scholarly journals Regtech: Bits and Bytes of Financial Regulation

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 103-109
Author(s):  
Dr. Krishnendu Ghosh
Keyword(s):  
Financial Institutions ◽  
Financial Services ◽  
Financial Stability ◽  
Structural Changes ◽  
Financial Regulation ◽  
Global Financial Crisis ◽  
Academic Research ◽  
Financial Sector ◽  
Regulatory Compliance ◽  
Cyber Attacks

Global Financial Crisis of 2008 has caused dramatic structural changes in the financial sector and financial services worldwide. Technological disruption has changed the dimension of finance around the world. Increasing threats of cyber-attacks has raised a serious concern for the banking and financial sector across the entire world. Supervisory mechanisms, compliances and regulations have become the key factors of consideration. The paper stresses out an importance of stringent financial regulations and regulatory compliance in the recent era of technological changes and innovations towards financial stability. This paper attempts to establish a strong theoretical overview of the promise and potential of the Regulatory Technologies (RegTech) for the wider financial ecosystem based on existing academic research and also publicly available practice-oriented insights from industry sources. The purpose of this paper is to develop an insight about the implications of RegTech for financial institutions and regulation. This study will help regulatory standard setters, bankers, investors, national & international financial institutions and other academicians to envisage the future of disruptive potential in financial technology.

Organisation of compliance across financial institutions

2014 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-76 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lukasz Prorokowski ◽  
Hubert Prorokowski
Keyword(s):  
Financial Institutions ◽  
Financial Services ◽  
Structural Changes ◽  
Global Financial Crisis ◽  
Regulatory Compliance ◽  
Policy Framework ◽  
Surveillance Systems ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Compliance Function ◽  
Financial Services Firms

Purpose – Compliance is defined as conforming to a rule, such as a policy framework, standard or law. Regulatory compliance encompasses all processes that require an entity to be aware of and conform to relevant regulations. As a result, organisation of compliance function remains complex due to the overwhelming set of compliance requirements that exert pressure on various business segments. This report aims to investigate how banks and financial services firms are responding to the regulatory-driven changes to the current compliance landscape, with particular attention paid to nascent challenges and structural changes affecting the organisation of compliance. Design/methodology/approach – The current research project is based on in-depth, semi-structured interviews with five universal banks and three financial services firms to pursue the best practices of adapting to the accelerating change in the regulatory-driven compliance landscape. Findings – In the aftermath of the global financial crisis, banks and financial institutions across the globe have been required to adapt to numerous regulatory reforms that are exerting increased pressure on compliance functions. Amid recent events of multi-million fines to banks that displayed flawed surveillance systems and control failings, the changing regulatory landscape has shown that the relationship with the regulators and compliance with the new regulatory frameworks is a difficult process even for the tier-1 global banks. Originality/value – Embarking on a peer review of the structures, roles, strategies and responsibilities of different compliance functions across banks and financial services institutions, this paper provides advice to financial institutions on ways of dealing with the complex emerging issues to ensure that the regulatory and compliance arrangements do not turn detrimental. At this point, the paper recognizes that the precise design of a compliance function will vary across individual banks and financial services firms. Nonetheless, this paper addresses the root issues and characteristics that are commonly shared despite the differences in organisations of compliance.

scholarly journals NON-BANKING FINANCIAL INSTITUTION OF UKRAINE AS A SUBJECT OF MONETARY RELATIONS

2021 ◽  
Vol 76 (3) ◽  
pp. 69-76
Author(s):  
Hanna Buha ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Monetary Policy ◽  
Financial Institutions ◽  
Financial Services ◽  
Financial Stability ◽  
Global Financial Crisis ◽  
Financial Sector ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
State Regulation ◽  
The Body ◽  
Monetary Relations

