parenteral antibiotic
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

336
(FIVE YEARS 76)

H-INDEX

35
(FIVE YEARS 4)

Antibiotics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 21
Author(s):  
Giuseppe Sangiorgio ◽  
Marco Vacante ◽  
Francesco Basile ◽  
Antonio Biondi

This study aims to systematically assess the efficacy of parenteral and oral antibiotic prophylaxis compared to parenteral-only prophylaxis for the prevention of surgical site infection (SSI) in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer resection. Published and unpublished randomized clinical trials comparing the use of oral and parenteral prophylactic antibiotics versus parenteral-only antibiotics in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery were collected searching electronic databases (MEDLINE, CENTRAL, EMBASE, SCIENCE CITATION INDEX EXPANDED) without limits of date, language, or any other search filter. The outcomes included SSIs and other infectious and noninfectious postoperative complications. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized trials (RoB 2). A total of six studies involving 2252 patients were finally included, with 1126 cases in the oral and parenteral group and 1126 cases in the parenteral-only group. Meta-analysis results showed a statistically significant reduction of SSIs (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.72; p < 0.0001) and anastomotic leakage (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.91; p = 0.02) in the group of patients receiving oral antibiotics in addition to intravenous (IV) antibiotics compared to IV alone. Our meta-analysis shows that a combination of oral antibiotics and intravenous antibiotics significantly lowers the incidence of SSI compared with intravenous antibiotics alone.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 7
Author(s):  
Laura Herrera-Hidalgo ◽  
Jose Manuel Lomas-Cabezas ◽  
Luis Eduardo López-Cortés ◽  
Rafael Luque-Márquez ◽  
Luis Fernando López-Cortés ◽  
...  

Ampicillin plus ceftriaxone (AC) is a well-recognized inpatient regimen for Enterococcus faecalis infective endocarditis (IE). In this regimen, ceftriaxone is usually administered 2 g every 2 h (AC12). The administration of AC in outpatient parenteral antibiotic treatment (OPAT) programs is challenging because multiple daily doses are required. AC regimens useful for OPAT programs include once-daily high-dose administration of ceftriaxone (AC24) or AC co-diluted and jointly administered in bolus every 4 h (ACjoined). In this retrospective analysis of prospectively collected cases, we aimed to assess the clinical effectivity and safety of three AC regimens for the treatment of E. faecalis IE. Fifty-nine patients were treated with AC combinations (AC12 n = 32, AC24 n = 17, and ACjoined n = 10). Six relapses occurred in the whole cohort: five (29.4%) treated with AC24 regimen and one (10.0%) with ACjoined. Patients were cured in 30 (93.3%), 16 (94.1%), and eight (80.0%) cases in the AC12, AC24 and ACjoined groups, respectively. Unplanned readmission occurred in eight (25.0%), six (35.3%), and two (20.0%) patients in the AC12, AC24 and ACjoined groups, respectively. The outcome of patients with E. faecalis IE treated with AC in OPAT programs relies on an optimization of the delivery of the combination. AC24 exhibit an unexpected rate of failures, however, ACjoined might be an effective alternative which clinical results should corroborate in further studies.


Author(s):  
Stephanie S Gelman ◽  
Eddie Stenehjem ◽  
Rachel A Foster ◽  
Nick Tinker ◽  
Nancy Grisel ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Safe hospital discharge on parenteral antibiotic therapy is challenging for people who inject drugs (PWID) admitted with serious bacterial infections (SBI). We describe a Comprehensive Care of Drug Addiction and Infection (CCDAI) program involving a partnership between Intermountain Healthcare hospitals and a detoxification facility (DF) to provide simultaneous drug recovery assistance and parenteral antibiotic therapy (DRA-OPAT). Methods The CCDAI program was evaluated using a pre-post study design. We compared outcomes in PWID hospitalized with SBI during a 1-year post-implementation period (2018) with similar patients from a historical control period (2017), identified by propensity modeling and manual review. Results Eighty-seven patients were candidates for the CCDAI program in the implementation period. 35 participants (40.2%) enrolled in DRA-OPAT and discharged to the DF; 16 (45.7%) completed the full OPAT duration. Fifty-one patients with similar characteristics were identified as a pre-implementation control group. Median length of stay (LOS) was reduced from 22.9 days (IQI 9.8-42.7) to 10.6 days (IQI 6-17.4) after program implementation, p&lt;0.0001. Total median cost decreased from $39,220.90 (IQI $23,300.71-$82,506.66) pre-implementation vs $27,592.39 (IQI $18,509.45-48,369.11) post-implementation, p&lt;0.0001. 90-day readmission rates were similar (23.5% vs 24.1%), p=0.8. At 1-year follow-up, all-cause mortality was 7.1% in the pre-implementation group vs 1.2% post-implementation, p=0.06. Conclusion Partnerships between hospitals and community resources hold promise for providing resource efficient OPAT and drug recovery assistance. We observed significant reductions in length of stay and cost without increases in readmission rates; 1-year mortality may have been improved. Further study is needed to optimize benefits of the program.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S403-S403
Author(s):  
Christian S Greco ◽  
Mohammad Mahdee Sobhanie ◽  
Kelci E Coe ◽  
Courtney Hebert ◽  
Margaret Williams

