scholarly journals Integrated Fragility Hip Fracture Program: A Model for High Quality Care

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (8) ◽  
pp. 461-467 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jensa C Morris ◽  
Anne Moore ◽  
Joseph Kahan ◽  
Marc Shapiro ◽  
Jinlei Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hip Fracture ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Adverse Effects ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Hip Fractures ◽  
Quality Care ◽  
Multidisciplinary Care ◽  
Care Physician ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Fragility Hip Fracture

BACKGROUND: Hip fractures are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality among elderly patients. Coordinated multidisciplinary care is required to optimize medical outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of the implementation of standardized, evidence-based protocols on clinical outcomes and mortality in patients with fragility hip fractures. INTERVENTIONS: A multidisciplinary group was convened to define best practices in fragility hip fracture care and implement a fragility hip fracture clinical protocol at Yale-New Haven Hospital. Clinical outcomes in 2015, prior to program initiation, were compared with 2018, after the program was well established. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Measured outcomes included 30-day mortality, blood transfusion utilization, adverse effects of drugs, venous thromboembolic complications, sepsis, myocardial infarction, mechanical surgical fixation complications during the index admission, length of stay, 30-day readmission, unexpected return to the operating room (OR) and time to the OR. RESULTS: The implementation of the Integrated Fragility Hip Fracture Program was associated with significant reductions in 30-day mortality from 8.0% in 2015 to 2.8% in 2018 (P = .001). Significant reductions were also seen in use of blood transfusions (46.6% to 28.1%; P < .001), adverse effects of drugs (4.0% to 0%; P < .001), length of stay (5.12 to 4.47 days; P = .004), unexpected return to the OR (5.1% to 0%; P < .001), and time to the OR <24 hours (41.8% to 55.0%, P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: An Integrated Fragility Hip Fracture Program using multidisciplinary care, physician and nursing engagement, evidence-based protocols, data tracking with feedback, and accountability can reduce mortality and improve clinical outcomes in patients with hip fractures.

scholarly journals Management of necrotising fasciitis within a burns centre: do outcomes differ?

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 205951312092474
Author(s):  
Joseph A Ward ◽  
John A G Gibson ◽  
Dai Q Nguyen
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Plastic Surgery ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Burn Injury ◽  
Wound Care ◽  
Quality Care ◽  
Multidisciplinary Care ◽  
Necrotising Fasciitis ◽  
Retrospective Case ◽  
Significant Difference

Introduction: Many similarities exist between the care of necrotising fasciitis (NF) and burn injury patients. Each group represents a small but complex cohort requiring multiple theatre trips, specialist reconstruction, meticulous wound care and multidisciplinary management. Over a six-year period, we sought to examine the clinical outcomes of NF patients managed within a burns centre against those managed by a plastic surgery service. Methods: A retrospective case-note review was performed for all identifiable patients referred to our institution’s designated burns centre or plastic surgery service between 2008–2014. Patient characteristics, length of stay, wound-related and clinical outcomes were extracted and descriptively presented with statistical analysis performed for survival and length of stay. Results: Twenty-nine patients were included in the study (burns centre [B]: 17 patients; plastic surgery service [P]: 12 patients). Median total length of stay (B: 37 vs. P: 50 days, P=0.38), local length of stay (27 vs. 19 days, P=0.29) and survival till discharge (94.4% vs. 100%, P=0.73) demonstrated no statistically significant difference. Conclusion: Caring for NF patients within a burns centre facilitated easier access to specialist reconstructive expertise and multidisciplinary care but did not lead to statistically significant differences in length of stay or survival. The management of NF within a burns centre facilitated provision of high-quality care to a highly challenging patient group.

