scholarly journals W poszukiwaniu tzw. centrum toponimii (wczesno)słowiańskiej – przypadek ziem polskich. Cz. I

LingVaria ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (23) ◽  
pp. 167-181
Author(s):  
Zbigniew Babik

This two-part paper presents the theoretical assumptions, and gives an account of the current progress of a Slavistic appendix which is being prepared by the present author for an as yet unwritten Dictionary of Polish topolexemes, an attempt to inventory and describe the entire lexical deposit of potentially Proto-Slavic origin contained in Polish place and terrain names. The aim of this research is to determine, based on the varying degree of its preservation in the toponymy of different regions, the place where Proto-Slavic vocabulary was formed. The first part presents the history of research together with a criticism of previous attempts, and explains the main methodological rules, focusing on the reconstruction of words which are not attested in Polish as appellatives. It also discusses the state of the source base, and problems which arise during work with various types of Polish toponomastic sources.

2021 ◽  
pp. 229-241
Author(s):  
Maciej Rak

The article has three goals. The first is to present the history of research on Polish dialectal phrasematics. In particular, attention was paid to the last five years, i.e. the period 2015–2020. The works in question were ordered according to the dialectological key, taking into account the following dialects: Greater Polish, Masovian, Silesian, Lesser Polish, and the North and South-Eastern dialects. The second goal is to indicate the methodologies that have so far been used to describe dialectal phrasematics. Initially, component analysis was used, which was part of the structuralist research trend, later (more or less from the late 1980s) the ethnolinguistic approach, especially the description of the linguistic picture of the world, began to dominate. The third goal of the article is to provide perspectives. The author once again (as he did it in his earlier works) postulates the preparation of a dictionary of Polish dialectal phrasematics.


Antiquity ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 92 (361) ◽  
pp. 233-238
Author(s):  
Simon Holdaway ◽  
Rebecca Phillipps ◽  
Joshua Emmitt ◽  
Veerle Linseele ◽  
Willeke Wendrich

From 1924–1928, Gertrude Caton-Thompson and Elinor Gardner surveyed and excavated Epipalaeolithic and Neolithic sites across the Fayum north shore in Egypt, publishing a volume entitled The Desert Fayum (1934). Since then, a number of researchers have worked in the Fayum (e.g. Wendorf & Schild 1976; Hassan 1986; Wenke et al. 1988; Kozłowski & Ginter 1989), and most recently the UCLA/RUG/UOA Fayum Project. The long history of research in the area means that the Fayum is a testament to changing archaeological approaches, particularly regarding the Neolithic. Caton-Thompson and Gardner's study is recognised as one of the most progressive works on Egyptian prehistory, and their research provided the foundation for many subsequent studies in the region (e.g. Wendrich & Cappers 2005; Holdaway et al. 2010, 2016; Shirai 2010, 2013, 2015, 2016a; Emmitt 2011; Emmitt et al. 2017; Holdaway & Wendrich 2017). A recent article in Antiquity, however, uses Caton-Thompson and Gardner's preliminary interpretations of their excavations at a stratified deposit in the Fayum, Kom W, to generate a series of speculative statements concerning agricultural origins in the region (Shirai 2016b). The majority of these statements are very similar to conclusions initially made by Caton-Thompson and Gardner in the first half of the twentieth century, and new data and theory needed to reassess earlier conclusions are not considered. Recently published studies concerning the Fayum north shore and adjacent regions provide a different view of the state of research in this region and the Egyptian Neolithic in general. Here we acquaint Antiquity readers with current archaeological approaches to the Fayum north shore Neolithic, with the intent of stimulating academic debate.


Author(s):  
Valerii P. Stepanenko ◽  

This paper addresses the history of research of a Byzantine seal dating from the twelfth century and analyzes of its iconography. In 1884, Gustave Schlumberger first published an anonymous Byzantine seal from his private collection in the famous Byzantine Sigillography (p. 502). Between 1905 and 1910, Nikolai P. Likhachev acquired a part of G. Schlumberger’s collection. This anonymous seal attracted Likhachev’s special attention, as evidenced by the inventory card written by his hand that survived. When entering the State Hermitage Museum collection, this seal got the number M–8759. Later on, it became a subject of the research by Valentina S. Shandrovskaia. According to the legend on the reverse, the seal belonged to an official of unknown name with the rank of protospatharios ἐπὶ τοῦ Χρυσοτρικλίνου, who held the position of the domestikos tes ypourgeias (δομέστικος τῆς ὐπουργείας) at the Christ-loving despotes (i. e. emperor). The front side of the seal features St. George spearing a dragon. It has been noticed that the scene showing this saint performing the feat rarely occurs on the tenth-to-twelfth century Byzantine seals with similar iconography.


