current Employment. Hammer:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Caris Lifesciences: Honoraria; PER Med education: Honoraria; PathEdEx: Current equity holder in private company. Prime:F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Current Employment.


Author(s):  
David W. Scott

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common lymphoma worldwide and consists of a heterogeneous group of cancers classified together on the basis of shared morphology, immunophenotype, and aggressive clinical behavior. It is now recognized that this malignancy comprises at least two distinct molecular subtypes identified by gene expression profiling: the activated B-cell-like (ABC) and the germinal center B-cell-like (GCB) groups—the cell-of-origin (COO) classification. These two groups have different genetic mutation landscapes, pathobiology, and outcomes following treatment. Evidence is accumulating that novel agents have selective activity in one or the other COO group, making COO a predictive biomarker. Thus, there is now a pressing need for accurate and robust methods to assign COO, to support clinical trials, and ultimately guide treatment decisions for patients. The “gold standard” methods for COO are based on gene expression profiling (GEP) of RNA from fresh frozen tissue using microarray technology, which is an impractical solution when formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue (FFPET) biopsies are the standard diagnostic material. This review outlines the history of the COO classification before examining the practical implementation of COO assays applicable to FFPET biopsies. The immunohistochemistry (IHC)-based algorithms and gene expression–based assays suitable for the highly degraded RNA from FFPET are discussed. Finally, the technical and practical challenges that still need to be addressed are outlined before robust gene expression–based assays are used in the routine management of patients with DLBCL.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document