Providing community intravenous therapy during the COVID-19 pandemic

2021 ◽  
Vol 30 (19) ◽  
pp. S4-S12
Author(s):  
Paul Hodgkins
Keyword(s):  
Good Practice ◽  
Hospital Setting ◽  
Community Services ◽  
Intravenous Therapy ◽  
Parenteral Antibiotic ◽  
Practice Recommendations ◽  
Care Organisation ◽  
Primary Care Teams ◽  
The Uk ◽  
Therapy Service

Community intravenous therapy is well-established in most regions of the UK. Although there are national good practice recommendations detailing the service provision of outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT), examples of extended service delivery of other therapies are limited. This article describes the development of a community IV therapy service through integration with acute and primary care teams. IV therapies delivered in addition to antimicrobials safely outside of the hospital setting are also discussed with scope for future areas of development explored. The benefits of care closer to home for patients during the global COVID-19 pandemic are examined, as well as the potential for widening the whole gamut of practice for already established NHS community services through the development of integrated working in a local care organisation.

scholarly journals Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy: updated recommendations from the UK

2019 ◽  
Vol 74 (11) ◽  
pp. 3125-3127 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ann L N Chapman ◽  
Sanjay Patel ◽  
Carolyne Horner ◽  
Mark Gilchrist ◽  
R Andrew Seaton
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Therapy ◽  
Antimicrobial Agents ◽  
Good Practice ◽  
Intravenous Therapy ◽  
Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy ◽  
Stakeholder Consultation ◽  
Practice Recommendations ◽  
Recent Developments ◽  
Adults And Children ◽  
The Uk

Abstract Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) offers safe, effective and patient-centred care for adults and children. The OPAT UK good practice recommendations for adults and children have recently been updated through a process of literature review, expert consensus and extensive stakeholder consultation. Here we discuss the key changes in the updated recommendations in the context of recent developments, including novel antimicrobial agents and delivery devices, the place of oral antimicrobials as an alternative to intravenous therapy, new OPAT service models and the broader antimicrobial stewardship agenda.

scholarly journals Updated good practice recommendations for outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) in adults and children in the UK

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ann L N Chapman ◽  
Sanjay Patel ◽  
Carolyne Horner ◽  
Helen Green ◽  
Achyut Guleri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Antimicrobial Therapy ◽  
Good Practice ◽  
Service Evaluation ◽  
Consultation Process ◽  
Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy ◽  
Practice Recommendations ◽  
Extensive Consultation ◽  
Adults And Children ◽  
The Uk

AbstractUK good practice recommendations for outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) were published in 2012 and 2015 for adult and paediatric patients, respectively. Here we update the initial good practice recommendations in a combined document based on a further review of the OPAT literature and an extensive consultation process. As with the previous good practice recommendations, these updated recommendations are intended to provide pragmatic guidance for new and established OPAT services across a range of settings and to act as a set of quality indicators for service evaluation and quality improvement.

Best practice for chronic oedema in community settings: what can we learn?

2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (12) ◽  
pp. 610-614
Author(s):  
Garry Cooper-Stanton
Keyword(s):  
Service Provision ◽  
Best Practice ◽  
Evidence Base ◽  
Community Services ◽  
Guidance Document ◽  
Community Settings ◽  
Tissue Viability ◽  
Delivery Of Care ◽  
Specialist Nurses ◽  
The Uk

There are various opportunities and challenges in the delivery of care to those diagnosed with chronic oedema/lymphoedema. Service provision is not consistent within the UK, and non-specialist nurses and other health professionals may be called on to fill the gaps in this area. The latest best practice guidance on chronic oedema is directed at community services that care for people within their own homes in primary care. This guide was developed in order to increase awareness, knowledge and access to an evidence base. Those involved in its creation cross specialist fields (lymphoedema and tissue viability), resulting in the document covering a number of areas, including an explanation of chronic oedema, its assessment and management and the association between chronic oedema and wet legs. The document complements existing frameworks on the condition and its management and also increases the available tools within chronic oedema management in the community. The present article provides an overview of the guidance document and discusses its salient features.

scholarly journals A Delphi Study Investigating Clinicians’ Views on Access to, Delivery of, and Adaptations of MBCT in the UK Clinical Settings

Mindfulness ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kate Williams ◽  
Samantha Hartley ◽  
Peter Taylor
Keyword(s):  
Delphi Study ◽  
Good Practice ◽  
Evidence Base ◽  
Clinical Settings ◽  
Training Support ◽  
Decision Making Processes ◽  
Complex Decision Making ◽  
Complex Decision ◽  
The Uk ◽  
Clinical Populations

