scholarly journals Observational Study of Peripheral Intravenous Catheter Outcomes in Adult Hospitalized Patients: A Multivariable Analysis of Peripheral Intravenous Catheter Failure

Author(s):  
Nicole Marsh ◽  
Joan Webster ◽  
Emily Larsen ◽  
Marie Cooke ◽  
Gabor Mihala ◽  
...  
The Lancet ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 392 (10145) ◽  
pp. 366-367 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander P J Vlaar ◽  
Beverley J Hunt

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicolas Hoertel ◽  
Marina Sánchez ◽  
Raphaël Vernet ◽  
Nathanaël Beeker ◽  
Antoine Neuraz ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTObjectiveTo examine the association between dexamethasone use and mortality among hospitalized patients for COVID-19.DesignMulticenter observational retrospective cohort study.SettingGreater Paris University hospitals, France.Participants12,217 adults hospitalized with COVID-19 between 24 January and 20 May 2020, including 171 patients (1.4%) who received dexamethasone orally or by intravenous perfusion during the visit.Data sourceAssistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris Health Data Warehouse.Main outcome measuresThe primary endpoint was time to death. We compared this endpoint between patients who received dexamethasone and those who did not in time-to-event analyses adjusting for sex, age, obesity, current smoking status, any medical condition associated with increased COVID-19-related mortality, and clinical and biological severity of COVID-19 at admission, while stratifying by the need of respiratory support (i.e., oxygen or intubation). The primary analysis was a multivariable Cox model and the secondary analysis used a univariate Cox regression in a matched analytic sample.ResultsAmong patients who required respiratory support, the end-point event of death occurred in 10 patients (15.9%) who received dexamethasone and 298 patients (26.4%) who did not. In this group of patients, there was a significant association between dexamethasone use and reduced mortality in both the crude, unadjusted analysis (hazard ratio (HR), 0.40; 95% CI, 0.18 to 0.87, p=0.021) and the adjusted multivariable analysis (HR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.22 to 0.96, p=0.039). In the sensitivity analysis, the univariate Cox regression model in the matched analytic sample yielded a same tendency, albeit non-significant (HR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.08 to 1.14, p=0.077). Among patients without respiratory support, the end-point event of death occurred in 14 patients (13.0%) who received dexamethasone and 1,086 patients (10.0%) who did not. In this group of patients, there was no significant association between dexamethasone use and the endpoint. When examining the association between the cumulative dose of dexamethasone received during the visit and the endpoint, we found that the administration of a cumulative dose between 60 mg to 150 mg among patients who required respiratory support was significantly associated with a lower risk of death in the crude, unadjusted analysis (HR, 0.28; SE, 0.58, p=0.028), the adjusted multivariable analysis (HR, 0.24; SE, 0.65, p=0.030), and in the univariate Cox regression model in the matched analytic sample (HR, 0.32; SE, 0.58, p=0.048), whereas no significant association was observed with a different dose. Among patients without respiratory support, there was no significant association between the cumulative dose of dexamethasone and the endpoint in the crude and in the adjusted multivariable analyses.ConclusionsIn this observational study involving patients with Covid-19 who had been admitted to the hospital, dexamethasone use administered either orally or by intravenous injection at a cumulative dose between 60 mg and 150 mg was associated with decreased mortality among those requiring respiratory support.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Toshiaki Takahashi ◽  
Ryoko Murayama ◽  
Mari Abe-Doi ◽  
Maki Miyahara-Kaneko ◽  
Chiho Kanno ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-34
Author(s):  
Chiho Kanno ◽  
Ryoko Murayama ◽  
Mari Abe-Doi ◽  
Toshiaki Takahashi ◽  
Yui Shintani ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amit Bahl ◽  
Steven Johnson ◽  
Nicholas Mielke ◽  
Patrick Karabon

Abstract Objective:Peripheral intravenous catheter (PIVC) failure occurs frequently, but the underlying mechanisms of failure are poorly understood. We aim to identify factors that predict premature PIVC failure.Methods:We conducted a single site prospective observational investigation at an academic tertiary care center. Adult emergency department (ED) patients who underwent traditional PIVC placement in the ED and required admission with an anticipated hospital length of stay greater than 48 hours were included. Ongoing daily PIVC assessments included clinical and ultrasonographic evaluations. The primary goal was to identify demographic, clinical, and PIVC related variables that predicted PIVC failure. Univariate and multivariate analyses were employed to identify risk factors for PIVC failure.Results:In July and August of 2020, 62 PIVCs were enrolled. PIVC failure occurred in 24 (38.71%) participants. Multivariate logistic regression demonstrated that the presence of subcutaneous edema [AOR 8.29 (1.50, 45.8) p = 0.0153], an above average neutrophil to lymphocyte (N:L) ratio [AOR 4.63 (1.06, 20.3) p = 0.0422], and the administration of an irritant/vesicant [10.3 (1.46, 72.6) p = 0.0.192] were associated with increased likelihood of premature PIVC failure. Conclusions:PIVC failure is related to clinical and ultrasonographic variables associated with inflammation: elevated N:L ratio, use of caustic medications, and presence of subcutaneous edema on ultrasound. Reducing inflammation of the vein may lead to better PIVC survival outcomes. Further large-scale randomized controlled trials are needed to validate and build upon the concepts in this study.


Author(s):  
Nicole Marsh ◽  
Emily N Larsen ◽  
Mari Takashima ◽  
Tricia Kleidon ◽  
Samantha Keogh ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document