scholarly journals Moisture-associated skin damage: an overview of its diagnosis and management

2021 ◽  
Vol 32 (Sup11) ◽  
pp. S11-S15
Author(s):  
Aby Mitchell ◽  
Barry Hill
Keyword(s):  
At Risk ◽  
Health Professionals ◽  
Wound Care ◽  
Predisposing Factors ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Skin Damage ◽  
Diagnosis And Management

This educational article introduces and explores moisture-associated skin damage (MASD) and the four forms it manifests as, namely, incontinence-associated dermatitis; intertriginous dermatitis; peristomal moisture-associated dermatitis; and peri-wound moisture-associated dermatitis. The aetiology and predisposing factors of each form are critically discussed, in addition to the treatments and interventions that can be used by nurses to support patient recovery. Nurses and other health professionals working with patients who are at risk of skin damage or who already require wound care, must be knowledgeable about all aspects of MASD. Fortunately, a plethora of evidence-based literature exists to support health professionals in their practice, although validated assessment and recording tools for incontinence-associated dermatitis are limited.

scholarly journals Moisture-associated skin damage: an overview of its diagnosis and management

2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. S12-S18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aby Mitchell ◽  
Barry Hill
Keyword(s):  
At Risk ◽  
Health Professionals ◽  
Wound Care ◽  
Predisposing Factors ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Skin Damage ◽  
Diagnosis And Management

This educational article introduces an explores moisture-associated skin damage (MASD) and the four forms it manifests as, namely, incontinence-associated dermatitis; intertriginous dermatitis; peristomal moisture-associated dermatitis; and peri-wound moisture-associated dermatitis. The aetiology and predisposing factors of each form are critically discussed, in addition to the treatments and interventions that can be used by nurses to support patient recovery. Nurses and other health professionals working with patients who are at risk of skin damage or who already require wound care, must be knowledgeable about all aspects of MASD. Fortunately, a plethora of evidence-based literature exists to support health professionals in their practice, although validated assessment and recording tools for incontinence-associated dermatitis are limited.

Update to device-related pressure ulcers: SECURE prevention. COVID-19, face masks and skin damage

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (5) ◽  
pp. 245-259 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amit Gefen ◽  
Karen Ousey
Keyword(s):  
Health Professionals ◽  
Pressure Ulcers ◽  
Wound Care ◽  
Skin Damage ◽  
Frontline Staff ◽  
Consensus Document ◽  
Simple Strategy ◽  
Digital Format ◽  
Introductory Article ◽  
Novel Coronavirus

The 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has brought the effects of device-related pressure ulcers (DRPU) into sharp focus. With the increased use of personal protective equipment (PPE), including face masks, continuous positive airway pressure (CAPP) masks and other devices, the incidence of DRPUs among health professionals and patients alike has risen starkly. As such, the Journal of Wound Care (JWC) consensus document, Device-related pressure ulcers: SECURE prevention, published in February 2020, is more relevant than ever. To help support patients and frontline health professionals, JWC is republishing the consensus in a digital format, along with a new introductory article outlining the DRPU risks posed by PPE and other medical devices used by patients and health professionals during the pandemic, and how the skin damage can be avoided. The aim is to provide frontline staff with a clear, simple strategy on how to prevent the risk of personal skin damage and/or DRPU during the pandemic, as well as point them in the direction of more indepth guidance on long-term strategies for prevention, for both themselves and patients.

Health professionals' perspectives on delivering patient-focused wound management: a qualitative study

2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (Sup7) ◽  
pp. S4-S13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janet L. Kuhnke ◽  
David Keast ◽  
Sue Rosenthal ◽  
Robyn Jones Evans
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Health Professionals ◽  
Best Practice ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
Wound Care ◽  
Foot Ulcer ◽  
Diabetic Foot Ulcer ◽  
Wound Management ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Venous Leg Ulcer