Abstract Objectives Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) is a well-evidenced relapse-prevention intervention for depression with a growing evidence-base for use in other clinical populations. The UK initiatives have outlined plans for increasing access to MBCT in clinical settings, although evidence suggests that access remains limited. Given the increased popularity and access to MBCT, there may be deviations from the evidence-base and potential risks of harm. We aimed to understand what clinicians believe should be best clinical practice regarding access to, delivery of, and adaptations to MBCT. Methods We employed a two-stage Delphi methodology. First, to develop statements around best practices, we consulted five mindfulness-based experts and reviewed the literature. Second, a total of 59 statements were taken forward into three survey rating rounds. Results Twenty-nine clinicians completed round one, with 25 subsequently completing both rounds two and three. Forty-four statements reached consensus; 15 statements did not. Clinicians agreed with statements regarding sufficient preparation for accessing MBCT, adherence to the evidence-base and good practice guidelines, consideration of risks, sufficient access to training, support, and resources within services, and carefully considered adaptations. The consensus was not reached on statements which reflected a lack of evidence-base for specific clinical populations or the complex decision-making processes involved in delivering and making adaptations to MBCT. Conclusions Our findings highlight the delicate balance of maintaining a client-centred and transparent approach whilst adhering to the evidence-base in clinical decisions around access to, delivery of, and adaptations in MBCT and have important wide-reaching implications.

scholarly journals Exploring patient safety outcomes for people with learning disabilities in acute hospital settings: a scoping review

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. e047102
Author(s):  
Gemma Louch ◽  
Abigail Albutt ◽  
Joanna Harlow-Trigg ◽  
Sally Moore ◽  
Kate Smyth ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Learning Disabilities ◽  
Patient Safety ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Grey Literature ◽  
Good Practice ◽  
Hospital Setting ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Infant Outcomes ◽  
Safety Outcomes

ObjectivesTo produce a narrative synthesis of published academic and grey literature focusing on patient safety outcomes for people with learning disabilities in an acute hospital setting.DesignScoping review with narrative synthesis.MethodsThe review followed the six stages of the Arksey and O’Malley framework. We searched four research databases from January 2000 to March 2021, in addition to handsearching and backwards searching using terms relating to our eligibility criteria—patient safety and adverse events, learning disability and hospital setting. Following stakeholder input, we searched grey literature databases and specific websites of known organisations until March 2020. Potentially relevant articles and grey literature materials were screened against the eligibility criteria. Findings were extracted and collated in data charting forms.Results45 academic articles and 33 grey literature materials were included, and we organised the findings around six concepts: (1) adverse events, patient safety and quality of care; (2) maternal and infant outcomes; (3) postoperative outcomes; (4) role of family and carers; (5) understanding needs in hospital and (6) supporting initiatives, recommendations and good practice examples. The findings suggest inequalities and inequities for a range of specific patient safety outcomes including adverse events, quality of care, maternal and infant outcomes and postoperative outcomes, in addition to potential protective factors, such as the roles of family and carers and the extent to which health professionals are able to understand the needs of people with learning disabilities.ConclusionPeople with learning disabilities appear to experience poorer patient safety outcomes in hospital. The involvement of family and carers, and understanding and effectively meeting the needs of people with learning disabilities may play a protective role. Promising interventions and examples of good practice exist, however many of these have not been implemented consistently and warrant further robust evaluation.

scholarly journals Perceptions of Peer Support for Victim-Survivors of Sexual Violence and Abuse: An Exploratory Study With Key Stakeholders

2021 ◽  
pp. 088626052110079
Author(s):  
Alison Gregory ◽  
Emma Johnson ◽  
Gene Feder ◽  
John Campbell ◽  
Judit Konya ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sexual Violence ◽  
Peer Support ◽  
Service Provision ◽  
Exploratory Study ◽  
Good Practice ◽  
Medical Model ◽  
Service Improvement ◽  
Physical And Mental Health ◽  
Safety Considerations ◽  
The Uk