61 HIP Fracture Management of Older Adults in a Public Tertiary Hospital in Kuala Lumpur: Analysis and Comparison with the Standard of Care in UK

2019 ◽  
Vol 48 (Supplement_4) ◽  
pp. iv13-iv17
Author(s):  
Gordon Hwa Mang Pang ◽  
Elizabeth Gar Mit Chong ◽  
Rizah Mazzuin Razali ◽  
Fatt Soon Lee ◽  
Weng Keong Yau
Keyword(s):  
Hip Fracture ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Hip Fractures ◽  
Operating Time ◽  
Small Sample ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Fracture Management ◽  
Operation Rate ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Bone Protection

Abstract Background There has been rapid improvement in evidence-based care for hip fracture in UK in which prompt, effective, multidisciplinary management has been shown to improve quality and reduce costs. The aim of this study was to evaluate the current outcome of hip fractures in our hospital, and to compare it to the outcome of evidence-based management of hip fractures in UK. Methods A cross-sectional study of all hip fracture patients aged 60 and above, admitted from 1st March 2018 until 28th Feb 2019. Medical records of 105 patients obtained from a hip fracture registry were reviewed. Clinical data such as patients’ sociodemographics, fall circumstances, fractures, peri-operative details, complications and mortality were extracted and analysed. Results The surgery rate was 67% (96.5% in UK). Among the 37 patients (35.2%) not operated, 15 refused operation. Rate of early surgery was only 9.3% (71.3% in UK). Medical stabilisation (28.2%) and no operating time (40.8%) were the main reasons for surgical delay. None had falls assessment (98% in UK) and only 7.6% was started on bone protection prior to discharge (60% in UK). The average length of stay was 17 days (15.8 days in UK). The 30 day mortality was 9.5% (8.5% in UK). Discussion Our results showed that there was no significant difference in length of stay and 30 day mortality compared to UK. However, this may be due to our small sample size. Lack of awareness of falls assessment and bone protection suggests that our current model of care needed improvement. Conclusion Our results highlighted the need to implement proactive strategies to improve the management of hip fracture in our centre. Ortho-geriatrics shared-care in hip fracture management was subsequently implemented in an effort to improve patient care and service. Further studies need to be done to re-evaluate the outcomes post implementation.

scholarly journals Outcomes of COVID-19 Negative Hip Fracture Patients During the Acute and Subacute Pandemic

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 215145932110066
Author(s):  
Naoko Onizuka ◽  
Lauren N. Topor ◽  
Lisa K. Schroder ◽  
Julie A. Switzer
Keyword(s):  
Hip Fracture ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Healthcare System ◽  
Perioperative Complications ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Surgical Care ◽  
Admission Rate ◽  
System Response ◽  
Fragility Hip Fracture

Objectives: To better elucidate how the COVID-19 pandemic has affected the operatively treated geriatric hip fracture population and how the health care system adapted to pandemic dictated procedures. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: A community hospital. Participants: Individuals ≥65 years of age presented with a proximal femoral fracture from a low-energy mechanism undergoing operative treatment from January 17, 2020 to July 2, 2020 (N = 125). Measurements: We defined 3 phases of healthcare system response: pre-COVID-19, acute phase, and subacute phase. Thirty-day mortality, time to operating room (OR), length of stay, time to start physical therapy, perioperative complications, delirium rate, hospice admission rate, discharge dispositions, readmission rate, and the reason of surgery delay were assessed. Results: The number of hip fractures has remained constant during the pandemic. The 30-day mortality rate, time to OR, and length of stay were higher in the pandemic compared to the pre-pandemic. Those who had a longer wait time to OR (≥ 24 hours) had more complications and increased 30-day mortality rates. Some of the surgery delays were related to OR unavailability as a consequence of the COVID-19 pandemic. Surgery was delayed in 3 patients who were on direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in pandemic but none for pre-pandemic period. Conclusion: This is the first study to compare the effect of the acute and subacute phases of the pandemic on uninfected hip fracture patients. In the age of COVID-19, to provide the best care for the vulnerable geriatric orthopedic populations, the healthcare system must adopt new protocols. We should still aim to promote prompt surgical care when indicated. It is important to ensure adequate resource availability, such as OR time and staff so that hip fracture patients may continue to receive rapid access to surgery. A multidisciplinary approach remains the key to the management of fragility hip fracture patients during the pandemic.

scholarly journals The independent patient factors that affect length of stay following hip fractures

2018 ◽  
Vol 100 (7) ◽  
pp. 556-562 ◽  
Author(s):  
T Richards ◽  
A Glendenning ◽  
D Benson ◽  
S Alexander ◽  
S Thati
Keyword(s):  
Hip Fracture ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Hip Fractures ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Acute Hospital ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Patient Factors ◽  
Mobility Status