The article emphasizes the unprecedented growth of the role and importance of monetary relations in the formation of the market component of society, by supplementing it – the financial market and financial services markets, non-bank financial institutions professionally engaged in large-scale financial transactions. In this regard, monetary relations in their interaction with legal norms give rise to financial legal relations, which simplifies and disciplines the understanding and perception of monetary relations as an object of financial and legal regulation. It is stated that the regulatory impact on monetary relations in the activities of non-bank financial latter in market relations goes beyond public finance, expanding due to corporate and private finance, their market component, and the volume of private and commercial monetary resources in such conditions are one of the parties to the financial and credit relations. The environment for the implementation of modern monetary policy is formed by many factors, which together create extremely difficult conditions and reduce the effectiveness of monetary policy in achieving its goals. However, the most significant is the spread of the global financial crisis, to overcome which Ukraine needs to improve the legal framework for monetary regulation and apply market mechanisms to regulate the credit system. From a legal point of view, it is important when considering monetary relations (especially the forms of their expression) to understand the substantial nature of the financial mechanism as a whole. It is not the institutions of the financial system such as commercial banks, insurance companies, pension funds, investment funds or other institutions that generate credit as such, but, on the contrary, the existence of monetary relations generates the relevant institutions. And this is not just a scholastic play on words or manipulation of scientific concepts, but a legal fact. Thus, despite the rather intensive formation, the non-banking financial sector has not yet become the main and convenient mechanism for providing the real sector of the economy with the necessary financial resources. They are going through the initial period of their formation, their development remains little dynamic, sometimes even chaotic, which is why it is important to further study their legal nature, activities, functions they perform in the economy of the state and so on. In order to minimize the risks that may result from the lack of stability, transparency and competitiveness of the non-banking financial sector, it is necessary to strengthen the institutional and financial capacity of bodies regulating the financial services market and create an effective system for preventing crimes committed by non-banking financial institutions. Public policy in the non-banking financial sector should be aimed at: creating a system of risk identification, monitoring and ongoing analysis of the financial services market in order to ensure opportunities to take precautions to ensure financial security; strengthening transparency and openness in the activities of financial institutions and the body that carries out state regulation and supervision of such institutions; increasing the solvency and financial stability of non-bank financial institutions; ensuring proper protection of consumers of non-banking financial services; preventing the use of non-bank financial institutions for unproductive withdrawal of capital abroad.

scholarly journals THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE FINTECH INDUSTRY AND ITS INFLUENCE ON THE FINANCIAL SECTOR

2019 ◽  
pp. 81-86
Author(s):  
I.I. D’yakonova ◽  
A.O. Drofa
Keyword(s):  
Financial Institutions ◽  
Financial Services ◽  
New Technologies ◽  
Global Financial Crisis ◽  
Financial Sector ◽  
Cyber Attacks ◽  
Customer Expectations ◽  
Financial Products ◽  
Personalized Services ◽  
The Global Financial Crisis

FinTech field began to develop rapidly since 2008, after the Global Financial Crisis. This was due to the fact that financial institutions could not quickly respond to consumer needs because of a number of regulatory and legislative restrictions that were implemented to overcome the consequences of the crisis. At the same time the main factors of FinTech development were technological evolution, emerging customer expectations, availability of funding and capital, and support from governments and regulatory authorities. FinTech makes traditional financial services more affordable, flexible and secure, and therefore FinTech is one of the main drivers of digital transformation of the whole financial sector and the development of financial accessibility in the world. The development of the FinTech industry has a huge influence on the financial sector. FinTech strives to make financial services more accessible for both consumers and businesses. FinTech companies are fast growing and attract a large amount of investment each year in their development. At the same time, traditional financial institutions feel threatened on their part, because with the increasing number of FinTech companies, competition in the financial services market is growing too. In order to stay on the market, traditional banks are forced to adapt to modern realities and develop cooperation with FinTech companies. FinTech companies can help banks provide financial products and services more effectively and strengthen their competitive advantages. For example, they can improve financial inclusion, enhance customer experience, increase transparency, improve security, and provide support and guidance. Thus, financial institutions in cooperation with FinTech companies are able to provide new financial products and services to groups of customers who previously did not have access to traditional financial services. In addition, thanks to new technologies, financial institutions can offer personalized services and communicate online with customers, which significantly increases their engagement and experience. Furthermore, FinTech companies can help financial institutions detect fraud and deal with cyber-attacks and other online risks. Keywords: FinTech, financial technologies, financial services, financial innovations, FinTech adoption.

Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC)—Oil Prices, Financial Stability, and the Use of Countercyclical Macroprudential Policies in the GCC

Policy Papers ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 15 (62) ◽  
Author(s):  
Keyword(s):  
Financial Services ◽  
Financial Stability ◽  
Global Financial Crisis ◽  
Financial Sector ◽  
Oil Price ◽  
Loan Loss ◽  
Financial Cycle ◽  
Macroprudential Policies ◽  
Systemic Risks ◽  
Wide Range

Economic and financial developments in the GCC economies are interwoven with oil price movements. GCC economies are highly dependent on oil and gas exports. Oil price upturns lead to higher oil revenues, stronger fiscal and external positions, and higher government spending. This boosts corporate profitability and equity prices and strengthens bank balance sheets, but can also lead to the buildup of systemic vulnerabilities in the financial sector. Banks in the GCC are well-capitalized, liquid, and profitable at present, and well-positioned to manage structural systemic risks. However, oil-macro-financial linkages mean that asset quality and liquidity in the financial system may deteriorate in a low oil price environment and financial sector stress may emerge. The scope for amplification of oil price shocks through the financial sector suggests a role for a countercyclical approach to macroprudential policies. Countercyclical macroprudential policy can prove useful to reduce the buildup of systemic risks in the financial sector during upswings, and to cushion against disruption to financial services during periods of financial sector stress. The GCC countries have considerable experience with implementing a wide range of macroprudential policies, but these policies have not generally been adjusted through the cycle. GCC central banks implemented several macroprudential measures before the global financial crisis and have continued to enhance their macroprudential frameworks and toolkits to limit systemic financial sector risks. Although there is some evidence of macroprudential tools being adjusted in a countercyclical way, most of the tools have not been adjusted over the financial cycle. Further enhancements to the GCC macroprudential framework are needed to support the countercyclical use of these policies. A comprehensive and established framework, supported by strong institutional capacity, is essential for countercyclical macroprudential policies. This framework should provide clear assignment of responsibilities and guidance on how policies will be implemented to maintain financial stability and manage systemic risks over the financial cycle. Addressing data gaps and the further development of reliable early warning indicators in signaling potential systemic stress are needed to help guide the countercyclical use of a broad set of macroprudential policies. Expanding the countercyclical policy toolkit and its coverage can help address emerging financial sector risks. The implementation of countercyclical capital buffers and dynamic loan loss provisions could boost resilience in line with systemic risks faced in GCC economies. At the same time, using existing macroprudential policies countercyclically would prove useful to address emerging financial sector risks in a more targeted way. Expanding the coverage of macroprudential tools to nonbanks can help boost effectiveness by reducing leakages.

scholarly journals Ten Years of the Global Reform of Financial Regulation: What is ahead?

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 91-113 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. S. Khudyakova
Keyword(s):  
Financial Institutions ◽  
Financial Stability ◽  
Financial Regulation ◽  
Global Financial Crisis ◽  
International Standards ◽  
Regulatory Standards ◽  
Regulatory Bodies ◽  
New Challenges ◽  
Financial Regulatory ◽  
Institutional Mechanism