Experiences of sexual violence, childhood sexual abuse, and sexual assault are common across all societies. These experiences damage physical and mental health, coping ability, and relationships with others. Given the breadth and magnitude of impacts, it is imperative that there are effective, accessible services to support victim-survivors, ease suffering, and empower people to cope, recover and thrive. Service provision for this population in the United Kingdom is complex and has been hit substantially by austerity. Since positive social support can buffer against negative impacts, peer support may be an effective approach. The aim of this exploratory study was to capture the views and perspectives of professional stakeholders concerning service provision for victim-survivors, particularly perceptions of peer support. In-depth semistructured interviews were conducted in the UK during 2018 with six professional stakeholders, highly experienced in the field of service provision for victim-survivors of sexual violence and abuse. An abductive approach to analysis was used, applying principles from thematic analysis. Our sample comprised four females and two males, and their roles included psychiatrist, general practitioner, service improvement facilitator, and senior positions within victim-survivor organizations. Interviews highlighted models of peer support for this population, good practice and safety considerations, and a lack of uniformity regarding quality and governance standards across the sector. Findings indicated that current funding models impact negatively on victim-survivor services, and that provision is fragmented and insufficient across statutory and not-for-profit sectors. The influence of the medical model upon service provision was evident, which resulted in apprehension around support delivered in less-usual forms—including peer support. Further research is needed to explore the potential of peer support for victim-survivors of sexual violence and abuse.

888 Challenges in The Management of Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding in General Surgery: Developing Consistent Practice and Application of BSG Guidelines

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Bhojwani ◽  
M Ahmed ◽  
F Mahmood ◽  
C Sellahewa ◽  
C Desai
Keyword(s):  
Risk Stratification ◽  
Gastrointestinal Bleeding ◽  
District Hospital ◽  
Hospital Setting ◽  
Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding ◽  
Shock Index ◽  
Retrospective Audit ◽  
Ct Angiogram ◽  
Sensitive Tool ◽  
The Uk

Abstract Introduction Lower gastrointestinal bleeding (LGIB) accounts for 3% of all surgical referrals in the UK, with an in-hospital mortality of 3.4%. The BSG 2019 guidelines recommend risk stratification as per Oakland scoring, inpatient lower GI endoscopy for admissions and CT-angiography for unstable patients. This study evaluates the delivery of these outcomes in a district hospital setting. Method Retrospective audit assessing all acute LGI bleed admissions from 01-07-2019 to 28-02-2020 at Russells Hall Hospital. Shock Index (SI) and Oakland score used to stratify patients into unstable, stable-major and stable-minor LGIB. Compliance with BSG standards was assessed by review of investigations and emergent patient management. Results 143 patients (Median age = 70years) evaluated, with 64 admissions having no formal risk stratification (OAKLAND-score) documented. Only 12 admissions underwent inpatient LGI endoscopy with sigmoid diverticulosis the most common pathology (39.3%). CT-angiogram was the initial investigation for 75% of patients admitted with unstable LGIB. Conclusions OAKLAND-scoring is a sensitive tool to stratify LGIB patients based on clinical parameters. Application of BSG-2019 guidelines and developing consistency in management is challenged by the lack of routine access to LGI endoscopy and tools to manage bleeding endoscopically.

scholarly journals An audit of UK audiological practice in specialist paediatric oncology centres regarding hearing assessment of children at risk of ototoxicity due to chemotherapy

2021 ◽  
Vol 135 (1) ◽  
pp. 14-20
Author(s):  
E C M Brown ◽  
C Caimino ◽  
C L Benton ◽  
D M Baguley
Keyword(s):  
High Frequency ◽  
Good Practice ◽  
Paediatric Oncology ◽  
Chemotherapy Drugs ◽  
Team Working ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Hearing Assessment ◽  
Self Test ◽  
The Uk ◽  
Monitoring Service

AbstractObjectivePlatinum-based chemotherapy drugs are associated with substantial ototoxicity. The hearing of children treated with these drugs should be closely monitored.MethodA questionnaire was sent out to the 19 audiology departments associated with national paediatric cancer specialist centres in the UK looking at current practice in ototoxicity monitoring.ResultsResponses were received from 17 of 19 centres (89 per cent). All offered some form of audiometric monitoring service. Extended high-frequency testing (9–20 kHz) was only utilised by 7 services (29 per cent). A majority of respondents were reluctant to consider self-test devices in paediatric ototoxicity monitoring (n = 9; 53 per cent). Provision of long-term audiological follow up is sporadic with only 4 (23 per cent) respondents keeping all children with normal hearing under review once treatment is completed.ConclusionWhile some good practice in paediatric ototoxicity was identified, opportunities exist to improve clinical practice and protocols, promote multidisciplinary team working and to utilise technologies such as extended high frequency and self-test audiometry.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document