Introduction Management of hip fractures has evolved over recent years to drive better outcomes including length of hospital stay. We aimed to identify and quantify the effect that patient factors influence acute hospital and total health service length of stay. Methods A retrospective observational study based on National Hip Fracture Database data was conducted from 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2015. A multiple regression analysis of 330 patients was carried out to determine independent factors that affect acute hospital and total hospital length of stay. Results American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade 3 or above, Abbreviated Mental Test Score (AMTS) less than 8 and poor mobility status were independent factors, significantly increasing length of hospital stay in our population. Acute hospital length of stay can be predicted as 8.9 days longer when AMTS less than 8, 4.2 days longer when ASA grade was 3 or above and 20.4 days longer when unable to mobilise unaided (compared with independently mobile individuals). Other factors including total hip replacement compared with hemiarthroplasty did not independently affect length of stay. Conclusions Our analysis in a representative and generalisable population illustrates the importance of identifying these three patient characteristics in hip fracture patients. When recognised and targeted with orthogeriatric support, the length of hospital stay for these patients can be reduced and overall hip fracture care improved. Screening on admission for ASA grade, AMTS and mobility status allows prediction of length of stay and tailoring of care to match needs.

scholarly journals Hip Fractures in Centenarians: Has Care Improved in the National Hip Fracture Database Era?

2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 161-165 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alastair G. Dick ◽  
Dominic Davenport ◽  
Mohit Bansal ◽  
Therese S. Burch ◽  
Max R. Edwards
Keyword(s):  
Hip Fracture ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Hip Fractures ◽  
District General Hospital ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Retrospective Case ◽  
Time To Surgery ◽  
Surgery Mortality ◽  
Hospital Acquired

Introduction: The number of centenarians in the United Kingdom is increasing. An associated increase in the incidence of hip fractures in the extreme elderly population is expected. The National Hip Fracture Database (NHFD) initiative was introduced in 2007 aiming to improve hip fracture care. There is a paucity of literature on the outcomes of centenarians with hip fractures since its introduction. The aim of this study is to report our experience of hip fractures in centenarians in the era since the introduction of the NHFD to assess outcomes in terms of mortality, time to surgery, length of stay, and complications. Methods: A retrospective case note study of all centenarians managed for a hip fracture over a 7-year period at a London district general hospital. Results: We report on 22 centenarians sustaining 23 hip fractures between 2008 and 2015. Twenty-one fractures were managed operatively. For patients managed operatively, in-hospital, 30-day, 3-month, 6-month, 1-year, 2-year, 3-year, and 5-year cumulative mortalities were 30%, 30%, 39%, 50%, 77%, 86%, 95%, and 100%, respectively. In-hospital mortality was 100% for those managed nonoperatively. Mean time to surgery was 1.6 days (range: 0.7-6.3 days). Mean length of stay on the acute orthopedic ward was 23 days (range: 2-51 days). Seventy-one percent had a postoperative complication most commonly a hospital-acquired pneumonia or urinary tract infection. Conclusion: Compared to a series of centenarians with hip fractures prior to the introduction of the NHFD, we report a reduced time to surgery. Mortality and hospital length of stay were similar.

scholarly journals A unified multidisciplinary fragility hip fracture pilot pathway in a trauma centre in Hong Kong: One-year outcome in the acute phase

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 77-84
Author(s):  
Matthew WH Lee ◽  
KH Chui ◽  
KK Tsang ◽  
KB Lee ◽  
Wilson Li
Keyword(s):  
Hong Kong ◽  
Hip Fracture ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Acute Phase ◽  
Performance Indicator ◽  
Surgical Complication ◽  
Trauma Centre ◽  
Unplanned Readmission ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Fragility Hip Fracture