Abstract Background Injection drug use is a nationwide epidemic associated with an increased risk of invasive Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) infections. Medication-assisted treatment (MAT) is effective in reducing substance use and increasing adherence to inpatient medical therapy in persons with injection drug use (PWID). Studies assessing the impact MAT has on completion of outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT) are limited. Methods This was a single-center, retrospective, cohort study at The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center in patients admitted from 12/1/2017 to 12/1/2019 with a diagnosis of S. aureus bacteremia who were identified as PWID either by ICD-9 or 10 code or chart review. A formal MAT program was established on 11/30/2018. Patients were assigned to the pre-MAT group if they were discharged prior to 11/30/2018 and to the MAT group with treatment after 11/30/2018. We evaluated a composite outcome of failure to complete OPAT, recurrence of S. aureus bacteremia during the OPAT period and readmission within 30 days. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to examine the association between MAT therapy and the primary composite outcome, while adjusting for proven confounders. Results A total of 700 patients were identified with 644 patients omitted based on exclusion criteria. The study population included 27 in the Pre-MAT group and 17 in the MAT. Median age was 37 years (IQR 30.6 - 46.1). There was a higher number of females in the MAT therapy group compared to the pre-MAT group (82% vs. 33%, p=0.002). Patients in the pre-MAT group had a significantly longer length of stay (25 days vs. 17 days, p=0.01). The primary composite outcome was met if a patient did not complete their OPAT, if they had a recurrence of S. aureus bacteremia during their OPAT or if they were readmitted to the hospital within 30 days. In the pre-MAT group 14/27 (52%) met the composite outcome versus 6/17 (35%) of the MAT group (p=0.28). Conclusion Patients in the MAT group met the composite outcome 17% less than those in the pre-Mat group which is suggestive of the impact MAT has on completion of OPAT therapy; however, this study did not reach statistical significance as it was underpowered. Further longitudinal evaluation with greater sample size is needed to fully evaluate this intervention. Disclosures Mohammad Mahdee Sobhanie, M.D., Regeneron (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Regeneron (Scientific Research Study Investigator, Was a sub-investigator for Regeneron 2066 and 2069)


2021 ◽  
pp. 77-79
Author(s):  
Surya Rao Rao Venkata Mahipathy ◽  
Alagar Raja Durairaj ◽  
Narayanamurthy Sundaramurthy ◽  
Anand Prasath Jayachandiran ◽  
Suresh Rajendran

Foreign body penetration is not uncommon and may be glass, shrapnel, needles, etc. and may occur in almost any part of the body. Impalement injury is when a blunt force causes a long object to penetrate a body part resulting in retention of the object in situ. The management following foreign body penetration includes tetanus prophylaxis, parenteral antibiotic cover and removal of the foreign body in the theatre with exploration for neurovascular injury, thorough debridement and repair of any damaged tissue. Here, we report a case of an industrial foreign body that impaled a middle aged male while at work in the left leg which was carefully removed under anaesthesia with no post-operative complications.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S409-S410
Author(s):  
Emily Hoff ◽  
Bilal Ashraf ◽  
Jillian Smartt ◽  
Kapila Marambage ◽  
Kavita Bhavan