Global financial crisis of 2008–2009 demonstrated the need for reforms in the system of financial regulation. An institutional mechanism was created under the auspices of the G20 with the purpose to implement a global reform. In the article results of the postcrisis global financial reform are analysed in contingent with review of the evolution of institutional mechanism, which specifics often determined success or its absence in particular directions of the reform. The author selects and reviews three main periods of development of the global financial regulation’s institutional mechanism. In the initial period – the first years after the crisis works were progressing in two directions simultaneously: a) co-ordination of activities of national financial regulatory bodies in coping with the crisis processes and neutralization of its consequences; b) development and reconciliation of major global standards of financial regulation. We can consider that period as successful because crisis processes were overcame in relatively short time, trade and currency wars were also avoided and at the same time international regulatory standards were widely agreed.The second period according to the author’s classification (approx. 2012–2015) – transmission to the implementation of agreed international standards at the national and supranational (EC) levels. That time a range of difficulties and contradictions between leading countries revealed. First of all these problems related to the spheres where the regulations of transnational activities of financial institutions had to be agreed. As the author shows exactly in that time a problem of the so-called asymmetrical sovereignty in the financial policy aggravated.The third period is continuing in the present time. During this period, from the one side, the global financial regulation expands its coverage according to emergence of new challenges, but from the other side the interest to the reform is being loosing and the trend to increase of the independence of the national financial regulators is expanding. So the threat to fragmentation of the international financial markets and revision of already agreed regulatory standards became not illusive.Special attention in the article was paid to analysis of the problem of regulating the shadow banking or non-bank financial intermediation (NBFI), which are till now largely outside of the regulatory mandate of the governance bodies. Rapid growth of transactions by the latter, according to the author’s opinion, is a threat to the global financial stability especially taking into account such factors as its close interconnectedness with traditional financial institutions (banks), exposure to the bank-like risks, the wide implementation of financial innovations for making new unregulated products.Investigating new challenges beyond the perimeter of the post-crisis reform the author came to the conclusion that implementation of financial technologies as well as the necessity to take into account ecological and social factors require serious transformation of the global financial system as well as it’s regulation. Taking into account the global nature of new challenges the need for international co-operation of financial regulatory bodies will be continued.

Financial Sustainability and Infrastructure Finance

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Felipe Carvalho de Rezende
Keyword(s):  
Financial Institutions ◽  
Financial Stability ◽  
Global Financial Crisis ◽  
Financial Sustainability ◽  
Infrastructure Finance ◽  
Strategic Role ◽  
Development Banks ◽  
The Global Financial Crisis ◽  
Capital Development

Among the lessons that can be drawn from the global financial crisis is that private financial institutions have failed to promote the capital development of the affected economies, and to dampen financial fragility. This chapter analyses the macroeconomic role that development banks can play in this context, not only providing long-term funding necessary to promote economic development, but also fostering financial stability. The chapter discusses, in particular, the need for public financial institutions to provide support for infrastructure and sustainable development projects. It concludes that development banks play a strategic role by funding infrastructure projects in particular, and outlines the lessons for enhancing their role as catalysts for mitigating risks associated with such projects.

scholarly journals Exploring the Role of Islamic Fintech in Combating the Aftershocks of COVID-19: The Pen Social Innovation of the Islamic Financial System

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 136
Author(s):  
Mustafa Raza Rabbani ◽  
Abu Bashar ◽  
Nishad Nawaz ◽  
Sitara Karim ◽  
Mahmood Asad Mohd. Ali ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Financial Services ◽  
Open Innovation ◽  
Financial Stability ◽  
Social Innovation ◽  
Global Financial Crisis ◽  
Financial System ◽  
Real Economy ◽  
Business Context ◽  
The World

The purpose of the current study is to investigate the role of the Islamic financial system in recovery post-COVID-19 and the way Fintech can be utilized to combat the economic reverberations created by COVID-19. The global financial crisis of 2008 has established the credentials of the Islamic financial system as a sustainable financial system which can save the long run interests of the average citizens around the world while adding value to the real economy. The basic ethical tenets available in the Islamic financial system make it more suited and readymade to fight the economic aftershocks of a pandemic like COVID-19. The basic principles of ethical Islamic finance have solid connections to financial stability and corporate social responsibility within the wide-reaching business context. With the emergence of Financial technology (Fintech) it has provided a missing impetus to the Islamic financial system to compete on equal ground with its conventional counterpart and prove its mettle. The study uses discourse analysis along with the content analysis to extract content and draw a conclusion. The findings of the study indicate that COVID-19 pandemic has provided the opportunity for the social and open innovation to grow and finance world have turned to open innovation to provide a speedy, timely, reliable, and sustainable solution to the world. The findings of the study provide significant implications for governments and policy makers in efficient application of Fintech and innovative Islamic financial services to fight the economic consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic.