Introduction: The growing impact of fragility hip fracture (FHF) on the healthcare system and the society has become a major concern worldwide. A unified multidisciplinary FHF pathway from admission to rehabilitation and back to community was established in 2015. The acute phase of the pathway was put into pilot in our hospital to evaluate the outcome. Method: A designated FHF team was established in our centre since January 2015. The FHF pathway was piloted since June 2015. Patients admitted with a hip fracture resulting from fall on standing height were included. Major outcome parameters were compared in three phases: (1) before FHF team and FHF pathway (January to December 2014), (2) after FHF team but before FHF pathway (January to May 2015) and (3) after FHF team and FHF pathway (June 2015 to May 2016). Result: In phases 1, 2 and 3, 631, 263 and 634 patients were included, respectively. From phases 1 to 3, the average key performance indicator (KPI) has improved from 49.2% to 65.8% to 70.0% significantly; average acute length of stay (days) has improved from 13.7 to 13.4 to 11.3 significantly; total surgical complication rates have improved from 6.2% to 7.6% to 5.8%. The 30-day mortality rate and the unplanned readmission rate (within 28 days) have remained below 2.7% and 2.2%, respectively. Conclusions: Implementation of an FHF pathway can form a multidisciplinary platform that can improve the standard of care and outcome for our FHF patients in terms of KPI and also length of stay. New knowledge added by this study: A newly designed and implemented fragility hip fracture pathway in our centre as a pilot with the results evaluated. Implications for clinical practice or policy: With the increasing elderly population in Hong Kong and globally, there is a need to design and implement a fragility hip fracture (FHF) pathway to improve the care and effectiveness for FHF patients.

Searching for the ‘winner’ hip fracture patient: the effect of modifiable and non-modifiable factors on clinical outcomes following hip fracture surgery

2019 ◽  
pp. 112070001987881 ◽  
Author(s):  
Konstantinos G Makridis ◽  
Leonidas S Badras ◽  
Stelios L Badras ◽  
Theofilos S Karachalios
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Hip Fracture ◽  
Medical Treatment ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Hip Fractures ◽  
Mortality Rates ◽  
Factors Affecting ◽  
Modifiable Factors ◽  
Modifiable Factor

Background: Various factors, other than the quality of surgery, may influence clinical outcomes of hip fracture patients. We aimed to evaluate the relative impact of several factors on functional outcome, quality of life, re-fracture and mortality rates following surgery for hip fractures. Methods: We studied 498 (62.2%) women and 302 (37.8%) men with a mean age of 81.3 years (range, 60–95) with hip fractures (femoral neck and pertrochanteric). The mean follow-up was 74 months (range 58–96). Various patient-related and surgery-related parameters were recorded and correlated to both objective and subjective mobility, functional recovery and quality of life scales. Mortality and re-fracture rates were also evaluated. Results: Using multiple regression analysis, age >80 years ( p = 0.000; 95% CI, 1.077–1.143) and ASA score III and IV ( p = 0.000; 95% CI, 2.088–3.396) (both non-modifiable factors) both proved to be independent (s.s.) factors affecting mortality rates. Age <80 years ( p = 0.000; 95% CI, 0.932–0.974), surgery delay less (modifiable factor) than 48 hours ( p = 0.046; 95% CI, 0.869–0.999), low dementia CDR index ( p = 0.005; 95% CI, 0.471–0.891) (non-modifiable factor), and osteoporosis medical treatment (modifiable factor) ( p = 0.006; 95% CI, 0.494–0.891) were shown to be independent (s.s.) factors affecting HOOS-symptoms. Osteoporosis medical treatment used proved to be an independent (s.s.) factor affecting HOOS-daily activities ( p = 0.049; 95% CI, 0.563–1.000) and quality of life (E-Qol-5D) ( p = 0.036; 95% CI, 0.737–1.325). Conclusions: A hip fracture patient aged <80 years old, with an ASA I-II, with low dementia CDR index and on osteoporosis medication has a better chance of an improved outcome (winner patient).

scholarly journals Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors and Anticoagulants Delay Surgery for Hip Fractures

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (23) ◽  
pp. 8617
Author(s):  
Oana Suciu ◽  
Bogdan Deleanu ◽  
Horia Haragus ◽  
Teodora Hoinoiu ◽  
Cristina Tudoran ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hip Fracture ◽  
Platelet Aggregation ◽  
Hip Fractures ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors ◽  
Fragility Hip Fracture ◽  
Time To Surgery ◽  
Aggregation Inhibitors ◽  
Antithrombotic Medication