Abstract Background Nearly 20% of people in the United States use drugs each year. People who use drugs (PWUD) are predisposed to complex infections that require long term intravenous (IV) antibiotics. A frequent clinical quandary in PWUD is safe administration of extended IV antibiotics. Current standard of care is IV antibiotic administration in skilled nursing facilities. In this system, PWUD frequently do not finish antibiotic therapy, resulting in avoidable complications of untreated infections and increased healthcare utilization. We present a pilot study of ten patients with a history of addiction who required long-term IV antibiotics to evaluate the feasibility of self administered outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (S-OPAT) for PWUD. Methods Ten patients who had a history of mild addiction and stable housing, social support and transportation were enrolled at Parkland Health and Hospital System to complete S-OPAT. We extracted demographic, drug use, clinical and access to care variables and patients were followed with weekly clinical appointments. Addiction severity was defined using the National Institute of Drug Abuse (NIDA) -Modified ASSIST Score. We completed post-intervention surveys to evaluate the impact of the intervention on provider-patient trust. Results A total of 10 patients were enrolled in S-OPAT (Table 1). The patients were 48 years old on average, all were male and seven were Hispanic. All patients had stimulant use disorder and no patients had commercial insurance. Treated infections were bone/ joint and skin/soft tissue in origin. All patients completed their antibiotic course, nearly all appointments were attended (96%) and there were no 30-day hospital readmissions (Table 2). More than two-third of patients experienced improvement in addiction severity with progress in multiple psychosocial factors including housing instability, social support and legal problems (Figure 1; Table 2). Table 1. Demographic, substance use and clinical variables among people who use drugs enrolled in the pilot project for S-OPAT (N=10). Table 2. Clinical, drug use and psychosocial outcomes among people who use drugs and received S-OPAT (N=10). Addiction severity was defined using the National Institute of Drug Abuse (NIDA) -Modified ASSIST Score. Figure 1. Progression of addiction severity before and after completion of self-administered outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy pilot among patients with a history of drug use (N=10). Addiction severity was defined using the National Institute of Drug Abuse (NIDA) -Modified ASSIST Score. Conclusion We demonstrate that PWUD can successfully complete S-OPAT with simultaneous improvement in addiction severity and psychosocial factors. We hope to create a framework for the patient-centered administration of extended courses of antibiotics for PWUD and to advocate for the expansion of individualized approaches to extended courses of IV antibiotics for PWUD. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures


2021 ◽  
Vol 30 (19) ◽  
pp. S4-S12
Author(s):  
Paul Hodgkins

Community intravenous therapy is well-established in most regions of the UK. Although there are national good practice recommendations detailing the service provision of outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT), examples of extended service delivery of other therapies are limited. This article describes the development of a community IV therapy service through integration with acute and primary care teams. IV therapies delivered in addition to antimicrobials safely outside of the hospital setting are also discussed with scope for future areas of development explored. The benefits of care closer to home for patients during the global COVID-19 pandemic are examined, as well as the potential for widening the whole gamut of practice for already established NHS community services through the development of integrated working in a local care organisation.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. 2150
Author(s):  
Lara Thieme ◽  
Simon Briggs ◽  
Eamon Duffy ◽  
Oliwia Makarewicz ◽  
Mathias W. Pletz

Enterococcus faecalis infective endocarditis is commonly treated with intravenous ampicillin/ceftriaxone combination therapy. Ampicillin, however, is unsuitable for outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT) regimens due to its instability in 24 h continuous infusors, and has been successfully replaced by benzylpenicillin used together with ceftriaxone in a few small case series. Since in vitro synergy data of penicillin/ceftriaxone against E. faecalis are still lacking, checkerboard assays were performed for 28 clinical E. faecalis isolates and one laboratory standard strain. Synergistic effects (both lowest and median FICI) were observed for penicillin/ceftriaxone in 15/29 isolates, while ampicillin/ceftriaxone exhibited synergism in 22/29 isolates. For isolates with ceftriaxone MICs ≤ 256 mg/L, the addition of free ceftriaxone trough concentrations to penicillin or ampicillin resulted in comparable synergistic effects for both combinations. In contrast, for isolates with ceftriaxone MICs ≥ 512 mg/L free ceftriaxone trough concentrations were only sufficient to exhibit synergistic effects in combination with ampicillin, but not penicillin. This study suggests that benzylpenicillin/ceftriaxone would be expected to be suitable for the OPAT treatment of enterococcal endocarditis for E. faecalis isolates with ceftriaxone MICs ≤ 256 mg/L. However, combination therapy would be expected to provide no advantage over benzylpenicillin monotherapy for isolates with ceftriaxone MICs ≥ 512 mg/L. Further investigation is required to analyse the relationship between ceftriaxone susceptibility and penicillin/ceftriaxone synergy, especially for isolates with ceftriaxone MICs of 64 to 512 mg/L.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document