When Hot and Cold Collide in Radical Change Processes: Lessons from Community Development

2002 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 532-546 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Marlene Fiol ◽  
Edward J. O'Connor
2015 ◽  
Vol 56 (1) ◽  
pp. 100-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy Hartge ◽  
Thomas Callahan ◽  
Cynthia King

This research asked 252 upper-, middle-, and first-line-level managers in organizations experiencing radical change to assess the effects of their own leaders’ communications and behaviors on their perceptions of the change process. Results indicated that the frequency of exhibition of most behaviors by leaders positively affected subordinates’ perceptions of change. For three types of behaviors, soliciting upward feedback, driving change, and providing resources, the importance of these behaviors to the subordinates’ moderated perceptions of the change process. Discussion of these results and their implications conclude the study.


Author(s):  
Birthe Kåfjord Lange ◽  
Anne Haugen Gausdal

Studies of radical change pay more attention to early phases of the change processes than to later phases and implementation. Research that can contribute to a deeper understanding of factors that influence the implementation of such changes is therefore called for. The purpose of this chapter is to increase the insight and understanding of how trust and psychological safety impact implementation of radical changes. To meet this purpose, we raise the following research questions: 1) What are the differences and similarities between the concepts of trust and psychological safety? 2) How does trust and psychological safety influence implementation of radical changes in organizations? To answer the first question, we start by conducting a review of the literature on trust and psychological safety in part one. Although both concepts are widely used, the observable level of precision and understanding of the concepts varies. Our review reveals that the concepts are popular and quite closely related, yet there are also important differences worth noticing. To answer the second research question, we apply the insight from part one to discuss a conceptual case, well-known to many organizations in current business life; the implementation of radical new service technology. The discussion reveals that both trust and psychological safety play important, but somewhat different roles in top-down and bottom-up organized radical and adaptive change processes respectively.


2017 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 172-185 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine J. Syrek ◽  
Conny H. Antoni

Abstract. The implementation of a new pay system is a balancing act that produces uncertainty and draws employees’ attention to the fulfillment of exchange agreements. Transformational leadership may be essential during these change processes. Based on psychological contract theory, we expected that transformational leadership impacts job satisfaction and affective organizational commitment through the fulfillment of relational psychological contracts, while the fulfillment of transactional psychological contracts may be crucial for employees’ pay and bonus satisfaction. We assessed 143 employees nested within 34 teams before and after (24 months) a pay for performance (pfp) system was introduced. Our results supported the mediation hypotheses considering job and pay satisfaction, but not considering commitment. Unexpectedly, the effect on bonus satisfaction was mediated via relational psychological contracts.


1997 ◽  
Vol 42 (12) ◽  
pp. 1106-1107
Author(s):  
Barbara J. Menzel
Keyword(s):  

1999 ◽  
Vol 76 (5) ◽  
pp. 783-802 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joanne Davila ◽  
Benjamin R. Karney ◽  
Thomas N. Bradbury
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 67 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-65
Author(s):  
Malin E. Olofsson ◽  
Hanne W. Oddli ◽  
Asle Hoffart ◽  
Hanna P. Eielsen ◽  
KariAnne R. Vrabel

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document