Objective: This study examined the perspectives of health professionals on the barriers and solutions to delivery of patient-focused wound management and outcomes. Methods: A qualitative, descriptive study design was used. Participants were health-care managers, clinical leaders, nurses and allied health members who are part of wound care services. Open-ended surveys were distributed to participants in a series of learning workshops, and data analysed to identify leading themes. Results: A total of 261 participants took part and 194 surveys were returned (response rate: 74%). From the analysis five themes emerged: patient/family wound-related education; health professional wound-related education; implementation of evidence-based wound care and dissemination of evidence-based wound information across professions and contexts; teamwork and respectful communication within teams; and a higher value and priority placed on wound care through collaborative teams by managers, leaders and policymakers. Conclusion: Findings suggest that ongoing, system-wide education is needed to improve prevention, assessment, treatment and management of four wound types: venous leg ulcer (VLU), diabetic foot ulcer (DFU), pressure ulcer (PU) and surgical wounds. Health professionals are committed to delivering best practice in wound care. Participants identified that effective patient-focused, evidence-based wound care involves having a health-care system with a clear mandate to ensure wound care is a priority. A high value placed on wound care by managers and clinical leadership could transform the present systems. Additionally, effective and widespread dissemination of evidenced-informed practice information is crucial to positive patient outcomes. Education and team commitment for consistent and respectful communication would improve care delivery.

scholarly journals The Significance of the Global Vascular Guidelines for Podiatrists: Answers to Key Questions in the Diagnosis and Management of the Threatened Limb

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lee C. Rogers ◽  
Michael S. Conte ◽  
David G. Armstrong ◽  
Lawrence A Lavery ◽  
Joseph L. Mills ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
At Risk ◽  
Multidisciplinary Team ◽  
Best Practice ◽  
Diagnosis And Treatment ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Diagnosis And Management ◽  
Practice Recommendations ◽  
Highly Effective ◽  
Key Questions

The publication of the Global Vascular Guidelines in 2019 provide evidence-based, best practice recommendations on the diagnosis and treatment of chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). Certainly, the multidisciplinary team, and more specifically one with collaborating podiatrists and vascular specialists, has been shown to be highly effective at improving the outcomes of limbs at risk for amputation. This article uses the Guidelines to answer key questions for podiatrists who are caring for the patient with CLTI.

Neonatal Intravenous Extravasation Injuries: Evaluation of a Wound Care Protocol

2006 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Doris Sawatzky-Dickson ◽  
Karen Bodnaryk
Keyword(s):  
Wound Healing ◽  
Birth Weight ◽  
Wound Infection ◽  
Gestational Age ◽  
Wound Care ◽  
Systemic Infection ◽  
Coagulase Negative Staphylococcus ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Infection Rates ◽  
Care Protocol

Purpose:To evaluate an evidence-based wound protocol for intravenous extravasation injuries in neonates.Sample:Nine newborns with intravenous extravasation injuries. Birth weight: 582–4,404 gm, gestational age: 24–40 weeks.Results:Five wounds were colonized with coagulase-negative Staphylococcus species, two with diphtheroids, three with Enterococcus. There was no evidence of wound infection or systemic infection. Rates of wound healing ranged from one to six weeks.

Men's perception and understanding of male-factor infertility in the UK

2021 ◽  
Vol 30 (9) ◽  
pp. S8-S16
Author(s):  
Eleanor L Stevenson ◽  
Cheng Ching-Yu ◽  
Chang Chia-Hao ◽  
Kevin R McEleny
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Emotional Support ◽  
Health Professionals ◽  
Male Fertility ◽  
Public Knowledge ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Male Factor Infertility ◽  
Male Factor ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Uk

Male-factor infertility is a common but stigmatised issue, and men often do not receive the emotional support and the information they need. This study sought to understand awareness of male fertility issues compared to female fertility among the UK general male public, and also what were perceived as being the optimum methods for providing support for affected men, emotionally and through information. Men feel that male infertility is not discussed by the public as much as female infertility. Lifestyle issues that affect male fertility are not well understood, and men affected by infertility desire more support, including online, from health professionals and through peer support. Health professionals, including those in public health, could offer evidence-based programmes to reduce stigma and increase public knowledge about infertility, as well as offer emotional support to men with infertility problems.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document