2014 ◽  
Vol 67 ◽  
pp. 5-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
Józef Misiewicz

The results of studies. on the synanthropic flora of all Polish sea harbours are reported. The first chapters describe in outline the physiographic conditions, trade contacts and the history of research on the synanthropic flora of Polish sea harbours. The detailed part (chapter 6) gives an analysis of the synanthropic flora with reference to its, state in the particular harbours, its biological durability, the proportion of apophytes and anthropophytes, the origin of anthropophytes, the flora of the particular harbour habitats, the state of the synanthropic flora of harbours as compared with the flora of some chosen areas. In the end chapter the results are summarised and conclusions are drawn.


2011 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-50
Author(s):  
Algimantas Liekis

The end of the 19th and the beginning of the 20th century frequently put forward the name of astronomer and geodesist Prof. Bernardas Kodatis, famous for his contribution to Lithuanian national revival, the establishment of the independent State of Lithuania, creating national systems of education and the history of economic and cultural restructuring of the country. Prof. Kodatis was born and matured in Potsdam and Berlin, in German environment (his great grandfather was a Samogitian). Yet at a gymnasium, Bernardas made up his mind to be a Lithuanian, to toil and fight for the sake of Lithuania Minor, Greater Lithuania and national qualities. However, up to now, no exhaustive research generalizing his life and work activities, except for the monograph of the present author (Algimantas Liekis. Prof. Bernardas Kodatis: The Life of the Returned Lithuanian V. 2010. 410 p.) has been proposed. The questions discussed in his papers, their importance to the sciences of geodesy and astronomy in the process of creating Lithuanian education system as well as the extent of his activities significant for Lithuanian nation and the State are attempted to be answered in this article. Also, particularly relevant biographical facts and fundamental moral principles used as guidance for the personal life of Prof. Kodatis are considered. Santrauka XIX a. pabaigos – XX a. pradžios lietuvių tautos atgimimo, nepriklausomos Lietuvos valstybės ir jos švietimo, mokslo sistemos kūrimo, krašto ūkinės ir kultūrinės pertvarkos istorijoje neretai galima rasti minint astronomą ir geodezininką prof. Bernardą Kodatį. Jo prosenelis buvo kilęs iš Žemaitijos. Pats gimęs ir brendęs vokiškoje aplinkoje – Potsdame, Berlyne, dar gimnazijoje apsisprendė esąs lietuvis, dirbo ir kovojo Lietuvos, lietuvių tautos labui. Iki šiol išsamesnis profesoriaus gyvenimą ir darbus apibendrinantis darbas tebuvo Algimanto Liekio monografija „Prof. Bernardas Kodatis: sugrįžusio Lietuvio gyvenimas” (Vilnius, Mokslotyros institutas, 2010. 410 p.). Straipsnyje mėginama atsakyti, kiek B. Kodačio darbai buvo ir šiandien yra reikšmingi geodezijos, astronomijos mokslams, kuriant lietuvišką švietimo sistemą, kiek jo veikla reikšminga lietuvių tautai ir jos valstybei, kokiomis moralinėmis nuostatomis profesorius vadovavosi gyvenime ir veikloje, kas reikšmingiausia jo biografijoje. Резюме Конец XIX – начало XX века отмечены возрождением литовского народа и его просвещением, началом создания системы обучения. В истории хозяйственной и культурной перестройки часто можно найти упоминание об астрономе и геодезисте проф. Бернардасе Кодатисе. Профессор родился и жил в Потсдаме и Берлине в немецком окружении (лишь его прадедушка был родом из Жемайтии), однако ещё будучи гимназистом Бернардас решает быть литовцем, работать и бороться на благо Малой и Большой Литвы и её народа. До настоящего времени не было исчерпывающей информации о его жизни и деятельности, за исключением монографии Альгимантаса Лекиса «Проф. Бернардас Кодатис: жизнь вернувшегося литовца» (Вильнюс, 2010. 410 с.). Какой же была его деятельность, насколько она актуальна для науки геодезии, астрономии, при создании литовской системы обучения, насколько она важна для литовского народа и государства, что было главным в его биографии, каких канонов морали он придерживался в жизни и деятельности? На эти вопросы автор и пытался ответить в настоящей статье.


Antiquity ◽  
1976 ◽  
Vol 50 (200) ◽  
pp. 216-222
Author(s):  
Beatrice De Cardi

Ras a1 Khaimah is the most northerly of the seven states comprising the United Arab Emirates and its Ruler, H. H. Sheikh Saqr bin Mohammad al-Qasimi, is keenly interested in the history of the state and its people. Survey carried out there jointly with Dr D. B. Doe in 1968 had focused attention on the site of JuIfar which lies just north of the present town of Ras a1 Khaimah (de Cardi, 1971, 230-2). Julfar was in existence in Abbasid times and its importance as an entrep6t during the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries-the Portuguese Period-is reflected by the quantity and variety of imported wares to be found among the ruins of the city. Most of the sites discovered during the survey dated from that period but a group of cairns near Ghalilah and some long gabled graves in the Shimal area to the north-east of the date-groves behind Ras a1 Khaimah (map, FIG. I) clearly represented a more distant past.


1983 ◽  
Vol 28 (7) ◽  
pp. 545-546
Author(s):  
Rae Silver

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document