COVID -19 and Indian Financial Markets: A Review

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (02) ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Kamaldeep Kaur Sarna
Keyword(s):  
Financial Markets ◽  
Financial Institutions ◽  
Financial Services ◽  
Stock Markets ◽  
Global Economy ◽  
Banking Sector ◽  
Global Financial Crisis ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Management Strategies ◽  
The Impact

COVID-19 is aptly stated as a Black Swan event that has stifled the global economy. As coronavirus wreaked havoc, Gross Domestic Product (GDP) contracted globally, unemployment rate soared high, and economic recovery still seems a far-fetched dream. Most importantly, the pandemic has set up turbulence in the global financial markets and resulted in heightened risk elements (market risk, credit risk, bank runs etc.) across the globe. Such uncertainty and volatility has not been witnessed since the Global Financial Crisis of 2008. The spread of COVID-19 has largely eroded investors’ confidence as the stock markets neared lifetimes lows, bad loans spiked and investment values degraded. Due to this, many turned their backs on the risk-reward trade off and carted their money towards traditionally safer investments like gold. While the banking sector remains particularly vulnerable, central banks have provided extensive loan moratoriums and interest waivers. Overall, COVID-19 resulted in a short term negative impact on the financial markets in India, though it is making a way towards V-shaped recovery. In this context, the present paper attempts to identify and evaluate the impact of the pandemic on the financial markets in India. Relying on rich literature and live illustrations, the influence of COVID-19 is studied on the stock markets, banking and financial institutions, private equities, and debt funds. The paper covers several recommendations so as to bring stability in the financial markets. The suggestions include, but are not limited to, methods to regularly monitor results, establishing a robust mechanism for risk management, strategies to reduce Non-Performing Assets, continuous assessment of stress and crisis readiness of the financial institutions etc. The paper also emphasizes on enhancing the role of technology (Artificial Intelligence and Virtual/Augmented Reality) in the financial services sector to optimize the outcomes and set the path towards recovery.

scholarly journals Institutional Arrangements for Fintech Regulation and Supervision

FinTech Notes ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (02) ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles Taylor ◽  
Christopher Wilson ◽  
Eija Holttinen ◽  
Anastasiia Morozova
Keyword(s):  
Financial Services ◽  
Financial Stability ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Financial Sector ◽  
Institutional Arrangements ◽  
Dual Roles ◽  
Regulation And Supervision ◽  
Regulatory Architecture ◽  
Institutional Structures ◽  
Policy Objectives

Fintech developments are shaking up mandates within the existing regulatory architecture. It is not uncommon for financial sector agencies to have multiple policy objectives. Most often the policy objectives for these agencies reflect prudential, conduct and financial stability policy objectives. In some cases, financial sector agencies are also allocated responsibility for enhancing competition and innovation. When it comes to fintech, countries differ to some extent in the manner they balance the objectives of promoting the development of fintech and regulating it. Countries see fintech as a means of achieving multiple policy objectives sometimes with lesser or greater degrees of emphasis, such as accelerating development and spurring financial inclusion, while others may support innovation with the objective of promoting competition and efficiency in the provision of financial services. This difference in emphasis may impact institutional structures, including the allocation of staff resources. Conflicts of interest arising from dual roles are sometimes managed through legally established prioritization of objectives or establishment of separate internal reporting lines for supervision and development.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document