Background: we aimed to analyze the influence of antithrombotic medication in delaying surgery for fragility hip fractures; Method: a total of 312 consecutive hip fracture cases over 55 years who underwent surgery in our Orthopedic Clinic; Results: of these, 90 patients received chronic antithrombotic medication. There were no differences between the medicated group and controls (n = 222) regarding age, gender, type of fracture and haemoglobin at admittance. However, median time to surgery was significantly longer in the medicated group: 4(3–6) days compared to 2(1–4) (p < 0.0001). By type of medication, time to surgery was: 3(1–4) days for acetylsalicylic acid (n = 44), 6(5.25–7.75) days for clopidogrel (n = 15), 4.5(4–7) days for acenocoumarin (n = 18) and 5(4–7.25) days for novel direct oral anticoagulants (n = 13). The Charlson comorbidity index was significantly higher in the medicated group: 5 [4–5] versus 4 [3–5]. There were no differences in transfusions except for fresh frozen plasma, which was administered more in the medicated patients; Conclusions: the prevalence of platelet aggregation inhibitors and anticoagulant use among fragility hip fracture patients is high, with almost a third using some form of antithrombotic medication. This may significantly lengthen time to surgery.

scholarly journals From ER to OR: Results After Implementation of Multidisciplinary Pathway for Fragility Hip Fractures at a Level I Trauma Center

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 215145932092738
Author(s):  
Kenoma Anighoro ◽  
Carla Bridges ◽  
Alexander Graf ◽  
Alexander Nielsen ◽  
Tannor Court ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hip Fracture ◽  
Hip Fractures ◽  
Trauma Center ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Blood Products ◽  
Total Blood ◽  
Fragility Hip Fracture ◽  
Level I

Introduction: Hip fractures are one of the most common indications for hospitalization and orthopedic intervention. Fragility hip fractures are frequently associated with multiple comorbidities and thus may benefit from a structured multidisciplinary approach for treatment. The purpose of this article was to retrospectively analyze patient outcomes after the implementation of a multidisciplinary hip fracture pathway at a level I trauma center. Materials and Methods: A retrospective review of 263 patients over the age of 65 with fragility hip fracture was performed. Time to surgery, hospital length of stay, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), American Society of Anesthesiologists, complication rates, and other clinical outcomes were compared between patients treated in the year before and after implementation of a multidisciplinary hip fracture pathway. Results: Timing to OR, hospital length of stay, and complication rates did not differ between pre- and postpathway groups. The postpathway group had a greater CCI score (pre: 3.10 ± 3.11 and post: 3.80 ± 3.18). Fewer total blood products were administered in the postpathway group (pre: 1.5 ± 1.8 and post: 0.8 ± 1.5). Discussion: The maintenance of clinical outcomes in the postpathway cohort, while having a greater CCI, indicates the same quality of care was provided for a more medically complex patient population. With a decrease in total blood products in the postpathway group, this highlights the economic importance of perioperative optimization that can be obtained in a multidisciplinary pathway. Conclusion: Implementation of a multidisciplinary hip fracture pathway is an effective strategy for maintaining care standards for fragility hip fracture management, particularly in the setting of complex medical comorbidities.

Nonpharmacological Interventions to Prevent Delirium: An Evidence-Based Systematic Review

2015 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan M. Rivosecchi ◽  
Pamela L. Smithburger ◽  
Susan Svec ◽  
Shauna Campbell ◽  
Sandra L. Kane-Gill
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Critical Care ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Adverse Effects ◽  
Hospital Costs ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Inpatient Settings ◽  
Stay Hospital ◽  
Critical Care Patients

Development of delirium in critical care patients is associated with increased length of stay, hospital costs, and mortality. Delirium occurs across all inpatient settings, although critically ill patients who require mechanical ventilation are at the highest risk. Overall, evidence to support the use of antipsychotics to either prevent or treat delirium is lacking, and these medications can have adverse effects. The pain, agitation, and delirium guidelines of the American College of Critical Care Medicine provide the strongest level of recommendation for the use of nonpharmacological approaches to prevent delirium, but questions remain about which nonpharmacological interventions are beneficial.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document